POSTED MAY 27, 2015




Unless you have been living on the moon for the past 25 years, this headline is old news. Unfortunately for us, old news morphs into “new news”. The subject article covers a lawsuit filed by Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, charging the Clintons with racketeering.

This time the corruption concerns the Clinton foundation. It has been an open secret that this foundation only gives a very small percentage of money received to their various recipients.

So, none of this is a surprise. What is disappointing is that these people have never been prosecuted for anything. Dozens of people around them dying under suspicious circumstances --- drugs being received and distributed from Mena, Arkansas airport while Bill Clinton was governor --- several women claiming Bill Clinton sexually assaulted them --- crooked land deals--- an impossible cattle futures trade netting Hillary over $100,000 – Benghazi, Libya, a dead Osama being killed again. Here's a question; Would a moral and well educated citizenry ever consider one of these people to rule them?

Bruce                                 New World Order News


Clinton Foundation hit with racketeering lawsuit

By Sarah Westwood | May 27, 2015 | 5:00 am


Bill and Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation have been hit with a racketeering lawsuit in Florida court.

The lawsuit, filed by Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, includes a legal request to have the Florida judge seize the private server on which Hillary Clinton and her aides hosted their emails while she served as secretary of state.

Klayman has filed dozens of lawsuits against the Clintons and other prominent politicians.

The racketeering, influenced and corrupt organizations, or RICO, case alleges the former first couple and their family philanthropy traded political favors for donations or generous speaking fees for Bill Clinton while his wife was the nation's chief diplomat.

"Negotiations by email about influencing U.S. foreign policy or U.S. Government actions to benefit donors to ... The Clinton Foundation or sponsors of speaking engagements would not be captured on a U.S. Government email account because her emails would not be with a U.S. Government official," Klayman said in court documents obtained by the Washington Examiner.

    Officials argue the "nature and scope" of Citizens United's FOIA requests are too broad.

    Sen. Chuck Grassley questioned Hillary Clinton's conflicting statements about her private emails.

"Hillary Clinton deleted 32,000 email messages from her email server that included her communications arranging, negotiating, and agreeing upon speaking engagements by Bill Clinton in return for large speaking fees and donations to The Clinton Foundation," the documents, dated May 20, said.

Klayman pushed the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida to order a "neutral forensic expert ... to take custody and control of the private email server and reconstruct and preserve the official U.S. Government records relating to the conduct of U.S. foreign policy during Defendant Secretary Clinton's term as Secretary of State."

Hillary Clinton handed over 55,000 printed pages of emails to the State Department in November of last year and reportedly erased the remaining records off her private server.

Critics of Clinton's decision to forgo use of an official email account argue the presidential candidate could have simply withheld any incriminating messages from the batch she gave the State Department.

Her supporters have dubbed the quest for Clinton's State Department emails a partisan "witch hunt."

Klayman pointed to the litany of scandals involving missing records that have followed the Clintons for decades, including the fact that thousands of emails disappeared during Bill Clinton's administration after White House officials threatened internal computer experts who blew the whistle on the "suppression."

"It's a perfect RICO case, it fits completely," Klayman said of the lawsuit. "Our Congress doesn't even have the guts to subpoena her documents. They'd rather get on Fox News. So we felt had to bring that case. Somebody's got to do it."

Klayman said a major reason for his lawsuit involves the fact that Cheryl Mills, then-chief of staff to Hillary Clinton, and the secretary of state herself "lied to the lower court" in by claiming there were no documents related to a pair of Freedom of Information Act requests he filed in 2012 while knowing those records actually did exist on the private server.

One FOIA, filed May 2012, pertained to allegations that Hillary Clinton issued waivers for preferred companies to do business with Iran despite strict congressional sanctions. The other probed a 2012 leak of classified information about Israel and Iran to the New York Times and was filed in June of that year.

Klayman said records on the Clintons' private server are "in imminent danger of being lost" in court documents and urged the court to intervene.

Clinton Foundation officials did not return a request for comment on the case.

The massive charity drew fire after a book by Peter Schweizer entitled Clinton Cash suggested foreign governments and companies with interests before the State Department donated to the foundation with the expectation that Hillary or Bill Clinton would ensure they received preferential treatment from the agency.




POSTED MAY 26, 2015




Despite the volume of overwhelming evidence regarding the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccines, the vast majority of Americans will submit their children to dozens of vaccines.

If you are one of those or if you know someone who is one of those, I have posted an article and consent form you may want to sign and give to your healthcare provider. It lists many of the dangers as well as the disclosure that the vaccine may not even work.

Actually, any thinking parent will never sign such a document, but sign or not, the fact that they have allowed their children to receive these vaccines is De Facto consent. It really just comes down to courage. Does a parent have the courage to go up against the government schools? It's not easy. Doing what's right when so many others just roll over, never is.

Bruce                               New World Order News


A Truthful Vaccine Consent Form – That No Mom Could Ever Sign

Tuesday, May 26, 2015

By Shawn Siegel

"The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity."(1)

Those are the closing words of the first tenet of the Nuremberg Code - informed consent – and make no mistake about it - from the most personal of parental perspectives, vaccination’s a macabre experiment, every time: no parent can be certain that a vaccine won’t permanently disable her child.(2) Egregiously, the administering doctor or nurse - or CVS pharmacist - in no way meaningfully fulfills his obligation by providing incomplete information, printed on a form he may or may not even offer, all the while touting the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine.

More fundamentally, the medical industry in no way fulfills its obligation when it omits from medical school curricula any meaningful education in the reality, nature or extent of vaccine injury, or the essential, fundamentally curative role of the disease recovery process.(3)

Largely because of the Internet, it’s now well known that many vaccinated kids develop the very diseases against which they’re supposedly protected. Indeed, there have been outbreaks of the various childhood diseases in which 100% of the kids were vaccinated.(4) Yet, the diagnostic bias which prompts a doctor to virtually discard the possibility of a disease in a patient who’s been vaccinated against it is commonplace, flying in the face of logic - and of good medical practice; of the very interests of the patient.

Indeed, the effectiveness of vaccines is an illusion, a contrivance, the most biting example of which is polio. When following on the heels of the release of the polio vaccine the CDC in 1955 changed the diagnostic parameters of paralytic polio from twenty-four hours of paralysis to sixty days (5), they automatically eliminated 60% of the cases thenceforth to be diagnosed – around 9,000 each year. How arbitrary! Had they simply made it ninety days, they could likely have wiped out another 15%, since, despite the well-constructed public perception that polio disables you for the rest of your life, the great majority of patients ultimately recover. The most astounding change, however, was in the definition of a polio epidemic, from 20 in a population of 100,000, to 35, overnight cutting virtually in half the likelihood that any subsequent outbreaks would be so labeled, as though the severity, or importance, or noteworthiness of paralytic polio had suddenly diminished by half. The result, of course, as with the incidence of the disease itself, was not a real, but a semantic elimination of epidemics.

The industry has answered the increased awareness that vaccinated kids can develop the diseases anyway with an illusory promise: that though vaccination may not prevent infection, it’ll make the disease less severe. Obviously there can be no guarantee that that will be the case, since the severity of disease is dependent on so many individual factors other than the mere presence of the pathogen, and, there’s no way to back out of vaccination – on an individual basis, no way to compare, thus no way to know.

The most inane vaccine myth is that the unvaccinated are somehow a threat - walking, eternal disease vectors. It’s an absurdity. Certainly they are no more a threat than the vaccinated. Kids and adults alike breathe communal air, drink from communal fountains, touch communal doorknobs – potential pathogens can be picked up, carried and transmitted by anyone. Anyone, vaccinated or not, can become infected, and begin infecting others during the typical incubation period of three to five days, or more.

Recently removed or renovated simply because the vaccine awareness community became aware of them, both the Johns Hopkins and St. Jude’s hospitals maintained on their websites advisories to immunocompromised patients, warning against allowing visits from anyone recently vaccinated with a live virus vaccine. Despite the hasty changes, the point is still made: neither hospital mentioned, or mentions, a word about unvaccinated kids being any kind of threat.

No – the reality is opposite, and sobering. We know from the 2013 FDA announcement that anyone vaccinated for whooping cough can develop an asymptomatic infection if subsequently exposed to the disease, and infect others for up to six weeks.(6) The presence of the vaccine-induced antibodies, produced without the participation and guidance of the innate immune system in the mucous membranes and gut, the first responder to natural exposure, convolutes the response process. In the case of whooping cough, then, the vaccination morphs the recipients into potential Trojan horses - the very disease vectors the uvaccinated are claimed to be.

The Lancet-published Ronne study (7)is revelatory. The title alone – "Measles Virus Infection Without Rash in Childhood is Related to Disease in Adult Life" – is a statement, telling us much: that measles rash isn’t only skin deep; that it’s the manifestation of a thorough cleansing, protecting the child against diseases later in life; that Mother Nature’s no fool, and is indeed gracious in unexpected ways, using the disease process early in life to prepare the child for successful adulthood. The study’s poignant in its text, as well:

The presence of measles virus specific antibodies at the time of infection interferes with the common immunological response to measles virus, especially with the development of specific cell-mediated immunity;
Intracellular measles virus may then survive the acute infection, and cause diseases which develop in adulthood;
There is a highly significant association between the phenomenon of missed measles rash and later development of immunoreactive diseases, sebaceous skin diseases, degenerative diseases of bone and cartilage, and certain tumours.

A Boston University(8) study corroborates, showing us that during a measles outbreak on that campus, not only were some of the vaccinated kids able to develop a full blown case of the disease, but the majority of them, with remaining vaccine induced antibody titers >120, were still able to develop the infection and accompanying respiratory symptoms, but not the rash. Measles is spread through respiration, so those students were likely able to infect others.

Natural measles isn’t alone in its provision of protection against more serious, chronic disorders - mumps is significantly associated with protection against ovarian cancer.(9) It would be foolhardy to assume those are the only two diseases that may ultimately leave the person fundamentally in better health than before the infection developed.

