And 2016, 2015 and so on. The subject article covers the so-called flu epidemic and the ineffective flu vaccine. I have been posting articles for some time on the ineffectiveness and dangers of vaccines. There is no evidence whatsoever, that any of these vaccines actually work, but there is a lot of evidence that vaccines can be dangerous and even life threatening. In actuality, many of the flu like symptoms are caused by a fungal infection. These types of infections come and go.

So here we are this year, where the CDC now admits that this year's flu vaccine is only 10% effective. (How do they know that?) Yesterday, I went to Walgreens and saw all kinds of posters advertising the flu shot, but I didn't see one poster telling unsuspecting consumers that the CDC says the shot doesn't work.

And that's the secret. The secret is our government masters want to keep up the facade that these vaccines save people from life threatening illnesses. The truth is they make a lot of money in selling these products. Now that many are wising up, our government masters are moving to require people to get vaccines under threat of law. Yeah, they really care!

Bruce                             New World Order News

Massive flu outbreak? Here’s the real story the media won’t touch. The lies, the hoax, the scandal.
I covered part of the scandal the other day, but here I’ll give you much more.
by Jon Rappoport
January 15, 2018

In case you haven’t been following the uproar over the flu outbreak, you’ve missed the fact that…

Health authorities admit this year’s flu vaccine is only 10% effective.
But of course, they urge you to take the vaccine anyway.

Why is this year’s vaccine ineffective? Because it’s made using chicken eggs, and researchers have discovered that the flu virus—which is placed in the vaccine—mutates in chicken eggs.

Therefore, by the time a person takes the flu shot, he’s not being protected against this year’s seasonal flu virus. He’s being protected against a mutated virus that isn’t causing the flu this year.

This is the conventional explanation. If you think it’s the whole story, I have condos for sale on the moon.

You see, vaccines have been made using chicken eggs—not just this year—but for the past 70 years.

That would mean the flu vaccine has been ineffective for decades. “The majority of flu vaccines are grown in chicken eggs, a method of vaccine development that’s been used for 70 years.”
But wait. There’s more. Much more. I’ll break it down into several scandals.

SCANDAL ONE: (I covered this the other day): Dr. Peter Doshi, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), reveals a monstrosity.
As Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a flu virus.

This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies.
So they don’t have the flu.

Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn’t possibly prevent all those “flu cases” that aren’t flu cases.
The vaccine couldn’t possibly work.
The vaccine isn’t designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.

Here’s the exact quote from Peter Doshi’s BMJ review, “Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease” (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):
“…even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive.”
“…It’s no wonder so many people feel that ‘flu shots’ don’t work: for most flus, they can’t.”
Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren’t the flu.

So even if you’re a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory, you’re on the short end of the stick here. They’re conning your socks off.
The basic flu symptoms—cough, fever, chills, sore throat, muscle aches, weakness—can be caused by a variety of factors that have nothing to do with a flu virus.

SCANDAL TWO: In December of 2005, the British Medical Journal (online) published another shocking Peter Doshi report, which created tremors through the halls of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), where “the experts” used to tell the press that 36,000 people in the US die every year from the flu.
Here is a quote from Doshi’s report, “Are US flu death figures more PR than science?”(BMJ 2005; 331:1412):
“[According to CDC statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001—61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified.”

You see, the CDC has created one overall category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths. Why do they do this? Because they disingenuously assume that the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu.
This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes.

But even worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.
Therefore, the CDC could not say, with assurance, that more than 18 people died of influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths.

Doshi continued his assessment of published CDC flu-death statistics: “Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006).” These figures refer to flu separated out from pneumonia.

This death toll is obviously far lower than the old parroted 36,000 figure.
However, when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of flu deaths plummet even further.

In other words, it’s all promotion and hype.
“Well, uh, we used to say that 36,000 people die from the flu every year in the US. But actually, all we can prove is about 20 deaths. However, we can’t admit that, because if we did, we’d be exposing our gigantic psyop. The whole campaign to scare people into getting a flu shot would have about the same effect as warning people to carry iron umbrellas, in case toasters fall out of upper-story windows…and, by the way, we’d be put in prison for fraud.”
SCANDAL THREE: The so-called Swine Flu pandemic of 2009. This one is a real eye-opener. The CDC was caught with its pants down.

Swine Flu was hyped to the sky by the CDC. The Agency was calling for all Americans to take the Swine Flu vaccine. Remember?
The problem was, the CDC was concealing a very dirty secret.

At the time, star CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, was working on the Swine Flu story. She discovered that the CDC had secretly stopped counting cases of the illness—while, of course, continuing to warn Americans about its unchecked spread.
Understand that the CDC’s main job is counting cases and reporting the numbers.
What was the Agency up to?

Here is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson:
Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “pandemic,” without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn’t that another investigation of yours that was shut down? Wasn’t there more to find out?

Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one [CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was “the most original story” he’d seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to stop it [after it was published on the CBS News website] and, in the end, no [CBS television news] broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It was fair, accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary.
—end of interview excerpt—

I’ll add a few details. It was routine for doctors all over America to send blood samples from patients they’d diagnosed with Swine Flu, or the “most likely” Swine Flu patients, to labs for testing. And overwhelmingly, those samples were coming back with the result: not Swine Flu, not any kind of flu.

That was the big secret. That’s what the CDC was hiding. That’s why they stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers. That’s what Attkisson had discovered. That’s why she was shut down.

But it gets even worse.

Because about three weeks after Attkisson’s findings were published on the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic, decided to double down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger one.

Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC’s response: “Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents — the CDC’s best guess is 22 million — came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009].” (“22 million cases of Swine Flu in US,” by Daniel J. DeNoon).

Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.

In the summer of 2009, the CDC secretly stops counting Swine Flu cases in America, because the overwhelming percentage of lab tests from likely Swine

Flu patients shows no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu.

There is no Swine Flu epidemic.

Then, the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.

So now…when health officials begin waving red flags and raising alarms about a current viral flu outbreak, it would be more than reasonable to demand they answer questions about their past lies and deceptions.
Unless you just want to take them at their word.
If so, good luck.




It's the worst of all worlds. Turkey has been threatening to attack the Kurds now setting up shop in Syria. Today, the shelling began. The whole cause of this crisis is the U.S. support for a 30,000 man Kurdish army forming a de-facto country in the border area between Turkey and Syria. Turkey hates this. Syria hates this. Now, today, US Coalition spokesman Col. Ryan Dillon saidTuesday of the Syrian Kurds in Afrin, "We don't support them, we have nothing to do with them".

So here we are. The U.S. has no right to occupy another country, but has refused to leave, putting them in a potential confrontation with Russia and Syria. Turkey, once a staunch ally, has been repeatedly double-crossed by the U.S. Now they are buying weapons from Russia and are attacking U.S. allies in Syria. AND, the allies, the Kurds, who put their necks on the line in the coming war with Turkey, has just had the rug pulled out from under them by the U.S.

If the goal of U.S. foreign policy is to unite the rest of the world against us, they are succeeding. Our direct and indirect spending on the military and all these wars, is around a trillion dollars per year. Do we really need to spend that kind of money to get everyone to hate us?

Bruce                                      New World Order News

Contradiction has become the norm for US foreign policy over the past many years - an observation that is clear to anyone even remotely paying attention.

On Tuesday the US State Department spokesperson was asked during the daily press briefing about the obvious contradiction inherent in US ally and NATO member Turkey shelling US-backed Kurdish forces in Afrin - the Kurdish held zone in northwest Syria near the Turkish border.
It's not the first time that a US partner force has attacked another US partner force in Syria (and then there's this Vice News headline from 2016 indicating it's sometimes gone three ways: "Three US allies are now fighting each other in northern Syria").

Thus far US military officials have sought to distance themselves from YPG (Kurdish People's Protection Units) operations in Afrin while simultaneously promising to ramp up support for the Kurdish YPG-dominated Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) throughout the rest of Northern Syria. US Coalition spokesman Col. Ryan Dillon saidTuesday of the Syrian Kurds in Afrin, "We don't support them, we have nothing to do with them" - in what was a clear case of the Pentagon trying to dance around the issue with old-fashioned double speak, pretending as if the Syrian Kurds themselves don't see "Rojava" Kurds as a single entity.

As a Pentagon spokesman recently told Defense One: "The Coalition is working jointly with the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) to establish and train the new Syrian Border Security Force (BSF). Currently, there are approximately 230 individuals training in the BSF’s inaugural class, with the goal of a final force size of approximately 30,000."

Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said of the new US-backed Border Security Force, which obviously is to be heavily Kurdish in composition, that it is akin to the US hosting a "terror army" along Turkey's border. Erdoğan has vowed "to strangle it before it’s even born."

Meanwhile Turkey has amassed a huge invasion force to oust the YPG from Afrin Canton, and sporadic fighting and shelling is widely reported to have already begun. This as Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has indicated"the Unites States will remain in Syria" while continuing to train its SDF proxies and bolster its new "Syrian Border Security Force."

Watch as Heather Nauert fumbles through a response to an excellent and obvious question: What is the US position as its NATO ally is shelling its number one ally in the fight against ISIS in Syria?...

I went to the @StateDept yesterday and asked about the contradiction of the US building a mostly-Kurdish Border Force on the Syrian border even as its NATO ally Turkey threatens to "strangle" it "before it's even born."
5:19 PM - Jan 17, 2018

Here is the exchange:
QUESTION: The Turkish military began shelling Kurdish positions in Afrin province in northern Syria. What is the U.S. position as its NATO ally is shelling the - its number one ally in the fight against ISIS in Syria?

MS NAUERT: Okay. I’m afraid I don’t have anything for you on that.

QUESTION: Can we move on, please?

MS NAUERT: Okay. Sir?

QUESTION: So you - wait, so you are saying - does--

MS NAUERT: I don’t have a specific report on whether or not we can confirm that that has taken place. Okay.

QUESTION: Okay. Well, along the same lines, there’s also been the announcement of a border force consisting primarily of Kurdish militias allied with the U.S. and the SDF along the Syrian-Turkish border, and President Erdogan called it a terror army and said he would strangle it before it’s born. So this is another place where there’s kind of a contradiction between two U.S. allies.


QUESTION: So I’m just wondering if the U.S. has a position on this.

MS NAUERT: Well, Turkey is a very important and valued NATO ally. We have a lot of interactions with the Turkish Government. As you probably know, the foreign minister of Turkey is in Vancouver right now, where I believe he will be meeting or have some sort of a chat with Secretary Tillerson, or at least some of our representatives later today. So an important NATO ally.

In terms of what is going on in Syria, the United States is in Syria to defeat ISIS. Any activities that we take part in with regard to the Syrian Democratic Forces is something that’s internal only - internal only to Syria. And I say that because it is important that we defeat ISIS, that we make sure - and when I say “we,” I say that not just on behalf of the United States, but the entire coalition, the 72 or 73-member coalition - the importance of not letting ISIS take root the way that they had before and further destabilize that country. So that -what the United States is involved with with regard to the Syrian Democratic Forces or the SDF is that, to defeat ISIS. That is solely what it is for. The internal purpose is of defeating ISIS.

QUESTION: But if Turkey does indeed attack the border force, what will the U.S. do?

MS NAUERT: I’m not going to get into any kind of hypothetical like that. Okay? Thank you.
Someone should inform the State Department that this "hypothetical" is already fast becoming the new reality on the ground. But such a blatant contradiction in which a US-backed force attacks another US-backed force is nothing new in Syria, yet no less outrageous as when it began happening years ago in the Syrian conflict. 



"The Whole World Is Sick And Tired Of US Foreign Policy"

This is the headline of the subject article. I would add, hopefully, that the American people are sick and tired of U.S. foreign policy. Whether you voted for Bush Jr., Obama or Trump, you did not vote for more and more wars. Each of those candidates pledged to wind down or end these wars. Each of the candidates lied and the wars go on.

Until recently, the average American pays very little attention to the wars being waged all over the middle east and Africa. Then came the false warning of an incoming missile attack heading to Hawaii. The most frightening thing is no one on the island was sure who was firing the missile. This illustrates the fact that we now have so many potential enemies, that we cannot be sure of who will attack us first.

Of course the best idea would be to bring our troops home, but because our leaders are insane, this will not happen as long as they are in charge.

Bruce        New World Order news 

According to four-star General Wesley Clark, in a 1991 meeting with Paul Wolfowitz, then-under-secretary of defense for policy at the Department of Defense, Wolfowitz seemed a little dismayed because he believed the U.S. should have gotten rid of Saddam Hussein in Operation Desert Storm but failed to do so. Clark summarized what he says Wolfowitz said:

“‘But one thing we did learn. We learned that we can use our military in the region, in the Middle East, and the Soviets won’t stop us. We’ve got about five or ten years to clean up those old Soviet client regimes, Syria, Iran, Iraq, before the next great superpower comes on to challenge us.’” [emphasis added]
This was certainly the case in the years that followed, as the United States used the pretext of 9/11 to attack both Afghanistan and Iraq with little to no substantive resistance from the international community. This trend continued as the Obama administration heavily expanded its operations into Yemen, Somalia, Pakistan, and even the Philippines, to name a few, right up until the U.S. led a cohort of NATO countries to impose regime change in Libya in 2011.

At the time, Russia withheld its veto power at the U.N. Security Council because it had received assurances that the coalition would not pursue regime change. After NATO forces began bombing Muammar Gaddafi’s palaces directly, a furious Vladimir Putin questioned: “Who gave NATO the right to kill Gaddafi?”

Following Gaddafi’s public execution on the streets of Sirte, Putin’s criticism of NATO’s betrayal went even further. He stated:
three countries.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan also came to Iran’s aid during the protests with Turkey’s Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu, openly stating:
“Iran’s stability is important for us…We are against foreign interventions in Iran.”

At the end of last year, Erdogan stated that U.S. sanctions on Iran were not binding on Turkey as it sought to outmaneuver them. At the time, Hurriyet news quoted Erdogan as saying “[t]he world does not consist of the U.S. alone.”

America’s influential decline was most evident in Donald Trump’s recent Jerusalem debacle, which saw the Trump administration issue stern threats to the entire world, warning they needed to vote in favor of Washington’s interests at the U.N. Most of the world chose to ignore those threats and gave the United States a giant “middle finger,” so to speak, voting overwhelmingly against the Trump administration.

While Washington is more than capable of unilaterally attacking other countries both covertly and overtly with an ever depleting list of allies, what is becoming increasingly clear is that it may not be able to do so without active opposition from the rest of the world, including nuclear powers Russia and China, which refuse to stay silent as the U.S. tries to shape the world in accordance with its geopolitical desires.“The whole world saw him being killed; all bloodied. Is that democracy? And who did it? Drones, including American ones, delivered a strike on his motorcade. Then commandos – who were not supposed to be there – brought in so-called opposition and militants and killed him without trial. I’m not saying that Gaddafi didn’t have to quit, but that should have been left up to the people of Libya to decide through the democratic process.”

No one appreciated it at the time, but America’s unchallenged ability to intervene anywhere and everywhere it chooses ended on that day. Fast forward to Barack Obama’s plans to implement an extensive strike plan against the Syrian government in 2013, which never transpired due  strong Russian opposition and widespread protests in the U.S. A few years later, Russia directly intervened in Syria at the request of the Syrian government and effectively implemented its own no-fly zone in significant portions of the country. Donald Trump’s April 2017 strike on the Syrian government was only conducted after his administration first notified the Russians through a deconfliction hotline set up to manage the Syrian conflict.

However, Russia isn’t the only country that is tired of America’s foreign policy, and the recent “emergency U.N. Security Council meeting” to discuss the current situation in Iran is a testament to that. Even Washington’s traditional allies cannot withhold their criticism of America’s desire to police the world.

“However worrying the events of the last few days in Iran may be they do not constitute per se a threat to international peace and security,” French Ambassador to the U.N. Francois Delattre said. “We must be wary of any attempts to exploit this crisis for personal ends, which would have the diametrically opposed outcome to that which is wished.”

Russia went even further, bringing up America’s own behavior and treatment of protesters as a counter-argument to the notion that Washington is motivated by human rights concerns in Iran.

“By your logic, we should have initiated a Security Council meeting after the well-known events in Ferguson,” said Russian U.N. Ambassador Vasily Nebenzya, addressing the U.S. delegation.

Iran also insisted the matter was an internal affair and not something for the U.N. to weigh in on, and China agreed, with their ambassador calling it a purely “domestic issue.”

French President Emmanuel Macron even went so far as to accuse the U.S., Israel, and Saudi Arabia of instigating a war with Iran.
“The official line pursued by the United States, Israel and Saudi Arabia, who are our allies in many ways, is almost one that would lead us to war,” Macron told reporters, according to Reuters. Instead, Macron called for dialogue with Tehran as he warned against the approach adopted by the aforementioned 



I have posted 2 articles concerning the above headline. As has been the consequence in U.S. foreign policy, enemies are now becoming friends in their opposition to U.S. military adventures.

First: A top Turkish general told a meeting of NATO military commanders, "We cannot and will not allow support and arming of the YPG terror group under the name of an operational partner. We hope this mistake will be corrected in the shortest time." Thanks to years of U.S. military assistance, Turkey is one of the most powerful nations in the middle east and in NATO. Now, the U.S. has said they will assist the mortal enemies of the Turkish government by establishing a defacto country right on Turkey's border. There is no way Turkey will allow this.

Second: The foreign minister of Syria has vowed to remove the U.S. rebels and supporting U.S. forces from Syria. Of course Syria cannot fight the U.S. by themselves, but they don't have to. Maybe the Turks will do it for them. Maybe Russia and Iran will covertly help. In any event, we have no business, whatsoever, in Syria. It is not our country. There is no request from Syria nor any authorization from the U.N. to be there. If we continue on this path, our military men and women will begin dying to support this reckless policy.

Bruce                                                 New World Order News

 Turkey is poised for an imminent massive ground invasion of Northern Syria to quash Kurdish militia groups currently holding Afrin near the Turkish border. Multiple regional outlets have reported a build-up of forces that could constitute the largest external intervening force thus far in the entirety of the Syrian war.

According to Middle East based Al-Sura News, Turkey's military build-up currently underway includes special forces troops, Army units, Turkish-backed Syrian Rebels and Turkey's air force. The Kurdish YPG/J (People's Protection Units) has held Afrin since the Syrian government withdrew from the area in 2012, which constitutes the western-most part of the self-declared Rojava autonomous Kurdish zone.

"First Turkish military convoy enters Syria's Idlib, heads to hilltop overlooking Afrin." via Turkey's Daily Sabah

Turkey considers it a "terrorist" enclave as it sees Syrian Kurdish factions as an extension of the PKK, while the US has claimed not to be active in supporting Kurdish operations in Afrin, which lies a mere 40 kilometers from Aleppo where the Syrian Army continues to advance through the Aleppo countryside and into Idlib province.

Over the weekend President Recep Tayyip Erdogan slammed recent US efforts to ramp up support for the Kurdish dominated Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), saying during a speech in Ankara, “A country we call an ally is insisting on forming a terror army on our borders." He framed US support to Syrian Kurds as undermining Turkey's security, adding, “What can that terror army target but Turkey? Our mission is to strangle it before it’s even born."
Meanwhile a top Turkish general told a meeting of NATO military commanders, "We cannot and will not allow support and arming of the YPG terror group under the name of an operational partner. We hope this mistake will be corrected in the shortest time."

Regional outlets Al Jazeera and Al Masdar News have confirmed that the large Turkish convoy has entered northwest Syria and that sporadic fighting against Kurdish forces is already underway. Notably the air force is said to be mobilized - a significant factor as Turkish ground forces, including its proxy rebel forces making up its "Euphrates Shield Operation", have had little success in the past dislodging Kurdish fighters without air support.

Should aerial power be utilized by Turkey it would mark a dramatic escalation, especially given that both Russia and the US operate over Northern Syria, with Russia controlling the airspace over Afrin Canton (as well as over Idlib, which have generally frustrated Turkish plans for greater involvement). Whether the operation against Syrian Kurds moves forward or not into a full scale Turkish assault depends in large part on Russia, which has administered 'deconfliction' zones in the Afrin area, and has sponsored trilateral talks with Turkey and Iran which seeks cooperation among the three powers to wind down the war in Syria. 

In response to news of the impending Turkish invasion, US Coalition spokesman Col. said Tuesday of the Syrian Kurds in Afrin, "We don't support them, we have nothing to do with them." Dillon explained further when pressed by Turkish state media journalists, "We are not operating in Afrin. We are supporting our partners in defeating remaining ISIS [Daesh] pockets along the Middle Euphrates River Valley, specifically in areas north of Abu Kamal, on the eastern side of the Euphrates River." 

The 42 km distance from Afrin to Aleppo is already dominated by Opposition Armed groups based near Aleppo in Anadan, Hraytan and all the way up to 
Turkey's current build-up and offensive comes after Dillon's controversial comments on Sunday in which he announced that the US coalition will establish a 30,000-strong new border security force with the SDF in Syria. In claiming to have "nothing to do with" Syrian Kurds operating in Afrin the Pentagon is seeking to distance itself from entering into direct conflict with Turkey in northwest Syria. 

Though Turkey has threatened many times before that it will dislodge Afrin from control of the Syrian Kurds, Erdogan might not be bluffing this time. Late on Tuesday he's reported to have phoned NATO General Secretary Jens Stoltenberg in order to inform NATO that the Afrin operation is being launched. 

The Syrian Foreign Ministry has responded negatively to the US pledge to create a new “border” force in northern Syria of some 30,000 US-backed fighters, saying not only are they violating Syrian sovereignty, but the Syrian Army’s goal must be to end the US presence in the country outright.
Syria has long opposed the US military presence in the country, which was deployed without Syrian permission, and which Pentagon officials say will last long after the outright defeat of ISIS.

Whether the Syrians can do anything about it is another matter. The US presence in Syria is substantial, and backed by a large, heavily-armed Kurdish force. Despite the US deployment being plainly illegal, there’s no practical way to remove them by force.

It’s curious that the Syrian state media made it clear the position was that of the military, as made by the foreign ministry, suggesting the two ministries may not necessarily be on the same page with rhetoric about the US presence.

Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz

Major Clashes in Libyan Capital, at Least 20 Killed, Airport Closed - January 15th, 2018
Aid Cranes Arrive at Key North Yemen Port of Hodeidah - January 15th, 2018
Russia FM: Zone for US-Backed Rebels Could Split Syria - January 15th, 2018
Syrian Rebels Push US to Resume Failed CIA Arms Smuggling Scheme - January 15th, 2018
US-Backed Syrian Kurds Mobilize Civilians, Turkey May Attack 'At Any Moment' - January 15th, 2018


Our government masters say it was James Earl Ray. How many know that there was never a trial for James Earl Ray? How many know the weapon allegedly used, was never fired in the FBI murder investigation to verify that it was the murder weapon? How many know there was a civil trial in Memphis, Tennessee, in 1999, litigating the evidence in the assassination?

The subject article covers the trial. After the trial, 12 jurors unanimously agreed that James Earl Ray did not kill MLK. The King family, after attending the trial, agreed James Earl Ray did not kill MLK. Of course you barely heard a blip from the mediawhores because that's what they do. They are a propaganda arm, not interested in news or truth. So here it is --- the entire transcript. By this time you should all be convinced our government masters almost always lie. If they say something, chances are ---- it's a lie.

Bruce                                                                          New World Order News

After four weeks of testimony and over 70 witnesses in a civil trial in Memphis, Tennessee, twelve jurors reached a unanimous verdict on December 8, 1999 after about an hour of deliberations that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. In a press statement held the following day in Atlanta, Mrs. Coretta Scott King welcomed the verdict, saying , “There is abundant evidence of a major high level conspiracy in the assassination of my husband, Martin Luther King, Jr. And the civil court's unanimous verdict has validated our belief. I wholeheartedly applaud the verdict of the jury and I feel that justice has been well served in their deliberations. This verdict is not only a great victory for my family, but also a great victory for America. It is a great victory for truth itself. It is important to know that this was a SWIFT verdict, delivered after about an hour of jury deliberation. The jury was clearly convinced by the extensive evidence that was presented during the trial that, in addition to Mr. Jowers, the conspiracy of the Mafia, local, state and federal government agencies, were deeply involved in the assassination of my husband. The jury also affirmed overwhelming evidence that identified someone else, not James Earl Ray, as the shooter, and that Mr. Ray was set up to take the blame. I want to make it clear that my family has no interest in retribution. Instead, our sole concern has been that the full truth of the assassination has been revealed and adjudicated in a court of law… My husband once said, "The moral arc of the universe is long, but it bends toward justice." To-day, almost 32 years after my husband and the father of my four children was assassinated, I feel that the jury's verdict clearly affirms this principle. With this faith, we can begin the 21st century and the new millennium with a new spirit of hope and healing.”
View Full Trial Transcript>
View Transcript of King Family Press Conference on the Verdict>
The King family stands firmly behind the civil trial verdict reached by twelve jurors in the Memphis, Tennessee courtroom on December 8, 1999.   
An excerpt from remarks made by Mr. Dexter Scott King, Chairman, President, and CEO of The King Center, during the December 9, 1999 press conference regarding the verdict that may be used in support of this family decision:

“We can say that because of the evidence and information obtained in Memphis we believe that this case is over. This is a period in the chapter. We constantly hear reports, which trouble me, that this verdict creates more questions than answers. That is totally false. Anyone who sat in on almost four weeks of testimony, with over seventy witnesses, credible witnesses I might add, from several judges to other very credible witnesses, would know that the truth is here.”

"The question now is, "What will you do with that?" We as a family have done our part. We have carried this mantle for as long as we can carry it. We know what happened. It is on public record. The transcripts will be available; we will make them available on the Web at some point. Any serious researcher who wants to know what happened can find out.”

The King family feels that the jury’s verdict, the transcripts of the conspiracy trial, and the transcripts of the King family’s press conference following the trial — all of which can be found on The King Center’s website — include everything that that family members have to say about the assassination.
Therefore, the King family shares the conviction that there is nothing more to add to their comments on record and will respectfully decline all further requests for comment.



According to the mediawhores and leftist screwballs, it would be the Trump comment even though Trump denies saying it. Let's put this to rest and then move to real news. It doesn't matter. Whether he said that or something like that, it doesn't matter. What does matter is the policy of allowing anyone from anywhere to set up shop in the U.S., immediately qualify for assistance, maybe be allowed to drive and vote, without any requirement to qualify for residence. This was never the case in the past and until recently, was never the case in any other nation. Our nation is hopelessly in debt. The last thing we need is more people drawing assistance without any possibility of providing a meaningful contribution to society.

Now, about the subject article ---- Yesterday, a 3 year old toddler was shot in the head by an Israeli soldier during an Israeli “military training” session in the northern occupied West Bank city of Tubas. Have you seen anything about this on any media? I haven't. Maybe it's somewhere, but at the very least takes a backseat to the meaningless political gossip that permeates our media today.

How about asking our President how he feels about “ our great friends in the middle east” when stories like this come up again and again? No, not a peep --- not from him, not from the leftists, not from the mediawhores. Real issues, concerning life and death should be a priority, but not here, not now.

Bruce                      New World Order News


A three-year-old Palestinian was shot in the head during an Israeli “military training” session in the northern occupied West Bank city of Tubas.
According to a statement by the Palestinian Authority’s Ministry of Health, the child was hit in the head with live bullets. He was taken to Rafidia Surgical hospital in Nablus.

She pointed out that the child’s relatives told “medical staff that he was shot during IDF training in the area.”
“The health situation of the injured child is stable,” the ministry said.

The Israeli military frequently conducts training in Palestinian communities in Tubas, the Jordan Valley of the occupied West Bank, Hebron, and several other areas. Palestinians are often forced to abandon their homes to make way for the training sessions.