Not until the live virus varicella – chickenpox - vaccine was licensed and used, in 1995, did we see regularly reported occurrences of shingles in babies and toddlers. More serious and painful than chickenpox, shingles is a reactivation of the chickenpox virus, traditionally reserved for adults and the elderly.(10) Again, we see the evidence that because of its unnatural route of introduction vaccination, rather than preventing disease, simply masks it and thwarts its natural display.

The toxins in vaccines are by this time legendary – mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, MSG, and more.(11) It’s virtually surreal to read the toxic hazard information and warnings associated with the ingredients in vaccines, while aware that they’re injected into millions, including newborns, infants, babies and toddlers. The damage they do, from minor and barely discernible to catastrophic and fatal, can hardly be called side effects; they’re the effects of the vaccines. The nature of vaccination and its unavoidable threat is clear in the government’s list of recognized injuries alone: anaphylactic shock; brachial neuritis; encephalopathy; chronic arthritis; thrombocytopenic purpura; and all the disorders and complications that may accompany them.(12) Historically, they include transverse myeltitis, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, cardiac arrest, death – and more.(13) Indeed, with virtually no exception, any vaccine can brain damage a child, and there’s no way known to predict who will so succumb, nor could there be, since it’s dependent on so many factors unique to each individual.

The exact same reasoning and logic apply to the simple fact that any vaccine can kill a child. Critically, vaccine toxins can accumulate in the body, so there’s simply no way to know whether the next introduction of neurotoxins will be the one to break the camel’s back. As well, the child’s vulnerability is forever changing, dependent primarily on nutrition, rest and environmental exposures to toxins – ironically, the most intimate and egregious of which are the previous vaccines. Vaccination’s simply a vortex of gathering likelihood of catastrophic reaction.

Flying in the face of both decency and free market, neither vaccine manufacturers nor the medical establishment that administers and extols the praises of vaccines are liable for any of the extensive damage they do, protected by the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and subsequent SCOTUS decision.(14)

We come to infectious disease, the underlying source of the vaccine industry’s nefarious success, and a distinction must be made. We call the dis-ease, the discomfort associated with illness, the disease, when it’s quite literally the cure, the display of the immune system at work, detoxing – eliminating the infection, deeply cleansing the body and returning it to wellness, with an innate intelligence far beyond the ken of science, as demonstrated by the aforementioned long term protections gained during the process.

The National Institutes of Health tells us that fever works for, not against the person – emphasis theirs; and that it can rise to over 107o with typically no damage expected.(15) Indeed, we read stories of new parents who have allowed the fever in their sick baby to take its natural course; of how the temperature rose to 103 or 104, or higher, but was short-lived – and successful; the baby recovered quickly and efficiently. The immune system’s exquisitely designed, and unreproducible, the engine of both disease prevention and disease recovery. Recovery from infectious disease often requires no special regimen, but when treatment is needed, the only rational approach, assuming there’s no truly critical, life-threatening condition, is to support the workings of the immune system, rather than use pharmaceuticals to artificially suppress the very processes that are eliminating the illness.

The tools that have been used to support the enormous recuperative powers of the body might surprise some. During the infamous Spanish flu pandemic of 1918, allopathic hospitals in the U.S. were losing more than 30% of their patients, while homeopathic hospitals lost only 3% or so. Poignant, however, is the report of the success of naturopath Dr. R. Lincoln Graham, who lost none of the many patients he treated in his clinic. His regimen: put the patient on a fast upon entry to the clinic; give a glass of spring water every hour; and give an enema each day. Picking up on the reported success of the treatment, another naturopath began implementing it, ultimately remarking that the complete recovery thus afforded his patients had become so expected as to be routine.(16)

Vitamin A for measles; vitamin C for whooping cough and many other illnesses – the list is long, and the resources many(17), and there are ample tales of people who’ve gone through entire lives, to old age, never having been vaccinated, never having taken an antibiotic, and never having visited a doctor other than for a fractured bone or other such injury.(18) The information’s so abundant, indeed, that it’s impossible that the infamous powers that be – those who control the policies and public face of the vaccine industry, at all levels – government, manufacturers, medical establishment and media – aren’t aware of it. It’s a darkly foreboding sign, then, that we’re all so well aware that the form I’ve provided, which is accurate in its statements, which meaningfully honors informed consent, and which no mom who still maintains a thread of connection to her instincts would ever sign, will never be provided by the AAP.

We are betrayed.



  2. Clinical trial, phase IV: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

  3. Access any of the MD interviews in the archives of The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust




  7. You can request a copy of the Ronne Study at



  10. After you've had chickenpox, the virus lies inactive in nerve tissue...Years later, the virus may reactivate as shingles.”






  16. Immunization: The Reality Behind the Myth, by Walene James, pp. 116 – 117.




POSTED MAY 22, 2015


Anyone who thinks secret societies control our nation must be nuts, right? Add to the list President John Kennedy. In the subject video President Kennedy warns America on the undue influence of those in secret societies. What about his future speeches on the subject. Unfortunately, there weren't any as he was killed shortly after.

Bruce                 New World Order News


POSTED MAY 21, 2015


55 years ago, the retiring President of the United States, warned the nation about the "military industrial complex". Today, here we are. Instead of spending Memorial day glorifying war, how about glorifying the warnings given by earlier leaders of our Constitutional Republic.

Bruce                New World Order News



POSTED MAY 20, 2015




At least not in the way we are being told. The subject article covers a June 5th deadline for Greece to make another loan payment. 30 days after that date they will be in technical default. Should they be declared in default. At that time investors holding certain investments called “Credit Default Swaps” will be able to make claims on banks which sold these investments. Of course, there are a whole lot of other things that will happen leading to a world wide collapse. Here's why it won't happen.

Nearly all the world's economies are based on paper representation of wealth. The central banks print the currency supposedly backed up by some form of tangible wealth. In practice, however, this was abandoned a long time ago. Today, the paper is just paper. It relies on the trust of the citizens. If Greece needs more money, the central bankers can give it to them, loan it to them, adjust the underlying debt, take possession of assets in lieu of payment or just pretend it was paid. It's all just paper or entries in a computer. They can add, subtract or do nothing. This way, the banks are protected and investors on the other side can be stalled indefinitely.

There is no way those in charge of the world's finances are going to allow their wealth to be destroyed. The other side of this is the “trust of the citizens”. That they can't control. One day, and maybe one day soon, the citizens will begin to realize their “paper” is worth nothing. They will then refuse currency and demand other forms of payment. That's when the collapse will come and there's nothing the international bankers can do to prevent it.

Bruce                                                 New World Order News


GREECE ANNOUNCES DEFAULT! D-Day for world banks and Stocks: June 5 — UPDATE: Moody’s Warns of Bank Deposit SEIZURES

Submitted by IWB, on May 20th, 2015


Today, a lawmaker from Greece announced what all of us have seen coming for months: On June 5, Greece will DEFAULT on its sovereign national debt.

UPDATE 1:20 PM — Moody’s Investor Service PUBLICLY WARNS of Bank Deposit SEIZURES for Greek Bank Depositors! ! ! (This will likely cause an IMMEDIATE “run” on all Greek Banks)

We’ve all been following the Greece problem for quite some time, and I think a recap might be a worthwhile endeavor to measure the impact of a potential Greek Default .

1) June 5 is the date on which the next payment from Greece is due to the IMF.

2) If Greece misses that payment – which seems likely – they will be in TECHNICAL default, but not (yet) ACTUAL default. According to IMF rules, it won’t actually BE a “default” for another 30 days.

3) Technicalities aside, if Greece defaults on June 5, then the European Central Bank (ECB) and any other entity holding Greek Bonds will realize those Bonds are not worth the paper they’re written on. WHAT HAPPENS NOW?

4) If the ECB has to write-off the Greek Bonds, will they then halt all other sovereign debt financing? That would make no sense since other countries are solvent. So what will the impact actually be to the ECB and other nations? I think: No impact at all.

5) What about individual EUROPEAN AND AMERICAN banks that are holding Greek Bonds? This seems to be where the trouble comes. Those banks will have to write-off those bonds, which will instantly put the bank books out-of-kilter. The bank balance sheets will show the bank to be over-extended on assets-to-liabilities. That will cause an instant HALT to those banks being able to lend money.

6) Within hours or perhaps a day or two, the NAMES OF EUROPEAN and AMERICAN BANKS with the most losses on Greek Bonds will become public (if it is not already public). It will also become common knowledge that those banks books are not stable. Will depositors then demand their money out of those banks? This is the NEXT TROUBLE SPOT.

If Depositors start demanding their money out of those banks, those banks will go bust. Maybe the ECB and the Federal Reserve (for U.S. banks) can provide emergency liquidity to those banks, but maybe they won’t.

Let’s presume the ECB and the Fed say “no” to emergency liquidity. They may be FORCED to say “no” due to statute law regarding them lending to now-insolvent banks! Several LARGE European and American Banks go bust. This sets-off more runs against more banks. The European banking system collapses as does the European stock market.

7) With European banks and stocks in collapse, will the financial fears spread to the United States? I think the fear WILL spread.

8) Who hold Credit Default Swaps (CDS) on Greece’s Debt? Banks! When Greece defaults, creditors will seek to exercise those CDS, which might — just might — take out a few big banks around the world; probably primarily here in the U.S.

If so, I believe we will see a similar “run” against US banks and similar crash of US Stocks. Once the U.S. goes, the rest of the world follows.

9) Result: Worldwide economic depression and financial ruin.

Did I guess wrong? Did I forget something?

Greek Default Announcement:

Moody’s Deposit SEIZURE Notice:

Lehman went totally under and AIG had to be bailed out with $700 Billion in taxpayer money. That cannot happen with Greece. There is no one to bail them out; no one to come riding to the rescue. The default will be REAL and cannot simply be a “non-event.”



POSTED MAY 19, 2015




Forgotten by most, the issue has once again gained some prominence. Today, on The Power Hour, Linda Jordan raised a number of issues that have come up since Obama's phoney birth certificate was made public.