It would be so nice if those of us who oppose some of the policies of Donald Trump could get a serious discussion going based on issues. Way back at the beginning of the Presidential campaign, Trump was barely a blip on the radar. Then came the leftist weirdo's. First came the mediawhores who would rant and rave about Trump being a racist, sexist, homophobe, misogynist and so on. Already, by that time, radios and T.V.'s all across the nation had tuned them out. Media opposition to Trump gave him credibility. Then there was Hillary. She was his opposition --- say no more.

Today, there are so many important issues that need attention --- like wars all around the world, but no, our leftist friends continue to make fools out of themselves and by contrast, make Trump look good. We have the ridiculous Russian collusion investigation, supported by the leftists, going on and on and on with no evidence whatsoever, again making Trump look good. We have the violent leftist demonstrations also making Trump look good. We have the leftist support of unlimited immigration of anyone who wants to come here, making Trump look good. We have the highly publicized political opposition of movie stars and professional athletes along with the kneeling by some NFL players during the National Anthem, also making Trump look good.

Wacko's, weirdo's and fruitcakes comprise the opposition to Donald Trump, leaving no place for the normal people to go, but reluctantly, very reluctantly, supporting Donald Trump. This brings me to the subject article. In the latest gathering of wacko's, weirdo's and fruitcakes, otherwise known as National Board of Review Annual Awards Gala in New York, Robert Deniro made a fool out himself in a profanity based tirade against President Trump. Of course, the other wacko's, weirdo's and fruitcakes thought he was great, but my guess is, ten's of millions of other Americans remain disgusted with the antics of this bunch. Dear leftists: you people are stupid. If you really want to get rid of Trump, stop empowering him with your moronic actions. At the very least keep your mouths shut and let others go back to real issues.

Bruce                                   New World Order News

Robert de Niro called President Trump a 'f***ing fool' in a foul-mouthed rant as he presented Meryl Streep with a best actress award on Tuesday night.
Introducing Streep at the National Board of Review Annual Awards Gala in New York- which is not broadcast on TV - De Niro took time out to call the President a 'f***ing idiot' and compare his presidency to the fairytale of the Emperor's New Clothes.

The Oscar-winner also branded Trump the 'baby-in-chief' and 'jerk-off-in-chief' while discussing Streep's new film The Post, which is about the publication of the Pentagon Papers into the Vietnam War.

[Robert de Niro attacked President Trump during an awards ceremony speech on Tuesday night in New York, calling him a 'f***ing idiot' and a 'fool']

Robert de Niro attacked President Trump during an awards ceremony speech on Tuesday night in New York, calling him a 'f***ing idiot' and a 'fool'
[De Niro, who was at the ceremony to introduce Meryl Streep, also called Trump a 'jerkoff-in-chief' and compared him to the 'delusional, narcissistic, petty, vindictive' President Nixon]

De Niro, who was at the ceremony to introduce Meryl Streep, also called Trump a 'jerkoff-in-chief' and compared him to the 'delusional, narcissistic, petty, vindictive' President Nixon

De Niro introduces Streep at the National Board Of Review Awards

Robert De Niro's award speech blasting Donald Trump in full 
Thank you. First congratulations to Tom Hanks. Tom Hanks has played opposite some of the most iconic figures in American cinema.
In Turner and Hooch he co-starred with a humongous, slobbering French Mastiff. In Toy Story his nemesis was action figure Buzz Lightyear. And who could forget his award-winning performance in Castaway, opposite a volleyball named Wilson.
That brings us to The Post, and another signature performance from the extraordinary Meryl Streep. 

Meryl is the most generous and giving actor. She not only inhabits her own character, she helps bring out the character of everyone else on the screen. Can a volleyball do that?

Not even if the volleyball was a stable genius.
It was fascinating to watch The Post.

That story took place nearly 50 years ago, but there are many parallels with today obviously.

At the time of the story Donald Trump was suffering with "bone spurs". Today the world is suffering from the real Donald Trump. Come on. You know. What are we talking about?

This f***ing idiot is the President. It's The Emperor's New Clothes - the guy is a f***ing fool. 
The publication of the Pentagon Papers was a proud moment for American journalism. The Times and the Post challenged the government over critical
First Amendment issues. And the press prevailed.

Our government today, with the propping [up] of our baby-in-chief - the jerkoff-in-chief I call him - has put the press under siege, trying to discredit it through outrageous attacks and lies.'

And again just like 1971 the press is distinguishing itself with brave, exacting journalism. 

The movie gave us glimpses of President Nixon as delusional, narcissistic, petty, vindictive, nasty and bats*** f***ing crazy. Ah the good old days.
The movie and my friend Meryl Streep showed us the evolution of courage - Kate Graham was forced into a man's world and showed the world and showed all those men something about the qualities of daring and devotion to public service - qualities that were thought of as male. No longer.
But, astonishingly, today women are still struggling to get their rightful place and their fare share.

I am still fighting for Meryl to be able to get 79 cents of what a man would get to play Catherine Graham. It's shameful, I know.

The good news is that I think we're at a watershed moment and it's about time. There are many to thank for that, but tonight is for Meryl Streep.
Meryl, thank you for speaking out on matters of conscience that affect us all. Thank you for being an actress who plays the most interesting characters with full commitment and without judgement.

You show us their heroism as well as their imperfections.

And I know that's a stretch for you - because Meryl doesn't seem to have any imperfections. And I say that with the most love for you, Meryl. I love you so much. Ladies and gentlemen, the National Board of Review's best actress...

As transcribed by Sopan Deb 

De Niro said: 'It was fascinating to watch The Post. That story took place nearly 50 years ago, but there are many parallels with today obviously.
'At the time of the story Donald Trump was suffering with "bone spurs". Today the world is suffering from the real Donald Trump.
'This f***ing idiot is the President. It's The Emperor's New Clothes - the guy is a f***ing fool. 

'The publication of the Pentagon Papers was a proud moment for American journalism. The Times and the Post challenged the government over critical First Amendment issues. And the press prevailed.
I'm not losing it and I'm not lazy! Trump opens up White... Fire and Fury is flying off shelves with publisher rushing...

'Our government today, with the propping [up] of our baby-in-chief - the jerkoff-in-chief I call him - has put the press under siege, trying to discredit it through outrageous attacks and lies.'

'And again just like 1971 the press is distinguishing itself with brave, exacting journalism. 

'The movie gave us glimpses of President Nixon as delusional, narcissistic, petty, vindictive, nasty and bats*** f***ing crazy. Ah the good old days.' 
De Niro has long been a vocal critic of Trump, saying during the presidential campaign that he would 'like to punch him in the face.'
Since then he has used many public speaking opportunities to trash the President, calling him a 'blatant racist', a 'bozo' and a 'motherf***er'.

[The actor has long been a vocal critic of Trump, saying he would like to punch him in the face and urging people to vote for Hillary during the 2016 election]

The actor has long been a vocal critic of Trump, saying he would like to punch him in the face and urging people to vote for Hillary during the 2016 election

He also used an awards speech just days before the 2016 election to call for people to vote for Hillary Clinton. 

Aside from De Niro and Streep, Whoopi Goldberg, Gal Gadot and Stephen Colbert were all in attendance at Tuesday night's award ceremony.  
Angelina Jolie also appeared with children Shiloh and Zahara Jolie-Pitt before accepting the Freedom of Expression Award for First They Killed My Father.
De Niro's attack comes as Trump battles questions over his competency and mental health raised in Michael Wolff's explosive new book. 

The famous columnist claims to have been a virtual fly on the wall during the first months of the new administration as it lunged from crisis to crisis.
He reports that the Trump team never anticipated winning and were simply using his presidential run as a branding exercise before it got out of hand.
As a result the team were woefully under-prepared for power, causing in-fighting among senior figures such as Jared Kushner, Steve Bannon and Reince Priebus.

Meanwhile Trump was attempting to stick to his golfing schedule and took to locking himself in his room with a cheeseburger by 6.30pm each night, Wolff writes.

His press team also refused to accept an interview without the questions being provided beforehand over concerns for his mental health.
Trump has hit back at the claims, proclaiming himself a 'stable genius' who is 'like, really smart' in a series of tweets.
His lawyers have also attempted to stop publication of the book, which is currently top of the Amazon bestseller list.



This week, President Trump announced he was cutting aid to Pakistan. Actually, I agree with the cut. I would actually agree with cutting all foreign aid to all nations, including Israel. Our country runs an annual deficit of close to 1 trillion dollars. Our government acknowledges a debt of in excess of 20 trillion dollars (it could be much, much higher). It doesn't take a PHD in economics to figure out that this runaway debt is not sustainable, so cutting foreign aid is one step we need to take, but he just couldn't let it stand at that.

In announcing the cut in foreign aid, Trump savaged Pakistan and its' lack of cooperation with the U.S. in the war on terror. Obviously, if a nation is publicly humiliated, they have to respond --- even if the criticism is justified. Today, Pakistan announced they are suspending all military and intelligence cooperation with the U.S. I think we can count on Pakistan to look towards Russia and China to fill the gap in aid and cooperation that used to be ours. As the insaniacs continue their march towards World War 3, it makes no sense, whatsoever, to line up more nations who might join the opposition in that war --- especially one who has nuclear weapons.

So add Pakistan to the ever increasing list of people to hate. Given enough time, this next war will be the U.S. against everyone else.

Bruce                                               New World Order News

In the wake of President Trump’s twitter outburst last week, alleging that Pakistan has given the U.S. “nothing but lies and deceit” accompanied by the suspension of US financial aid, Defense Minister Khurram Dastgir Khan declared that military and intelligence cooperation with the United States are suspended, during an address at the Institute of Strategic Studies in Islamabad on Tuesday.

Khan, who was speaking at a seminar titled: "Contours of Security Environment of Pakistan,’ said the U.S. is now facing defeat in Afghanistan after a 16-year war, despite spending billions of dollars. With defeat imminent, he claims the U.S. is using Pakistan as a ‘scapegoat,’ rather than defending and securing the Pak-Afghan border.

“Pakistan does not want to put a price on its sacrifices but wants them to be recognized,” Khan added that Pakistan would not allow Afghanistan’s war to be fought on Pakistani soil.

Military relations between Pakistan and the United States have stretched as far back as 1947. The Afghan-Pakistan Center of Excellence is a division of United States Central Command (USCENTCOM), with military operations sometimes jointly focused on Afghanistan and Pakistan. It’s widely known that CIA drone bases and U.S. military logistical operations for Afghanistan are located in the country.

Kahn emphasized, "a wide field of intelligence cooperation and defense cooperation have been suspended,” but added the supply lines for NATO troops in Afghanistan would remain open. There was little mention of the fate of CIA drone bases operating in the country.
Pakistani demonstrators burn images of President Donald Trump and the U.S. flag during a protest against U.S. aid cuts in Lahore on January 5.
Khan stated, "you see the facilities that we have extended to them (Americans) are still in operation. We have not suspended them. But there is also a wide field of intelligence cooperation and defense cooperation which we have suspended."

Ironically, during the speech, Kahn criticized the U.S. for doing very little to fence the border with Afghanistan. The border stretches some 2,500 Km, where militants frequently take advantage of the open-order.

“It is convenient to blame Pakistan for cross-border terrorism whereas the US has not lifted a finger to help fence-up the border,” Khan was quoted as saying.

Maybe if Trump fails to build his "border wall" in the US, he can erect one between Pakistan and Afghanistan?

The unprecedented collapse in diplomatic relations between the US and Pakistan comes less than a week after Pakistan announced it would ditch the US Dollar in bilateral trade with China, and adopt the Yuan as China has successfully replaced the US as Pakistan's sovereign "big brother."
Richard Snelsire, a U.S.Embassy spokesman said, according to VOA news, "we have not received any formal communication regarding a suspension."
Meanwhile, so far 2018 has been nothing but a setback for Washington and Islamabad relations. President Trump kicked off the new year with a Twitter war pressuring Islamabad to “do more” to combat terrorism.



It happens more and more often --- Israel attacks someone. The subject article covers another missile attack from Israeli jets against targets in Syria. Here is a quote form the Israeli military “Israel has previously said it will prevent Syrian territory being used to set up bases or transfer advanced weaponry to the Lebanese Hezbollah militant group, which has been a key ally for Assad in the six-year Syrian civil war.”

There are a few of things wrong with the Israeli position. First. Israel does not decide who can be in Syria. It is not their country. Attacking people in another country just because you don't like them is nothing more than an act of war. Second. Israel does not decide who can be in Lebanon. Lebanon is not part of Israel. Just because Israel is militarily stronger, it does not give them the right to bully them. Third. There is no evidence that Hezbollah is transferring advanced weapons to Lebanon, but if they did, they have that right. Israel has no problem with the U.S. and Europe giving them advanced weapons.

Hypocrisy has always been an integral part of Israeli foreign policy. When Israel claims missiles made out of plumbing parts, are fired from Gaza, they attack with bombs and missiles. Then when they fire missiles at Syria, it's O.K.

Bruce                                   New World Order News

According to Syria's state media, the Syrian Army reported that Israel had attacked targets near the war-torn nation's capital with jets and ground-to-ground missiles early on Tuesday, causing damage.

Syria retaliated, according to the statement; its air defenses hit an Israeli aircraft and intercepted several missiles which had been launched from within Israel.

The General Command of the Army and the Armed Forces announced that Syria's defense network had responded to three Israeli rocket attacks on military positions in the Al-Qutayfah area, north of Damascus.
Israeli missiles targeted military sites in Qutifah area near the capital of Damascus, SANA news agency reports.

Syria warned the Israeli side about risks posed by such attacks, according to the outlet.
There were no reported casualties. The Israeli Army has refused to comment on the incident.

This is not the first time Tel-Aviv has launched an unprovoked attack on neighboring Syria. In September 2017, Israel struck Syrian army positions in the province of Hama, near the city of Masjaf, killing two people.

In October, Israeli Air Force fighter jets destroyed a Syrian air defense battery just 50 km from Damascus, claiming the attack was precipitated by the shelling of IDF aircraft as they carried out tasks on the territory of Lebanon.

In September, a Syrian official told Sputnik that in August Israel had bombed a military airport near Damacus, adding that it was done "to encourage and support terrorists."



I refer to them as the “BLM” gang – not to be confused with Black Lives Matter. The BLM Gang is a bunch of government established bureaucrats and thugs engaged in terrorizing honest farmers and ranchers throughout the western United States. They steal and kill livestock. They steal land. They extort money from ranchers. They use armed police to intimidate farmers. They take the land they steal and sell it to their benefactors. They serve no useful purpose whatsoever.

One American hero, Cliven Bundy, has stood up to these government rustlers. Over the past few years he has resisted, sometimes with armed ranchers, the BLM attempt to steal his land and kill his livestock. The subject article covers a federal judge's order to federal prosecutors to free Cliven Bundy and leave him alone. Federal prosecutors are forbidden to reinstate past indictments.

So there it is. Even a federal judge is disgusted with the conduct of this homegrown, government sponsored, terrorist organization. They need to be disbanded and those who have committed criminal offenses, prosecuted AND, it will never happen with this bunch. The bunch to which I am referring is our government masters. The BLM gang is not in opposition to the principles of our government, they are some of the enforcers of those “principles”.

Bruce                                   New World Order News

A federal judge Monday threw out criminal charges against Nevada cattleman Cliven Bundy, his two sons and a co-defendant in the 2014 Bunkerville standoff, citing "flagrant misconduct" by prosecutors and the FBI in not disclosing evidence to the defense before and during trial.
"The government's conduct in this case was indeed outrageous," U.S. District Judge Gloria M. Navarro ruled. "There has been flagrant misconduct, substantial prejudice and no lesser remedy is sufficient."

The judge issued her ruling before a packed courtroom with nearly 100 spectators, as more than a dozen other spectators had to wait outside the courtroom doors. As Navarro dismissed the case, Cliven Bundy's lawyer put his arm around his client. Supporters in the public gallery held hands, wiped tears from their eyes and hugged. One looked up and whispered, "Thank you Lord.''

The dismissal with prejudice, meaning a new trial can't be pursued, marked an embarrassing nadir for the federal government, which now has failed to convict the Bundys in two major federal cases stemming from separate armed standoffs.

The second stunning victory for the Bundys and their followers may serve to bolster their fight against federal control of public land, but it's not clear how their movement has fared. The three have spent most of the last two years in jail. Ammon Bundy owes at least $180,000 in legal fees in the Oregon case, and he said most of his national clients in his vehicle fleet service business left out of fear.

After the judge's ruling, the senior Bundy attempted to walk out of the courtroom in his blue jail garb and ankle shackles but was blocked by deputy U.S. marshals. He was released soon afterwards, wearing a cowboy hat, blazer and cowboy boots. He took hugs and handshakes from supporters. His sons, Ammon and Ryan Bundy, have been out of custody since November, when they were allowed to leave jail to stay in private homes under GPS monitoring.
"I've been a political prisoner for right at 700 days today," Cliven Bundy said, his arm around his wife, Carol Bundy. "I come in this courtroom an innocent man and I'm going to leave as an innocent man. My defense is a 15-second defense. I raised my cattle only on Clark County, Nevada, land and I have no contract with the federal government. This court has no jurisdiction and authority over this matter. And I have put up with the court in America as a political prisoner for two years."

Cliven Bundy turned his attention to state and local authorities, saying Nevada's governor, the Clark County commissioners and the sheriff were "aiders and abettors'' and "terrorists'' for failing to protect his family's rights and liberties. He said he plans to go home and have a "good steak,'' continue to graze his cattle and scheduled a news conference Tuesday outside the Clark County sheriff's office.
Cliven Bundy speaks after criminal charges thrown out

The judge found prosecutors engaged in a "deliberate attempt to mislead" and made several misrepresentations to both the defense and the court about evidence relating to a surveillance camera and snipers outside the Bundy ranch in early April 2014, as well as threat assessments made in the case.
"The court is troubled by the prosecution's failure to look beyond the FBI file," Navarro said.

She said she "seriously questions" that the FBI "inexplicably placed'' but "perhaps hid" a tactical operations log that referred to the presence of snipers outside the Bundy residence on a "thumb drive inside a vehicle for three years,'' when the government has had four years to prepare the case.
"The court has found that a universal sense of justice has been violated,'' Navarro said.

The judge found it especially egregious that the prosecutors chose not to share documents that the defendants specially asked for in pretrial motions, and "grossly shocking''  that the prosecutors claimed they weren't aware the material would assist the defendants in their defense.

"The government was well aware of theories of self defense, provocation and intimidation,'' Navarro said. "Here the prosecution has minimized the extent of prosecutorial misconduct.''

The judge issued her ruling in 30 minutes from the bench. Just before the hearing, Ryan Bundy led relatives and supporters in prayer in the courtroom corridor, even saying a prayer for the judge.

"Father in heaven ... we thank you for the protection that was given to us over this duration of time and through this trouble," he said, his head bowed as he held his cowboy hat over his chest. "We ask that you bless Judge Navarro and she will choose to side with thee and liberty. ... Father in heaven, we need our father home. Father in heaven, we need freedom back in our land."

After the judge's decision, when asked for his reaction, Ryan Bundy laughed and said, "It's about time. It's about time."
Ammon Bundy, holding black bound copies of the Bible and the Book of Mormon, called his wife and said, "I'm going to go home, take care of my family and go to work." He also plans to celebrate his youngest child's birthday. The boy turned 3 on Monday and Bundy missed the first two birthdays while he was in custody or at the Malheur refuge.

He promised to keep working for his cause. "I'm not done fighting by any means," he said. 

For Ryan Payne, who awaits sentencing after pleading guilty to federal conspiracy in the 2016 armed takeover of the refuge in southeastern Oregon, the judge's ruling was "bittersweet,'' said assistant federal public defender Brenda Weksler. Payne was ordered to report to the U.S. Marshal's office to determine if he'll be held while awaiting sentencing in Oregon.

"This prosecution has really been a tragedy for everyone involved,'' said Ryan Norwood, Payne's co-counsel, assistant federal public defender Ryan Norwood. "Ryan Bundy, Cliven and Ammon lost two years of their lives from this.''

Public land advocates fear the fumbling of the Nevada case, following the 2016 jury acquittals of the Bundy brothers and others in the armed takeover of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon, will buoy the Bundys' claims of federal government overreach and embolden militias to engage in future armed standoffs with federal officers over management of public land.

"This is an outrage, a total miscarriage of justice,'' said Patrick Donnelly, Nevada state director for the Center for Biological Diversity, outside the courthouse later Monday. "The prosecution mangled this case. It should have been a slam dunk.''
Donnelly said he thinks the dismissal will embolden the Bundys "fringe movement,'' though he doesn't think their actions have led to a huge rise in support.

"Bundy is an outlier. This whole movement is an outlier fringe movement,'' Donnelly said. "But it only takes a handful.''
Jonathan Greenblatt, chief executive officer of the Anti-Defamation League, decried the government's mistakes and predicted future armed standoffs as a result.

"This case represented the last opportunity for justice in this case of extremists who had organized in armed opposition to the government,'' he said.
The judge on Dec. 20 declared a mistrial after finding prosecutors withheld six types of evidence from defendants that should have been shared at least a month before the trial started. She said then that she would consider whether to dismiss the case outright or allow a new trial.

Cliven Bundy, 71, Ammon Bundy, 45, and Ryan Bundy, 42 and co-defendant Ryan Payne, 34, were indicted last year on conspiracy and other allegations, accused of rallying militia members and armed supporters to stop federal agents from impounding Bundy cattle in April 2014. Federal officers and rangers were acting on a court order filed after Cliven Bundy failed to pay grazing fees and fines for two decades. Outnumbered, the federal officers retreated and halted the cattle impoundment on April 12, 2014.

 The judge found the prosecutors' violations were "willful" and led to due process violations. She said they waited too long to provide FBI and other agency reports and maps on surveillance, including the location of a camera and snipers, outside the Bundy ranch; threat assessments that indicated the Bundys weren't violent; and nearly 500 pages of U.S. Bureau of Land Management internal affairs documents that included paperwork indicating that cattle grazing hadn't threatened the desert tortoise, considered an endangered species.

Late disclosures of evidence trickled out just before and during the start of the trial "by happenstance,'' defense lawyers noted. One government witness under cross-examination by Ryan Bundy acknowledged watching live-feed video images from an FBI surveillance camera and another referenced a 2012 FBI threat assessment that determined the Bundys weren't likely to be violent. In pretrial motions, Ryan Bundy requested evidence on any "mysterious devices'' outside the Bundy ranch in early April 2014, and Payne's lawyers sought all threat assessments in July 2017, but prosecutors didn't turn over the information until ordered days before or during trial.

Defense lawyers argued that the government didn't "seem to recognize'' or "professed ignorance'' on what constituted Brady material, required by the 1963 landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. Maryland to be shared with the defense.
The defense lawyers urged dismissal, saying it was the only sufficient remedy for the government's callous disregard of its constitutional obligations to share any potentially favorable evidence with the defense.

Weksler, who represents Payne, argued that prosecutors repeatedly failed to abide by deadlines for sharing discovery evidence, were dismissive of specific requests for evidence, engaged in a "pattern to ridicule and disparage the defense" requests and then made "brazen proffers" to the court that specific information didn't exist, only to find out later that they were mistaken.

"The fact that the government sought to ask a jury to convict these defendants and then ask this Court to sentence them to prison for the rest of their lives without giving the defense the information recently disclosed should more than trouble this Court,'' Weksler wrote in a recently unsealed motion to dismiss.

Prosecutors countered that any failure to provide evidence was "inadvertent'' or because they reasonably believed the law didn't require them to share the material. They sought a new trial, arguing that they "neither flagrantly violated nor recklessly disregarded" their evidence obligations, but believed the material they failed to share in a timely manner wasn't relevant for the defendants' defense.
Myhre, who until last week served as Nevada's acting U.S. attorney but is back in his earlier role as first assistant U.S. attorney, wrote in a court brief that he and his colleagues believed the court's restrictions barring self-defense arguments during earlier standoff trials this year meant his team didn't have to share information about certain aspects of the law enforcement response.
Prosecutors and the lead FBI agents in the case quietly sat listening to the judge's ruling Monday. They did not make any statements in court or afterwards.

The government may appeal the dismissal. The prosecution team in recent weeks added a new assistant U.S. attorney, Elizabeth White, the chief appellate lawyer in the Nevada U.S. attorney's office. Attorney General Jeff Sessions also sent an evidence discovery expert to the federal prosecutors' office in Las Vegas after the mistrial to review the case.

"We respect the Court's ruling and will make a determination about the next appropriate steps,'' said Nevada's interim U.S. Attorney Dayle Elieson, in a released statement.

Co-defendants convicted during two prior Bunkerville standoff trials are likely to seek the dismissal of their cases through appeals, arguing that they went to trial without the evidence that came out piecemeal during the last trial.

The judge, however, ruled this month, that the defendants still awaiting trial - Melvin Bundy, Dave Bundy, Jason Woods and Joseph O'Shaughnessy could not join the motion to dismiss by Cliven Bundy and his sons because they failed to demonstrate how the prosecutions' violations in this last trial harmed their rights, as deadlines for the governments' sharing of evidence hasn't expired yet for their cases. The judge also Monday ruled that the double jeopardy clause does not bar a new trial.



The subject video covers a few of the lies used to convince us in the U.S. to support wars. Those of us who lost a loved one or friend in these wars, should be angry with our government masters. In the interest of power and money, they have conspired through lies, to involve us militarily in various wars around the world. These wars have cost the lives of thousands of American service personnel and, over the years, millions in foreign countries. Now, today, we are witnessing the disruption of the lives of more millions in Africa and the middle east. This has led to an uncontrollable migration to Europe, Canada and the U.S.

Keep this in mind when they ask you to send your money and children to the next war.

Bruce                                                     New World Order News





Ironically, the recount of the 2016 Presidential election, initiated by 3rd party candidate Jill Stein, started this. Recounts in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada and other places showed massive voter fraud. Indeed, the Michigan recount had to be stopped as more than 50% of the votes in Detroit could not be confirmed. The entire status of the vote in Michigan was in danger of being invalidated. Other recounts in California showed millions of votes were cast by people ineligible to vote.

After his inauguration, President Trump formed a commission to investigate voter fraud. So what happened? You guessed it. Nothing! Yesterday, President Trump disbanded the commission. Many of the States refused to cooperate and filed law suits. After all, if some of our government masters are the beneficiaries of vote fraud, we can't expect them to expose this.

So here we are --- again. Our election system has become a sick joke. It is so bad that the U.S. has refused to open the elections to international oversight. Many 3rd world countries are now operating more honest elections that ours. Wonder how John McCain kept getting reelected? How about over 90 % of Congress with a 9% approval rating? Now you know. No need for any investigations here.

Bruce                               New World Order News


President Donald Trump has signed an order to collapse his Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity.
The Trump administration had faced opposition or limited cooperation from most states, when the commission controversially requested voter information, such as Social Security numbers and addresses.

In a statement, the White House said, “Despite substantial evidence of voter fraud, many states have refused to provide the Presidential Advisory
Commission on Election Integrity with basic information relevant to its inquiry. Rather than engage in endless legal battles at taxpayer expense, today I signed an executive order to dissolve the Commission, and have asked the Department of Homeland Security to review these issues and determine next courses of action.”

After announcing that he was dissolving the committee, Trump tweeted on Thursday morning that the “system is rigged, must go to Voter ID,” adding that it was “mostly Democratic states” that refused to share voter data because “they know that many people are voting illegally.”

Many mostly Democrat States refused to hand over data from the 2016 Election to the Commission On Voter Fraud. They fought hard that the Commission not see their records or methods because they know that many people are voting illegally. System is rigged, must go to Voter I.D.

Only Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Ohio and Washington State had complied with all of the commission's requests. California, Kentucky, Maine, Minnesota, New Mexico and South Carolina had all signaled their unwillingness to cooperate.