Back in 2011, Loretta Fuddy supposedly went into a vault in Hawaii to view the birth certificate and then photo copy it. Obama then went on nationwide TV to proclaim this document proved he was born in Hawaii. Almost immediately experts exposed this as one of the most amateurish frauds ever committed. Never mind that. As is the case with so many government stories, it's their story and they're sticking to it. Of course it's ridiculous, but since when did that stop them?

Anyway, Loretta Fuddy is dead. Yes, another convenient plane crash. This took place in December of 2013. The subject article covers the irregularities in this crash and subsequent investigations. I guess she won't be doing any talking. This brings me to my final point. When are those who insist on cooperating with these psychopaths going to learn? How many of them have to be killed before they understand once they complete their task, they then have outlived their usefullness.

Bruce                                             New World Order News


Final Nail: Barack Obama And The Death Of Loretta Fuddy; So Many Red Flags Raised

Barack Obama And The 

Death Of Loretta Fuddy

Linda Jordan | Birther Report

When Hawaii Public Health Director Loretta Fuddy, a central player in the production of Barack Obama’s forged birth certificate, died in a mysterious plane crash1, many people suspected foul play, as improbable as it seemed. Now a wrongful death lawsuit, filed by Fuddy’s brother, has lawyers suggesting that someone may have tampered with the engine.

When Loretta Fuddy stepped into that vault at the Hawaii Department of Health and retrieved what she said was Barack Obama’s original, 1961, Certificate of Live Birth, she stepped into the history books. Fuddy said she made a paper photocopy of the document and gave it to Obama’s lawyer, Judith Corley from the Perkins Coie law firm. Obama says he then scanned and posted the birth certificate on to the White House website on April 27, 2011 to convince us of his citizenship.2 What he posted has been proven by experts to be an abject forgery.3 Among them, Reed Hayes who is a Certified Document Examiner in Honolulu, Hawaii and has been hired by Obama’s own lawyers for his expertise.

The day of the plane crash, December 11, 2013, there were nine people on board. Clyde Kawasaki was the pilot. Kawasaki and several passengers have said that shortly after take off they heard a loud metallic thud or bang and the engine lost power. Kawasaki successfully glided the aircraft to an ocean landing a few hundred yards offshore. Fuddy, who had recently been named in a Grand Jury request 4 to investigate her role, in any, in the production of Obama’s forged birth certificate, made it out of the plane and in to a life jacket. For the first twenty five minutes the group stayed together and all accounts say that Fuddy was fine and in no distress.5 At that point she drifted off with her Deputy Director Keith Yamamoto and, around eighteen minutes later, she was dead. Fuddy was the only fatality. The last person to see her alive and the only person to have witnessed her death, Yamamoto, was never interviewed by the Maui Police Department. Coast Guard rescue swimmers found Fuddy alone, floating in her life jacket around 200 yards from the nearest survivor, a woman.6 My earlier articles on Loretta Fuddy’s death can be found

As with many accidents a lawsuit was not too far behind. On June 9, 2014 Lewis Fuddy filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Pratt & Whitney Canada, (P&WC) the maker of the engine7 in the Cessna Caravan that Fuddy was a passenger in and against Makani Kai Air who operated the commuter aircraft. The lawsuit specifically charged P&WC with manufacturing a faulty engine which, in turn forced the ocean ditching which, in turn, caused his sister’s death.8

On July 14, 2014 P&WC responded in part,“
P&WC asserts that if any product at issue was designed, manufactured and/or sold by P&WC, any damages allegedly resulting from such product were proximately caused by the unforeseeable misuse of, improper maintenance/inspection of, alteration of or tampering with such product by parties over which P&WC had no control.” (PW&C reply brief p. 5, July 14, 2014, Civil NO. 14-1-1329-06, First Circuit Court, State of Hawaii)

It is significant that P&WC lawyers used ‘alteration” and “tampering” in the same sentence. Tampering introduces the element of criminal intent. They are saying that someone may have tampered with the engine to cause harm versus “altering” it in an attempt to improve function.9 Suggesting foul play in this kind of small plane accident is not standard boiler plate language.

P&WC raised this notion five months after the engine had been recovered and throughly inspected by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), P&WC and other investigators. (The inspection began 1/21/2014 at P&WC in Montreal)10 The lawyers knew what the findings of the engine investigation were when they included the possibility of tampering in their reply brief. If the inspection had shown no indication of engine “tampering”, if the experts had been able to rule out foul play, I don’t think P&WC lawyers would have brought it up.

So why did they? After reading the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) report I can see where they are coming from.11 The “tampering” suggestion was not a shot in the dark. The FAA report includes what I think is an unusual bit of evidence found during the engine inspection.

NTSB-has been involved with the engine tear-down at P&WC facility. The findings were somewhat limited since the engine compressor turbine blades were somewhat melted by the intense fire. Although, metals examination from P&WC metal experts are testing what is left from the engine.” (FAA Herman Rios report, p.3, 4/03/2014, updated June 2014) This seems strange to me. Why would only some of the blades melt? The area that houses the turbine blades is small. If there was a fire intense enough to melt metal it seems it would have engulfed the whole compartment. But, I am not an expert.

Note that it says the turbine blades were melted by the “intense fire” not “intense heat”. This really jumped out at me. My first thought was, “What engine are they looking at?” There are several eyewitness accounts, a video12 of the ocean ditching, photographs taken of the plane from above right after it landed, and there is absolutely nothing to suggest that there was a fire much less an “intense fire”.

I have interviewed one of the passengers in depth and they confirm that before the engine failure, during the failure, after the ocean ditching, and until the plane sank (twenty five minutes after landing) there was no visible smoke, there were no visible flames and there was not even the smell of smoke.

The pilot, Kawasaki, did say in one interview that all of the lights and alarms were going off on his dash right after the engine quit, including the fire alarm, but all he smelled was a bit of oil. Aircraft fire alarms can go off in response to heat when there is no fire.

I began to research what kind of fire or heat it would take to melt compressor turbine blades, which are designed to operate at very high temperatures. Compressor turbine blades are generally made out of a steel or nickel superalloy which increases heat resistance.13 14 In fact heat increases their strength. The melting point of this alloy is extremely high.

Intensive alloy and process development activities during the past few decades have resulted in [nickle] alloys that can tolerate average temperatures of 1050 C with occasional excursions (or local hot spots near airfoil tips) to temperatures as high as 1200 N C, which is approximately 90% of the melting point of the material.” (JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER Vol. 22, No. 2, March–April 2006)

It took about three minutes from take off to ocean ditching. I have asked several people, who have knowledge with compressor turbine engines and the Cessna Caravan in particular, if a fire, hot enough to melt turbine blades, could occur within that time frame and if it could happen with no noticeable smell, smoke or flames. Couched in careful pilot engineer language their overall response was that the scenario did not seem plausible.

O.K., so maybe the flames would not have been visible and I am barking up the wrong tree, but at the very least it seems that smoke and/or the smell of it would have been noticed by the pilot and passengers.

The P&WC engine in question has a reputation for dependability. It is a work horse of an engine, very reliable. That said, there have been engine failures due to something called “creep” in the turbine blades.15 The tendency of a solid material, like metal, to deform, to change shape over time when subjected to stress and heat for long periods, particularly as they near their melting point. The compressor blades are housed in a shroud with precise clearance. If the spinning blades changed shape the result could be catastrophic.

P&WC safety investigator Marc Gratton identifies the specific part involved in the Cessna engine failure,“
The shroud cut up clearly shows a high energy impact, confirming CT blade fracture as primary cause of engine distress however I’m afraid we won’t be able to explain the reason for the fracture.” (FAA Herman Rios report, p. 3)

It appears there was some sort of blade fracture in this case, given the damage they found to the inside of the shroud 16, but metal experts found no evidence of creep in the turbine blades of this engine. A note from P&WC Gratton, to Jim Struhsaker at the NTSB, was included in the FAA report, “
Jennifer has completed the mettallurgical evaluation of the other [turbine] blades and no evidence of creep was found.” (FAA Herman Rios report, p. 3)

Another strange detail, in response to Lewis Fuddy’s lawsuit Makani Kai says that they don’t have enough “sufficient knowledge” to confirm that Kawasaki was an employee or authorized agent of Makani Kai when he was flying the plane. They would only confirm that he was indeed the pilot that day. From the Fuddy lawsuit, paragraph 12, “
...the subject aircraft was piloted by Clyde Kawasaki (Kawaskaki), an employee, servant or otherwise authorized agent of Makani Kai, acting within the course and scope of his employment and/or agency.” Makani Kai reply, “Makani Kai admits that the subject aircraft was piloted by Clyde Kawasaki (“Kawasaki”), but is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph 12 of the complaint.” How could Makani Kai not know if Kawasaki was an employee or authorized agent of theirs!? Can anyone just walk in and fly their planes? Makani Kai is on the record as saying that Kawasaki had been flying for them for about a year. So why refuse to acknowledge that Kawasaki was working for them when he piloted the ill-fated flight?17

After reading this I researched employee rosters for Makani Kai and could not find any with Kawasaki’s name on it. Also, on the FAA report the hire date, indicating when Clyde Kawasaki started to work for Makani Kai, is left blank.

The details surrounding Loretta Fuddy’s death raise so many red flags you’d think you were in Pamplona during the running of the bulls. This FAA report and lawsuit just add to an ever-growing list of strange factoids.

* A review of news accounts and the public record from the Maui Police Department, Maui Fire Department, and the United States Coast Guard have Loretta Fuddy dyeing three different ways, from severe internal injuries 18 to drowning 19 and finally cardiac arrhythmia 20, and in four different places, in the fuselage 21, in the wreckage 22, in the waters off of Molokai 23 and on the island of Molokai 24. That alone calls for some kind of reckoning.

*On December 13, 2013, after performing an autopsy on Fuddy, the Medical Examiner, Dr. Lindsey Harle, made a preliminary finding that Fuddy had drowned.25 The fact that she was wearing a life jacket and that eye witnesses say that Fuddy was in no distress for at least the first twenty five minutes in the water, was not enough to overcome this preliminary finding. That means the physical evidence of drowning, that Harle found during the autopsy, was so strong it outweighed eye witness testimony.