EPIC, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, has declared victory in the commission's demise. The non-profit, which was the first to sue the Trump administration over the issue, noted that it has a pending Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the US Department of Homeland Security “for records concerning the federal government's collection of personal data on voters.”

Late last month, a US appeals court gave the Trump voter fraud commission a minor victory, dismissing EPIC's lawsuit claiming the commission violated federal privacy protection requirements of the 2002 E-Government Act.
In January 2017, one week into Trump's presidency, Trump tweeted that at least 3 million illegal votes had been cast in the 2016 election, citing an unverified claim by the app VoteStand.
The commission had been expected to release a report in 2019. Its vice chair, Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, recently told Fox News that there have been 938 voter fraud convictions since 2000, which he called just the “tip of the iceberg.”



The subject article covers a plan from the Israeli government to remove illegal immigrants of African origin from Israel. The government will pay them $3500 to leave or face arrest and imprisonment.

Of course the government denies any racism in their policy, but others of African descent, who are legally residing in Israel, disagree. Thousands of African Jews from Ethiopia and Sudan have been complaining of racial discrimination for years. Opportunities for jobs and housing have been curtailed or denied to them. I have included a link for another article covering this.

It's hypocritical that this government's claim for legitimacy is based in the claim of racism against Jews, but after they have been given land to form a country, they themselves create an apartheid state backed up by military power funded and provided from the U.S. and Europe. Isn't it amazing that there is no end to the whining about the Confederate flag and slavery in the U.S. 170 years ago from our leftist friends, but these same people are totally silent about the racism that exists in Israel and other places today.

Bruce                                          New World Order News

Israel said it would pay thousands of African migrants living illegally in the country to leave, threatening them with jail if they are caught after the end of March.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in public remarks at a cabinet meeting on the payment programme, called the migrants' presence a threat to Israel's social fabric and Jewish character, and one government minister has referred to them as 'a cancer'.

Some 60,000 have crossed into Israel from nations such as Eritrea and Sudan, many fleeing war and persecution as well as economic hardship. 
The plan launched this week offers African migrants a $3,500 payment from the Israeli government and a free air ticket to return home or go to 'third countries', which rights groups identified as Rwanda and Uganda.

[Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in public remarks at a cabinet meeting on the payment programme, called the migrants´ presence a threat to Israel´s social fabric and Jewish character, and one government minister has referred to them as 'a cancer' ]

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in public remarks at a cabinet meeting on the payment programme, called the migrants´ presence a threat to Israel´s social fabric and Jewish character, and one government minister has referred to them as 'a cancer' 
Netanyahu: 'The mission is to deport those illegal infiltrators'

Netanyahu said: 'We have expelled about 20,000 and now the mission is to get the rest out.'
An immigration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said there are some 38,000 migrants living illegally in Israel, and some 1,420 are being held in two detention centres. 

'Beyond the end of March, those who leave voluntarily will receive a significantly smaller payment that will shrink even more with time, and enforcement measures will begin,' the official said, referring to incarceration.
Some have lived for years in Israel and work in low-paying jobs that many Israelis shun. 

Israel has granted asylum to fewer than one percent of those who have applied and has a years-long backlog of applicants.
Rights groups have accused Israel of being slow to process African migrants' asylum requests as a matter of policy and denying legitimate claims to the status.

[Children from South Sudan hold their hands up against a bus window where an Israeli aid worker had written 'I Love U' on the window as dozens of South Sudanese migrants from the Tel Aviv area are deported from Israel, 17 June 2012]

Children from South Sudan hold their hands up against a bus window where an Israeli aid worker had written 'I Love U' on the window as dozens of South Sudanese migrants from the Tel Aviv area are deported from Israel, 17 June 2012
[A refugee from the Sudan peers through the bars of his prison cell at Maasiyahu Prison, in Ramle, Israel, Sunday, May 28, 2006]

A refugee from the Sudan peers through the bars of his prison cell at Maasiyahu Prison, in Ramle, Israel, Sunday, May 28, 2006
Teklit Michael, a 29-asylum seeker from Eritrea living in Tel Aviv, said in response to the Israeli plan that paying money to other governments to take in Africans was akin to 'human trafficking and smuggling'.

'We don't know what is waiting for us (in Rwanda and Uganda),' he told Reuters by telephone. 'They prefer now to stay in prison (in Israel) instead.'
In his remarks, Netanyahu cited the large presence of African migrants in Tel Aviv's poorer neighbourhoods, where he said 'veteran residents' - a reference to Israelis - no longer feel safe.

'So today, we are keeping our promise to restore calm, a sense of personal security and law and order to the residents of south Tel Aviv and those in many other neighbourhoods,' he said.



The subject article covers the latest Tweet from President Trump. In the Tweet he refers to the Justice Department as controlled by the “Deep State”. Well, I am sure he didn't just figure that out today. I'm also not totally sure that he himself is not controlled by the deep state.

Anyway, he wondered why Huma Abedin hasn't been indicted? Lets' go further. Most of America is wondering why the Clinton's haven't been indicted? We wonder why no high ranking bankers have been indicted? We wonder why no one was indicted after the controlled demolition of the 3 buildings in the World Trade Center? We are wondering why so few elected officials are indicted for corruption? We are wondering why no one in the FBI has been indicted for murdering Randy Weaver's wife or 80+ men, women and children at Waco, or Robert “LaVoy” Finicum  on a snowy road in Oregon?

No, when we look at this criminal government, it is no mystery as to why no one gets indicted for anything. They are crooks and they will always be crooks.

Bruce                           New World Order News

On Saturday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee (R) argued that without a prosecution against Huma Abedin, “we’re all going to lose patience with the attorney general.”
Huckabee said that if Huma Abedin is not prosecuted, “I think we’re all going to lose patience with the attorney general. I love Jeff Sessions. I think he’s a great guy. But he’s got to do the job that he’s there to do, and that’s to universally enforce the law. And when I say universally, without regard to who a person is, if they’re the highest person in the land, or if they are the lowest person in the land.”
Huckabee also cited Lois Lerner, Bruce Ohr, Peter Strzok, and Lisa Page as people who should be held accountable.



When discussing the many false flags perpetrated by elements within our government, I have to remind those who deny the possibility of false flags of the assassination of John Kennedy. It is truly sad that there are so many trolls and apologists that dominate the discussion on the internet on this subject. Polls continually show 80 to 90% of the American people accept the fact that this President was the victim of an organized killing. Yet, a search on Google or other search engines show the vast majority of articles accept the Warren Commission version without exception. It should be noted that even the U.S. Congress found that this assassination was indeed committed by multiple shooters.

So let's just concentrate on one point --- Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone assassin. If Oswald planned to kill Kennedy in Dallas in late November of 1963, how did he know Kennedy would drive by the Texas School Book depository during his shift in good weather at 5 miles per hour, when he applied for the job in early October? Indeed, official records show the final route had not been established until a maximum of a few days before the trip. So Oswald was a mastermind knowing this opportunity would present itself more than a month after he was hired there and he was an idiot in purchasing a carbine rated in NRA “poor” condition using bolt action.

I point this out as validation for all of the other stuff. Those of us who distrust everything coming from government spokesmen refer to the continual lies and coverup in a crime committed almost 55 years ago. So, if they'll kill the President of the United States and then use future generations to help in the coverup, they are absolutely capable of anything. Don't kid yourselves by thinking “they would never do that”. They would and they have.

Bruce                                       New World Order News

The most important conclusion of the Warren Commission (WC) concerning the assassination of President John F. Kennedy is that Lee Harvey Oswald was at the 6th floor window of the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) and fired three rifle shots at the Presidential motorcade. But this conclusion falls apart completely if Oswald was actually on the second floor just after the shots were fired (he was) or even, perhaps, in the first floor doorway watching the motorcade at the very moment of the assassination.
Where was Oswald when the shots were fired?
The WC never did have hard evidence that Oswald was actually on the 6th floor when the shooting began. No one in the TSBD could place him there around 12:30 when the first shots rang out. Howard L. Brennan, a bystander,  looked up at the 6th floor from across Elm Street and claimed to have seen a man with a rifle at the (half opened) window but he was unable to identify Oswald in a police line-up later that day. If Oswald was in the 6th floor “snipes nest” no one actually saw him there.
The real problems for the WC begin, however, when Oswald was identified outside the 2nd floor employee lunch room approximately 2 minutes after the final shot. He was seen there and stopped for questioning by TSBD supervisor Roy Truly and  Dallas police officer Marion Baker. The officer shoved a pistol in Oswald’s belly and asked the Depository supervisor whether Oswald belonged in the building; he did. By all accounts, Oswald was holding a Coke and appeared calm and non-pulsed by the abrupt appearance of police.
But having Oswald on the 2nd floor so soon after the shooting posed a  problem for the WC. After all, if Oswald was on the 6th floor firing a rifle, did he really have time to hide that rifle between several rows of book boxes at the west end of the Depository; exit the 6th floor and then travel down 4 flights of stairs, to` appear on the 2nd floor where, as noted, he was positively identified?  The WC concluded that all of this activity could be accomplished in the time allotted but critics have always doubted that improbable timeline.
But there is a more serious problem associated with the alleged Oswald decent to the 2nd floor.  Two TSBD employees, Sandra Styles and Vicki Adams, were both at a 4th floor window watching the motorcade. Almost immediately after the last shot (perhaps within 40 seconds according to Ms. Adams) both women left the window, crossed the 4th floor, and then descended the stairwell to the ground floor. Now since the WC assumed that Oswald was descending those very same stairs at roughly the same time, it seems probable that these women would have seen or heard him; they did not.
Moreover Dorothy Garner, another TSBD supervisor, stayed at the 4th floor stairwell exit and watched Styles and Adams descend;  she did not see Oswald on the stairwell either. After a short period of time, she then watched Roy Truly and Officer Baker ascend those same stairs on their way up to the 6th floor. Yet as we have noted, Truly and Baker had already confronted Oswald on the 2nd floor and this confrontation must have occurred prior to Garner’s observations and prior to the stairway decent of Adams and Styles.  Thus, either Oswald descended those stairs well before Styles and Adams (even though they started down two floors lower) or he could not have been on the 6th floor firing at the President.
We know for certain that Oswald was near the 2nd floor lunch room within minutes of the fatal shot. But where was Oswald a minute or two earlier…at the precise moment of the assassination?
The famous Altgens photo (showing the motorcade in the foreground and the TSBD in the background) which was taken simultaneously with a bullet hitting JFK, also shows a man in the front doorway of the TSBD who looks remarkably like Lee Harvey Oswald. Speculation began almost immediately that it was Oswald but the WC concluded, instead, that the man was Billy Lovelady another TSBD employee.  Lovelady testified before the WC that he was in fact the man in the Altgens photo and several other TSBD employees appeared to confirm Lovelady’s story.
But like many other aspects of the WC theory of the assassination, the Billy Lovelady story has almost completely collapsed. Modern photo analysis has all but proven that the man in the doorway is Oswald and not Lovelady (although Lovelady is likely somewhere on the front steps also). The relatively thin face in the enhanced photo appears to be Oswald’s. The chin looks like Oswald’s as does the hairline. But the clincher is the unique looking shirt that the man in the doorway is wearing. For all intensive purposes, it’s almost like a fingerprint.
There are many films and photographs of Lee Harvey Oswald in the Dallas police station after his capture that show him wearing a rather strange looking, long sleeve shirt. The shirt has an odd gray weave design, has rather unusual looking lapels and is unbuttoned almost to the waist. Oswald is also wearing a white tee shirt that is exposed above his unbuttoned shirt.
Well, the man in the doorway is dressed in exactly the same manner; there are just no dissimilarities whatever. The long sleeve shirt he is wearing looks identical to Oswald’s: same pattern and weave, same grayish color, similar looking white tee shirt peaking above a shirt that is open almost to the waist. Even the shirt lapels, especially the left lapel, appear to match up precisely with the Oswald shirt in police photos. It is unreasonable to believe that this man in the doorway is none other than Lee Harvey Oswald.
Moreover, aside from physical appearance and dress, the man in the doorway is also standing and assuming a pose much like Oswald does in several police station photos. Lee Oswald had a habit of standing with his arms hanging down close to his body with his left hand reaching across his body to grasp his right arm. The man in the doorway appears to be standing in exactly the same manner as he leans in to watch the motorcade. In conclusion, the face, shirt and posture of the man in the doorway appears to match those of Lee Harvey Oswald. Either this is the world’s most amazing coincidence or “doorway man” is Oswald and, therefore, Oswald could not have been shooting at the President from the 6th floor.
But what about Billy Lovelady? Lovelady may well have been on the steps of the TSBD at the time of the shooting, but his claim to be the man in the doorway is simply not credible. Lovelady’s face is rounder than the man in the doorway and his chin is very different;  he is stockier and heavier than the man in the photo. But the clincher, of course, is the unique shirt and the way it is worn.  Lovelady never had a shirt anything like the doorway man’s shirt; if he did, he never produced it.  Indeed, when asked to produce and be photographed in the shirt that he wore on November 22, 1963, Lovelady appeared in a short sleeve, boldly stripped shirt that had no resemblance whatever to the doorway photo shirt. The Lovelady (self) identification is a hoax.
Lee Harvey Oswald was almost certainly not  the 6th floor shooter but he may well have been a “patsy” (as he claimed) and framed for involvement in the events of November 22, 1963. What that precise involvement was still remains unresolved.



The subject article covers one in thousands of adverse reactions to the flu shot. Reactions range from getting the flu, to Guillain-Barré syndrome, to suspicious deaths. This article covers a healthy individual receiving the flu shot, then shortly thereafter, encountering a number of very serious side effects. She experienced blindness, skin blisters and MS. She may never recover.

Meanwhile, national news reported today that this years flu vaccine was only 10% effective. Knowing how much they lie, I would guess that the flu vaccine is probably 100 % ineffective. Of course, employers all over the nation are blackmailing their employees to get the flu shot or face repercussions.

So, roll up your sleeves and the sleeves of your children and pray you will be lucky.

Bruce                             New World Order News

It was only weeks following a flu shot that Jennifer Whitney says she was diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis. The 34-year-old Mukilteo, Washington resident says she took the vaccine after being pressured by her boss at work. Inevitably, Whitney was terminated from her job due to taking time off to deal with the onset of MS symptoms. Whitney spent ten months unable to see and is no longer able to have children.

She told MailOnline: ‘Some people tell me that I must be imagining it because they believe vaccines are safe, but that’s not the case.

‘I’m not imagining all these symptoms and I’m certainly not imagining how well I used to be. Whether I’ll ever be that well again, I don’t know.’
Whitney was a manager at an optometry business at the time of her MS diagnosis. She says that pressure from her boss forced her hand with getting a flu shot.

‘As the manager, I felt pressurized into setting an example to the other employees,’ she said. ‘My boss encouraged everyone to get it.
‘I didn’t want to cause any arguments, so I went to the pharmacy in my lunch-hour and received my flu shot. Then I went back to work.’

In the days that would follow, Whitney claims she experienced a variety of potential side-effects, including a headache, pain, and dizziness.
‘I just about managed to drive home, but had to call my husband from the car to come and help me,’ Mrs Whitney said.

‘I was so weak, I couldn’t walk, so my husband had to carry me to our apartment. Once inside, he lay me down on the sofa.
‘Little did I know I’d be spending the next few weeks in that exact same spot.’

Doctors told her she had a condition known as benign vertigo. The next day, Whitney was subjected to an MRI at which point she was diagnosed with MS. She was told that her immune system was attacking her brain.

‘I was so shocked,’ she said. ‘I’m a really healthy person and had never been off sick from work.

To have suddenly developed a serious, untreatable and incurable illness practically overnight was hard for me to comprehend.’
The MS medication’s side-effects further complicated her life.

‘My skin broke out in blisters all over my body. I reported this to my neurologist, who called me back in for tests for lupus which is a rare side-effect of Gilenya.’

The events rendered her unable to do her job. She developed severe shaking that made it difficult for her to handle eyeglasses. That’s when she claims she was fired for taking too much time off from her job. She says that she developed burning eyes following her termination.

She also says that she discovered that the vaccine courts pay out the largest settlements to flu shot victims.

Unemployed, she now experiences bouts of blindness in both of her eyes.


Teacher 'was evicted from first class United seat so that airline could give it to US Congresswoman who ''always does it'' and was threatened by staff when she complained'

Yes, our government masters are at it again. The subject article covers Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, the congresswoman from Houston, demanding a first class airline seat belonging to another person. Yes, Ms. Lee is a friend of the poor. She works tirelessly to help the disadvantaged. The sad truth is, the vast majority of our elected representatives see themselves as the “new American royalty”. They live lavish lifestyles at your expense. You can ever talk to them. You can't write them. You can't get any personal response to emails. You will never see them in a local store, restaurant or movie theater. They don't mix with the great unwashed.

So suck it up and bow down. They live by different rules and standards. They do what they want, when they want. Don't get in their way, or something bad could happen.

Bruce                                      New World Order News

A school teacher from Washington, DC is accusing United Airlines of evicting her from her first-class seat and giving it to a Democratic congresswoman
Jean-Marie Simon, 63, was flying home on December 18, having boarded a flight from George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston bound for the capital 
When she boarded the final flight of her trip home on December 18, she was told by the gate attendant that her ticket was not in the system 
Simon was then told that the seat she had purchased, 1A, was taken 
She was compensated with a $500 voucher and another ticket in Economy Plus
Upon boarding the plane, Simon noticed that her seat was taken by Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, the congresswoman from Houston
The airline denies that it gave Jackson Lee preferential treatment, saying that Simon had canceled her ticket 
Simon, who denied the airline's claim that she canceled her ticket, boarded the plane and snapped a photo of Jackson Lee sitting in the seat she had purchased

PUBLISHED: 01:06 EST, 24 December 2017 | UPDATED: 10:17 EST, 24 December 2017

A school teacher from Washington, DC has accused United Airlines of evicting her from her first-class seat and giving it to senior Democratic congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee.

Jean-Marie Simon, 63, was preparing to board her final flight home from George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston on December 18 after an hour-long weather delay when she was told by the gate attendant that her ticket was not in the system.  
When the attendant asked her if she had canceled her ticket, Simon replied: 'No. I just want to go home.' 

Simon, who was on the second leg of her return flight from Guatemala, was then told that the seat she had purchased, 1A, was taken. 
The airline compensated her with a $500 voucher and another ticket for that flight in Economy Plus. 

[Jean-Marie Simon, 63, was flying home on December 18, having boarded a flight in Houston bound for the capital. She said the airline denied her a seat she paid for in first class and instead gave it to Democratic Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (seen in the seat near the window)]

Jean-Marie Simon, 63, was flying home on December 18, having boarded a flight in Houston bound for the capital. She said the airline denied her a seat she paid for in first class and instead gave it to Democratic Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (seen in the seat near the window)

[Simon (above), a school teacher from Washington, DC, says United Airlines evicted her from her first-class seat and gave it to the Democratic congresswoman]

Simon (above), a school teacher from Washington, DC, says United Airlines evicted her from her first-class seat and gave it to the Democratic congresswoman

Upon boarding the plane, Simon noticed that her seat was taken by Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, the congresswoman from Houston.

Simon believes that she was removed from her seat by United in order to accommodate the Congresswoman.
The airline, however, denies this.

'After thoroughly examining our electronic records, we found that upon receiving a notification that Flight 788 was delayed due to weather, the customer appears to have canceled her flight from Houston to Washington, DC within the United mobile app,' United said in a statement.

'As part of the normal pre-boarding process, gate agents began clearing standby and upgrade customers, including the first customer on the waitlist for an upgrade.'

Simon denies the airline's claim that she canceled her ticket and claims United staff threatened to remove her from the flight for complaining and for taking a photo of Lee in her seat. 

The teacher said she has screenshots of her United app that shows a canceled flight to Houston in August during Hurricane Harvey when she was supposed to visit her daughter, according to the Houston Chronicle. 

[Simon believes that she was removed from her seat by United in order to accommodate Lee. The airline, however, denies this]

Simon believes that she was removed from her seat by United in order to accommodate Lee. The airline, however, denies this
United says the screenshot wouldn't show the December 18 flight as canceled because Simon did eventually end up taking the flight.

Simon said that she saw Jackson Lee board with plane with a flight attendant before all of the other passengers but wasn't aware of who she was at the time. 

After she was seated, she was told by another passenger that her original seat was occupied by a congresswoman and that he had seen her do it twice before.

[Simon denied the airline's claim that she canceled her ticket, leading to the mix-up]

Simon denied the airline's claim that she canceled her ticket, leading to the mix-up
Other people on the flight claim they have witnessed the congresswoman carry out similar behavior at least three times before. 

'I've seen Lee and IAH cutting in line and rudely taking advantage of her status before. United knows she will play the race card if she isn't treated like royalty so they just give in. They don't care about a hard working teacher vs a privileged idiot,' one person tweeted.  

Simon said before take off the plane was delayed for nearly an hour due to mechanical problems. During this time Simon said she went to the front of the plane and snapped a picture of Jackson Lee in her seat.

She then told a flight attendant she believed she was bumped from her seat by the airline out of favoritism toward a senior politician.

In a statement on Saturday, Jackson Lee said: 'I asked for nothing exceptional or out of the ordinary and received nothing exceptional or out of the ordinary.' 

Jackson Lee said Simon, who is white, confronted a black flight attendant about the perceived slight. 
The congresswoman suggested that her grievance may have something to do with the fact that she is an African American. 

[Jackson Lee (seen above giving a speech in Washington, DC on September 20) suggested that Simon, who is white, complained to the airline because she and one of the flight attendants are African American women, thus making them easy targets]

Jackson Lee (seen above giving a speech in Washington, DC on September 20) suggested that Simon, who is white, complained to the airline because she and one of the flight attendants are African American women, thus making them easy targets

'Since this was not any fault of mine, the way the individual continued to act appeared to be, upon reflection, because I was an African American woman, seemingly an easy target along with the African American flight attendant who was very, very nice,' Jackson Lee said in the statement.

Simon claims she was told by another passenger that her original seat was occupied by Sheila Jackson Lee and that he had seen her do it twice before.
Other people on the flight claim they have witnessed the congresswoman carry out similar behavior at least three times before.

One person said he had witnessed Lee 'cutting in line and rudely taking advantage of her status before'. He claimed that United knows Lee would play the race card if 'she isn't treated like royalty'.

Reports from back in 1995 when Lee first came to Washington allege that she was routinely chauffeured just one block to work in a government car at the taxpayers' expense, the Standardreports.  
'This saddens me, especially at this time of year given all of the things we have to work on to help people.
'But in the spirit of this season and out of the sincerity of my heart, if it is perceived that I had anything to do with this, I am kind enough to simply say sorry.'  

Simon denied any suggestions she was a racist.

'I had no idea who was in my seat when I complained at the gate that my seat had been given to someone else,' she said.
'There is no way you can see who is in a seat from inside the terminal.' 

Simon said that five minutes after she snapped the photo of Jackson Lee, another flight attendant sat next to her and asked her if she 'was going to be a problem.'

The teacher said she was so distraught by how the airline treated her that after she arrived home she wrote a letter to the CEO, Oscar Munoz, and posted it on social media.

An airline representative contacted her last Saturday morning and repeatedly apologized.

Simon has asked for a formal, written apology.
'It's just impossible to suspend disbelief and swallow that story that I cancelled my flight,' she said said. 

[United Airlines has experienced a number of public relations headaches in the past year related to its customer service. On April 9, Dr David Dao (above) was violently dragged off a flight just before take off in Chicago because the airline needed to make room for crew]

[United Airlines has experienced a number of public relations headaches in the past year related to its customer service. On April 9, Dr David Dao (above) was violently dragged off a flight just before take off in Chicago because the airline needed to make room for crew]

United Airlines has experienced a number of public relations headaches in the past year related to its customer service. On April 9, Dr David Dao (above) was violently dragged off a flight just before take off in Chicago because the airline needed to make room for crew 
Passenger video shows Dao being dragged off United flight

United Airlines has experienced a number of public relations headaches in the past year related to its customer service. 
The most notorious case was that of Dr David Dao.

On April 9, just before a United flight was set to take off from Chicago to Louisville, security personnel forcibly dragged Dao off a plane to make room for United crew members.

Dao refused to give up his seat and was left bloodied by the experience, which was filmed on cellphone video and posted to social media.
The viral backlash was a black eye for United, which apologized. The airline and Dao reached a financial settlement for an undisclosed sum of money.  



The subject article covers 10 things that are now moving out of reach for average people. Actually, the middle class in America has been declining for decades. One of the reasons this has not been apparent, is the entry of women into the work place. In the distant past, men were primarily the sole support of the family. Beginning in the 1960's and increasing through the 1980's, families had both men and women working full time.

This was just a band aid to mask the decline in real wages for average working people. Today, the chickens have come home to roost. Americans are having more and more difficulty buying a new car. Back in the 1960's, the typical automobile loan was for 3 years. Today, it can stretch out to 7 years. Movies, concerts, single family homes and vacations used to be affordable to almost every working person. Today, they are moving into the luxury category.

There may be many reasons for the decline in the living standard of average Americans, but one fact remains. It makes no sense for an employer to pay a high wage to an employee when he can get a foreign worker to do the same work for a low wage.

Bruce                                       New World Order News

Middle class benefits are being revoked in the name of affordability. Because of several factors including stagnant wages, rising costs, and politics, being a member of the American middle class is quickly losing what little prestige it has remaining.

Are you middle class? In its discussion of historical middle class societies, The Economist reports, “Their members are neither rich nor poor but somewhere in-between…’Middle-class’ describes an income category but also a set of attitudes … An essential characteristic is the possession of a reasonable amount of discretionary income. Middle-class people do not live from hand to mouth, job to job, season to season, as the poor do.”

Some argue that the most sensible income amount to attach to the middle class would be the median household income, around $54,000. Perhaps, anyone who earns between the 25th percentile and 75th percentile is a member of the middle class.

Diana Farrell, once Deputy Director of America’s National Economic Council, told The Economist she thinks a middle class income begins at the point where a person (or family) has one-third of their income left over for discretionary purposes after they’ve provided themselves with food and shelter. In other words, someone who earns $3,000 per month would have $1,000 left after they’ve paid their mortgage or rent, utilities, and grocery bills.
Discretionary income is not so easy to find. We’ve created a list of ten things the middle class can no longer really afford. We’re not talking about lavish luxuries, like private jets and yachts. The items on this list are a bit more basic, and some are even necessities.

1. Vacations
A vacation is an extra expense that many middle-earners cannot afford without sacrificing something else. A Statista survey found in 2014, 54% of people gave up purchasing big ticket items like TVs or electronics, so they could go on a vacation. Others made sacrifices like reducing or eliminating their trips to the movies (47%), reducing or eliminating trips out to restaurants (43%), or avoiding purchasing small ticket items like new clothing (43%).
The work environment is so competitive and demanding these days, even workers who receive paid time off often skip vacations. In 2014, Americans failed to use a total of 429 million days of paid leave. In fact, 40% of American workers cite the heavy workload awaiting their return as the top reason for not leaving the office, while 22% don’t want others to see them as “replaceable.” Yet research shows that vacation improves productivity and enhances personal health.

2. New vehicles 
While many consumers take a great deal of pleasure in buying a new vehicle, a report from shows many households are stretching dollars more than they should. Out of the nation’s 25 largest cities, Washington D.C. is the only place where families can truly afford a brand new car, according to a simple calculation. The online consumer finance company used what is known as the 20/4/10 rule to determine affordability. This means people put down at least 20%, finance it for no longer than four years, and not let the total monthly vehicle expense (including principal, interest, and insurance) exceed 10% of gross income.

High price tags don’t necessarily stop Americans from driving new cars. According to Experian, the average loan amount for a new vehicle at the end of 2016 hit $30,621, the highest level on record. The average loan term for a new vehicle is 68 months. Even used vehicle loans have an average duration of 66 months. About a third of all new vehicle transactions are leases — a typical method to purchase more car than you should. Meanwhile, the average monthly payment for new and used cars totaled $506 and $364, respectively.