* Strangely, the Coroner’s Inquest Report, signed the same day as Fuddy’s autopsy, December 13, 2013, lists the final cause of death as “Acute Cardiac Arrhythmia due to Hyperventilation”.26 It was signed by Maui Police Detective Jamie Winfrey, who is also a Deputy Coroner. I asked Dr. Harle how she could determine someone drowned and then, on the same day and with no new information, change the cause of death to cardiac arrhythmia? She said she didn’t, that it was "several weeks [to a ] month" after the autopsy before she changed the cause of death.27 So, how did Winfrey know the final cause of death was going to be cardiac arrhythmia several weeks to a month
before the medical examiner says she even figured it out? I asked Winfrey that question and never got an answer. This is more than just a red flag. It’s evidence that the cause of death was prefabricated. For some reason, I suspect to cover-up something about the way Fuddy died, drowning was out and cardiac arrhythmia was in.

*Fuddy's autopsy report was almost entirely blacked out in spite of it being a public record.28

*Keith Yamamoto, the last person to see Fuddy alive and the only person to witness her death, was never interviewed by the Maui Police Department. Under HRS 841-3 it was their job to investigate Loretta Fuddy’s death and they have refused to do it.29

* Government employees in Hawaii are required to disclose their financial investments to the Hawaii Ethics Commission. This becomes a public record. 2012 is the oldest filing they currently list online. It is unclear if interests in stocks, mutual funds or other investments were to be included on the February 2012 form, I think it’s implied, but Keith Yamamoto did not list any. Six months later, in August 2012, the form he filed specifically asks if you have any financial interests in stocks, mutual funds, bonds, and money market investments. Yamamoto did list between $427,000 to $770,000 value in those items. On May 13, 2013 he stated that he had no changes to report since his last filing. On February 26, 2014 he reported changes reflecting investments valued at $461,000 to $1,035,000. Several companies Yamamoto had investments with were in Chicago. One of them is called Ariel Investments. The CEO of Ariel is John Rogers who is tight with Barrack Obama. He was co-chair of Obama’s Presidential inaugural committee in 2009. From 2010 to 2013 he was Chair of the Presidential Advisory Council on Financial Capability for Young Americans. Between August 2012 and February 2014 Yamamoto’s salary went from the $50,000 but less than a $100,000 category to the $100,000 but less that $150,000 category.30

Yamamoto’s investments are most likely legitimate and a possible influx of money could have come from selling his business, Keith’s Cookies, prior to February 2012. But it always peaks my interest when I find Chicago and Obama connections in strange places.

Closing: In the liberal name calling lexicon a “birther” is someone who must be scoffed at, laughed at, and treated with disdain. This is done in order to distract attention away from the facts we legitimately raise. Specifically, that Barack Obama is using fake identification. A forged birth certificate, a forged selective service registration and a phony social security number.

Why would Obama need fake ID? Why does anyone need it? They can’t get the real thing or there is something about themselves they want to hide. In Obama’s case I think he’s hiding the fact that he is not a citizen of the United States, certainly not a natural born citizen, and therefore is not eligible to be President. (Remember, Obama claimed for 17 years that he was born in Kenya)31

According to the rules of evidence when someone produces documents that are proven to be forgeries the party harmed by the forgeries, in this case the American people, have the right to force the production of the real documents. If they exist.

1.  Since 2008 Obama has fought every legal attempt made by citizens to get him to produce his original (not forged) birth certificate, social security application, selective service application and college records. He has spent millions of dollars hiring lawyers ( like Perkins Coie), in order to keep his bonafides hidden.

2.  Before he was deployed for the seventh time a respected military surgeon, Terry Lakin, asked Obama to produce his original birth certificate in order to prove he was a lawful citizen and, therefore, a lawful President. Obama refused. Lakin was court martialed and sent to prison.32

3.  Obama turned down a $50 million dollar donation from Donald Trump, to Obama’s charity of choice, in exchange for producing his real birth certificate so it could be authenticated. Who turns down $50 million dollars in order to not show a document they say they have and they say is real? Answer: Someone who is using a forged birth certificate.

4.  Obama also turned down a $5 million dollar donation from Trump to release his college records. Who turns down $5 million dollars just to avoid showing their college records? Answer: Someone who has no college records or is listed on those records as a non-citizen who most likely received financial aid reserved for foreign students. (

At all cost, Barack Obama has made it clear that he will keep his paper trail, his identity, hidden. I have no trouble imagining what he would do to a 65 year old public health employee who has grown tired or scared or sick of her part in his charade and can no longer pretend that the birth certificate he posted on the White House website is real.

Maybe some of these red flags surrounding Loretta Fuddy’s death don’t amount to much. Sloppy paperwork, miscommunication. Maybe turbine blades can melt within 2 minutes as the result of an intense fire that has no visible flame, smoke or smell and could continue to burn under water. (Magnesium shavings anyone?) But, changing the cause of death from drowning to cardiac arrhythmia? And changing it three to four weeks before the Medical Examiner says she even figured it out? No. Somebody is hiding something about the way Loretta Fuddy died. The only way to know what they are hiding and why, is to carry out a formal, independent investigation.

~~End Notes~~



Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s documentation of Obama’s forged documents can be found here:
Mike Zullo, who is the lead investigator for the Cold Case Posse says that Reed Hayes, a Certified Document Examiner in Honolulu, Hawaii produced a 40-page, report concluding that the birth certificate Obama posted on the White House website is completely forged. Obama’s own defense team. Perkins-Coie, a law firm that has been working for Barack Obama for five years defending him against challenges to his birth certificate and his citizenship, has used Hayes as an expert witness. Perkins-Coie will have a very hard time challenging Hayes’ expertise and credibility.

Miss. Fuddy was named in two affidavits (one public, one sealed) filed in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington on October 18, 2013, by Douglas Vogt, citing twenty points of forgery that comprise misprision of treason and misprision of felony. Vogt, with researcher and document expert Paul Irey, investigated the intricacies of the forgery. Mr. Vogt’s affidavit and Miss. Fuddy’s involvement gained national attention when he was interviewed on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report on December 4, 2013, exactly one week to the day before her tragic death on December 11, 2013.

“A passenger and the pilot have said they were shocked to hear she didn't survive because she seemed fine in the moments after everyone got out of the plane and waited in the water for help to arrive.” NTSB: Officials still trying to determine Fuddy's cause of death. By Jennifer Sinco Kelleher Associated Press POSTED: 11:51 a.m. HST, Dec 20, 2013 LAST UPDATED: 01:25 a.m. HST, Dec 21, 2013



On August 21 I asked the Hawaii Court for a copy of the Fuddy lawsuit and replies. They are public records. They replied that they managed to get the records out of storage but it would be about six months before they reviewed the records and then they would get back to me with a cost for copying. A few days later I hired a legal messenger service in Hawaii to get me a copy of the suit and had it within a few hours. When I asked them if the Court had to go get the case out of storage I was told “No, 2014 cases are readily available.” Here it is, now 8 months after I requested a copy of the case, and the Hawaii Court has yet to provide it.

tam·per ; to render something harmful or dangerous by altering its structure or composition.

“Airplane was brought up onto a barge and moved to a HNL harbor. The engine was found intact and then readied to be shipped to P&WC in Montreal, Canada for tear down and investigation. The tear down was scheduled to start on 01/21/2014. NTSB, AEG and Small Aircraft Director investigators were scheduled to be in attendance.” (FAA Herman Rios report, p3)

While the final NTSB Report has yet to be released the inspection of the engine was completed long ago. Some of those findings were found in the FAA report.


Titanium alloys are used for some purposes and the melting point is between 1549-1649 C. Pratt Whitney use some titanium alloys for their engine parts but the engine diagram I found shows a nickle alloy being used for the turbine blades. Either way, nickle alloy, titanium alloy, the melting point is high.

Pratt Whitney has recently charged one of its suppliers for providing substandard titanium and then lying about it. But this does not affect the Cessna 208B engine which is a PT6A-114A engine. Tue Sep 2, 2014 6:10pm EDT Related: Stocks, Markets Jet-engine maker Pratt & Whitney accuses titanium supplier of fraud Sept 2 | By Lewis Krauskopf

Creep process described.

“The shroud cut up clearly shows a high energy impact, confirming CT blade fracture as primary cause of engine distress however I am afraid we won’t be able to explain the reason for the fracture.” (P&WC Safety Investigator Marc Gratton to NTSB Jim Struhsaker in Rios FAA report, p 3)

“The pilot, Clyde Kawasaki, has been flying for Makani Kai for one year. He previously worked as a pilot for Aloha Airlines and has experience working thousands of hours of flight time, according to a Makani Kai representative.”

USCG Case Report Case #665884 Debrief A/C Commander CG1720 LT (the name after LT is blacked out, CG means Coast Guard and 1720 is a plane identifier number for the CG Hercules.) “ CG1720 arrived O/S at 0220Z…..A/C Commander did not notice if a 121.5 distress signal was radiating. He relayed that the pilot of the downed A/C stated that he lost engine power shortly after take-off as he was making the left turn to head towards Honolulu, after his second attempt to restart the engine failed he prepped passengers and crew for a water landing and had them don PFD’s. He was able to execute a good water landing and disembark passengers prior to the A/C sinking. Mrs. Fuddy was alive but had sustained severe internal injuries during the ditching. She succumbed to those injuries while awaiting rescue resources to arrive.”

“On December 13, 2013, an autopsy on the body of Loretta FUDDY was performed by Dr. Lindsey Harle within the morgue at Molokai General Hospital. The preliminary cause of death is Drowning. Disposition: Pending Final Autopsy Report, Toxicology Results.” (Detective Jamie Winfrey, Deputy Coroner, MPD @ 1028 hours [10:28 am], December 13, 2013).” The autopsy on Loretta Fuddy began at 0700 hours [7:00am]. All eye witness accounts confirm Fuddy was wearing a life jacket that kept her afloat.

January 6, 2014 Maui County Police Department Press Release, Fuddy cause of death Cardiac Arrythmia.

Maui Fire Department Captain “Fuddy, 65, was among nine people in a Cessna that crashed into the ocean Wednesday, shortly after leaving Kalaupapa Airport on the island of Molokai about 3:15 p.m. The eight others on the plane, including the pilot, were rescued, but Fuddy "remained in the fuselage of the plane," Honolulu Fire Capt. Terry Seelig told KHON-TV. "It's always a difficult situation when you're not able to get everybody out."

“On Thursday, Lt. William Juan with the Maui Police Department said that Fuddy's body had been recovered from the wreckage and that an autopsy would be conducted.”


I had emailed the Sheriff and DOH Administrator of Kalaupapa and asked them to confirm if they had conducted an investigation into Fuddy’s death under HRS 841-3. No response. It was not until part 1 of this article was published, in fact the very day, that Janice Okubo, Hawaii State Department of Health, replied, “In accordance with Hawaii Revised Statutes 841-3, an autopsy was conducted and the report is available from the Maui County Police Department. The unattended death occurred on Molokai and the Maui Chief of Police is the Coroner for Maui County.” October 29, 2014.



“On the day of the autopsy I informed Detective Winfrey that the preliminary cause of death was drowning...Later, over the course of several weeks and months, additional scene and witness statements were brought to me by various investigating agencies (including the police department and the FAA), I obtained additional medical history for Ms. Fuddy, and I was able to review microscopic biopsies of Ms. Fuddy’s internal organs for evidence of chronic disease. Based on all of the information provided to me and the autopsy findings, I concluded that her cause of death was cardiac arrhythmia...” (Email from Harle to Jordan: December 29, 2014)


Hawaii Revised Statutes 841-3 “As soon as any coroner or deputy coroner has notice of the death of any person within the coroner's or deputy coroner's jurisdiction as the result of violence, or as the result of any accident, or by suicide, or suddenly when in apparent health, or when unattended by a physician, or in prison, or in a suspicious or unusual manner, or within twenty-four hours after admission to a hospital or institution, the coroner or deputy coroner shall forthwith inquire into and make a complete investigation of the cause of the death.” HRS 841-5 – Form of oath. The coroner or deputy coroner may administer an oath to the witnesses as follows: “You solemnly swear that the evidence you shall give to this inquest concerning the death of the person (giving the name of the person dead if possible) which is now under investigation, shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth: SO HELP YOU GOD.” HRS 841-13 The clothing and personal property found on any human body appearing to have come to death under any of the circumstances set forth in section 841-3 may be recovered and held as evidence by any police officer, pending the investigation of the facts and the final disposition of any trial which may arise out of the death.


Some people knew about the biography he wrote for his publisher and some just heard rumors about it. When that information was published on Andrew Breitbart’s website the whole world knew about it.


Linda Jordan is a researcher out of Seattle Washington. In 2011 she ran the SSN Barack Obama used on his 2010 tax return through the government run E-Verify system and discovered that the SSN had been flagged with a Special Indicator Code for fraud. It was not Obama's SSN. Since then she has continued to work to expose Obama's use of forged identity documents. Fake ID he used to get on the ballot and in to the White House. She is the owner of We The People T.V. at




POSTED MAY 18, 2015




This New Jersey couple did it right. They opted out in sending their children to a government school. Alternatively, they are home schooling their children. Nationally, home schoolers soundly beat public school students in performance, testing and college admission qualification. No matter, to the self appointed Stazi like, New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency representative demanded entry and used police to get it. She also stated that these home schoolers had to meet State standards. Really? You mean like learning how to spell your own name? Or--- reciting government positions on gay and lesbian issues? Or --- repeating teachings on how wonderful abortion is?

No, these parents did exactly the right thing. They took control of their children's education. They set the standards because they are THEIR children, not a possession of the State, but they did make one mistake. That mistake was to call the police. Never call the police unless your life depends on it and even then, think long and hard. Predictably, the police intimidated the couple to let the State rep in. What they should have done is, slam the door in her face. If she called the police, they should have answered the door, but not let them in and requested them to come back with a legal warrant. Remind our government masters that this country is still under the Constitution. The least they can do is obey it.

Bruce                            New World Order News



Government invades home school, interrogates family about vaccines and firearms

Sunday, May 17, 2015 by: Daniel Barker

(NaturalNews) An unwanted visit from a Division of Child Protection and Permanency (DCP&P) case worker to a Belvidere, New Jersey, family's home has become the basis of a $60 million lawsuit against the state agency.

On January 13, 2015, the Zimmer family answered a knock at the door from Michelle Marchese, a DCP&P case worker who demanded to be let in the home for interrogation purposes regarding the homeschooling of Christopher, Sr., and Nicole Zimmer's son, Christopher, Jr.

Surprised by the aggressive nature of Marchese's demeanor and her demand to be admitted inside the home "Now!," Christopher, Sr., decided to call the police, not being certain what his rights were in such a situation.

Before calling the police, Zimmer asked Marchese about the purpose of her visit. She responded that their 15-year-old son was not receiving a "proper education" and that she was authorized to make sure their homeschooling was being done "correctly."

As Christopher Zimmer Sr. recounts:

My fear was, if I didn't let her in the house, if I had closed the door and didn't let her in the house then the police would be knocking at the door and think I'm hiding something.

Upon arrival, the police allowed Marchese to enter the home without a warrant so that she could inspect and question the family. Once inside, according to the lawsuit filed by the Zimmers, Marchese continued to issue threats and began what the family termed an "intense interrogation."

The questioning soon turned intrusive after beginning benignly enough. Marchese demanded to see textbooks and test scores, even though New Jersey law does not require
homeschooling parents to furnish such evidence.

The Zimmers were told by Marchese that their son's education must "follow the public school curriculum" and that the parents were required to work with the public

In fact, New Jersey law mentions no such requirements. From the New Jersey Department of Education website:

The law does not require or authorize the local board of education to review and approve the curriculum or program of a
child educated elsewhere than at school. When parent/guardian educate a child elsewhere than at school, they are responsible for the educational outcomes of the child. The local board of education is not required or authorized to monitor the outcomes of the child.

The interrogation became even more intrusive when Marchese began questioning Christopher, Jr. He was asked about guns in the
home, vaccinations and whether or not his parents fought or used drugs. Marchese then demanded to see the guns that Zimmer, Sr., legally owns and which are kept in a safe.

She also asked if Christopher, Jr., had ever "appeared suicidal." In the end, the Zimmers were coerced into signing a HIPAA medical release form which would give the agency access to all of the boy's medical records.

After the visit, the Zimmers hired an attorney, revoked the HIPAA release form and filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in Trenton charging the agency with "unlawful and unconstitutional home intrusion."

Hopefully, the Zimmers will prevail in court while setting a precedent which may help prevent these types of abuses in the future.

It should be noted that Nicole Zimmer's homeschooled daughter is studying to become a teacher and is currently working as a teacher's aide. She has also made the dean's list at the school she attends.

Throughout the country, parents who decide to educate their children at home have been unfairly targeted by child protective services, leading to an alarming number of cases where innocent families' rights are trampled on. And the situation only seems to be getting worse.

It should be every family's right to decide where and how their children are to be educated, particularly in light of the generally sorry state of public schools across the nation.

Whether or not individual families choose to homeschool their children, we should all stand up for their right to do so




POSTED MAY 15, 2015


Michigan Baby Dies, Pathologists Confirm Vaccines Responsible


This case goes back to 2008. Knowing that, one may be tempted to say that, due to the length of time, it is irrelevant. Of course, that is exactly what our government masters and the pharmaceutical industry wants us to think, but not so fast.



Over the past few decades, there has literally been millions injured and even killed by vaccines. These greedy corporations spend more time in covering up these facts then they do in actually trying to help the public. The French family of Michigan was not going to let their baby's death be in vain. No matter how long it took, they were going to expose this modern day Nazi cult. I'm not going to go over facts which we and many others have communicated on the dangers of vaccines and their ineffectiveness. A simple search can reveal that. I am going to directly attack those who, for a buck, will do anything to insure their lifestyle.



These are the same types who lie us into war again, for a buck. These are same types who guilt us into paying higher and higher taxes, only to steal that money for themselves. These are the same types who arrange parades for our troops and then steal the money from the VA system. These are the same types who screamed “panic” during the 2008 banking crisis, and then stole trillions of taxpayer dollars to prop up their international banker friends. Knowing all this, does it come as a surprise that they would willingly put the lives of children in danger --- for a buck.



Bruce                                           New World Order News



Michigan Baby Dies, Pathologists Confirm Vaccines Responsible

Augustina Ursino

May 14 2015


Rachel French did what most parents do: she took her baby to the doctor to get vaccinated. She was unaware of the associated risks that come along with these drugs and learned the hard way. She lost her adorable son less than three days after he was given eight routine vaccines.

Her son’s autopsy report stated he died from asphyxiation from an undetermined cause. There was nothing obstructing his airways, nor did he have any physical signs of trauma at the time of his death.

The medical examiner and detective handling the case did not provide a good enough explanation for Rachel to understand what had happened to her baby. This led Rachel on her own journey to find out the truth. Rachel was told by the doctors that the vaccines had nothing to do with what had happened.

Years later, her lost son came through to her in a dream and eventually helped her uncover the truth. Her own investigation involving a child death investigator and pathologists proved the vaccines were responsible. This is their family’s harrowing story.

A Life That Will Never Be Forgotten

Elijah Daniel French was born on May 4, 2007, in Oakland County, Michigan. His parents and siblings called him “Danny.” He was always so happy, smiled a lot and was loved by everyone around him.

Like most babies in the United States, newborn baby Danny was given his first hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours after birth. When it was time to take him to the doctor’s office to keep receiving the vaccines on the CDC schedule, it wasn’t always easy for mom to make the appointments and she found herself rescheduling them.