3. Student loans  
Since student loans are passed out like candy in America, virtually anyone can attend college. However, that debt may prove to be unaffordable in the long term if you overpaid for your degree. While college graduates typically experience lower unemployment rates and higher lifetime earnings than high school graduates, members of the middle class are finding out the hard way that student loans can wreak havoc on budgets.

Over the past decade, total college debt in America has surged 84% to over $1.2 trillion, according to the Federal Reserve. Approximately 40 million consumers have at least one open student loan, with the average balance totaling nearly $30,000 per borrower. More than 11% of college debt is officially at least 90 days past due. However, due to deferment, grace periods, and forbearance, the Federal Reserve admits the true delinquency rate on student loans is roughly twice as high. In comparison, credit cards have a delinquency rate of 8.2%.

4. Emergency savings 
Nearly half of Americans are placing almost nothing aside for the future. According to a survey, 18% of respondents are saving nothing at all, while another 28% are saving no more than 5% of their incomes. Overall, fewer than one in four Americans are saving more than 10% of their incomes, including one in seven who are saving more than 15%. Only 35% of households with annual income between $50,000 and $75,000 are saving more than 10% of their incomes.

A separate report finds a mere 38% of Americans have enough money in their savings or checking accounts to pay for life’s little surprises, such as a $500 car repair or a $1,000 emergency room visit. If a financial emergency arises, 22% plan to cover the bill by reducing spending elsewhere, 16% say they will borrow money from family and friends, and 12% expect credit cards to fill the hole — potentially leading to even bigger problems down the road.

5. Retirement savings 
The golden years aren’t just becoming tarnished, they’re becoming extinct. The National Institute on Retirement Security (NIRS) reveals some of the most depressing stats on retirement available. Out of all working age American households, the median retirement account balance totals only $2,500. Households near retirement age have a median balance of $14,500 — not even enough to replace one year’s worth of expenses for most older adults.
A retirement without some kind of employment is becoming a thing of the past. According to a new report from Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies (TCRS), 20% of all workers expect to continue working as long as possible in their current or similar position until they can’t work any longer, and 41% envision transitioning into retirement by reducing their hours or by working in a different capacity that is less demanding. Only one in five workers plan to immediately stop working and fully retire when they reach a certain age or savings goal.

6. Medical care 
Medical care is a basic necessity and something we’d think would be affordable for someone earning a middle income. A Forbes article published data indicating that workers in large companies — many of whom are members of the middle class — “face nearly $5,000 in premiums, co-payments, deductibles and other forms of co-insurance.”

During the past few years, these costs have had a large impact on working Americans. A report by Feeding America found that a shocking 66% of households say they’ve had to choose between paying for food and paying for medical care — 31% say they have to make that choice each and every month.

7. Dental work 
According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “The U.S. spends about $64 billion each year on oral health care — just 4 percent is paid by Government programs.” About 108 million people in the U.S. have no dental coverage and even those who are covered may have trouble getting the care they need, the department reports.

People will often purchase medical coverage and forgo dental because it’s so expensive. Plus, dental insurance may cover only 50% of the more expensive procedures, like crowns and bridges. This leaves those who have insurance with large co-payments.
In many cases, middle-earners will delay or even forego some of these procedures in efforts to save on costs. According to the CDC, nearly one in four adults between the ages of 20 and 64 have untreated dental issues (like cavities or infections).

8. Skipped paychecks  
You know the situation is dire when even those with decent incomes can’t afford to skip a paycheck. Nearly one-third of households making $75,000 or more a year live paycheck-to-paycheck at least sometimes. A separate report from the Brookings Institution finds that around 38 million American households live hand-to-mouth.

Making ends meet each month has been the top financial priority for three consecutive years, according to Bankrate. In 2014, 41% of Americans are most financially concerned with paying bills, up from 36% in 2013 and 32% in 2012. Staying current or getting caught up on bills is the most common priority across all age groups, but highest among those ages 50-64, when Americans should be concerned with unaccomplished retirement goals instead of the monthly bills. The second most concerning financial priority is paying down debt.

9. Child care 
Kids are expensive. The U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates it costs almost a quarter-million dollars to raise a child to age 18. Housing is the largest component of that estimate, but child care expenses also take up a significant portion and don’t appear to be getting cheaper anytime soon. The WSJ finds child care expenses are rising nearly twice as fast as overall prices, and in 41 states, sending a 4-year-old to full-time preschool exceeds 10% of a median family income. Full-time preschool is more expensive than pubic college tuition in 23 states, and care for an infant costs more than rent in 17 states.

10. Going to the movies 

There’s nothing like seeing your favorite superhero on the big screen with surround sound, but that doesn’t always justify the price of admission. Many people aren’t going to the movie theater as often as they used to, and a big reason is the price. According to a recent report from PricewaterhouseCoopers, rising ticket prices is the biggest reason for movie theater dissatisfaction across all age demographics.

Ignoring the convenience of watching movies at home instead of an auditorium packed with annoying strangers, it’s not hard to see why more Americans are choosing to skip the movie theater for cheaper alternatives. The average movie ticket costs nearly $9. That’s roughly $36 for a family of four before you even get to the overpriced concession stand that’s marked up in order to keep ticket prices lower and the theater in business. By the end of the two-hour outing, a family could easily spend $60. In contrast, $60 buys the middle class six months of Netflix and all the movies and shows their eyes can handle.



Of all the issues to pick a fight with almost every other nation in the world, the “Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel” issue has got to be the dumbest.

Nicky Haley, proving to be one of the worst ambassadors ever, threatened to “take names” before the U.N. vote on rejecting the U.S. position. After the vote, only 7 other nations besides the U.S., and Israel voted on the U. S. side. And those 7 were small 3rd world countries. 128 nations voted against the U.S. position.

I wonder if Israel asks our government masters to go out and jump off a building, would they comply? So stupid!

Bruce                                              New World Order News



I know. Every single time there is a disaster, there seems to be a government connection. I wouldn't believe it if there weren't absolute proof. The subject article and accompanying videos seem to provide that proof.

So the questions come up. Why would anyone do that? Is there anything to gain? Is there some way the video evidence can be dis-proven? All of us have enough problems to deal with without the specter of some black op, deep state, plots to push our nation into anarchy. So I'm going to hold out hope that this is just a coincidence, but judging from past events, this may be wishful thinking.

The train was on its' “inaugural trip” on a brand new line. It has been reported that the train was going 80 miles per hour on a track rated for 30 miles per hour. The latest news reports are starting to blame the engineer saying he was “distracted”. This is where my antenna starts to go up. It always starts with ridiculous explanations that make no sense. The engineer would not push the train to 80 MPH on a 30 MPH track because he was on the train too. I'm sure he wasn't in a hurry to die. Also, he isn't the only one in the engine compartment. Others who work for the railroad also aren't interested in dying. Wouldn't one or more of them tell him to slow down. If he didn't listen, they could pull the emergency switch. Then there is the “coincidence” of the derailment coming right on a bridge over the interstate, where emergency crews were waiting. This was a brand new track that “coincidentally” had no electronic speed governor.

O.K. These are the questions. I am wide open to logical answers that prove this was an unfortunate accident. I want it to be that, but if it's not, we need to know.

Bruce                              New World Order News

At least six people died when an Amtrak train with 78 passengers and five crew members on its inaugural trip on a new line from Seattle to Portland, Oregon, derailed and fell onto traffic from an overpass of Interstate 5 just north of the Washington state capital, Olympia.

All of the surviving passengers were taken to hospitals in Pierce and Thurston Counties, including at least four who sustained severe injuries.
Pierce County sheriff’s Det. Ed Troyer said the train struck several vehicles on Interstate 5 but nobody in the vehicles died.

A U.S. official told the Associated Press preliminary signs indicate the train may have struck something before going off the tracks.

Comment by owr 23 hours ago
Betcha the train struck some cemented tracks. Some sources are saying ANTIFA had a hand in mixing some cement that day, in that location. FEMA appears to have been wanting in on the excitement as they are reported to have been conducting a drill in the same area that day. It makes me want to go hummm.
Whoa... the thot plickens??
Comment by truth on Tuesday

Video: Mass Casualty Drill Conducted The Same Time And Place Of Amtrak Derailment
In yet another striking example of a pre-planned training drill being conducted at the exact same time as a real disaster or terror attack, DuPont Mayor Mike Courts has confirmed that a “mass casualty” drill was underway near the area of the horrific Amtrak train derailment that killed at least 3 people and left roughly 100 more injured.

That’s right, multiple agencies, as well as at least three mass casualty emergency vehicles, were already in the area “training” for a disaster when a real one apparently hit which has obviously raised a plethora of questions, especially when you consider past terrorists strikes that also had training drills seemingly go live.

As Infowars noted, “While the details of the train derailment in Olympia, Washington continue to come out, one particular fact is raising questions. There was a mass casualty event drill being staged at the exact time and place of the accident.”

The shocking revelation that authorities were “prepared” for the train derailment was initially revealed by a local ABC News reporter who directly confirmed that the mayor himself was in the area before the “accident” even happened.

“The mayor tells me, ironically today they were doing training for a mass casualty incident and that he was here, along with many other agencies, planning their day when this situation happened,” the reporter said.

The ABC report then went on to once again confirm that city officials were indeed carrying out a



It looks like the Congress will be passing another “tax reform” bill this week. Although there are various views on whether or not the average American will see a tax cut, it can be argued that our government masters would not be enacting “tax reform” unless they would be getting more money. Of course, we can count on tens of thousands of pages in the “tax reform” bill. Then we can count on billions of dollars in taxpayer expense researching, complying and opposing how these “reforms” are being applied.

Maybe by now you are seeing what I am referring to in the headline. How about a very simple tax plan? How about a one page tax form that can be submitted without any accountants, without any danger of audits, without thousands of IRS employees and thousands of bookkeepers and accountants employed by businesses? According to our subject article, published by, the savings to business and individuals would be $409,000,000,000.00. Now that's a tax cut! The best part of it is the U.S. Treasury wouldn't give up 1 cent.

In the past those running for office have promised to do just that. Donald Trump, during the campaign, promised just that. So why don't they do it? It's the same answer for everything they do. They are amoral swine, more interested in exercising power and control over us, than giving us any benefit. So it will never happen ---not with this bunch. Meanwhile, prepare for another tax screw job. Also, live in terror that you will be audited. Even if you win a case against the IRS, the legal fees will break you. Now you understand.

Bruce                                       New World Order News

Key Findings:
The growing complexity of the U.S. tax code has led to large compliance costs for households and businesses.
Using data from the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, it is possible to estimate the total cost of tax compliance on the U.S. economy.

Americans will spend more than 8.9 billion hours complying with IRS tax filing requirements in 2016.
All in all, tax compliance will cost the U.S. economy $409 billion this year.


There are many reasons to reform the U.S. tax code. The United States has a high marginal corporate tax rate, a poorly defined tax base, and an out-of-date international tax system. However, one often overlooked issue in tax reform is complexity. For decades, the tax code has become more and more detailed, with thousands of additional pages of statutes, regulations, and case law. This added complexity imposes a real cost on the U.S. economy. Tackling the cost of tax complexity to our nation’s economy should be a priority for lawmakers.

The Expanding Size of the Tax Code

Over the last century, the federal tax code has expanded dramatically in size and scope. In 1955, the Internal Revenue Code stood at 409,000 words. Since then, it has grown to a total of 2.4 million words: almost six times as long as it was in 1955 and almost twice as long as in 1985.

However, the tax statutes passed by Congress are only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to tax complexity. There are roughly 7.7 million words of tax regulations, promulgated by the IRS over the last century, which clarify how the U.S. tax statutes work in practice. On top of that, there are almost 60,000 pages of tax-related case law, which are indispensable for accountants and tax lawyers trying to figure out how much their clients actually owe.

It Takes America 8.9 Billion Hours to Comply with IRS Paperwork.

Tax complexity creates real costs for American households and businesses, starting with just the time it takes us to comply with the tax code.

According to the latest estimates from the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Americans will spend more than 8.9 billion hours complying with IRS tax filing requirements in 2016.[1] This is equal to nearly 4.3 million full-time workers doing nothing but tax return paperwork. The majority of the 8.9 billion hours will be spent complying with U.S. business (2.8 billion hours) and individual income (2.6 billion hours) tax returns (Table 1, below).

It wasn’t long ago that official estimates put the annual IRS paperwork burden at 6.1 billion hours.[2]However, the IRS recently revised its estimate of the hours required to comply with business tax returns from 363 million to 2.8 billion,[3] which increased the total time estimate by nearly 50 percent.
The Tax Complexity Will Cost the U.S. Economy $409 Billion This Year.

The time it takes to comply with the tax code imposes a real cost on the economy. Individuals and businesses need to devote resources to complying with the tax code instead of doing other productive activities. For example, a business owner who needs to file a complex tax return each year may hire an accountant or tax lawyer to do it. This tax professional may cost $70,000 a year or more. This is $70,000 that this business owner cannot devote to purchasing equipment or hiring workers. Economists refer to this as an opportunity cost, and it results in lost productivity.

Put in dollar terms, the 8.9 billion hours needed to comply with the tax code computes to $409 billion each year in lost productivity, or greater than the gross product of 36 states (Table 1).[4]

Table 1. Estimate Hourly and Compliance Costs of IRS Paperwork in 2016

Form/Title of Top 50 Most-Costly Code Provisions Total Annual Hours Burden Total Annual Cost In Dollars
Source: and author calculations based on BLS December 2015 estimate of hourly compensation costs. (1) For large business forms and complex forms such as estates, we used an hourly compensation cost of $52.05 for professional and related workers. For all other forms, we used $37.28, the average compensation for all full-time private sector workers,

U.S. Business Income Tax Returns (1) 2,832,500,000 $147,431,625,000
U.S. Individual Income Tax Returns 2,647,000,000 $98,680,160,000
Income Tax Returns for an S Corporation (1) 889,393,518 $46,292,932,612
Form 4562–Depreciation and Amortization (1) 448,368,447 $23,337,577,666
Employer’s Quarterly Federal Tax Return (1 388,256,964 $20,208,774,976
Income Tax Returns for Estates and Trusts (1) 375,796,476 $19,560,206,576
Form 940, FUTA Tax Return (1) 105,295,370 $5,480,624,009
Form 4797–Sales of Business Property (1) 100,633,248 $5,237,960,558
Schedule C: Profit and Loss from Business 71,701,693 $2,673,039,115
Form 1099-INT, Interest Income 63,059,438 $2,350,855,849
Proceeds from Broker and Barter Exchange Transactions (1) 49,396,988 $2,571,113,225
IRA Contribution Information 48,731,780 $1,816,720,758
Short Form Return of Exempt Organizations 43,656,636 $1,627,519,390
TD 8864 Taxation of Fringe Benefits (1) 37,922,688 $1,973,875,910
Distributions from Pensions, Annuities, IRAs 37,519,860 $1,398,740,381
Form 8941 – Credit for Small Employer Health Insurance Premiums 34,278,346 $1,277,896,739
Form 1099-DIV–Dividends and Distributions 34,115,874 $1,271,839,783
26 CFR 31.6001-1 Records in general; 26 CFR 31.6001-2 Additional Records under FICA 30,273,950 $1,128,612,856
Heavy Highway Vehicle Use Tax Return 27,120,040 $1,011,035,091
Foreign Tax Credit (Individual, Estate, or Trust) 25,066,693 $934,486,315
W-8 BEN, W-8BEN-E, W-8EIC, W-8EXP, W-8IMY, W-8 MOU Program 25,003,304 $932,123,173
Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax Under Section 501(c), 527, or 4947(a)(1) 24,951,529 $930,193,001
1099-G Certain Government Payments 24,709,380 $921,165,686
1099-Miscellaneous Income 24,639,062 $918,544,231
Form 8948, Preparer Explanation for Not Filing Electronically 18,270,900 $681,139,152
Paid Preparer’s Earned Income Credit Checklist (Form 8867) 17,824,793 $664,508,283
Reg-111583-07(TD 9405)(Final) — Employment Tax Adjustments; REG-130074-11 – Rules Relating to Additional Medicare Tax 16,900,000 $630,032,000
Employer’s Annual Employment Tax Return 15,702,300 $585,381,744
Split-Interest Trust Information Return 15,152,550 $564,887,064
Form 2678 – Employer/Payer Appointment of Agent 13,731,200 $511,899,136
REG-113572-99 (Final) Qualified Transportation Fringe Benefits 12,968,728 $483,474,180
Form 990-PF 11,054,637 $412,116,867
Employer’s Annual Tax Return for Agricultural Employees 10,880,812 $405,636,671
Form 3800, General Business Credit 8,345,000 $311,101,600
Mortgage Interest Statement 8,038,699 $299,682,699
Profit or Loss From Farming 7,845,596 $292,483,819
Form 8282, Donee Information Return; Form 8283, Noncash Charitable Contributions 7,806,097 $291,011,296
Domestic Production Activities Deduction 7,398,000 $275,797,440
Form 5300, Application for Determination for Employee Benefit Plan 7,201,200 $268,460,736
Annual Return of One-Participant (Owners and Their Spouses) Retirement Plan 7,005,000 $261,146,400
Form 8825–Rental Real Estate Income and Expenses of a Partnership or an S Corporation 6,288,600 $234,439,008
Publication 1345, Handbook for Authorized IRS e-file Providers 6,023,762 $224,565,847
Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return 5,262,319 $196,179,252
Application for Determination for Adopters of Master or Prototype or Volume Submitter Plans 5,139,000 $191,581,920
Tuition Payments Statement 4,848,090 $180,736,795
Quarterly Federal Excise Tax Return 4,478,956 $166,975,480
Form 8957 – Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) 4,446,476 $165,764,625
Form W-2G–Certain Gambling Winnings 4,304,877 $160,485,815
Information Return of U.S. Persons With Respect To Certain Foreign Corporations 4,280,244 $159,567,496
All remaining IRS regulations (1) 285,801,030 $10,654,662,398
IRS Total 8,906,390,150 $409,241,340,626

The cost of complying with U.S. business income taxes accounts for 36 percent of the total cost of the entire tax code, at $147 billion. Complying with the individual income tax costs another $99 billion annually.

Many businesses choose to become S corporations in order to avoid the second layer of tax that is applied to traditional C corporations. This, too, apparently comes with a high compliance cost. The compliance costs for America’s 4 million S corporations now total more than $46 billion annually, nearly $12,000 per firm.

The estate and gift tax, which will only collect approximately $20 billion in federal revenues this year, has a compliance cost of $19.6 billion.

Time is precious, and Americans should not be forced to waste it complying with IRS tax forms. On other occasions, the Tax Foundation has used macroeconomic modeling to show that a well-designed tax reform plan can improve economic growth, boost wages, and encourage new investment throughout the economy. However, the Tax Foundation’s model results generally do not factor in how much time Americans will save complying with a simpler tax code.

The latest official estimates of the eye-popping amount of time and money that Americans lose each year in complying with IRS paperwork—8.9 billion hours and $409 billion in lost productivity—indicate that the most important benefit of tax simplification may be the gift of time.


BREAKING: 3 People Arrested For Allowing Massive Voter Fraud In Alabama

I turned on my TV to see the coverage of this breaking story. Guess what? Nothing there. No, the mediawhores can't be bothered with such a minor story as election fraud in a U.S. Senate election. Nothing to see here. Just move along.

The story covers the fraudulent registration of 3,000 people for the expressed purpose of voting for the Democrat candidate, Doug Jones. Is there anyone out there who thinks that these are all the fraudulent votes? We have already covered the registration of convicted felons in order to vote in this election. I'm sure some of these felons appeared before Judge Moore. Then there was the miraculous landslide in absentee ballots in favor of Jones. Then there were the military ballots which still haven't been counted. No, nothing to see here. Next time there is a vote, just stay home. Maybe if no one shows up, our “elected government” will be exposed for what it is.

Bruce                          New World Order News

The Daily Presser is reporting 3 women have been arrested for allowing thousands of invalid votes to register for Democrat Doug Jones.

From (Link:

Alabama State Police have arrested three women in Birmingham for allowing more than 3000 invalid votes for Doug Jones to processed through the polling station they had volunteered to operate. The State Attorney’s Division of Integrity in Elections is calling the acts of the women a “blatant disregard for the duties of civil servants, a violation of the public trust and a 2nd-degree felony.”

Wanda Werkmeister, Olivia Pertuiary, and Maureen Brown will all face charges of conspiracy to contribute to widespread voter fraud and violation of the public trust, both punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a million dollars in fines.




The subject article is more than 4 years old, but believe me, it hasn't gotten any better. It contains 20 examples of absurd courses offered at various universities throughout this nation. After you read it, you will understand why we constantly see college educated and deg-reed individuals that come off as morons.

The worst part of all of this is that billions of taxpayer dollars are being flushed down this “educational toilet”. No, it's not everyone, but it shouldn't be anyone. In a nation where there is an outstanding student debt of over a trillion dollars, we absolutely don't have any room to spend money on “Lady Gaga and the Sociology of Fame”  , “Invented Languages: Klingon and Beyond” and “Arguing with Judge Judy”. Maybe this partially explains why, when we access an individual at a call center, we get someone in a foreign country.

I have said in the past there are many reasons why an empire collapses. This is one more. It is sad that, we in America, no longer have any say in the governing ( or non governing) of our nation.

Bruce                                 New World Order News

Would you like to know what America’s young people are actually learning while they are away at college?  It isn’t pretty.  Yes, there are some very highly technical fields where students are being taught some very important skills, but for the most part U.S. college students are learning very little that they will actually use out in the real world when they graduate.  Some of the college courses listed below are funny, others are truly bizarre, others are just plain outrageous, but all of them are a waste of money.  If we are going to continue to have a system where we insist that our young people invest several years of their lives and tens of thousands of dollars getting a “college education”, they might as well be learning some useful skills in the process.  This is especially true considering how much student loan debt many of our young people are piling up.  Sadly, the truth is that right now college education in the United States is a total joke.  I know – I spent eight years in the system.  Most college courses are so easy that they could be passed by the family dog, and many of these courses “study” some of the most absurd things imaginable.

Listed below are 20 completely ridiculous college courses being offered at U.S. universities.  The description following each course title either comes directly from the official course description or from a news story about the course…

1. “What If Harry Potter Is Real?” (Appalachian State University) – This course will engage students with questions about the very nature of history. Who decides what history is? Who decides how it is used or mis-used? How does this use or misuse affect us? How can the historical imagination inform literature and fantasy? How can fantasy reshape how we look at history? The Harry Potter novels and films are fertile ground for exploring all of these deeper questions. By looking at the actual geography of the novels, real and imagined historical events portrayed in the novels, the reactions of scholars in all the social sciences to the novels, and the world-wide frenzy inspired by them, students will examine issues of race, class, gender, time, place, the uses of space and movement, the role of multiculturalism in history as well as how to read a novel and how to read scholarly essays to get the most out of them.

2. “God, Sex, Chocolate: Desire and the Spiritual Path” (UC San Diego) – Who shapes our desire? Who suffers for it? Do we control our desire or does desire control us? When we yield to desire, do we become more fully ourselves or must we deny it to find an authentic identity beneath? How have religious & philosophical approaches dealt with the problem of desire?

3. “GaGa for Gaga: Sex, Gender, and Identity” (The University Of Virginia) – In Graduate Arts & Sciences student Christa Romanosky’s ongoing ENWR 1510 class, “GaGa for Gaga: Sex, Gender, and Identity,” students analyze how the musician pushes social boundaries with her work. For this introductory course to argumentative essay writing, Romanosky chose the Lady Gaga theme to establish an engaging framework for critical analysis.

4. “Lady Gaga and the Sociology of Fame” (The University Of South Carolina) – Lady Gaga may not have much class but now there is a class on her. The University of South Carolina is offering a class called Lady Gaga and the Sociology of Fame.  Mathieu Deflem, the professor teaching the course describes it as aiming to “unravel some of the sociologically relevant dimensions of the fame of Lady Gaga with respect to her music, videos, fashion, and other artistic endeavours.”

5. “Philosophy And Star Trek” (Georgetown) – Star Trek is very philosophical. What better way, then, to learn philosophy, than to watch Star Trek, read philosophy, and hash it all out in class? That’s the plan. This course is basically an introduction to certain topics in metaphysics and epistemology philosophy, centered around major philosophical questions that come up again and again in Star Trek. In conjunction with watching Star Trek, we will read excerpts from the writings of great philosophers, extract key concepts and arguments and then analyze those arguments.
6. “Invented Languages: Klingon and Beyond” (The University Of Texas) – Why would anyone want to learn Klingon?
7. “The Science Of Superheroes” (UC Irvine) – Have you ever wondered if Superman could really bend steel bars? Would a “gamma ray” accident turn you into the Hulk? What is a “spidey-sense”? And just who did think of all these superheroes and their powers? In this seminar, we discuss the science (or lack of science) behind many of the most famous superheroes. Even more amazing, we will discuss what kind of superheroes might be imagined using our current scientific understanding.

8. “Learning From YouTube” (Pitzer College) – About 35 students meet in a classroom but work mostly online, where they view YouTube content and post their comments.  Class lessons also are posted and students are encouraged to post videos. One class member, for instance, posted a 1:36-minute video of himself juggling.

9. “Arguing with Judge Judy” (UC Berkeley) – TV “Judge” shows have become extremely popular in the last 3-5 years. A fascinating aspect of these shows from a rhetorical point of view is the number of arguments made by the litigants that are utterly illogical, or perversions of standard logic, and yet are used over and over again. For example, when asked “Did you hit the plaintiff?” respondents often say, “If I woulda hit him, he’d be dead!” This reply avoids answering “yes” or “no” by presenting a perverted form of the logical strategy called “a fortiori” argument [“from the stronger”] in Latin. The seminar will be concerned with identifying such apparently popular logical fallacies on “Judge Judy” and “The People’s Court” and discussing why such strategies are so widespread. It is NOT a course about law or “legal reasoning.” Students who are interested in logic, argument, TV, and American popular culture will probably be interested in this course. I emphasize that it is NOT about the application of law or the operations of the court system in general.

10. “Elvis As Anthology” (The University Of Iowa) – The class, “Elvis as Anthology,” focuses on Presley’s relationship to African American history, social change, and aesthetics. It focuses not just on Elvis, but on other artists who inspired him and whom he inspired.

11. “The Feminist Critique Of Christianity” (The University Of Pennsylvania) – An overview of the past decades of feminist scholarship about Christian and post-Christian historians and theologians who offer a feminist perspective on traditional Christian theology and practice. This course is a critical overview of this material, presented with a summary of Christian biblical studies, history and theology, and with a special interest in constructive attempts at creating a spiritual tradition with women’s experience at the center.

12. “Zombies In Popular Media” (Columbia College) – This course explores the history, significance, and representation of the zombie as a figure in horror and fantasy texts. Instruction follows an intense schedule, using critical theory and source media (literature, comics, and films) to spur discussion and exploration of the figure’s many incarnations. Daily assignments focus on reflection and commentary, while final projects foster thoughtful connections between student disciplines and the figure of the zombie.

13. “Far Side Entomology” (Oregon State) – For the last 20 years, a scientist at Oregon State University has used Gary Larson’s cartoons as a teaching tool. The result has been a generation of students learning — and laughing — about insects.

14. “Interrogating Gender: Centuries of Dramatic Cross-Dressing” (Swarthmore) – Do clothes make the man? Or the woman? Do men make better women? Or women better men? Is gender a costume we put on and take off? Are we really all always in drag? Does gender-bending lead to transcendence or chaos? These questions and their ramifications for liminalities of race, nationality and sexuality will be our focus in a course that examines dramatic works from The Bacchae to M. Butterfly.