On October 18, 2007, Danny was taken in for his unintentionally delayed well-baby checkup. During this visit, at five and-a-half months old, he was vaccinated for seven diseases. He received the DTaP, hepatitis B, polio, Hib and pneumococcal vaccines. He suffered some adverse reactions to the drugs and had difficulty breathing, while dealing with the high fever that also resulted.

On February 25, 2008, Danny was given the same injections he received at his last appointment. He was almost ten months old at this time. Afterwards, the breathing difficulties and high fever returned.

Danny’s pediatric well-baby visits left him unwell. Since the doctor never pointed out a connection to the vaccines and Danny’s reactions, his mother Rachel never made the connection, either. She trusted the doctor would inform her to stop vaccinating her son if he were at risk of injury from subsequent vaccines, but no warning was given.

Rachel consoled her baby and listened to the doctor by giving him Albuterol to deal with his asthma. He was also given Children’s Tylenol® to help ease the fever caused by the vaccines.

Not being made aware that further vaccines could harm her baby, Danny’s mother took him in for the next round. Danny was almost fourteen months old when his mother took him in to receive the routine twelve month shots.

On July 1, 2008, Danny received the MMR, Hib, Varicella, and DTaP vaccines. These eight vaccines were given in four injections.

His mother stated,


That night, Danny was still eating and drinking but was cranky and slept more than usual.


By the next day, he was extremely fatigued, irritable and had a loss of appetite. He did not have a fever at this time. He was red and warm where they injected him. These symptoms only worsened.


By the third day, Danny was unable to stay awake for longer than thirty minutes, he had zero food intake, his fluid intake diminished and he cried excessively.


Seventy-one hours after his doctor visit, Danny developed a fever from the vaccines and was given Children’s Tylenol. His doctor was called but there was no answer from him because it was the July 4th holiday, the office was closed.


He was given Tylenol at 2:00 PM and was laid down on the floor, on a comforter in the living room, near the wall, where he took a nap. I checked on him while my other children played.


I checked on him at 4:00 PM to see if he felt feverish and he was cool to the touch. I thought he was just cold so I covered him up. He was sleeping, I thought. He didn’t look dead.


It was about forty minutes later when I discovered he was unresponsive and had passed away.


911 was called seventy-five hours post vaccination. The EMS sheet stated four shots were given four days prior. It was actually only 3 days prior that he was vaccinated.


A detective came out briefly and my son was taken to the hospital where he was left. Then his autopsy was to be done and I waited for answers.


I was told my baby most likely died within thirty minutes after he was given the Tylenol, at around 2:30 PM. This was based on lividity, rigor onset, and Tylenol levels in his blood.


I was told, “Oh, vaccines couldn’t have done this,” and I had no reason to question them because they were doctors and doctors don’t lie.


Danny died on July 4, 2008, the day he turned 14 months old, less than three days after he was vaccinated.”

Danny’s Reported Cause Of Death Raised Questions

After Danny passed away, an investigation took place. A detective came for a brief visit and nothing ever came of it. A short time later, Danny’s case was closed as solved, even though there was no resolution.

Danny’s autopsy report stated his death was ruled as position/compression asphyxia from an undetermined manner. This ruling suggests an outside force was responsible, but this didn’t make sense because Danny’s airways were not obstructed and there was no physical trauma to his body and there were no signs he had struggled. Danny had no petechial hemorrhaging in his face and his hyoid bone was intact when he passed.

Rachel decided to contact the medical examiner, L.J. Dragovic, M.D., to get a better understanding of what exactly happened to her son.

Rachel stated,


I had one conversation in my life with L.J. Dragovic, the medical examiner that handled my son’s autopsy. We spoke over the phone. I asked him what the cause of death reported on the autopsy meant. The explanation he gave was that “it means some outside force put enough pressure on him that he could not breathe.”


He told me my son was too old to die from SIDS and he admitted he did not see pictures of the scene to determine what could’ve put pressure on him. He told me Danny did not die from his asthma, that his asthma was not responsible.


I asked, “Is there any other way this happened? It just isn’t making sense to me.” He said it could have been anything. “You have other kids, right? Probably one of them just laid on him or they stepped on him when they were playing.”


He then told me if I needed any more help that I should call the detective. So I did. I called the detective that day, completely distraught, and I begged him not to tell me if his investigation found it was one of my girls that stepped on him because I thought I could never deal with that.


He said he hadn’t even seen the autopsy yet and he would get in touch with me.


I called back a few days later and was told he was no longer a detective but a patrol officer and my son’s case was forwarded to the sergeant who had taken over the case.


The sergeant told me the case was closed and that I could retrieve the evidence, which included the comforter he was sleeping on. They also took the Tylenol, Albuterol and a sippy cup that was not given back to me.


Danny died on July 4, 2008, and I received his cause of death report on Thursday, September 4, 2008. I talked to Sgt. Troy that following Tuesday and on Wednesday, I picked up the comforter he was laying on when he passed.


The county medical examiner is the only one with authority over the sheriff, my son’s case was not even investigated thoroughly and on Sept 1st of that year, the sheriff’s detective was demoted to patrol duty and the case was taken over by the Sergeant, just in time for his cause of death to be released; the case was closed as solved, but I felt it was never solved.”

The Report Did Not Mention The Vaccines

The serum test performed revealed Danny had a level of 5.5 mg/L of acetaminophen in his blood, which would be from the Tylenol given to him just before he died. The vaccines Danny had just received were not on the report.

Each vaccine contains a large number of ingredients. Vaccines are medical drugs that are injected directly into the body and all of them are associated with life-threatening risks. Vaccines contain heavy metals such as mercury and aluminum that can harm the brain. Metals injected into a person can disrupt their nervous system, helping to shut down the respiratory system.

The vaccines Danny had just received are the most plausible cause of his death. These should have been mentioned on his autopsy report, but they were not. Other parents who have lost their child after vaccination, coming forward, are admitting the same thing, that the vaccines are not being listed on the autopsy.

The EMS sheet stated four shots were given four days prior, but the medical examiner who examined Danny and wrote up the autopsy report didn’t acknowledge this. There was no mention of the three-day illness Danny suffered after the shots, either. Parents want to know why this important information is being ignored.

Rachel then found out the medical examiner that performed her son’s autopsy had publicized his stance on SIDS years before, in 1997. [1]

From an article published in the Irish Times, the author who wrote about L.J. Dragovic had this to say:

He stressed that he, like the SIDS lobbyists, wanted to see no more unexplained infant deaths.


"But I believe that everything that can be explained should be explained, and people taught how to avoid preventable deaths."


A lot of infant deaths were due to "positional asphyxia," where the child smothered, he said.”


He acknowledged that some sudden infant deaths were not due to asphyxia and were apparently inexplicable. But he preferred the use of the term "undetermined," and the continued pursuit of explanations. He advocated constant contact with small babies, especially for the first 12 to 18 months, and particular attention to the possible role of older siblings and pets in sudden infant deaths.”

This means that in 1997, when this article was published in the Irish Times, the same medical examiner who performed Danny’s autopsy in 2008, L.J. Dragovic, featured in that article, is still blaming these deaths on older siblings or pets and telling parents sleeping too close to baby should be of concern. He makes no mention of the vaccines these children are being given, as a reason for the concern they are dying so young.

Rachel was tormented by this thought that one of her other kids could’ve caused Danny’s death. This is another horrendous tactic used to hide the truth, to blame other siblings or pets, but not the vaccines, and let the parents fend for themselves.

Elijah Daniel French's Vaccine Record

A Powerful Dream Of Danny Helped Lead To Answers


I was told the vaccines were safe. I never did realize the vaccines could be responsible for what happened to my son. I was told it couldn’t be the vaccines and I trusted them.


I even continued to vaccinate my other children. I never denied vaccines until 2011 when I denied the HPV vaccine for my daughters and the Hep A vaccine for the son I had just after Danny died. I was seven months pregnant with him when Danny passed away.


This was before I knew about Danny, but these two vaccines didn't sit well with my mommy instinct.


I learned more in 2011. It wasn’t until more than a few years after Danny passed, that I had a weird dream of my son. He came to me in my dream and it is the only dream I know of him being in.


He was just sitting in his bouncy seat and a man’s voice said, "It was the ‘site-o-kin’ storm that killed me.”


I decided to Google the term and found the term cytokine storm. I was shocked at what I had found. This dream, combined with a few other bothersome details, led me to send off his slides and other things I had saved.”

Pathologists Confirm Vaccine-Induced Hypercytokinemia Caused The Asphyxiation

Rachel felt the need to do her own investigation and seek a second opinion. She shared with us,


My family has cholesterol issues and all of my children get regular bloodwork done because we are at a high risk of heart disease from high cholesterol issues.


Danny had blood samples taken when he was twelve months old. On the day of Danny’s well-baby visit two months later, just before he passed, the day he was given that last set of shots, they had to take his blood again because of a previous lab mix-up.


I wasn't comfortable with the way things were going so I had requested that the samples be sent to a facility for storing.


I had kept a locket of Danny’s hair after he had passed away, some slides requested after his autopsy, and decided to send some teeth and bone fragments from his ashes to the pathologist, along with the stored blood samples I had requested be saved. I then made arrangements to have the evidence reviewed.


Everything was reviewed by three separate pathologists. All three confirmed the same findings. The pathologists stated vaccine-induced hypercytokinemia as the cause of my son’s asphyxiation.


They were able to determine this in large part to the blood panel taken prior to Danny receiving his vaccines, in contrast with the samples I had stored.


They also agreed encephalopathy was likely responsible, as it’s a cytokine storm syndrome.


Danny’s pathology report stated his cause of death was asphyxiation, secondary to hypercytokinemia, caused by vaccines received approximately 72 hours prior.


My son too had a brownish to pinkish colored mucous coming from his mouth when he died. My daughter witnessed this and I saw evidence of this on the blanket when it was returned to me, as well as on his unwashed clothing. I have since been made aware this regularly happens in babies passing after vaccination.”

Danny’s Airways Shut Down Because Of The Vaccines

Rachel stated,


I know it was the vaccines that took my son’s life. A cytokine cascade caused his airway to swell shut, killing him. I no longer vaccinate because of what the vaccines did to my son.


Parents need to trust themselves and always get a second opinion. His life could have been saved if I was warned his earlier reactions were a sign that future vaccines could cause even worse harm.


No parent should ever have to go through this and that’s why I want to share our story.”

Danny is greatly missed and thought of every day. In honor of sweet Danny, his mother made this video to remember him.


A Child Death Investigator Gets Involved

Rachel informed the investigator of the time frame of Danny’s adverse reactions after the vaccines were given. The child death investigator admitted most parents are not made aware of this information before they take their child to get vaccinated. This is very true information and is worth understanding.

This was the investigator’s response:


I’ve had cases where serious adverse events occurred within prescribed time frames according to the reportable events table and they were not reported. The most recent case was a 4 year old who developed encephalopathy within 5 days of receiving MMR and DTaP.


The Reportable Events Table (RET) states encephalopathy is a reportable event if it occurs within 7 days of DTaP and within 15 days of receiving MMR. The parents got the same answer you got from their doctor, “It couldn’t possibly have been the vaccinations.” Nevermind that what had occurred was required by law to be reported, whether or not the doctor thought it was the vaccinations.


I am so sorry for your loss. There is such a heavy bias by health care providers to ignore harm from treatments they give, and it colors every single aspect of vaccine adverse events and their aftermath.


It is so difficult to prove causality because of the ultra high standards they have set and barriers such as physician reticence to admit vaccines may have caused harm. It is a miracle that there are even any NVICP resolutions to cases as it is.


From what you described, your baby had an altered mental status, likely due to encephalopathy. I am so, so sorry for your loss. I’ve actually seen similar cases where the Medical Examiner (ME) determined encephalopathy, but claimed it was secondary to shaken baby and had the parents prosecuted. Horrible, horrible, things.”

Rachel Filed A Report With VAERS

Rachel took it upon herself to file a report with the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) this year, since the doctor that should’ve done this did not. At the moment, she only has a temporary VAERS ID number. She is still waiting for the report to be finalized and it will then be viewable to the public, in the VAERS database. [2]

Based on the deadline of two years to file a claim with the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, when your loved one dies likely as a result of being vaccinated, it is now too late for Rachel to file. Had she learned the truth sooner, she would’ve been able to file a claim.

Exceptions should be made in cases like hers and she plans to pursue this. Parents should become familiar with the listed reactions to vaccines by reading the package inserts and the reportable events table. You must learn how difficult it is to receive any compensation should you or a loved one become vaccine-injured. [3]

A Friend Of Rachel Lost Her Own Child After Being Vaccinated

Rachel mentioned,


A friend I had met before learning the truth about what happened to Danny went through something similar with her baby. The coroner called her and said her baby’s death was a SIDS case related to the DTaP vaccine he received at two months of age.


She called the next day, got a new medical examiner who said the other medical examiner was gone, she waited eight months for the autopsy report that was filled out by a different person and it stated accidental suffocation or something along those lines. She lost her other kids and had to fight tooth and nail to get them back.”

Certain Tests Should Be Performed To Help Prove Vaccine Injuries

Parents need to know what required tests should be performed during the autopsy to help prove their case, should they find themselves filing a vaccine injury claim. They should have their loved one’s cytokine and chemokine protein levels tested. Elevated amounts after vaccination can help prove the vaccines caused their death. Encephalopathy is a commonly suffered vaccine injury in children.

Mandated vaccines contain mercury and aluminum that can damage a person’s brain, causing death or disruption of development. "If brain tissue is taken, check for Hg and Al, which would indicate those metals crossed the blood brain barrier and may have been the precipitating factor in the child’s demise, as they are potent neurotoxins and can cause encephalopathy.” [4]

MMR- And DTaP-Associated Risks Include Encephalopathy And Death

Two triple vaccines, DTaP and MMR, out of the eight vaccines Danny received, are associated with these risks shown below. This list clearly shows Danny suffered injuries related to these vaccines given to him, but the medical examiner didn’t take notice. Parents need to read the vaccine package inserts and learn these risks. [5]

Vaccine injuries are ignored to protect the vaccine program. Giving more than one vaccine or a combination vaccine to a child helps vaccine manufacturers cover up related injuries because it is too hard to prove which vaccine harmed the person. Their is no way to prove which vaccine, or if all of the vaccines, caused the injury.

Instead of proving it’s safe to inject all of these vaccines together during these well-baby checkups, laws have been passed to grant immunity to vaccine makers which give them no incentive to make safer vaccines, but rather an incentive to add more vaccines to the schedule, without testing if it’s safe to inject all of these at once. This is being done while lobbyists are working hard to strip away your exemption rights.

Giving Tylenol After Vaccination Can Be Dangerous

Merck’s manual advises acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Children’s Tylenol®, is known to deplete glutathione levels in the body and can cause liver damage. [6] Glutathione is needed to help detoxify the body. It is a very important antioxidant that helps reduce oxidative stress which can lead to a large number of health problems, including brain damage. [7]

Doctors need to warn parents their child could be harmed more by giving them Tylenol after receiving vaccines, especially the MMR vaccine that Danny had received. Although Danny did not survive, he could’ve been at a higher risk of vaccine-acetaminophen-induced autism because no doctor told Rachel to avoid giving him Tylenol after receiving the MMR injection. “This preliminary study found that acetaminophen use after measles-mumps-rubella vaccination was associated with autistic disorder.” [8]

Vaccinations load the body with viruses, bacteria, heavy metals, foreign animal, plant and human DNA contaminants, synthetic chemicals, genetically modified organisms, etc. Some of these ingredients are documented to cause cancer. Glutathione is needed to help the body rid itself of this toxic buildup.

Danny showed classic signs he was reacting negatively to the vaccines, before he received the Tylenol. The levels of acetaminophen found in his blood during the autopsy were not at a level overdose is said to occur. Consuming acetaminophen after vaccination can add to the cascade effect, causing the body to not detoxify fast enough, thus making it harder to rid the body of the toxic chemicals injected from the vaccines.

Michigan Health Officials Make It Harder For Parents To Opt Out Of Vaccination

As of Jan. 1, 2015, Michigan parents filing a non-medical exemption form for their children first will be required to ask a health department official to certify that they have received one-sided state vaccine “education.” Without that health department “certification,” a non-medical vaccine exemption will not be accepted by a day care facility, school or other state-funded activity program.” [9]

Michigan’s Republican governor, Rick Snyder, supported and signed off on this bill even though public input was clearly stifled. It’s likely the next step taken will be to remove the philosophical and religious exemptions altogether. This tactic is being played out in other states, including California.

Many parents have informed us their child suffered life-threatening vaccine reactions, including seizures and interrupted SIDS, within minutes to hours after getting vaccinated, but they were later denied a medical exemption from further vaccines. Parents need to get informed, protect and help strengthen their state’s vaccine exemption laws. It’s better to fight for those rights while you still have them, because it’s harder to get them back once gone.

Parents who do not vaccinate their children do not expect another child to get vaccinated to protect their child, even though the media likes to portray this. If health officials want to remove exemption rights, claiming that action protects others, they need to create a new exemption for parents to file to opt out of having any of their children further vaccinated if one of their children died or suffered injuries from the vaccines, protecting those children, too.

You can’t claim you want to protect one child more than another. Without creating a new exemption law for these families while trying to strip away existing exemptions, that is exactly what is being done.

Health officials cannot expect parents to further vaccinate any of their children when one of their children has already suffered an associated risk that comes along with any vaccine, including death, like what happened to Danny. Adding insult to injury, Danny’s death was covered up. It took his mother’s own will to find out the truth and do her own investigative work to get answers.

Please learn which vaccines your child is expected to get when you take them into the doctor’s office for their well-baby checkup. [10] Never leave without a copy of your child’s medical record, showing all of the vaccines given, batch numbers, vaccine manufacturers' information and where the injections were given. These records routinely go missing to cover up negligence by doctors and nurses and injuries caused by vaccines. It is much easier to get those files at each visit and store these records in a safe place for when you may need them.


It is very clear that vaccine-related deaths and injuries are being intentionally hidden. Parents of vaccine-injured children are doing their own investigations and coming forward more, seeking the truth denied to them by health officials.

Inform your friends, family and neighbors that this is going on, that children are dying from the vaccines. Be brave. Help preserve your fundamental right to choose what gets injected into you or your child’s body. Making good medical decisions can only be done when you are informed.

Our hearts go out to Danny and his family and all of the other precious children who have suffered the same fate. Their families are working hard for us to raise needed awareness about the harm vaccines can cause.

Elijah Daniel French “Danny”
May 4, 2007 - July 4, 2008
Passed away at 14 months old, less than three days after receiving eight vaccines.



POSTED MAY 14, 2015




Gerald Celente is the publisher of The Trends Forecaster. For more than 30 years, Mr. Celente has had uncanny success in his analyses of future trends. Some of the language is colorful, so discretion is advised.

Bruce                          New World Order News


POSTED MAY 13, 2015




The subject article and video has become all too common in today's America. In a past posting, I quoted figures of over 400 people killed by police so far this year. A search of the internet or YouTube reveals scores of examples of police brutality against unarmed Americans, wanted for nothing and convicted of no crimes. This has to stop.

As I write this people are in the streets of Madison, Wisconsin, in expressing their disgust with the failure of prosecutors to even bring an officer to trial in the killing of an unarmed man, but it doesn't end there. From Missouri, to Maryland, to Florida, to California, people are getting fed up. I understand that only a minority of police use this kind of brutality, but those who stand by and do nothing represent an absolute majority. Now the police force in St. Louis County, Mo., has promised an “investigation”. I think we can predict where that will go. Really? Police investigate themselves?

I have also commented in the past that these examples of brutality are just plain stupid. Even if one was inclined to hide behind a badge in order to brutalize innocent civilians, is it smart? Has it ever entered in their minds that they live and travel in these same communities. All of the people who have been victimized have family and friends. All of the victimizers spend the majority of time interacting with some of these people. No, not smart.