15. “Oh, Look, a Chicken!” Embracing Distraction as a Way of Knowing (Belmont University) – Students must write papers using their personal research on the five senses. Entsminger reads aloud illustrated books The Simple People and Toby’s Toe to teach lessons about what to value by being alive. Students listen to music while doodling in class. Another project requires students to put themselves in situations where they will be distracted and write a reflection tracking how they got back to their original intent.

16. “The Textual Appeal of Tupac Shakur” (University of Washington) – The UW is not the first college with a class dedicated to Shakur — classes on the rapper have been offered at the University of California Berkeley and Harvard — but it is the first to relate Shakur’s work to literature.

17. “Cyberporn And Society” (State University of New York at Buffalo) – With classwork like this, who needs to play? Undergraduates taking Cyberporn and Society at the State University of New York at Buffalo survey Internet porn sites.

18. “Sport For The Spectator” (The Ohio State University) – Develop an appreciation of sport as a spectacle, social event, recreational pursuit, business, and entertainment. Develop the ability to identify issues that affect the sport and spectator behavior.

19. “Getting Dressed” (Princeton) – Jenna Weissman Joselit looks over the roomful of freshmen in front of her and asks them to perform a warm-up exercise: Chart the major moments of your lives through clothes. “If you pop open your closet, can you recall your lives?” she posits on the first day of the freshman seminar “Getting Dressed.”

20. “How To Watch Television” (Montclair) – This course, open to both broadcasting majors and non-majors, is about analyzing television in the ways and to the extent to which it needs to be understood by its audience. The aim is for students to critically evaluate the role and impact of television in their lives as well as in the life of the culture. The means to achieve this aim is an approach that combines media theory and criticism with media education.
Are you starting to understand why our college graduates can’t function effectively when they graduate and go out into the real world?

All of this would be completely hilarious if not for the fact that we have millions of young people going into enormous amounts of debt to pay to go to these colleges.

In America today, college education has become a giant money making scam.  We have a system that absolutely throws money at our young people, but we never warn them about the consequences of all of these loans.  The following is an excerpt from an email that one reader sent me recently about the student loan industry…

For example, one woman told me that her and her husband sat down and thought of every possible expense they could when they were applying for parent/student loan for their daughter. When the approval came back, they were approved for 7k more than they asked for…how about ****! Of course at 7%, why not! Funny thing is they kept the 7k, because she’s in wealth management and said she could “easily” get more than 7% in the stock market……awesome! I have another example of a younger friend of mine who graduated law school from Vanderbilt with 210k in student loans. I asked if tuition was that much there. She said kind of, but they kept offering more than the actual tuition, so she took it and used it for a better lifestyle. Now 20% of her income goes to pay those loans, and it’s still not enough to touch one dollar of the principal…so all she is doing is paying interest, and building on principal…like a revers amortizing mortgage. To make it worse, she was able to save 25k, so she is going to buy a house somehow. Having explained to her that the best investment in the world is to pay off a high interest loan, she said I’m tired of waiting to have a life.

In a recent article entitled “The Student Loan Delinquency Rate In The United States Has Hit A Brand New Record High” I detailed how nightmarish our student loan debt bubble is becoming.  According to the Federal Reserve, the total amount of student loan debt has risen by 275 percent since 2003, and it just continues to soar.

A college education can be a wonderful thing, but right now we have got a system that is deeply, deeply broken.



Oh, they're busy, busy, busy. I have posted one article and 3 headlines concerning our government masters blood lust to start a nuclear war. The first is an incident in Syria. According to both Russian and U.S. sources U.S. F 22's had to deploy flares to “shoo away” Russian jets flying too close to the U.S. imposed deconfliction zone. O.K., let's go over this again. Syria is not a U.S. State. We have no business there. Our presence is actually an act of war against a nation who poses no threat whatsoever to U.S. security. On the other hand, Russia was invited by the recognized government of Syria to provide military assistance to rid their nation of terrorists. This has been successful. Ask yourself this: Would you risk the life and health of your son, daughter, husband, wife or other loved one to fight in Syria?

The second headline concerns a proposal by the U.S. to join Taiwan in military exercises in the South China Sea. China has already expressed their determination to oppose this, possibly militarily. Again, there is nothing to gain and a lot to lose.

The third headline concerns a threat on the part of the Trump administration to enact a blockade against North Korea. Of course this an act of war, but that is apparently what they want. Yes, North Korea is testing all sorts of weapons. There are scores of nations testing weapons, including ours. North Korea now possesses nuclear weapons. So do Russia, China, Israel, India, Pakistan, France, England and us. If that is an excuse to start a war, do we plan to attack those countries as well? I'm wondering how long we can continue these policies before we do get into this world war? You won't have to worry about seeing this war on TV. You will see it our your window.

Bruce                       New World Order News


The Russian Defense Ministry has said that an F-22 got close to a pair of Su-25 jets, hampering them from escorting a humanitarian aid convoy. It dismissed reports of the Russian jets being “intercepted.”

The incident took place Wednesday in the vicinity of the Syrian town of Mayadin, when a pair of Su-25 close air support jets were escorting a humanitarian aid convoy, the Russian Defense Ministry said. A US F-22 stealth fighter came from across the Euphrates river and approached the aircraft, firing flare decoys in front of them.

A Su-35 fighter jet, which provided cover for the Russian planes, “rapidly approached” the F-22 from the rear and the US warplane left the area afterward, the ministry added.

The ministry stressed that the incident occurred above the western bank of the Euphrates River, dismissing media reports that the Russian planes were allegedly operating over the eastern bank.

A Russian Sukhoi Su-35 bomber lands at the Russian Hmeimim military base in Latakia province, in the northwest of Syria © Vasily Maximov] Russian Su-35 chased away rogue US F-22 jet: MoD blasts US Air Force for hampering Syria op
Earlier, US military officials told media, that a F-22 fighter fired flares to warn Russian planes away from a “deconfliction line” in Syria. After the encounter, the Russian planes reportedly left the area. 

“Two F-22s went too close to two Russian jets so we had to use the de-confliction channels,” a US Central Command (CENTCOM) told Sputnik on Thursday. “This is not something extraordinary... It happens sometimes several times a day.” The official has also confirmed that the militaries of the two countries have discussed the incident.

Moscow and Washington agreed on a flight safety memorandum in Syria in 2015 and established a hotline to prevent emergency situations. Using this early-warning system, the militaries of the two countries discuss the approximate locations and missions of their planes to avoid them being in the same airspace at the same time.

However, the two sides have repeatedly accused each other of disregarding the memorandum and being reluctant to use the tools at their disposal to prevent incidents. A similar incident between the Russian and US militaries was reported by Russia’s Defense Ministry last week. It said that a Russian Su-35 was forced to chase away a rogue US F-22 jet on November 23.

“The F-22 launched decoy flares and used airbrakes while constantly maneuvering [near the Russian strike jets], imitating an air fight,” Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Major General Igor Konashenkov said last Saturday in a statement, accusing the US military of attempts to disrupt the anti-terrorist operation and preventing Russian planes from bombing Islamic State terrorists.


“Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything.”― Joseph Stalin

Yesterday, I covered growing evidence that there would be massive vote fraud in the Alabama special election. Sadly, I and scores of others were correct. I have posted an article outlining some of the obvious fraud in that election. It is disappointing that Americans put up with this as well as scores of other destructive practices on the part of our government masters. I'm not going to repeat the points made in the article, but I am going to point to the many, many other cases of vote fraud in recent years here in the U.S. None of this is reported by the mediawhores and much of this is ignored by the population as a whole.

I have also posted a link to Here, Bev Harris, shows how easy it is to hack into voting machines and change the results. So vote fraud is nothing new, as our old friend, Joseph Stalin bragged about. Instead, it is a disease which Americans suffer from. The disease is denial. Yes, it happens to everyone else, but it can't happen here. It can and it did.

Bruce                                 New World Order News

The story of the day centers around the highly publicized and anticipated Special Election that took place in Alabama on December 12, 2017.  By the end of the night it seem to many on the left that the fight was over and deed was done, Doug Jones was declared the winner.  However, Roy Moore, along with countless supporters, are refusing go along with the idea that a staunch liberal and progressive Democrat somehow turned a Senate seat blue after decades of being red as a recount is being pondered and voter fraud evidenceis examined.

This is an incredibly important election, as most genuinely are, but this is a fight for the Make American Great Again campaign against the globalist powers at work.  Moore was not the perfect candidate, but he stood tall in the wake of both major U.S. parties demanding he step aside.  He could have just taken the hint and moved along but he is not that kind of man.

The allegations have been refuted and even some have been completely discredited.  It is not likely that someone can go for 30 years in public service with allegations like these going unheard.  That is why so many were skeptical about the allegations in the first place because the women waited until the time before a massive election to try and curry disapproval from undecided voters.

Moore stood tall against the false accusation that may have played a role in the turnout. He is still going to keep fighting as the military has yet to be counted as well as the potential for a recount.

However, Moore remained firm in his beliefs and position and so he refused to step aside thus putting the decision in the hands of the people of Alabama, or at least he thought they would be the ones deciding. Numerous reports are showing discrepancies and “coincidences” that compromise the integrity of the vote.  Many have found that activists took to the popular social media site “Reddit” to ask African-Americans in Georgia, Mississippi, and Tennessee to travel to Alabama to vote.

It has been proven in the past that Democrats use very dishonest and corrupt means to get votes.  This was made perfectly clear during the Project Veritas videos during the election where an election rigging specialist described a lot of the tactics they use to get what they want.  This includes busing people from location to location to ensure multiple votes or at least voters from out of state.

Many claim to have witnessed such buses unloading voters to the polls yesterday in Alabama and only time will tell if video proof can be made public.  However, there are more subtle means of detecting voter fraud then just looking out for false voters.  The statistics of the night show a dramatic, and almost unbelievable, turn out for Democrats in the race with a 92% turnout.

Many, like Political analyst Bill Mitchell above, are skeptical of the results of this election as the numbers are simply too unbelievable. This along with evidence that voter fraud definitely takes place is enough reason to be suspicious.

This is not only surprising as Democrats usually fail to show up for midterm elections, and this is even more unscheduled than those, but also alarming as only around 50% of Republicans showed up to vote.  Despite these large gaps in turnout, the race was incredibly close and could truly come down to the military absentee ballots that Moore is hoping will at least secure a state mandated recount.

It is troubling to even think that the electoral systems of the United States could be compromised through fraudulent voters, biased ballot counters, or even corrupt officials ruling in the eleventh hour that the state could destroy their ballots as the integrity of the voting system is what keeps the peace between the people and the government.

If our elections can no longer be safe from fraud or bias, then the entire concept of the Republic is null and void.  If all the bad guys have to do is bus people in, intimidate local voters, and just make up stories about their opponents that never get proven true then there is likely no chance that a non-corrupt person could make it into the office to achieve something good.

Our ancestors knew the dangers that forces working domestically represent as they look to undermine everything that the United States stands for. Abraham Lincoln, as controversial as he may be, had to deal with this first hand and understands just how much Democrats want to keep control.
This is the very idea that our nation was founded on and it seems like this election could be an actual attack on that idea.  Roy Moore needs to keep fighting now more than ever before as the very basis for our system of government is under attack because in reality, if Democrats can steal a Senate seat in Alabama, they can steal one anywhere.

There  are several videos on this site. One of the best is "Hacking Democracy". Of course you'll never see or hear anything about this from the Mediawhores.



Today is the election in Alabama's special election for the U.S. Senate. Despite the smear tactics used by those who don't want Judge Roy Moore to enter the Senate, polls have consistently showed Moore with a comfortable lead ---- until this week. Right out of the blue a Fox poll showed Moore's opponent with a 10 point lead. Then, today, the Alabama Supreme court set aside a lower court ruling requiring precincts to keep a record of ballots cast. So, let the cheating begin.

It doesn't always work. Last year, despite voter fraud in the millions of votes, Hillary Clinton still lost the election. I don't know about this one, but can it be any more obvious? Let's not bother to verify the votes. No, no reason to keep a record by providing photo evidence of the legitimacy of votes. This country is in real trouble on a number of fronts. Every single major election has questions about vote fraud and it never has any meaningful investigation. If Americans cannot be assured that their vote is fairly counted, then we no longer have a democratic form of government. These are just used to validate the position of our rulers. Our elections are just as phony as those held in the old Soviet Union. If this continues we will soon share their fate.

Bruce                                                New World Order News

Updated 11:33 AM; Posted Dec 11, 3:42 PM

By Connor Sheets
Update - 9:05 a.m. Dec. 12, 2017: Late Monday night, the Alabama Supreme Court stayed the Montgomery County Circuit Court's order earlier that day directing Alabama election officials to preserve digital ballot images during Tuesday's Senate election.

Alabama can destroy digital voting records after all
Alabama is allowed to destroy digital voting records created at the polls during today's U.S. Senate election after all.
A judge directed Alabama election officials Monday afternoon to preserve all digital ballot images in Tuesday's hotly contested U.S. Senate special election.
An order granting a preliminary injunction was filed at 1:36 p.m. Monday - less than 24 hours before voting is to begin. The order came in response to a lawsuit filed Thursday on behalf of four Alabama voters who argued that the state is required to maintain the images under state and federal law.

"All counties employing digital ballot scanners in the Dec. 12, 2017 election are hereby ordered to set their voting machines to save all processed images in order to preserve all digital ballot images," Montgomery County Circuit Judge Roman Ashley Shaul wrote in the order.
Priscilla Duncan, attorney for the plaintiffs, applauded the order.

"[The images] need to be preserved at least six months under the statute," Duncan told Monday afternoon. "They are being told at this point to preserve all digital ballot records."

Reached by phone shortly after the injunction was issued Monday, Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill declined to comment. Merrill and Ed Packard, the state administrator of elections, are the two defendants named in the suit filed Thursday.

"We don't comment on lawsuits," Merrill said.
Digital ballot images are essentially digitized versions of the paper ballots Alabamians fill out in the voting booth. In Alabama, these digital images are destroyed once an election has passed, according to Duncan.

"People think that when they mark the ballots and they go into the machine that that's what counted," she said. "But it's not, the paper ballot is not what's counted. That ballot is scanned and they destroy [the ballots] after the election ... If there's ever an election challenge you need to have what was actually counted."

The destruction of the images allegedly opens the door to potential hacking because there are no hard copies of the ballots, according to Duncan.
"The Department of Homeland Security notified our Secretary of State here that Alabama is one of the 21 states that had been targeting for hacking of election systems," she said, referring to this year's special election for Georgia's 6th congressional district.
Shaul wrote in the order that destroying the images could have a negative impact on voters in Alabama.

"After hearing arguments and reviewing the filings, it appears that Plaintiffs and similarly situated voters would suffer irreparable and immediate harm if digital ballot images are not preserved," the order states.




In the never ending desire to start WW3 , the insaniacs who control our government have revealed their true intentions in our subject articles. Despite claiming the our military invaded Syria to “fight ISIS”, they have now announced they will stay even though ISIS has been defeated. Not only has ISIS been defeated, they have been defeated by Russia and the Syrian military with the U.S. military doing everything they could to thwart the Russian/Syrian effort.

Indeed, in the beginning of the emergence of ISIS, it has been disclosed that ISIS received military assistance from both the U.S. and Israel. Hundreds of thousands of innocent people have been killed in this failed invasion. Millions have been displaced and some of those have immigrated to Europe.

So let's understand exactly what is going on here. Russia was invited by the legitimate government of Syria to assist them in their fight against an invasion from a force largely comprised of foreign invaders. The U.S. received no such invitation. The Syrian government has stated this an invasion and the occupation of Syrian territory is totally illegal. As if this isn't bad enough, U.S. military spokesman have threatened to shoot down Russian aircraft flying into territory occupied by the U.S.

Yes, they are nuts. While we are preparing for Christmas, they are preparing for a nuclear war. This a war that will kill millions and affect us all. Our children and family members will be forced to fight it and in the end, everyone on earth will lose. We allow them to stay in power. No matter how dangerous some of those in some foreign nations may be, our biggest enemies are right here.

Bruce                        New World Order News

Two weeks ago, I wondered if heightened Pentagon rhetoric about “unsafe Russian flying practices” in Syria was to prepare the media for a possible shoot-down of a Russian plane by the US. Now the US has moved on to openly threatening to do so.
Recall that on November 24th CNN ran an article whereby, according to unnamed officials, poor US pilots were being  “subjected to unsafe Russian flying practices” This followed a report a week earlier where an unidentified Pentagon officer spoke about “threatening” and “potentially threatening” Russian aircraft and their “increasingly alarming behavior” (which later in the article simply turned out to be Russians flying within weapons range of US assets on the ground).
Ryan Brown

Now the Pentagon has graduated to openly raising the prospect of shooting down a Russian warplane directly through its spokespeople. Colonel Damien Pickart, the spokesman for US Air Forces Central Command, said yesterday the US military has “the greatest concern” it could “shoot down a Russian warplane because its actions are seen as a threat” — in other words, if they cross into “coalition airspace” in eastern Syria. Yes, bizarrely the Pentagon refers to Syria to the east of the Euphrates as “our airspace”:

“We saw anywhere from six to eight incidents daily in late November, where Russian or Syrian aircraft crossed into our airspace on the east side of the Euphrates River,” Pickart said.

The US claims it can not honestly know if Russian aircraft are crossing the river by “mistake” or because they mean to attack “coalition forces,” and that therefore US fighters could already legitimately have shot them down in “self-defense”:

The Air Force pilots showed restraint, but given that the actions of the Su-24s could have reasonably been interpreted as threatening to the American aircraft, the F-22 pilots would have been with their rights to fire in self-defense, officials at the Qatar air base said.
This is pure nonsense. This is not about any fear of Russian attack, but about turf.

Firstly an Su-24 is ground attack jet, and would not be used to attack other warplanes. More importantly, the Russians revealed last week that they had already carried out over 600 combat sorties to target ISIS to the east of the river in support of the usually US-backed YPG Kurdish militias. The YPG has, in turn, hailed the Russian air cover.* The Americans know full well that Russians are not crossing the river to attack them or their proxies. On the contrary, they’re there to back the same faction the US is backing, but Pentagon wants a monopoly on that, and on the territory that comes with it.

Additionally, while the Pentagon complains about a number of incidents in which the US and Russian aircraft supposedly nearly collided due to Russians flying on the “wrong” side of the river, the Russian Ministry of Defense has said that US fighters have already simulated an attack on Russian ground attack jets:

“On November 23, in the air above the western bank of the Euphrates River, a U.S. F-22 fighter hindered actively Russia’s two Sukhoi-24 attackers in fulfilling their combat tasks to destroy a command station of the Islamic State near Mayadin,” spokesman of the Russian Defense Ministry Igor Konashenkov said.

“The F-22 fired heat flares and released braking flaps, constantly maneuvering, to simulate a dogfight.”
The F-22 Raptor “halted dangerous maneuvers and hurried away into Iraq’s air space” after the Russian Su-35S highly maneuverable aircraft appeared nearby, Konashenkov said.

So who is actually doing the threatening here? The Russians who are crossing the river to help the US-backed YPG, or the US which simulates attacks on Russian aircraft?

But don’t worry, if the US does shoot down a Russian plane it will be the Russians fault for either flying above US-allied Kurdish forces that they’re helping:
Other Russian planes have flown within striking distance or directly over allied ground forces for up to 30 minutes, escalating tensions and the risk of a shootdown, American officials said.
...or else for “baiting” the Americans into shooting them down:

“It’s become increasingly tough for our pilots to discern whether Russian pilots are deliberately testing or baiting us into reacting, or if these are just honest mistakes,” said Lt. Col. Damien Pickart, the command’s spokesman.

You see, those Russians want to be shot down, and nothing is ever America’s fault. (Recall that according to neocon revisionism Saddam pretended to have WMDs to bait the US into invading him.)

The US Air Force has already shot down a Syrian Su-22 over central Syria, bombed the Syrian army on three separate occasions in southern Syria killing about a dozen Syrian soldiers, and bombed the Syrian army in the ISIS-encircled city of Deir Ezzor killing 100, supposedly by mistake, but actually most likely in a calculated move to sabotage the Lavrov-Kerry deal of September 2016 which envisaged the US and Russia working more closely together.




The subject article covers one of the accusers of Judge Moore backtracking on one of her original statements. She had released what was purported to be, a note and signature from Roy Moore in her high school yearbook back in 1977. She has now admitted that some of the entries were added by her. Even if we accept the fact that Moore signed the yearbook, there is no evidence of anything improper. Even if we accept her accusation that Moore did something improper, it was 40 years ago. Ask yourself this: Is there anything in the past 40 years, that if made public, would cause you embarrassment? Now, isn't it amazing that despite 10's of thousands of dollars dedicated to digging up dirt on Judge Moore, all they could find are these questionable accusations going back 40 years. It actually proves he has outstanding character.

All of that being the case, the Democrats are now retreating into the sewer of potential vote fraud in this election. Investigators have discovered scores of pre-marked ballots for the Democrat nominee. Also the State has issued a directive that a paper trail validating ballots in the upcoming election is unnecessary. A couple of weeks ago there was a push in Alabama to allow convicted felons the right to vote in the upcoming election. I'm sure there is no chance that a convicted felon who appeared before Judge Moore, would carry a grudge.

So, here we go again. More crooks. More corruption.

Bruce                      New World Order News

Roy Moore accuser Beverly Young Nelson threw her credibility in the toilet when she hired notorious sham attorney Gloria Allred, and now she’s flushed what remained of her reputation down to the sewer. According to Washington Post national political reporter Michael Scherer, Young admitted to adding the date and place to Moore’s alleged signature in her high school yearbook.

Here’s a photo of the inscription, which clearly includes Nelson’s addition of the date “12-22-77” and the location “Olde Hickory House.”

This is just astounding. Moore has denied up and down that the signature is his, and his attorney specifically stated that the “77” signed in the yearbook should be looked at by a handwriting expert. And now we know that Nelson was lying the entire time.
This does nothing to help her story, and, in turn, it undermines the stories of Moore’s other accusers.

If Nelson thought she was going to take down Moore with her accusation and her fraudulent signature, she wasn’t thinking straight.
If Moore’s opponent, Democrat Doug Jones, thought he was going to have a chance at winning in a deep-red state, his hopes were just dashed.

This revelation puts everything in question now. Voters who were on the fence, and were inclined to believe the accusations against Moore, will now question if the former Alabama Supreme Court judge is a predator.

The uncertainty may be enough to put Moore over the edge, and make him the next senator from Alabama.
This is astounding news. Please share it over Facebook now and let us know what you think in the comment section below!




The subject article covers the approval of a bankruptcy judge in the Toys R Us case to pay executives millions of dollars in bonuses to executives. Sadly, this is a growing trend in the U.S. today. Toys R Us is in bankruptcy. They have been losing millions for years. Obviously, their business plan is an absolute failure. Those who invested in that company are going to lose most, if not all of their investment. You would think those in charge should not be rewarded for this catastrophe --- not to be. Almost all large corporations pay top executives large amounts if they are a big enough failure. Here's a question: Do I want to be paid millions of dollars for working or not working? Most would choose the latter. So what is the incentive?

Here in Tennessee, the University of Tennessee football coach was just fired. He was being paid around 4 million dollars a year for coaching. After he was fired he received around 7 million dollars for not coaching. Whether it is Hewlett Packard firing their disastrous CEO, or universities paying off their failed department heads, it has become apparent that failure is more profitable than success. Just look at many of the U.S. government departments. If a department solves all of its' problems, they go away and with them, all of the funding. How about the never ending search for a cure for cancer? Find a cure? No more money. Never find a cure? The money keeps rolling in.

Over the years I have outlined many of the problems that will eventually bring down the American empire. Rewarding failure is a big one.

Bruce                            New World Order News

Toys "R" Us has won approval to pay $16 million in bonuses to 17 top executives if the company hits financial targets during the holiday shopping season.
The bankruptcy court trustee Judy Robbins, a Justice department attorney who represents the interest of creditors, had argued that the proposed bonuses were excessive and were little more than retention bonuses meant to keep the executives from jumping ship due to uncertainty about the company's future.

While companies in bankruptcy are allowed to issue incentive bonuses, retention bonuses are not permitted.

"It defies logic and wisdom, not to mention the Bankruptcy Code, that a bankrupt company would now propose further multi-million dollar bonuses for the senior leadership of a company that began the year with employee layoffs and concludes it in the midst of the holiday season in bankruptcy," she argued in her filing. "Apparently, this Christmas, Toys "R" Us intends to deliver not only 'children their biggest smiles of the year' but the insiders, too."

In its filings in favor of the bonusues, the company had argued the payments were necessary to get executives to perform at a high level during its bankruptcy.

"It is the [company's] employees - and more particularly the senior management team - that must execute at this critical juncture and provide the foundation for a successful turnaround," it said in a filing.

U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Keith Phillips approved the payouts on Tuesday. Because Toys "R" Us filed for bankruptcy in September, it must now must get court approval for many of its basic business decisions.

These new bonuses will be in addition to another $8.2 million in retention bonuses paid to some of these same executives before Toys "R" Us filed for bankruptcy. They would be required to return the retention payments should they quit the company within a year of receiving them.
Among the 17 executives who would get payments is chairman and CEO David Brandon, who joined the company in 2015.

Related: Why Hasbro might buy Mattel

The company said it also has filed for an incentive program for other employees beyond the senior management, and that such bonus plans are standard practice for companies going through a bankruptcy restructuring.

While the company asked for $16 million, the bonus plan could actually pay out $32 million if the company reaches much better than expected profit targets. But that's a result the company "will find very difficult to achieve," according to the filing.

The company said it had 1,600 stores at the time of the bankruptcy filing, and 65,000 employees, although it has gone ahead with plans to hire additional seasonal help for the holiday season. It lost $330 million in the first half of this year as sales fell by 5%, and has lost more than $1.8 billion since its last reported an annual profit five years ago.

Toys "R" Us has been struggling for years, not just with a shift of consumers buying goods from online competitors such as Amazon (AMZN), but also with increased competition from traditional brick-and-mortar retailers such as Wal-Mart (WMT) and Target (TGT).
Bankruptcy filings this year alone include Gymboree, Payless Shoes and RadioShack, which recently completed its second trip through bankruptcy.
Bankruptcies in the retail sector are up about 30% so far this year, according to, and the number of store closings has more than tripled to about 6,700, breaking the record set during the worst of the Great Recession.




One stupid move after another. Let's attack Afghanistan. Let's go back to Somalia. Let's confront Russia --- on everything. Let's violate Chinese territory. Let's have war with North Korea. Let's attack Iran. Let's send troops to Syria. Let's attack Libya. Let's go back into Iraq. Let's get involved in the civil war in Yemen. Get the picture?

Our government masters are desperate to start another war, even if it means a world war. The latest move towards national suicide is the move to recognize Jerusalem as he capitol of Israel. Here's the problem. It's illegal. It's illegal under the U.N. mandate establishing the nation state of Israel. Jerusalem is to be an international city to be used by the 3 faiths residing in that area. There is another problem. Muslims world wide consider Jerusalem as their holy city. Nothing can inspire people to kill and die more than religious fervor. There are 1.5 billion Muslims world wide in a number of nations. Many of them now feel justified in declaring jihad against the U.S. and Israel. If we had to fight them for the cause of freedom, then so be it, but this is absurd.

I asked if the U.S. is trying to lose the next war. I know, with the economy on the brink of collapse, the common wisdom is to start a war. People would support their lying politicians as the flag is being waved, but what if we lose? Many of the nations of the world have problems with each other, and under normal circumstances would not ally with one another, but now the U.S. may be accomplishing what would have been unthinkable only a short time ago. Russia, China, Turkey, Iran, North Korea, Indonesia, Venezuela, and a number of other nations are now considering putting their differences aside to oppose the U.S. Meanwhile, the U.S. is going broke trying to fight everyone, everywhere.

I have described our government masters as “insaniacs” in their blood lust to start a world war. Sadly, we must now add our current President to that group.

Bruce                                          New World Order News


U.S. President Donald Trump is “declaring war in the Middle East,” a senior Palestinian diplomat told reporters Wednesday after it was revealed that the United States will recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and eventually relocate its embassy there.

“At a time when the entire Middle East and the Palestinian and Israelis need a certain breakthrough, a re-engagement in negotiations, here he [Trump] comes […] to start a whole new episode of confusion, anarchy, distortion to the concept of a two-state solution,” Manuel Hassassian, the Palestinian general delegate to the UK, told the BBC’s Today program Wednesday.

By recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, which the president is expected to announce later Wednesday, Trump would declare “war in the Middle East” as well as “war against 1.5 billion muslims,” Hassassian said.

Shortly after Trump’s decision was revealed, Palestinian authorities called for “three days of anger” in protest, Spiegel reported. Palestinians have also called the move a “kiss of death” to the two-state solution, according to Reuters.

Israel Katz, the Israeli minister of intelligence, said “violent protests” would be a “big mistake” by the Palestinians and called on them “to not walk this path,” Spiegel reported. Katz added that Trump would not be “cowed by threats.”

Trump to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital

Hassassian said Trump’s decision would not only concern muslims, but also “hundreds of millions of Christians that are not going to accept the holy shrines to be totally under the hegemony of Israel.”

Trump will be making his announcement despite heavy criticism from U.S. allies, including France, Jordan and Saudi Arabia, which have urged the president to avoid the extremely sensitive topic.

The Jordanian king “affirmed that the decision will have serious implications that will undermine efforts to resume the peace process and will provoke muslims and Christians alike,” said a statement from the king’s office, obtained by Reuters.
No other country has its embassy in Jerusalem.



As the mediawhores crow about the indictment of Michael Flynn for lying to the FBI, something has become painfully obvious to the rest of us. This investigation run by former FBI head, Robert Mueller, is populated with political hacks and crooks. Almost all of the “investigators” are Democrat party stooges and Hillary operatives. Mueller himself is neck deep in the uranium one scandal and no, you won't see anyone investigating or indicting him

The subject article covers an interview with Flynn conducted by FBI agent Peter Strzok. It turns out that Strzok may have entrapped Flynn into confessing to this minor crime. It was also revealed that Strzok was instrumental in helping Hillary Clinton to avoid a criminal charge by changing the wording in an FBI description of her crimes. One,  “grossly negligent” was a felony, the other description was lowered to “extremely careless”.

So now Strzok has been fired from the investigation. I'll bet any amount that Mueller knew this from the get-go. Otherwise, if he feels Strzok's actions justified being fired, Mueller should fire all the rest including himself. Just like Madusa's head full of snakes, when one is removed there are many more remaining.

Bruce                     New World Order News


Did Mueller know the The New York Times was going to publish the story about the anti-Trump FBI agent and coerced Michael Flynn into pleaing guilty before it came out? If this is true, there was no way Flynn would have plead guilty in light of the recent revelation that there was a corrupt FBI agent that interviewed him. It seems the liberal media sat on their anti-Trump FBI stories for a few days to give Mueller time to hit Flynn.

FBI agent Peter Strzok was one of two FBI agents who interviewed Flynn, which took place on Jan. 24, at the White House, said several sources. Strzok at the time was having an affair with Lisa Page, a lawyer for FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. Fox News' Sean Hannity suggest Flynn may have been tricked into having the interview with Strzok without a lawyer:

According to another source, with direct knowledge of the Jan. 24 interview, McCabe had contacted Flynn by phone directly at the White House. White House officials had spent the “earlier part of the week with the FBI overseeing training and security measures associated with their new roles so it was no surprise to Flynn that McCabe had called,” the source said.

It was discovered that the FBI agent fired from Mueller's Trump-Russia investigation changed a key phrased used by FBI Director James Comey to describe Hillary Clinton's email crimes. It seems Peter Strzok, who was fired for sending colleagues anti-Trump text messages, changed Comey's description of Clinton's actions from a hard-hitting "grossly negligent" to soft "extremely careless."

From True Pundit: (Link:

A former top counterintelligence expert at the FBI, now at the center of a political uproar for exchanging private messages that appeared to mock President Donald Trump, changed a key phrase in former FBI Director James Comey’s description of how former secretary of state Hillary Clinton handled classified information, according to US officials familiar with the matter.

Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey’s earlier draft language describing Clinton’s actions as “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” the source said.

Share on Facebook 



It is ironic how the mediawhores and our government masters view those who tell lies. We have just witnessed Michael Flynn being charged with lying to the FBI. Indeed, years ago, Martha Stewart went to prison for lying to the FBI. Of course this is a one way street. If lying is bad, why isn't it against the law for the FBI, or any police entity, to lie to us? Why isn't it against the law for any of our government masters to lie to us--- anyone remember Saddam's weapons of mass destruction? It should be obvious that the danger of one in authority lying to us has much greater consequences than an individual without any significant power.

This brings us to our old friend, Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. I have posted a headline quoting him calling the government of Iran “Nazi's” wanting to kill Jews. I have also posted an article covering the very large Jewish community in Iran. Indeed it is the second largest Jewish community in the middle east. They are free to worship. They are protected by law. They even have a representative in the Iranian parliament. They have had a presence there for hundreds of years. When given the opportunity to leave Iran, the Jews there declined.

Back to the lying ----- if we are going to allow our leaders to lie to us in order to start a war, we are indeed a lost people. All of our problems here in the U.S. have their foundation in allowing our leaders to lie to us without consequences. Some of those lies have led to the death of many thousands. They are the problem, not the inconsequential lies of Martha Stewart and Michael Flynn.

Bruce                            New World Order News

Jewish community in Iran: all you need to know

Iran, a home for Jews for more than 3000 years, has the Middle East’s largest Jewish population outside of Israel.

Most Iranian Jews live in the capital. In Tehran, there are 13 active synagogues that hold weekly services, five Jewish schools, two Jewish kindergartens, and a 100-bed capacity Jewish hospital. Although there are active Jewish communities all around the country, Tehran’s community is the most significant.

Since Iranian president Rouhani took office, Jews say they have been heartened by the support they’ve received. His government agreed to allow Jewish schools to be closed on Saturdays to mark Shabbat, the day of rest. Rouhani also allocated the equivalent of $400,000 to a Jewish charity hospital in Tehran and invited the country’s only Jewish lawmaker to accompany him to the United Nations General Assembly in New York last year.

Rouhani also offers New Year’s greetings to Jews on Rosh Hashanah — and the Jewish community in Iran is hopeful that a July nuclear deal signed by Iran, U.S. and five other world powers could bring an end to international isolation and improve their place in society.

The official recognition of minorities was rooted in the Iranian constitution: Zoroastrian, Jewish, and Christian Iranians are the only recognized religious minorities who, within the limits of the law, are free to perform the religious rites and ceremonies and to act according to their own cannon in matters of personal affairs and religious education.

Within this framework, the Jewish minority was guaranteed permanent representation in the Iranian parliament. The constitution also dictates that the Islamic Republican government and Iranian Muslims must treat non-Muslims according to Muslim principles of ethics and justice.

In practice, Jewish freedom of worship has not been limited in a meaningful way, and to this day Jewish holidays receive coverage in the media. Each year, local television stations broadcast programs on Jewish holidays–especially Passover, when the state media carries the blessings of the Jewish community head and Majles representative. The community has continued administering its own schools, synagogues, and other institutions, including Jewish hospitals, nursing homes, cemeteries, and libraries.

Today, Jews participate in Iranian civic and political life. Many Jews join the Iranian masses in protesting the State of Israel on the annual “Qods Day” (Jerusalem Day), and during the Iran-Iraq war (1980-1988), Iranian Jews supported the war effort by donating ambulances and surplus goods as well as making hospital visits. Some Jewish youth even took part in the fighting and were wounded in combat.

Many Jews fled the country after the 1979 Islamic Revolution. However, most of the remaining Jews of Iran feel an unbreakable bond to their homeland and continue to live there. In a gathering of Iranian Jews in Shiraz at the end of 2002, several months after the release of some of the detainees, one of the leaders of the Jewish community made the following speech:

“We are not the same subdued people as before. We are alive, joyful, active and Iran-lovers. We’ve been inhabitants of Iran for the past 2,700 years … and Iran is our native country. We are essentially Iranians first and then Jews. We are proud to be Iranians. Long live Iran. Long live Iranians Jews.” (From the movie “Jews of Iran,” directed by Ramin Farahani)

Homayoun Sameyah Najafabadi, head of Tehran’s Jewish community, said it goes beyond simply coexisting — his community is deeply rooted in what is now called Iran.

“Iranian Jews are even more Iranian than Muslims — we’ve been here for 2,700 years,” he told NBC news.

Images: Iranian Jews pray at the Abrishami synagogue on Palestine Street in Tehran. (photos credit:REUTERS)


COLLAPSE UPDATE: Yellen “Very Worried about Sustainability of US Debt Trajectory”

It's on its' way and there's no way to stop it. The subject article covers Fed Chief, Janet Yellen expressing worry about the increase in the U.S. debt. Really? She can't be that ignorant of the past 37 years. How about this question. What was the national debt when Ronald Reagan took office? That includes all of the previous administrations from George Washington through Jimmy Carter. It was a shade under 1 trillion dollars. Today, the Fed admits to a national debt of $20.57 trillion. Others peg the total as high as 200 trillion. Also, it has increased by $723 billion over the past 12 weeks. Yes, the national debt has increased almost as much in 12 weeks as it had in almost 200 years leading up to the Reagan administration.

Here's what Yellen didn't say. The debt under Reagan could never be paid and the debt now can never be paid. The currency is ready to collapse. In fact, if it weren't for the military might of the U.S. projected all around the world, this currency would have been rejected in world commerce and collapsed long ago, but even that cannot prevent the inevitable.

So what will life be like when this finally happens? It will be somewhere between life in the Old Soviet Union after their collapse and life in New Orleans during and after hurricane Katrina. What we're experiencing now is not reality. It is more like a surreal experience. On the other side, the collapse of an empire is not only possible, it becomes inevitable.

Bruce                                   New World Order News


U.S. national debt tops $1 trillion, Oct. 22, 1981

But only a few lost souls in Congress care.

Even as lawmakers are trying to cobble together a tax-cut bill that would cut revenues by $1.5 trillion over ten years, the gross national debt has spiked $723 billion over the past 12 weeks since Congress suspended the “debt ceiling.” It just hit $20.57 trillion, or 105% of GDP.

Over the past six years, since November 2011, the gross national debt has surged nearly 40%, or by $5.8 trillion. Back in 2011, gross national debt amounted to 95% of GDP. Before the Financial Crisis, it was at 63% of GDP. There are no signs that the relentless rise in the debt is slowing down. On the contrary – the tax cuts are going to steepen the curve:

In the chart above, note the last three debt-ceiling fights – the flat lines in 2013, 2015, and 2017, followed each time by an enormous spike when the debt ceiling was lifted or suspended, and when the “extraordinary measures” with which the Treasury keeps the government afloat were reversed.
And the Fed is getting increasingly nervous about the “sustainability” of this debt.

There are only a few lawmakers left in Congress that have a sense of fiscal responsibility. One of the lost souls is Senator Bob Corker, a Republican from Tennessee, who, to address his anxieties about the deficit and the debt, wants to add a provision to the tax-cut bill that would raise taxes automatically if the economy doesn’t hit certain growth targets in the future. This “trigger” is designed to slow by a smidgen the relentless rise of the national debt. He has come under withering criticism for it from Republican lawmakers and conservative lobbying groups.

Fitch Ratings believes that “under a realistic scenario of tax cuts and macro conditions,” the US gross national debt will balloon to 120% of GDP by 2027. The way things are going right now, that is likely an impossibly rosy scenario.

So on Wednesday, Fed Chair Janet Yellen was telling Congress about the economy, its challenges, and the “disappointingly slow” recovery since the recession. And when she was asked about this “trigger,” she said that it was up to Congress to decide how to confront the fiscal outlook, but added that she was worried about the “sustainability of the US debt trajectory”:

“The idea of triggers is motivated by the concern that some have over the picture we have of debt sustainability now and into the future, and I would simply say I am very worried about the sustainability of the US debt trajectory.”

The future of the deficit and the debt trajectory “should be a very significant concern,” she said.
On Monday, Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan had chimed in about the unsustainability of the trajectory of the national debt. Further complicating his assessment: In addition to the $25.57 trillion in outright debt, there are also the “unfunded entitlements” with a present value of “approximately $49 trillion,” he said. And he added:
“In my view, the projected path of US government debt to GDP is unlikely to be sustainable – and has been made to appear more manageable due to today’s historically low interest rates.”

Ah yes, the admission: The Fed’s interest rate policy has made the US debt only “appear more manageable” because it brought down the cost of servicing this debt and removed an incentive for Congress to do anything about it. But when rates are rising as they are, at the same time when the debt is ballooning as it is, this debt will start imposing an ever larger burden on the budget, and it will become less and less manageable.

So here you have it. The trajectory of US government debt is “unsustainable,” according to Yellen, Kaplan, and many others. In fact, just about everyone acknowledges this except for the only people that can actually do something about it: the lawmakers in Congress. They don’t even know the meaning of “unsustainable.” It’s not part of their vocabulary. It has been replaced by “fund raising” and “campaign contributions.” And they’re happier than ever to run up the debt, no holds barred.

The Fed is increasingly pointing at “excesses,” “distortions,” and “imbalances” in the markets. Read… Stock Market Lazes Happily on a Powerful Time Bomb, and the Fed Begins to Worry




The subject articles cover a study showing there has been no global warming in the past 23 years. I have also posted a headline where a credit rating agency has threatened cities with credit downgrades if they don't submit plans to fight global warming. Let me translate. If you give us a pile of money to fight a non existent crisis, we won't punish you. It's a simple shakedown. After all, what does a credit agency have to do with global warming? Nothing, but it has a lot to do with diverting money from you to them.

Sadly, this has been a common tactic with our government masters and their corporate bosses. That tactic is identifying a crisis which doesn't exist and getting you to give money to pay for it. How about the Gulf of Tonkin attack? It never happened. How about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction? They didn't exist? What about Assad gassing his own people? He never did it. If fact, back in the 1970's some of these same phony scientists were warning us about the coming ice age.

No, the best course is to assume anything coming from the government is a lie until they prove otherwise. This is no different.

Bruce                                                             New World Order News

STUDY: Satellites Show No Acceleration In Global Warming For 23 Years

Global warming has not accelerated temperature rise in the bulk atmosphere in more than two decades, according to a new study funded by the Department of Energy.

University of Alabama-Huntsville climate scientists John Christy and Richard McNider found that by removing the climate effects of volcanic eruptions early on in the satellite temperature record it showed virtually no change in the rate of warming since the early 1990s.

“We indicated 23 years ago — in our 1994 Nature article — that climate models had the atmosphere’s sensitivity to CO2 much too high,” Christy said in a statement. “This recent paper bolsters that conclusion.”

Christy and McNider found the rate of warming has been 0.096 degrees Celsius per decade after “the removal of volcanic cooling in the early part of the record,” which “is essentially the same value we determined in 1994 … using only 15 years of data.”

The study is sure to be contentious. Christy has argued for years that climate models exaggerate global warming in the bulk atmosphere, which satellites have monitored since the late 1970s.

Christy, a noted skeptic of catastrophic man-made global warming, said his results reinforce his claim that climate models predict too much warming in the troposphere, the lowest five miles of the atmosphere. Models are too sensitive to increases in carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere, he said.

“From our observations we calculated that value as 1.1 C (almost 2° Fahrenheit), while climate models estimate that value as 2.3 C (about 4.1° F),” Christy said.

While many scientists have acknowledged the mismatch between model predictions and actual temperature observations, few have really challenged the validity of the models themselves.

A recent study led by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory climate scientist Ben Santer found that while the models ran hot, the “overestimation” was “partly due to systematic deficiencies in some of the post-2000 external forcings used in the model simulations.”

Christy’s removal of volcanic-driven cooling from satellite temperature data could also draw scrutiny. The study also removed El Nino and La Nina cycles, which are particularly pronounced in satellite records, but those cycles largely canceled each other out, the co-authors said.

Christy said his works shows the “climate models need to be retooled to better reflect conditions in the actual climate, while policies based on previous climate model output and predictions might need to be reconsidered.”

Two major volcanoes — El Chichon in 1982 and Pinatubo in 1991 — caused global average temperature to dip as a result of volcanic ash, soot and debris reflecting sunlight back into space.

Those eruptions meant there was more subsequent warming in the following years, making the rate of warming appear to be rising as a result of man-made emissions or other factors, Christy said.

“Those eruptions happened relatively early in our study period, which pushed down temperatures in the first part of the dataset, which caused the overall record to show an exaggerated warming trend,” Christy said.

“While volcanic eruptions are natural events, it was the timing of these that had such a noticeable effect on the trend. If the same eruptions had happened near the more recent end of the dataset, they could have pushed the overall trend into negative numbers, or a long-term cooling,” Christy said.



And it's not getting any better. Predictions for 2018 store closings number as high as 9000. The stock market is soaring. Bit Coin is soaring, but it's not real. Just ask the employees and stock holders of the companies that have closed those thousands of retail outlets.

The worst thing about all of this is that no one in a position of power and influence is taking all of these warnings seriously. They either lie about the state of the economy or ignore it altogether. It is assumed that just because we're the United States and just because we are still relatively prosperous, it will just continue on as is. Ask yourself this: Is there any empire of the past that still exists? Also, of all the past empires, how many of those in control publicly warned their citizens of the possibility of an economic collapse?

We have an advantage that most of those in the past do not. We have their example. Maybe those in charge of Rome or Greece or Egypt or Babylon could be forgiven as they didn't have the knowledge they needed to head off disaster. We have no such excuse. Our government masters may know deep down that we are at the brink, but they seem content to let us all go right off the cliff.

Bruce                                       New World Order News

Recovery? We Have Tripled The Number Of Store Closings From Last Year...

Did you know that the number of retail store closings in 2017 has already tripled the number from all of 2016?
Last year, a total of 2,056 store locations were closed down, but this year more than 6,700 stores have been shut down so far. 

That absolutely shatters the all-time record for store closings in a single year, and yet nobody seems that concerned about it.  In 2008, an all-time record 6,163 retail stores were shuttered, and we have already surpassed that mark by a very wide margin.  We are facing an unprecedented retail apocalypse, and as you will see below, the number of retail store closings is actually supposed to be much higher next year.

Whenever the mainstream media reports on the retail apocalypse, they always try to put a positive spin on the story by blaming the growth of Amazon and other online retailers.  And without a doubt that has had an impact, but at this point online shopping still accounts for less than 10 percent of total U.S. retail sales.

Look, Amazon didn’t just show up to the party.  They have been around for many, many years and while it is true that they are growing, they still only account for a very small sliver of the overall retail pie.
So those that would like to explain away this retail apocalypse need to come up with a better explanation.

As I noted in the headline, there are 20 different major retail chains that have closed at least 50 stores so far this year.  The following numbers originally come from Fox Business…
1. Abercrombie & Fitch: 60 stores
2. Aerosoles: 88 stores
3. American Apparel: 110 stores
4. BCBG: 118 stores
5. Bebe: 168 stores
6. The Children’s Place: hundreds of stores to be closed by 2020
7. CVS: 70 stores
8. Guess: 60 stores
9. Gymboree: 350 stores
10. HHgregg: 220 stores
11. J.Crew: 50 stores
12. JC Penney: 138 stores
13. The Limited: 250 stores
14. Macy’s: 68 stores
15. Michael Kors: 125 stores
16. Payless: 800 stores
17. RadioShack: more than 1,000 stores
18. Rue21: up to 400 stores
19. Sears/Kmart: more than 300 stores
20. Wet Seal: 171 stores

If the U.S. economy was really doing well, then why are all of these major retailers closing down locations?
Of course the truth is that the economy is not doing well.  The U.S. economy has not grown by at least 3 percent in a single year since the middle of the Bush administration, and it isn’t going to happen this year either.  Overall, the U.S. economy has grown by an average of just 1.33 percent over the last 10 years, and meanwhile U.S. stock prices are up about 250 percent since the end of the last recession.  The stock market has become completely and utterly disconnected from economic reality, and yet many Americans still believe that it is an accurate barometer for the health of the economy.
I used to do a Black Friday article every year, but I have ended that tradition.  Yes, there were still a few scuffles this year, but at this point the much bigger story is how poorly the retailers are doing.

So far this year, more than 300 retailers have filed for bankruptcy, and we are currently on pace to lose over 147 million square feet of retail space by the end of 2017.

Those are absolutely catastrophic numbers.
And some analysts are already predicting that as many as 9,000 stores could be shut down in the United States in 2018.

Are we just going to keep blaming Amazon every time another retail chain goes belly up?
What we should really be focusing on is the fact that the “retail bubble” is starting to burst.  In the aftermath of the last financial crisis, retailers went on an unprecedented debt binge, and now a lot of that debt is starting to go bad.

In fact, in a previous article I discussed the fact that “the amount of high-yield retail debt that will mature next year is approximately 19 times larger than the amount that matured this year”.  This is going to have very serious implications on Wall Street, but very few people are really talking about this.
Most stores try to stay open through Christmas, but once the holiday season is over we will see another huge wave of store closings.

And as individual stores close down, this will put a lot of financial pressure on malls and shopping centers.  Not too long ago, one report projected that up to 25 percent of all shopping malls in the entire nation could close down by 2022, but I tend to think that number is too optimistic.
The retail industry in the United States is dying, and the biggest reason for that is not Amazon.

Rather, the real reason why the retail industry is in so much trouble is because of the steady decline of the middle class.  The gap between the ultra-wealthy and the rest of us is greater than ever, and we can clearly see the impact of this in the retail world.

Retailers that serve the very wealthy are generally doing well, and those that serve the other end of the food chain (such as dollar stores and Wal-Mart) are also doing okay.

But virtually all of the retailers that depend on middle class shoppers are really struggling, and this is going to continue for the foreseeable future.
Most American families are either living paycheck to paycheck or are close to that level, and these days U.S. consumers simply do not have much discretionary income to play around with.  More hard working Americans are going to fall out of the middle class with each passing month, and that is extremely bad news for a retail industry that is literally falling apart right in front of our eyes.
*  *  *

Michael Snyder is a Republican candidate for Congress in Idaho’s First Congressional District, and you can learn how you can get involved in the campaign on his official website. His new book entitled “Living A Life That Really Matters” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on




It's a loaded question. The answer is the same for any crimes committed by our government masters --- nothing. It's been in the news lately, but it's nothing new. Most of us remember Congressman Barney Frank and his gay whorehouse being run out of his home. The there was Teddy Kennedy running around with no pants on at his West Palm Beach house. Former majority leader Wilbur Mills caught with a prostitute who jumped into a tidal pond trying to get away from him. Gary Hart, Anthony Weiner, Al Gore and, of course, Bill Clinton. I could list more, but you get the idea.

The subject article covers how America puts up with pervert politicians and the lack of consequences for them. It has been said that when America ceases to be good, it will cease to be great. One judgment can be looking at those whom we choose to be our leaders. Another can be how we, as a society, look the other way while hundreds of thousands die as we pursue never ending wars around the world.

We are not so different from those in pre-world war 2 Germany. In exchange for economic prosperity, they would ignore crimes against humanity committed by their government. In the end, after World War 2, 1 out of 3 Germans had died violently. Those who do not learn from the errors of the past are doomed to repeat them.

Bruce                                       New World Order News

Pervert Politicians Represent a Sick Society 

Once again the august and noble governmental careerists reveal their nature. Let no man or woman ever be disappointed. The aristocracy of public policy always has a way of reaching down and deep to pull off the pants of naked exposure. Nothing has changed in this pattern of conduct. Only the methods of fusing perversion with favors vary with the excess of the billionaire moguls who fashion the popular culture. Washington DC has an insatiable appetite for projecting power dominance that may only be exceeded for the lust of campaign donations. The perfect storm of celebrity debauchery streams directly into the corridors of legislation and agency administration. Such behavior is well known, even though most practices are ignored as a matter of course.

According to the Washington Times, Weinstein’s sexual harassment scandal tarnishes Hollywood; Democratic Party has serving representatives running for cover.

"The blowback quickly reached Washington, where a number of Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer of New York, Sen. Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, said they would forward their campaign donations from Weinstein to charities supporting women.

Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Kamala D. Harris of California donated $5,000 and $10,000, respectively, to women’s organizations. Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut gave $2,700 to the Connecticut Alliance to End Sexual Violence, and Sen. Kristin Gillibrand of New York gave $11,800 to RAINN, the national sexual assault hotline, according to their press offices."

Pray tell just how many party favorites were oblivious to the widely known habits that permeate the producer power relationships both on and off the silver screen. Even the tarnish to the Camelot image of the Kennedy era, from mixing the celebrity mystic with the brute force of Federal authority, seldom shock the adoring fan base. So what is the entire hullabaloo really about?

Well, the hubbub has very little to do with a moral awakening by the general public. By those standards, engaging in an occasional groping by an alumnus of Saturday Night Live seems forgivable as long as one is a professor of obscene conduct. Nothing is funny about this comedy of errors. So what is the punch line?

When stuck for a laugh, dip down into the well of routing out the closest conservative Christian within reach, especially one who defends the Ten Commandments. Again, nothing new about this in the Babylonian Talmud cult that rules the MTV society.

So when the Bubba of defilers avoids interviews about his mile high fun on the Lolita Express, it only feeds interest to read the screenplay. Bill Clinton Still Silent About Flights On Pedophile’s Sex Plane only raises the party bar.  

"Between 2001 to 2003, Clinton and Epstein traveled together on extended trips around the world, according to flight records released in 2015 by Gawker.
Accompanying Clinton aboard the private jet was Doug Band, his “body man” and president of Teneo Holdings, a company that arranged speaking engagements and lucrative business deals for the former president.

On one trip Clinton also traveled with actor Kevin Spacey, who is now accused of have sex with an underage boy."

For those who have been on Clinton overload for decades the capricious New York Times can always be counted upon to muddy up the waters. Their latest, After Weinstein: The Fallout for 34 Men Accused of Sexual Misconduct, From Lewd Texts to Rape acknowledges "Here is a list of such cases, which we will update periodically. The list does not include accusations against men for whom there has been no or minimal fallout."

Gee, where is the list of women perverts? If sex scandals only stem from the male genitalia maybe the most important twist to the scandals goes missing. From across the pond, the Sun takes up the "PC" analysis in Women will be driven out of politics by ‘toxic’ sex scandal, Ruth Davidson warns.

"Our political institutions are in danger of gaining a reputation as a toxic workplace for women.
"Let me make my position plain - we need to throw open the doors on what has gone on in the past.

"We need to flood the dark corners of Parliament - and politics in general - with the disinfectant of sunshine."We ask our political representatives to do a professional job; the very least they should expect is a professional workplace with decent HR practices in which to function.
"We need to address those misdeeds because we cannot let them put off the next generation of lawmakers."

How nice that the home of so many closet queens can take a back seat to the deviants who molest women can take the heat.
Now from that bastion of establishment journalism, Time provides an even longer list compiled by Samantha Cooney. Here Are All the Public Figures Who’ve Been Accused of Sexual Misconduct After Harvey Weinstein seems to omit any women as the perpetrators of the power trip of sexual dominance. MS. Cooney states:

"The Weinstein scandal has sparked a national conversation about sexual misconduct and prompted others to come forward with accusations ranging from groping to rape against prominent men, including former Gossip Girl actor Ed Westwick, House of Cards star Kevin Spacey, actor Ben Affleck and former President George H. W. Bush. 

These are the men who have been accused of sexual misconduct after the Harvey Weinstein allegations."
HELLO !!! Where do you find a list of female perps?

What is the message coming out of this never-ending featured cinematograph script to unclothe all those Harveywood sickos and their crony politicians who double in their buddy flicks? Obviously, better to shift your gender preference so your Lilith kinkiness can take down your own Adam.
So the lesson to take away from the power trip that targets male dominated scandals is not to be a teacher and use the authority of the class room to inflict preeminence over all those innocent children. Sorry, Mary Kay Letourneau is not eligible to run with the political bulls. THE 50 MOST INFAMOUS FEMALE TEACHER SEX SCANDALS is the other side of the coin.
John O’Sullivan in The Australian writes,

 "We seem to have reached a general social conclusion after a remarkably brief and one-sided debate: sexual exploitation of vulnerable women by powerful men has been a vast hidden epidemic in our society and must now be halted once and for all. But how?
That’s not difficult to answer. George MacDonald, the Scottish religious novelist (who inspired CS Lewis), once wrote that it was the duty of a man to protect women against all men, starting with himself. If all men were to act consistently on that principle, there would be no problem of sexual harassment to solve.

But as every man must concede (including the author of this column), only a small minority of men (generally with names prefixed by “St”), consistently live up to this standard. We should be encouraged to do so by our moral upbringing and by the general mes­sages of our culture. But since both sexes are composed of fallen creatures, we will always fall well below 100 per cent success in this endeavour even in a high-minded society. An additional problem is that we don’t live in a high-minded ­society but in a liberated one. And the liberation of manners, in ­alliance with the law of unintended consequences, has had effects that the reformers didn’t expect."

Ask yourself, how many rehab programs will Harveywood need to attend to get across this lesson of self-control? For the power elites, this formula is gender neutral. That legendary Baroness of Corporatist feminism, Leona Helmsley stated in the Nov. 1990 issue of Playboy.

"There is definitely a double standard for men and women: When a man loses his temper, he is aggressive; I'm a pushy bitch. A man is confident and authoritative; I'm conceited and power-mad. Men don't want women getting to the top. Period."

Employing the Weinstein model, the political class exemplifies the proven substitute to viagra; namely, no term limits. When John Conyers robed in mere underwear provides ample qualifications for re-election, you know the House is a brothel of disrepute.

These signs of deviance are just symptoms of the core factor that perpetuates the revolving door of political bribery. Achieving influence by perverting the popular narrative corrupts both the public and the power brokers, who seek to buy politicians and the government that ostensibly, administer the rules.   
The general society is mostly a non-participant factor in the great game of delusion that conditions the populace to accept the psychopathic culture that devalues all human life and degrades each individual. The consequences of a debasement of moral principles are demonstrated all around us.

If women are serious about earning the respect of men, their best step forward is to adopt a pro-life value system. If men want to earn the respect of females they should treat women as if each were their mother. Finally, for those who are confused as to their natural sexual gender, grow up and accept reality.
SARTRE - November 28, 2017   



I have covered this story from a number of angles over the years, but since it is so important for the health and well being of our children, I feel motivated to continue. The subject article covers a few of the harmful ingredients in childhood vaccines. It is amazing that millions pay no attention to putting ingredients like aluminum, propylene glycol, thimerisol and polysorbate 80, among others into our bloodstreams and that of our children.

So, once again ----- if you are one who thinks taking a vaccine provides you with immunity from a disease, why do you care if I choose not to get that vaccine? If I come down with that disease, you should be in no danger.

Bruce                      New World Order News

Vaccine Ingredients: America’s Dirty Little Secret

At first glance, vaccination appears to be a life-saving benefit of modern medicine. We are told vaccines eradicated polio, the measles and a host of other communicable diseases. However, as the health of America’s children declines, we must take a critical look at causal factors and commonalities in this population.

About half of the children in the U.S. suffer from a developmental disability or chronic health condition. The health of our children is in peril and good sense dictates there must be a cause. How could fifty percent of a nation’s children be sick? Logically speaking, there must be a sound and reasonable explanation. [1]

The Truth About Vaccines
The explanation is multifaceted: in the mid-90s, the U.S. introduced genetically modified foods, which can alter DNA and RNA; we have failed to study the correlation between acetaminophen and the reduction of glutathione (glutathione is a necessary component in detoxification); and we have increased the vaccination schedule from twenty (in the 1980s) to 72 (2017 CDC recommended schedule).

If fifty percent of any population is chronically ill, there will be commonalities among that population and identifiable causal factors. Yes, the U.S. has introduced genetically modified foods to our food supply and acetaminophen decreases the body’s ability to excrete toxins. However, what is most notable about the U.S. is that we have one of the most aggressive vaccine schedules in the world. Could this be a causal factor in the rise of childhood illnesses?

The increase in the vaccine schedule equates to an increase in neurotoxic ingredients found in vaccines. Childhood vaccines contain ingredients such as aluminum phosphate, formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, 2-phenoxyethanol, aluminum hydroxide, sodium chloride, polysorbate 80 (Tween 80), MRC-5 cells and normal human diploid cells, to name a few. [2]

Health organizations argue that while these ingredients may be toxic to the body, they are administered in miniscule amounts and, therefore, will not cause cellular damage. While this argument sounds reasonable, it is not based in fact. The fact of the matter is, adequate studies on the use of polysorbate 80 (also known as Tween 80) in vaccines have not been conducted.

The Truth About Polysorbate 80
The following vaccines contain a form of polysorbate 80:
DTaP (Infanrix)
DTaP—IPV (Kinrix)
DTap-HepB-IPV (Pediarix)
DTaP-IPV-Hib (Pentacel)
Influenza (Agriflu)
Influenza (Fluarix)
Meningococcal (MenB-Trumenba)
Pneumococcal (PCV13—Prevnar13)
Rotavirus (RotaTeq)
Tdap (Boostrix)

The issue with polysorbate 80 is that “Polysorbate 80 is used as an emulsifier by the pharmaceutical industry to enhance the delivery of chemicals/drugs from the blood into the brain across the blood brain barrier (BBB). Being that the BBB is impermeable to many things in the bloodstream, researchers needed to find a way to deliver chemicals/drugs into the brain from the bloodstream in order to treat hard-to-reach brain infections/lesions/tumors, etc. Polysorbate 80 is one such chemical that helps in this delivery.” [3]

These following questions are precisely the questions we must be asking. If polysorbate 80 can open up the blood brain barrier (BBB), what is to stop harmful vaccine ingredients such as formaldehyde, acetone, aluminum (a known neurotoxin), etc., from causing cellular damage?
If the function of polysorbate 80 is to enhance the delivery of chemicals and drugs from the blood and across the BBB, is this ingredient a contributing causal factor in the rise of childhood illnesses in the U.S.? If vaccine ingredients include known neurotoxins such as, aluminum, is it safe to assume that polysorbate 80 administered in vaccines is facilitating neurological damage?

Unanswered Questions About Vaccines

I pose these questions as they are yet to be answered. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has never done a study of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children to compare health outcomes of each group. They do not study synergistic toxicity (studying the combination of two or more toxins) and therefore, do not know how these ingredients impact neurological development.

The CDC is believed to be an independent regulatory agency; however, many CDC employees leave the CDC and take high-paying positions for pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines. Julie Gerberding was a director of the CDC and is now president of Merck’s Vaccine Division. Paul Offit sat on the CDC advisory boards and voted to add new vaccines to the vaccination schedule. While at the CDC, Offit worked for Merck, developing a Rotavirus vaccine. This vaccine was added to the schedule and Offit sold the patent to Merck for $182 million dollars; Offit stated it was “like winning the lottery.” [4]

The issue here is not one of conspiracies or even theories. We know that polysorbate 80 opens the BBB and allows for the delivery of chemicals and drugs to the brain. In addition to this harmful ingredient, there are food proteins found in vaccines. These proteins can cause food allergies — notice the increase in peanut and food allergies? — and yet, health agencies like the CDC will not study the causal link between the increase in food allergies and proteins used in vaccines. [5]

The Sad Truth About Fetal Cells
Vaccines also contain fetal cells. The MMR vaccine, for example, contains aborted fetal cells from 1966. The cells were extracted from an aborted fetus whose mother was a psychiatric patient. If we introduce fetal cells and, therefore, human DNA to a child, does this foreign DNA trigger autoimmune responses? [6]

The increase in childhood illness must have a cause or trigger. There must be common factors when half of America’s children are chronically ill. Could vaccine ingredients be the causal factor of the increase in childhood illnesses? This question remains unanswered by the CDC.

As stated above, many CDC employees have a vested financial interest in continuing to sell and market vaccines. As childhood illnesses continue to increase, logic and reason must be applied to the debate and we must identify common factors. What do American children have in common? The large majority receive vaccines per the CDC schedule, 72 vaccines by age eighteen.

Until synergy, the exposure of food proteins and human DNA in vaccines are properly studied, it is reasonable and logical to assume that vaccines are deteriorating the health of our children. The regulatory agencies designed to oversee vaccine safety are profiting from the sale of vaccines; with that knowledge, parents must remain vigilant. Because CDC employees profit from vaccine sales, there is not an unbiased regulatory agency monitoring vaccine ingredients.

Could these ingredients be the cause of the rise of childhood illnesses? As of today, this appears to be the most logical answer. Vaccine ingredients are a synergistic nightmare and just may be America’s best kept dirty little secret.





The mediawhores don't cover this very much, but those working in healthcare are very aware. Healthcare workers in hospitals, clinics and even beginning their education are being forced against their will to receive vaccines. The main one being required is the flu vaccine.

Many healthcare workers are aware of 2 facts concerning this vaccine: 1) There is no evidence this vaccine works. 2) There is overwhelming evidence this vaccine contains several dangerous ingredients. Because of this and general principles, healthcare workers are increasingly resisting these authoritarian tactics. One article covers the firing of 50 healthcare workers because of their refusal to be vaccinated against their will. The second one covers suggestions healthcare workers could implement when confronted with these mandates.

I will repeat my question which no one in support of mandatory vaccination has been able to answer: If you believe vaccines prevent disease and you have been vaccinated, why do you care if I choose not to be vaccinated? According to you, you are in no danger.

Bruce                                        New World Order News

Minnesota Hospital fires 50 employees who refused to get flu shots

Essentia Health has fired about 50 employees because they refused to get flu shots.
The health care provider set a Monday deadline for employees to get flu shots or receive an exemption for medical or religious reasons.
Chief of patient quality and safety, Dr. Rajesh Prabhu said Essentia’s mandatory approach came down to two things, a desire to increase patient safety and an understanding that Essentia’s 82 percent flu vaccination rate from 2016 wasn’t going to change voluntarily.

“Purely voluntary or more education doesn’t get you those high levels of immunization compliance and as you know other states, other health care organizations have done the same thing we have,” he said.
Since September, Essentia has told employees, volunteers, students and vendors they have three options: get the flu shot, get an approved religious or medical exemption, or leave Essentia.

Fight back against America's police state with this great shirt!
As of Tuesday, Dr. Prabhu said 99.5 percent of employees have chosen the first two options, but fifty so far have been terminated with more left waiting to hear back on their exemptions.

Minnesota Nurses Association Duluth chair Steve Strand said with so many employees in that limbo, his union doesn’t know how many members may have lost their jobs just yet.
“We believe that they will be denying some of those, and then those individuals may end up terminated also,” he said.

But Strand said the MNA does intend to fight any terminations for a policy they say is unnecessarily intrusive and may not even be effective. He said if Essentia had negotiated with his nurses before implementing the policy they would have suggested a mulch-tiered approach that included a voluntary policy and stricter hygiene practices. He cited CDC research showing this year’s vaccine is expected to be 60 percent effective against the flu.

Nonviolent Civil Disobedience in Protest Against Coercive Flu Shots (Without Informed Consent)

Hello Fellow Healthcare Worker! Having managed so far to avoid being fired for refusing the seasonal Flu vaccine, with methods ranging from Religious Exemption, to Mask-Wearing, here are some of my observations “from the field”, in hopes that you may find something that will be useful in your own situation. 

Desperate times call for desperate measures, and in America, Civil Disobedience has a long and effective history of being utilized by those oppressed, to bring attention to their plight, gain sympathy from persons of influence, and change the course of the national conversation regarding their cause.
The more trouble for the employer that we can make of Mandatory Vaccination Time, the more annoyed they will be with the whole process.

Most people really don’t like having to get shots. This includes some managers, Human Resources personnel, the Infection Control team, Pastoral Care staff, administrators, office staff, and legal department personnel. These people are not likely to go against the tide. In fact they usually “go along to get along”. However, at least some of them must secretly be a little disgruntled about the whole thing. Some may even be secretly cheering us on. Let’s leverage any support we can get from them. If they are not against us, they may potentially be for us.

The more of a hassle it is to get the 90% vaccination rate and to fill out and submit all the necessary documentation, plus the nuisance of annually dealing with exemptions, declinations, and documenting and policing all of that, the worse of a taste it will leave in people’s mouths.

These people are busy and most of them don’t welcome any more impositions on their time. (This can also work in our favor in the future, for if the flu shot is enough of a hassle, then when CMS attempts to mandate even more vaccines in the future, employers who are already resenting the bureaucratic hassles, may begin to “push back” a little.)

When they roll out “Flu Shot Time”, try asking your fellow employees, to please consider waiting until the last possible day to get their mandatory shot. You can say you are helping participate in the national observance of “After You Day!”

This day will vary from each place of employment, it is basically the final day of any “deadline” that is given, to get a flu shot.  We can frame the “After You Day” in this way: Healthcare workers are conscious of the fact that some years there are flu vaccine shortages, and being the noble, self-sacrificing professionals that we are, we merely wish for all others to have their chance to get the vaccine first. If your employer says “Oh, we have enough for everybody”, staff can demur & say, “Oh, that’s ok, we always think of others first!”

Having a substantial portion of the employees wait until the last day, would surely cause some teeth-gnashing in the Infection Control office. They may move back the deadline, in which case the staff should take advantage of getting to wait longer!

Wouldn’t it be great if this really did catch on as a national thing? The public would have to ask, why ARE all those healthcare people putting off getting THEIR shot until the last possible day? Some light bulbs may go off above some people’s heads.

Below are some examples of nonviolent civil disobedience that hospital employees can use that will help highlight the unfairness and absurdities of coercive flu vaccinations (which are usually ineffective and, in most years, also unnecessary). Coerced flu shots are also in total violation of the sacred principle of informed consent.

1) Don’t go to the vaccine pushers, make them come looking for you.
If you are in danger of being fired over the issue:  Drag out all interactions. Don’t respond to emails right away. Make appointments for meetings as far in the future as possible. Make the meetings last a long time. If you are handed something to read and/or sign, take as long as possible reading it.  Ask for clarification.  Pause a long time to digest the “clarification”. Also, most people don’t realize, they usually don’t have to sign anything “right now”.  Say you would need to take a copy home with you so you can research it further, or talk it over with “someone”. Then, don’t be in any hurry to return the paperwork. If they press you to return it, say you need more time. You might even misplace it!

2) Regarding signing anything, follow suggestions others have posted to NAMV, such as, drawing a line through things you don’t agree with, writing in your own statements, and then sign “Under Duress” next to your signature. If you have to write in a reason for declining, you can type your statement out, print it off, then make a copy of their paper with your typed statement superimposed over the area where you were supposed to handwrite an answer. (It helps to use a bolder typeface than their paper used.) It looks much more serious & professional, when you can turn in a paper that they thought would have a little handwritten statement on it, to rather look like you mean business. Insist on having a copy of everything.

3) If you have to meet with management or Human Resources, try to meet with just one person. Then after that meeting, request to meet with their superior, or your superior, or any other department you can think to involve, but make the meetings one at a time, and as many days apart from each other, as possible. The goal is to stay employed as long as possible, plus those meetings should be on paid time, right?

4) If your hospital requires masks, depending on their policy, flout it when you are off-duty. If staff is allowed to have family members or others stop by the nurse’s station to pick up or drop off things, chat briefly while on duty, make sure to do the same to your on-duty coworkers, unmasked. Bring cookies. Visit in the rooms of friends or relatives who are hospitalized. Eat meals at the hospital cafeteria on your time off. All without a mask. (And see the light bulbs go on.)

5) If you are to be terminated, DON’T Resign! Don’t go with quiet dignity. Be angry (not threatening) or miserable, whichever feels right to you. Make them (from the higher-ups to the secretaries) look you in the eye. Make them squirm with discomfort. Try to make sure their consciences bother them. Your tears affect your fellow humans at the gut level. Especially in health care, where empathy is hopefully in greater supply. Take a long time to clean out your desk, locker, etc., and do it when there are likely to be the most people around. Write farewell notes. We want this to affect morale. If coworkers are fearful and resentful, and higher-ups are feeling, used, guilty, and uncomfortable, that is as it should be.

6) Once terminated, gather your quiet but cheerful dignity about you, hold your head up, and go back to visit often, taking cookies to former coworkers, visiting patients, eating in the hospital cafeteria, (lunch dates with former coworkers?), visiting the chapel, anywhere where members of the public can be. Smile a lot. You are free!

7) If terminated, try to network with others in your area.  As a group, perhaps you can get local news media interested in your story. If interviewed, stay on-topic, i.e., this is about resisting MANDATORY vaccination, don’t stray into individual concerns about vaccine safety, ingredients, etc. You can say something like: “No vaccine is 100% effective, and no vaccine is 100% risk-free. Vaccination is an invasive medical procedure, and we support voluntary, informed consent, for our patients as well as ourselves.”

8) If you are a religious person, pray for guidance before any meeting. Christians may wish to ask the Holy Spirit to give them the right words. Catholics may wish to ask the intercession of St. Michael, or another favorite saint. If you work for a faith-based entity, where meetings are often opened with a prayer, before meeting with anyone in regard to your declining the flu shot, say you would like to begin the meeting with a prayer, and have an appropriate prayer ready.

9) Be sure to seek medical attention to document the traumatic after effects and difficulties you have been put through (whether submitting to the shot or not). If you absolutely feel you have no option but to get the shot (nursing students have my greatest sympathies here!), you may find that being forced into having a vaccination is likely to haunt you and be memorable to you for a long time.

The person who gives you the shot may also find it a memorable experience. Your soul is likely to be in agony over this and you may find yourself giving it full expression at the time the shot is being given. Don’t be surprised if you find yourself letting out your pent-up frustration, screaming, sobbing, hyperventilating, writhing, jumping around, yelling, knocking the syringe away, all giving expression to the angst you are feeling at this violation of your body and your conscience.

When you finally get control of yourself afterward, you may need to explain that the symptoms were out of your control. You may wish to ask the person who gave you the shot, to then help you fill out and file a Vaccine Adverse Event Report (VAERS) to the government, and, be sure to mention that you hope you don’t get Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) from this whole event. If you DO experience symptoms such as sleep disturbance, depression, crying for no reason, anxiety, nervousness, appetite disturbances, poor concentration, flashbacks, or feeling ill when you have to be around needles at work, etc., be sure to seek medical attention to document the after-effects and difficulties you are having.

If you do end up having to sue for workplace trauma or file a disability claim it will be very important to have documents with dates, times, who, what, where, and, of course medical records showing how forced vaccination has adversely affected you will be very helpful.
Be brave, fellow Healthcare Worker, and remember, while the other side accuses us of not protecting our patients, understand, we ARE protecting them from something far worse than Influenza, by fighting to protect the right to Informed Consent and the right of competent adults to control their own healthcare decisions. This IS for our patients!



Well, it apparently has failed. I am referring to the mediawhore campaign to smear Judge Roy Moore and prevent him from being elected to the U.S. Senate. Over the past few weeks there have been numerous reports from the mediawhores that Moore was inappropriate towards women back in the 1970's. Independent investigators have found these reports to be false and the voters are rejecting this campaign. According to the subject article, a poll is showing Moore holding a big lead over his Democrat opponent.

Even more troubling for the leftists is their longstanding method of securing and maintaining power is failing. Going way back to Barry Goldwater, the leftists have used smears, accusations and innuendo, to defeat conservative candidates. “You're a racist”. “You're a homophobe”. “You're an anti-Semite”. “You're a misogynist”. It's always worked before, but not this time. Maybe, finally, the public is wising up. After all, does anyone believe someone who is constantly calling those with whom they disagree these names? It may be getting to the point where when the mediawhores call someone these names, it actually makes people want to support them. Any enemy of them is a friend of mine.

Bruce                                New World Order News

Judge Roy Moore Leads Liberal Doug Jones 58% to 35% in latest Tribune Poll

n an unscientific online poll conducted by The Trussville Tribune, Republican Roy Moore led Democrat Doug Jones by a healthy margin.
The poll limited participating IP addresses to one entry and had 2,741 participants. The Tribune covers the cities of Trussville, Clay, Pinson, Center Point, Argo and Springville in Jefferson and St. Clair counties.
When asked who participants would vote for in Alabama’s U.S. Senate race, 58.5 percent chose Moore over Jones with 35 percent. Less than 4 percent said they would not vote and less than 2 percent said they would write in a candidate.
Asked if they were affiliated with a political party, 46.5 percent of participants identified as Republican, 33 percent said they were independent, and 22 percent said Democrat.
The poll participants identified as conservative 55 percent of the time, moderate 30 percent, and liberal 15 percent.
Asked if they believed the allegations about Moore, 50 percent did not, 36 percent did believe the allegations and 14 percent were undecided.



Over the past 2 years, Saudi Arabia, backed by American air strikes, and using American weapons, has been systematically eradicating the entire population of Yemen. It all started when rebels in Yemen overthrew the U.S. installed government. Saudi Arabia then attacked Yemen from the air and instituted a blockade to prevent them from receiving supplies.

It has been reported that over 50,000 children have died over the past 2 years directly resulting from the military action waged against them. More millions are starving and racked with disease. The UN has warned that these actions will result in the death of millions if not stopped.

So here we are. The land of the free and the home of the brave. All of the principles upon which our republic was founded are being flushed down the toilet. The world watches while the majority in our nation is preoccupied with Thanksgiving and football. If there is anyone who can justify the killing of tens of thousands of innocents, I would love to hear the reasons. That being said, maybe the final chapter of the American empire is being written for future generations.

Bruce                     New World Order News
60 Minutes, barred from Yemen, still got the footage

This week on 60 Minutes, correspondent Scott Pelley reports on the dire conditions for children in Yemen. The situation is so severe that, according to the U.N., a child in Yemen dies every ten minutes. But the widespread starvation is an underreported story because, as Pelley explains, the Saudi-led blockade that's cutting off food supplies is also blocking journalists from entering Yemen.
It happened to Pelley and a 60 Minutes crew as they tried to enter Yemen to film conditions on the ground for this week's report.

"It's an extreme case," Pelley tells 60 Minutes Overtime. "In my experience, I have never found a country so sealed off from the rest of the world as Yemen under the Saudi coalition today."

"It's very rare to have a situation in which you have this all-out war, millions of people facing famine, nearly a million people infected by cholera—and the world can't see it," he says.
60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley
Prior to leaving for Yemen, the producers of the story, Nicole Young and Katie Kerbstat, worked for months to gain the necessary permissions to enter the country. The team had obtained visas from both sides of the conflict, the Yemeni authorities and the Houthi rebels, and they worked contacts at the World Food Program, the United Nations, and the U.S. State Department. The producers said Saudi authorities gave them informal permission through a liaison.

The producers' plan was to land in Djibouti, a small country in the Horn of Africa, then take a ship about 25-30 miles across the Red Sea to Yemen.
At least, that was the plan.

The 60 Minutes producers' plan was to land in Djibouti, a small country in the Horn of Africa, then take a ship about 25-30 miles across the Red Sea to Yemen.

"As soon as we got to Djibouti, the Saudis rescinded the permission that they had given us to be on the ship," Pelley says. So the team started asking questions. Was the ship being held in port? No, they were told. It was still going; they were not.

From the window in their hotel room, they watched the ship depart without them.
A view of Yemen taken from the boat the 60 Minutes team was barred from boarding.

Their next opportunity to reach Yemen was by plane, so they put their names on the flight manifest to be on that trip. But they were later told their names had been crossed off.

Finally, they received permission to board a World Food Programme flight at the end of that week, so they arrived at the airport in Djibouti, loaded their cases of television equipment onto the plane, and waited patiently with boarding passes in hand.

Then a message arrived saying the Saudis had closed the airspace. Pelley guessed that a military exercise was the reason. Then a second message arrived saying the airspace would remain closed until 60 Minutes' gear was off the plane.

"We were told that the airspace was closed because of a problem that needed to be remedied," Young says, "and we were the problem."

60 Minutes producer Nicole Young
Though physically blocked, the team was not deterred.

"We don't ever want to allow a government to prevent us from doing a legitimate story," Pelley says. "And over the years at 60 Minutes, we have gone to considerable risks to prevent that kind of thing from happening."

Since they were unable to get a 60 Minutes camera crew into Yemen, the producers did the next best thing—they asked others to film for them. According to the producers, one of the shooters they recruited is a non-journalist whose day job is working in the humanitarian community; the other is a local Yemeni who reports under an alias.

"They weren't hard to convince," Young says. "What we just needed to do was make sure it could work for us."

60 Minutes associate producer Katie Kerbstat with a child born in a refugee camp in Djibouti from Yemeni parents.

That meant giving the new shooters a crash course in basic 60 Minutes camera techniques. It wasn't all that complicated: Use a tripod or hold the camera as still as possible, don't pan, and make sure the shot lasts at least 15 seconds.  

The two shooters, working separately, quickly shot video of conditions inside Yemen. One sent files digitally, and the other carried the video files back to Djibouti on a hard drive and handed it off to the 60 Minutes team before they departed for New York.
The contents of those video files told a tale of woe, says Pelley.
Haifa, a seven-year-old victim of Yemen's famine, weighs just 11 pounds.

"We saw pictures of children who were just wasting away because of the famine, because of the cholera in that country," Pelley says. If they survive, many of those children will be part of a "lost generation" for Yemen, says Pelley. Without food, a child's physical growth and brain growth is stunted — and irreversible.
The Saudis have pledged $8 billion in humanitarian aid for Yemen, but they've delivered very little of that. David Beasley, who runs the World Food Programme, is starting to feel hopeless, telling Pelley on the 60 Minutes broadcast, "I don't see a light at the end of this tunnel."

The video above was produced by Ann Silvio, Will Croxton, Sarah Shafer Prediger, and Lisa Orlando. It was edited by Will Croxton.


DTP Vaccine Increases the Death Rate by 5 to 10 Times

This is really frustrating. Over the past several years, I and many others, have posted numerous studies and articles showing the potential dangers of vaccines. On top of that there is no evidence that these vaccines work. None-the-less parents march their children to the local pusher (otherwise known as the health care professional) to get a variety of vaccines.

The subject article covers one such study. The study shows that giving the DPT vaccine to infants aged between 3 and 5 months increasing the possibility of death from 5 to 10 times. I'll make a prediction that the vast majority of Americans will ignore this, as will the medical community and send their babies to get all of the recommended shots. Know it or not, they are literally risking long term damage and even death, according to numerous studies.

I have been wondering if all of this negative publicity has had any effect on the population at large. Just in my small circle I have met many who have rolled up their sleeves and gotten the flu shot. I ask if they know what's in it? None of them have responded positively. Anyway, I don't know any other way than to continue to put out the word even if it has little effect. If it saves a few, that's better than none.

Bruce                                                         New World Order News

(NaturalHealth365) New research is showing significant findings regarding the health risks associated with vaccines. A paper written by Dr. Peter Aaby and colleagues from the Statens Serum Institute (SSI) in Denmark indicates that receiving the DTP vaccine – early in life – dramatically increases infant mortality rates.

The study compares mortality associated with the whole cell pertussis DTP vaccine at 3 to 5 months of age in vaccinated and unvaccinated children in Guinea-Bissau. Mortality was found to be an alarming 5 to 10 times higher in those children receiving the DTP vaccine as compared with the unvaccinated.
Danish vaccine manufacturer and pro-vaccine researcher admits DTP vaccine kills children

The scientists found children who received OPV (oral polio vaccine) simultaneously along with the DTP vaccine fared better. It appears that the OP vaccine somehow offsets the DTP vaccine, although mortality rates were still higher than normal overall. Infant mortality from any cause after 3 months of age was found to be dramatically increased in infants after receiving vaccination.

While the negative vaccine side effects were much stronger for children who only received the DTP vaccine and no OPV, both vaccines, administered in the 1980s, likely contained high amounts of aluminum and mercury.

These findings are truly alarming, as is the authors’ conclusion:

“All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus, or pertussis.”
This is an extraordinary indictment of one of the most commonly used childhood vaccines in the world.
DTP vaccine weakens the immune system and increases the risk of infections

The study was conducted by the Statens Serum Institute (SSI) and funded in part by the Danish government. SSI is one of the principal vaccine manufacturers in Denmark, and Aaby is a highly respected PRO-vaccine scientist.

In the face of a pattern of stonewalling and denial by pharmaceutical companies and health organizations, this strong statement against vaccination and vaccine side effects is refreshing. The results were published in the January 2017 issue of EBioMedicine.

Researchers have theories about why the DTP vaccine is so harmful to infant health. They believe that while the diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus vaccine
may protect against infections related to these illnesses, it also weakens the immune system significantly while doing damage to overall health. This in turn makes children more vulnerable to illness and mortality from other types of infections.
It’s time for more research and transparency about vaccine side effects

UNICEF was supplied with DTP vaccines by five pharmaceutical manufacturers in the 1970s and 80s. A cascade of lawsuits followed almost immediately in the U.S. due to vaccine side effects harming children. This led to the disturbing move by Congress to give immunity to vaccine makers via the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Program and its own “Vaccine Court.”

The World Health Organization and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention refuse to perform vaccine safety studies on vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children or publish reports by other researchers.

Yet, clearly, the findings from the Danish government underscore the need for more of this type of research as well as transparency about vaccination safety.



Meanwhile the real perverts, many of whom populate our media and Congress go unscathed. I don't want to go on too much about this supposed scandal as that just gives attention to professional slanderers. I have posted a couple of headlines concerning some of the accusations along with an open letter from Judge Roy Moore. In those articles and letter it becomes very evident that the only purpose of these accusations is to prevent a conservative, Christian man from getting into an exclusive club. That club is the U.S. Congress and Senate.

Sadly, it has become obvious that this club is not for the moral or the honest or those dedicated to serving the American people. No, this club is populated by amoral swine, whose only purposes are to loot the American people, do very little actual work, lie and join in self indulgence. Roy Moore does not qualify. If fact, if he were the kind of man of which he is accused, he would be welcomed with open arms. Just ask Gary Hart, Barney Frank, John Edwards and Bill Clinton.

Oh, I almost forgot to include one more attribute necessary for the Senate ---- you have to be a hypocrite.

Bruce                          New World Order News

                  "We are in the process of investigating these false allegations to determine their origin and motivation," Moore said in the                         Hannity letter. "For instance, we have documented that the most recent accuser, Beverly Nelson, was a party in a divorce                         action before me in Etowah County Circuit Court in 1999. No motion was made for me to recuse.
                   "In her accusations, Nelson did not mention that I was the judge assigned to her divorce case in 1999, a matter that                                   apparently caused her no distress at a time that was 18 years closer to the alleged assault. Yet 18 years later, while talking                        before the cameras about the supposed assault, she seemingly could not contain her emotions."

Birmingham, ALABAMA — The mother of Leigh Corfman, who says that Alabama Senatorial Candidate Roy Moore tried to engage in a sexual encounter with her when she was 14, has contradicted a key detail of Corfman’s story.
Speaking by phone to Breitbart News on Saturday, Corfman’s mother, Nancy Wells, 71, says that her daughter did not have a phone in her bedroom during the period that Moore is reported to have allegedly called Corfman – purportedly on Corfman’s bedroom phone – to arrange at least one encounter.
Moore strongly denies Corfman’s claims.
The Washington Post, which first published its newsmaking, on-the-record interview with Corfman last week, cited Corfman as remembering that she provided Moore with her number when she was 14. She said that she spoke to Moore from what she described as the phone in her bedroom.
Citing Corfman, the Post reported:
when she recalled the alleged drive with Moore from her house.
5 – 7: The Post used the word three times when citing Corfman in the following paragraph:
She remembers an unpaved driveway. She remembers going inside and him giving her alcohol on this visit or the next, and that at some point she told him she was 14. She says they sat and talked. She remembers that Moore told her she was pretty, put his arm around her and kissed her, and that she began to feel nervous and asked him to take her home, which she says he did.
8 – Referring to the alleged sexual encounter, the Post reported:
She remembers that Moore kissed her, that he took off her pants and shirt, and that he touched her through her bra and underpants. She says that he guided her hand to his underwear and that she yanked her hand back.
9 – In that same encounter, the Post relates:
She remembers thinking, “I don’t want to do this” and “I need to get out of here.” She says that she got dressed and asked Moore to take her home, and that he did.
Meanwhile, Wells told Breitbart that she and her daughter stick by the Post’s story. “It’s truthful and it was researched very well,” she said.
Asked if she could remember Moore, then a 32-year-old assistant district attorney, allegedly asking to watch her daughter in 1979 while Wells went into a courtroom, Wells recounted the story essentially the same way she told it to the Post.
Wells told this reporter: “We were sitting in the hall. He came up and started talking to us. We were sitting on a bench waiting to go into court. He said, you know, ‘What are you doing.’ You know, we told him. He is Roy Moore. And he said, ‘You don’t want her to go in there and hear all of the bickering.’ And I said, ‘No.’ He said, ‘I will be glad to stay out here with her and bring her in if she needs to come in.’ And so that is the way it started.”
“Probably if it were in today’s times that never would have happened,” Wells added. “He sounded like someone that I could trust and we were there in the courthouse.”
Corfman described her own troubled background to the Post, including three divorces, bankruptcies and a history of drug abuse.
The Post related:
She says that her teenage life became increasingly reckless with drinking, drugs, boyfriends, and a suicide attempt when she was 16.
As the years went on, Corfman says, she did not share her story about Moore partly because of the trouble in her life. She has had three divorces and financial problems. While living in Arizona, she and her second husband started a screen-printing business that fell into debt. They filed for bankruptcy protection three times, once in 1991 with $139,689 in unpaid claims brought by the Internal Revenue Service and other creditors, according to court records.
Moore strongly denied Corfman’s claims. “These allegations are completely false and are a desperate political attack by the National Democrat Party and the Washington Post on this campaign,” Moore said in immediate response to the Post’s story.
Moore’s campaign said in a statement, “This garbage is the very definition of fake news and intentional defamation.”
The campaign pointed out that Moore has been married to his wife, Kayla, for nearly 33 years and has four children and five grandchildren. It also noted that Moore has served in public office in the past and that no such allegations were previously made.
The statement said:
The Judge has been a candidate in four hotly-contested statewide political contests, twice as a gubernatorial candidate and twice as a candidate for chief justice. He has been a three-time candidate for local office, and he has been a national figure in two ground-breaking, judicial fights over religious liberty and traditional marriage.
“After over 40 years of public service, if any of these allegations were true, they surely would have been made public long before now,” the statement continued.
On Saturday, Moore further addressed the allegations:
“Now I want to address something that some people have come here to hear about,” Moore said at a local campaign event. “Shortly after becoming the Republican nominee for the United States Senate, the Washington Post began an attack on the Foundation for Moral Law, on my wife, and on me. For weeks, we read about my salary which they distorted, about taxes where they said we were paid money we never got. But we endured that.”
“Later, they came out and endorsed my opponent in this race,” he continued. “Just two days ago, the Washington Post published yet another attack on my character and reputation in a desperate attempt to stop my political campaign for the United States Senate. These attacks about a minor are completely false and untrue about something that happened nearly 40 years ago. But more than being completely false and untrue, they are very hurtful to me personally.”
“I wanted to make it clear to the media present and the people present, I have not provided alcoholic beverages—beer or anything else—to a minor. I have not been guilty of sexual misconduct with anyone,” he declared. “These allegations came only four and a half weeks before the general election on Dec. 12. Why now?”
“For forty years I have been closely scrutinized in the press and the public media. I have had investigations by the attorney general, I’ve had investigations by the judicial inquiry commission on more than one occasion, I’ve had investigations by the court of the judiciary, I’ve been in five statewide campaigns in which they do opposition research—they do investigations, as you can see in every one I’ve ever run—and three county elections and two major controversies over religious liberty and the Ten Commandments and same-sex marriage,” he continued. “I’ve been investigated more than any other person in this country. That grown women would wait forty years to come right before an election to bring charges is absolutely unbelievable.”
Aaron Klein is Breitbart’s Jerusalem bureau chief and senior investigative reporter. He is a New York Times bestselling author and hosts the popular weekend talk radio program, “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio.” Follow him on Twitter @AaronKleinShow. Follow him on Facebook.
Written with additional research by Joshua Klein.

Former Gadsden mall manager says Roy Moore wasn't banned



The subject article covers still another, in a very large list of shameful treatment of our military and the military veterans. After the meltdown of the nuclear reactors at Fukashima, the U.S. aircraft carrier, Ronald Reagan, was ordered to sail into waters close to the disaster. It didn't take long that many of the sailors on the ship began to exhibit symptoms of radiation poisoning. Right on cue our government masters reacted as they have so many times before. The ignored the problem. “They must be crazy. Send them to Psychiatrists”. “It wasn't related to radiation, it must be something else”. “We're investigating”. Meanwhile, many are dying horrible deaths.

After World War One, the government reneged on promises made to veterans. They assembled in a campsite outside of Washington, D.C. President Herbert Hoover then ordered the Army to clear the veterans' campsite. Army Chief of Staff General Douglas MacArthur commanded the infantry and cavalry supported by six tanks. The Bonus Army marchers with their wives and children were driven out, and their shelters and belongings burned.

Then there was the agent orange debacle from the Vietnam war. There are the dead soldiers who fought a war in Iraq over non-existent weapons of mass destruction. U.S. soldiers are being forced to guard poppy fields in Afghanistan.

So, if want to know what your government really thinks of the military, former Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, sums it up: “Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.” Forget the parades and music and empty words of praise from politicians, remember all they have done and continue to do.

Bruce                 New World Order News

Former US Senator: All these Navy sailors have died after Fukushima radiation exposure — TV program reveals many are now dead — Veterans break down in tears… suffering cancers, paralysis, amputations, bleeding from anus, severe pain (VIDEO)

Courthouse News, Sep 1, 2017 (emphasis added): Dying Navy Sailors Push for Trial on Fukushima Meltdown — Representing cancer-ridden Navy service members who say they were exposed to radiation on a humanitarian mission in Fukushima, former Sen. John Edwards urged a federal judge Thursday to set a date for trial. Over a decade after serving as John Kerry’s running mate in the 2004 presidential election, Edwards now represents hundreds of Navy sailors who were aboard the USS Ronald Reagan… “We have all these sailors whose case is now five years old, who have died or are in the process of dying right now,” said Edwards… Edwards noted that some of his other clients have seen their children born with birth defects… He said they want to make sure “the truth comes out” and that the “word gets out about the dangers and risks that exist not just in Japan, but in other parts of the world.”



I have posted 3 headlines covering some of the various scandals circling around some of our former and current government masters. “Indictments are just around the corner”. “There are 33 sealed indictments from a DC Grand Jury”. “The Congress is holding hearings on the Uranium deal”. I've said it before and I'll say it again. These hearings, indictments, investigations and rumors of indictments are going nowhere. It's crooks investigating crooks.

Here is my answer to these headlines: I'll believe it when I see it. Maybe one day the American people will get really fed up with these people.

Bruce                                   New World Order News


​Tom Fitton on JW suing over Mueller/Comey Collusion, Comey's Memo Leak, & Antifa/JW in Court​

​Bret Baier: FBI Sources Believe Clinton Foundation Case Moving Towards “Likely an Indictment”



As if we don't have enough to worry about------ but we have to consider this. We spend a lot of time talking about an economic collapse or nuclear war. Yes, these are very real possibilities which would forever change our lives, if not end them, but what about this? The subject article covers the stopping of trucks for just five days.

Anyone driving down the highway will see a never ending parade of trucks delivering and transporting goods from coast to coast. The streets of our cities and towns are packed with delivery vehicles. If they weren't there, the shelves in our grocery stores and other retail outlets would soon be empty. Obviously, if that were to happen, panic would immediately follow. There aren't enough police in the world to control all of that.

I'm sure that our potential enemies are well aware of this vulnerability here in the U.S. I'm not going to go into the various ways they could cause a disruption like this. I don't want to give them any ideas, but you can use your imagination and there is a lot we can do. Stock up. Food, fresh water, medical supplies, toilet paper, ammunition for weapons and warm clothing will keep you from becoming a victim should disaster hit. We have already seen natural disasters causing just that in some areas of our nation. Those who were prepared only experienced inconvenience. Those who were not, were at the mercy of the elements and emergency personnel.

Bruce                             New World Order News

In Just 5 Days Without Trucks, Chaos Would Erupt in America 

Have you ever thought about how fast things could go sideways in America?  What if we went 5 days without trucks moving supplies across the country? Have you considered how JUST ONE THING could change the world as we know it?

The video below has been around for several years, but if you haven’t seen it in a while, it is worth watching again.

Think for a moment about what would happen if the trucks stopped running. The trucking industry is the lifeblood of this country, and according to this, it would only take 5 days without trucks for all hell to break loose.




The answer is, have an official investigation. I was going to make a list of crimes committed by the Clintons, bankers, corporate crooks and politicians, but
the list would exceed the capacity of this web site. So I listed a couple of today's headlines just to peak your interest.

There are so many “investigations” going on that it is impossible to keep track of all of them. So now we have Donna Brazile's revelations, James Comey's lies and cover ups, the Uranium 1 scandal, election fraud and others. So let's investigate! Let's hold hearings! Let's have a big show! And let it go on forever. Eventually, we'll have to issue a multi-thousand page report. Maybe we'll keep it secret for National Security and in the end --- nothing. We're still trying to get all of the documents on the assassination of John Kennedy.

Never mind Dancing with The Stars, we have real soap operas more entertaining than any sporting event or T.V. show. The only problem is, there is no end.

Back in the 1970's during the Watergate investigation, Hillary Clinton was kicked off the committee. The Democrat head of that committee stated the she was the most corrupt person he ever met. 40+ years later and dozens of investigations later, Hillary remains among us. Enough said.

Bruce                      New World Order News

Hillary Clinton requested FBI Dir. Mueller deliver highly enriched uranium to the Russians in 2009 in secret ‘plane-side tarmac meeting’

​​A former top Clinton confidante and Democrat pollster believes it’s time for a special prosecutor to be appointed to investigate Hillary Clinton.

​Trey Gowdy Sets His Sights On Obama Deep State Traitor​


COLLAPSE UPDATE: 2017 just set the all-time record for store closings

I know, most of the media and government spokesmen continue to peddle the fairy tale that the economy is in a robust recovery. Along with that lie comes government statistics – also lies. Unemployment is below 5 %. Inflation is nearly non-existent and other such non sense.

A much better barometer is in retail. Those are the stores that have customers. In order to be a customer, you have to have the ability to make a purchase. In order to make a purchase, you have to have money. In order to have money, most of us have to have a job. Hopefully, that job will pay you money in excess of what is needed to pay for the absolute necessities.

The subject article flies in the face of government reports. Even though there are almost 2 more months left in this year, this year has set a record for store closings. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that there are not enough people with enough money to keep existing stores open, let alone build more. Every indicator shows that next year will be more of the same – maybe even worse. And what happens to the thousands of workers who were employed in those stores? What kind of customers will they be in the future? So this collapse is real even it is slow.

Once the borrowed money, unemployment benefits, welfare payments and other government supplements end, and they will, well, just use your imagination.

Bruce                          New World Order News

​2017 just set the all-time record for store closings

​ Since January 1, retailers have announced plans to shutter more than 6,700 stores in the U.S., according to Fung Global Retail & Technology, a retail think tank.

That beats the previous all-time high of 6,163 store closings, which hit in 2008 amid the financial meltdown, according to Credit Suisse (CS).

Walgreens helped vault this year's tally to a new high when it said Wednesday that it plans to close about 600 locations. 



The subject article covers Attorney General Jeff Sessions, once again, recusing himself in the uranium 1 investigation. He was asked by Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) to appoint a special counsel to conduct an investigation into this matter and was met with silence as Sessions walked out. So many investigations, so many crimes, so many crooks.

I'll ask again: Aren't you getting sick of these people? I honestly don't know why they are there. All they do is find new ways to fight wars around the world, spy on us, pass new laws to restrict our freedoms, send our jobs out, bring unlimited illegals in while reducing the quality of medical care and jobs for average people.

So here's an idea. Let's go a little further than what Jeff Sessions wants to do. Why not have all of our government masters recuse themselves? They have long since failed to act in the interests of the American people. As has been the case with empires on the past, those in charge forgot those who put them there. They then, eventually, were removed from those positions. A mass recusal might benefit us all.

Bruce                                               New World Order News

​Congressman Says Jeff Sessions Has Recused Himself on Uranium One Deal

​Attorney General Jeff Sessions told a small group of lawmakers in late September he was recused from appointing a special counsel to look into potential corruption surrounding the Uranium One deal and Fusion GPS’s work on the Trump dossier, according to one of the lawmakers present.

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) told Breitbart News on Wednesday that he and other House Judiciary Committee Republicans had met with Sessions at the Justice Department on September 28 in advance of an upcoming committee hearing with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein later this month.



The “spoiled brat” of the U.S. is at it again. This is a big deal, but can be stopped if only our government masters had the courage. Using Lebanon's airspace without permission, Israeli jets fired missiles into Syria, attacking a copper factory. Ask yourself this question: What if Mexico decided to send missiles into the U.S. , attacking various buildings and military facilities? We know the answer. We would retaliate, swiftly and severely. It would be justified. So, what's the difference? There is only one and it revolves around “special privileges” for Israel.

Israel continues to ignore UN resolutions. Israel has never officially defined their borders. Israel has turned Gaza into a prison camp. Israel discriminates against minorities in their own country. Israel illegally occupies territory belonging to other nations. Israel routinely violates the territory of their neighbors. Israel has not signed the nuclear non proliferation treaty. Israel bombs and attacks other nations without justification. But I guess it's O.K. After all, they're Israel. They don't have to live by the same rules as everyone else.

Bruce                              New World Order News 

​Damascus Calls Israel 'Agent of Terrorism' After Airstrike on Syrian Factory

​"Yet another aggression of Israel… shows that Israeli authorities are not satisfied with the state terrorism against the Arab population in occupied Palestine, Syria and Lebanon. They want to play the role of the official agent of terrorism," the ministry's document read, as quoted by the SANA news agency.

Damascus' statement comes a day after a Lebanese security service source told Sputnik that Israeli aircraft had carried out an attack on targets in Syria from Lebanon's airspace.

READ MORE: Israel Carries Out Airstrike Against Syrian Targets From Lebanon's Airspace

According to a Syrian air force source, the Syrian army's 72nd division launched surface-to-air missiles at Israeli planes in the Homs province in response to the airstrike.


COST OF U.S. WARS: $250 Million A Day For 16 Years

I could have named this “collapse update” as this is the primary reason economic collapse cannot be avoided. A quick calculation of those figures means $1,000,000,000 is being spent every 4 days.

We might have some reason to justify this if these wars accomplished anything positive. It hasn't. The 16 years refers to the time we have been in Afghanistan. Once again --- could someone explain why we are there? Then there's the operations in Syria, Yemen, Iraq as well as a number of African countries. If we weren't there, I mean any of these countries, would we be taken over by a foreign power? Of course not! If we remain fighting all these never ending wars, will it bankrupt our nation? Probably.

So, if you are an enemy of the U.S., you are hoping we continue down this road. The debt will continue to balloon. The debt will never be paid. The dollar will collapse and so will our nation.

Bruce                            New World Order News

Defense Department: The War On Terror Has Cost $250 Million A Day For 16 Years

American taxpayers have spent $1.46 trillion on wars abroad since September 11, 2001.

The Department of Defense periodically releases a “cost of war” report. The newly released version, obtained by the Federation of American Scientists Secrecy News blog, covers the time from the September 11th terrorist attacks through mid-2017.

The Afghanistan War from 2001 to 2014 and Iraq War from 2003 to 2011 account for the bulk of expenses: more than $1.3 trillion. The continuing presence in Afghanistan and aerial anti-ISIS operations in Iraq and Syria since 2014 have cost a combined $120 billion.

​We're Losing Afghanistan By Every Metric That Matters

​​The news out of there is grim. A report released today by a watchdog U.S. government agency details what's been happening in Afghanistan as the United States' attention has been fixated elsewhere: The coalition is losing Afghanistan by every metric that matters.

The report comes from the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, or SIGAR. This is the Congressionally empowered group formed to watch over the $121 billion the U.S. has spent since 2001 to rebuild Afghanistan, and to try to ensure it isn't lost to the widespread corruption in the country. SIGAR's quarterly report doubles as a thermometer to gauge what's happening in Afghanistan.



It all started with the refusal on the part of some pro football players to stand for the National anthem while choosing to kneel, but it actually goes way back. Victims censored or fired for inappropriate remarks include Jimmy the Greek, Hank Williams Jr. and John Rocker. Whether or not I agree with everything they or anyone else says is not the issue. The issue is people have a right to say anything they want with the obvious “don't cry fire in a crowded theater” exception. The fact that this right was included in the the very first amendment to the Constitution shows how much the founders considered the importance of freedom of speech. Of course we're going to disagree and then we exercise our right to do just that --- peacefully and reasonably.

So now we have morphed into the absurd and the people are reacting by closing their wallets and changing the channel. The absurdity to which I refer are the so-called offensive remarks that merit hysterical reactions. Some of those issues that have come up just this month are Cam Newton calling a woman “a woman”. The owner of the Houston Texans making a remark about the “inmates running the prison”. Then we have a player from the Houston Astros calling a Japanese pitcher “a little boy' in Spanish.

Let's take a walk down memory lane and ask how the pioneers of the past acted in order to help achieve racial equality. Why didn't Jackie Robinson “take a knee”? How about Hank Aaron? Why didn't Rosa Parks demonstrate against offensive remarks? I'm sure Martin Luther King wanted to get thousands to demonstrate against someone being called a “little boy”. No, you won't find any of these courageous people engaged in the ridiculous trivia that is so prevalent today. They were too busy having their lives and the lives of their families threatened. They were too busy seeing firebombs thrown through windows. They were too busy watching crosses burning on their lawns. They were too busy getting attacked by fire hoses and dogs when they demonstrated.

Thanks to the courage of millions of both white and black people, this generation rarely has to endure the trials that were all too common just a couple of generations ago. Minority sports athletes, both professional and college are reaping the fruits that the sacrifice of others has made possible. Many professional athletes are millionaires. This was not possible for any person of color 70 years ago. Then there are those who get free education, which also was not possible in the not too distant past.

Jackie Robinson and Martin Luther King endured real hardship. In the case of King, he gave his life. None of those pioneers were rich, but thanks to them and others, opportunity exists where none was possible in the past.

So here we are. Those who insist on making something out of nothing are in danger of ruining it for everyone. The vast majority of us work hard every day in construction and transportation and restaurants and retail and mines. We have little sympathy for those who enjoy a life that we can only dream of. Then there is the fact that they get their money from us. They get their stadiums and arenas from us through our tax dollars. One way or another, it will stop. Let's hope these athletes and sports media  come to their senses while they still can.

Bruce                                 New World Order News

NFL ‘take-a-knee’ fallout: stadiums empty; ESPN lays off more employees

Breitbart‘s Dylan Gwinn reports, Oct. 29, 2017, that “the NFL’s early games featured plenty of empty seats”.

And although fans have clearly decided they have better things to do on a Sunday afternoon than watch bad football and activist players “take a knee,” there’s still no indication the NFL is listening.

Meanwhile, decline in viewership has led ESPN to lay off more employees by year’s end.

Robert Jonathan reports for Inquistr, Oct. 26, 2017, that ESPN, the self-named Worldwide Leader in Sports that’s drowning in red ink and dragging down parent company Disney, reportedly is planning to lay off more employees before year’s end. Even ESPN’s flagship SportsCenter broadcast could be included in the downsizing.



This is nothing new. We have been reporting on the continual slide towards oblivion for the JC Penney Corporation for a couple of years now. They have been closing stores, laying off employees and cutting inventory. Just last year they announced a plan to begin carrying large appliances in an effort to come back from the grave. As predicted, that plan has accelerated the unavoidable disaster.

So how are they still surviving and how does that affect us? Penney's like Sears, and many other large corporations have been surviving on borrowed money. Stocks, bonds, unpaid bills and lines of credit from banks and financial institutions pump money into this bottomless pit. It won't be long before those providing this money will give up on Penney's before they themselves, get sucked down.

This all affects us in a number of ways. First, there are the thousands of employees that are still hanging on. They will all lose their jobs. Then there are those who have invested in Penney's stock and bonds. They will all lose their money. Then there are those who have had their IRA's and 401k's exposed to Penney's stocks and bonds. That portion will be totally lost. Many will not even know that until they get their statements. Then there are the hundreds of malls that will be losing one of their anchor stores. They will all lose that income as well as accumulated debt.

This is a snowball involving many retailers and suppliers. It will affect all of us --- some more than others.

Bruce                                    New World Order News

JCPenney slides deeper into the retail apocalypse as it slashes profit forecasts

JCPenney just keeps sliding into the retail apocalypse abyss, and its shares are paying a major price.

The company's stock dropped by as much as 25% on Friday after the retailer cut third-quarter profit forecasts. The department store expects to see a loss of $0.40 to $0.45 a share in the period, far worse than analyst expectations for a loss of $0.18 a a share. JCPenney is set to report results on November 10.

The plunge brings JCPenney's year-to-date decline to 56% as it struggles to adjust to a retail environment where companies are either being crushed by Amazon or partnering with the Jeff Bezos-led juggernaut to stave off extinction.



Back on April 21, 1986 Geraldo Rivera got a prime time slot on nation wide TV to open Al Capone's vault. This had been widely publicized and the public was led to believe there would be previously undisclosed documents and valuables which had been locked away for decades. Guess what? There was nothing there. The vault was empty and, if there was something there once upon a time, it had been removed.

So here we go again. Tomorrow, as has been authorized by President Trump, secret files held by the U.S. government will now be made public. Now we'll know who really killed John Kennedy! Are you kidding? Let's analyze this. Elements of the same government which probably participated in the killing and cover up of the assassination of the President and has held the so-called “secret documents” for over 50 years, is going to release the “truth” to the public. Going back to Al Capone --- if he were still alive in 1986, would it be reasonable to believe that he would tell the truth about his vault or any of his other crimes?

This is just another stunt. Without getting into the volume of information concerning the assassination, one thing is clear. This government has been lying to the people about the assassination since 1963. The lies aren't even good. As for me, I'm not going to waste any of my time going over the latest cover up.

Bruce                                New World Order News

​Why You Shouldn’t Get Your Hopes Up Over JFK Files

​Today is the much-anticipated release date of the infamous JFK files. President Trump’s remarks on the declassification set social media ablaze with speculation on what we might learn from these documents. However, truth-seekers should be reluctant to get their hopes up. If the documents contained anything too revealing about the truth behind JFK’s assassination, the CIA, NSA or any other US intel organization would be stupid to release it. The CIA is many things, but it is not stupid.