Bruce                            New World Order News





Elderly Couple Honk At Off Duty Cop; Cop Breaks Man’s Nose, Smashes Teeth Out With Gun

Uniformed officers arrived and "laughed and joked" with attacker

by Steve Watson | InfoWars | May 13, 2015

An elderly couple in St. Louis County found out what happens when you honk your horn at a cop this past weekend, when the officer drew his gun and pistol whipped the man in the face, while wrestling with the woman as she attempted to defend her husband.

Describing the harrowing incident to local reporters, Janet and Donald Akers noted that they were unable to pay their respects to Janet’s deceased mother on Mother’s day, as they were beaten up by the cop before they could get to the graveyard.

Mrs Akers was driving the car, when she was suddenly rushed upon by a large unmarked black truck. Fearing that the truck was going to collide with their vehicle, she honked her horn.

To let him know, hey, you’re coming over to hit us, and then he backed down, got behind us, and honked and honked and honked, all the way through the intersection,” said Janet.

Not knowing that the driver of the truck was a cop, Mrs Akers pulled over to attempt to diffuse the situation, and suddenly found herself and her husband under attack at gunpoint.

I didn’t know if he was going to shoot us or what,” said Donald, who admits he was in fear for both their lives.

However, the off duty cop used the butt of the gun to pistol whip Mr Akers in the face.

He hit me right across the nose with it, broke my nose, my sinus cavities, broke my teeth.” Akers told reporters.

The officer then began fighting with Mrs Akers as she tried to stop the attack. Bystanders were alerted by the struggle, and jumped in to break up the fight.

Mrs Akers called the police, and officers arrived, but simply made the situation worse.

The police came, and went over directly to him. And they were all talking, laughing, joking around,” she said, adding “We feel like they knew him right off the bat.”

Instead of calling for medical attention for Mr Akers, and reprimanding the attacker, the uniformed officers instead treated the couple as if they were criminal suspects, and searched their vehicle.

They never searched that guy’s truck. He had the gun,” Donald said.

I thought they were going to shoot my husband, and I was really scared for that.” Janet further noted, fearing the cops would seek retribution against the couple.

The St Louis County Police refused to release the name of the off duty officer, saying that an investigation into the incident is ongoing.







POSTED MAY 12, 2015




This is on the heals of the death of 2 recently vaccinated babies and the hospitalization of 37 others. This from a total of 52 children vaccinated. The children received injections of vaccines for tuberculosis, rotavirus and hepatitis B. Be prepared. The pharmaceutical industry is already ramping up their propaganda machine in an effort to blame anything else except the vaccines. That might work except there is so much evidence on the dangers of vaccines over the years, that any attempt to blame something else could not explain the other incidents.

Of course, it is a tragedy when children die unnecessarily, but it is hard, if not impossible, to understand why parents continue to march their children off to the “health care professional” to get their “required” vaccines. It's nothing more than medical Russian Roulette. Sadly, in the case of these Mexican parents, they and their children lost.

Bruce                                      New World Order News


Depopulation test run? 75% of children who received vaccines in Mexican town now dead or hospitalized

Monday, May 11, 2015
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Tags: vaccine injury, depopulation agenda, deadly side effects



(NaturalNews) Despite the insidious attempts of the corporate-controlled U.S. media to censor the stories about the deadly side effects of vaccines, the truth keeps surfacing. The latest vaccine tragedy to strike has killed two babies in La Pimienta, Mexico and sent 37 more to the hospital with serious reactions to toxic vaccine additives. ()

"...14 children are in serious condition, 22 are stable and one is in critical condition," the Chiapas Health Secretariat said in a statement via

What's especially alarming is that only 52 children were vaccinated in all, meaning that 75% of those receiving the vaccines are now either dead or hospitalized.

The vaccines were administered by the
Mexican Social Security Institute, known as IMSS. The IMSS confirmed the deadly reactions occurred after children received injections of vaccines for tuberculosis, rotavirus and hepatitis B -- the same viral strains targeted by vaccines routinely administered to children in the United States.

IMSS suspends vaccination pending further investigation

According to Fox News Latino, the IMSS has suspended the vaccines pending the outcome of an investigation into why so many children have been killed and hospitalized.

According to the entire mainstream media in the United States -- which is 100% controlled by corporate interests -- vaccines never harm anyone and are perfectly safe to inject into children in unlimited quantities. This dangerous, inhumane "Vaccine Injury Denialism" is rampant across the corporate-controlled media, which contributes to the deaths of innocent babies and children by refusing to acknowledge the truth that vaccines kill and injure children on a regular basis.

Just recently, in fact, the UK government agreed to
pay $90 million to victims of the swine flu vaccine. That vaccine caused permanent brain damage to over 800 children across Europe. The truth is that vaccines regularly harm and even kill innocent children, most likely because of the toxic chemical adjuvants and preservatives they still contain.

As the CDC openly admits, vaccines are still
intentionally formulated with mercury, aluminum, MSG and formaldehyde. Some vaccines even use ingredients derived from aborted human fetal tissue. Last year, a CDC scientist blew the whistle on the CDC committing scientific fraud
to cover up links between vaccines and autism in young African-American males.

Test run for depopulation via vaccines?

As globalists now fully realize, vaccines are by far the best way to cull the human population because most people can be tricked into lining up and asking for them. Thus, there's no need to resort to all the difficulties used by the Nazis to commit genocide in World War II, involving complex logistics of railroad cars, gas chambers, construction of mass graves, prisoner tracking via IBM computing technology, and so on. (Yes, Nazi genocide and prisoner tracking was powered by early IBM computers. See IBM and the Holocaust, the strategic alliance between Nazi Germany and America's most powerful corporation...)

As the vaccine industry has now come to realize, it's so much easier to kill people when they voluntarily comply with the injections. Hence the aggressive media propaganda push to achieve absolute blind obedience to vaccines so that no one will ask questions when sterilization or euthanasia chemicals are used. That's no doubt why vaccines have been routinely tested for depopulation programs via two primary methods:

# 1) Achieve covert sterilizations of targeted populations by combining sterilization chemicals with vaccines. (The "slow kill.")

# 2) Directly kill vaccine recipients by intentionally lacing vaccines with euthanasia chemicals that cause death. (The "fast kill.")

Method #1 has been repeatedly used throughout Africa, Mexico and South America to inflict sterilization upon targeted groups via immunization and vaccination programs. Just last year, in fact, I reported on
the discovery of a covert depopulation vaccine program being run in Kenya

Tetanus vaccines given to millions of young women in Kenya have been confirmed by laboratories to contain a sterilization chemical that causes miscarriages, reports the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, a pro-vaccine organization.

A whopping 2.3 million young girls and women are in the process of being given the vaccine, pushed by UNICEF and the World Health Organization.

"We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen," Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi told
LifeSiteNews. "They were all laced with HCG."

Method #2 now appears to be under way in Mexico as 75% of those children injected with vaccines are now either dead or hospitalized.

Vaccine-induced depopulation was attempted in Mexico in 1974

As Truth Stream Media exhaustively documented, a depopulation exercise was run in Mexico in 1974, using vaccines as the cover story.

The scheme was dreamed up after the release of the
National Security Study Memorandum 200
which highlighted the global population problem and urged governments to find ways to reduce the global population.

As explains:

Concentration on this "problem" of how to reduce the population was planned for 13 key countries, including India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Colombia. Of those, the document singled out Mexico as having one of the highest (and therefore, most worrisome) growth rates of all. The document read, "Perhaps the most significant population trend from the viewpoint of the United States is the prospect that Mexico’s population will increase from 50 million in 1970 to over 130 million by the year 2000."

To combat this problem, "medical spooks" -- who were almost certainly U.S.-funded depopulation vaccine crews -- began injecting women all across Mexico with anti-fertility drugs disguised as vaccines. If you doubt this, read your history. The U.S. government's National Institutes of Health was
caught red-handed running human medical experiments on prisoners in Guatemala. President Obama was even forced to publicly apologize in 2011 after the cover-up collapsed! There is nothing the Nazis did in the 1930s and 40s that the pharmaceutical industry wouldn't be willing to repeat today under the label of "science."

But getting back to Mexico, as the covert depopulation vaccination program spread across Mexico City in 1974, locals began to catch on to the deception, and public resistance grew. As these newspaper clippings reveal, parents began hiding their children in their own homes to avoid them being injected with sterilization chemicals at the public schools. (California, by the way, also targets children at schools in order to avoid parents having the opportunity to say "No!")

Mexico City - Associated Press - Rumors that persons disguised as inoculation teams were giving school children shots that sterilized them forced health authorities to suspend all vaccination drives today and to post police outside Mexico City schools. Thousands of parents stormed various schools in the Mexico City area Tuesday and took their children home.

It's also important to note that these sterilization vaccines were being administered essentially at gunpoint, as police were accompanying the vaccine crews:

Callers told newspapers and TV stations that the sterilization crews were protected by police escorts and that they included white-robed men and women "who looked like foreigners."

This same scenario is now about to be replicated in California, by the way, where
SB 277 would criminalize parents of children who are not vaccinated, essentially at gunpoint.

What's even more interesting is that the exact same arguments we hear today about vaccine skeptics -- they're punitively labeled "anti-vaxxers" or "anti-science" -- were also being used in Mexico in 1974. As the following newspaper clipping shows:

The Mexican Medical Association issued statements denying that any kind of inoculation could cause sterility... Officials said superstition and ignorance of preventive health [i.e. "anti-science"] were responsible for the widespread belief that the rumors were true.

In other words, even though sterilization teams were running around Mexico, injecting people with chemicals as part of a depopulation agenda, any person who pointed this out was immediately labeled "anti-science" and derided as "ignorant."

Very little has changed in four decades, it seems: the same tactic is still used today, even while children are being killed or injured every single day due to the toxic ingredients used in vaccines.

CDC's intelligence operatives caught running disinfo campaigns

The "science bullying" behind vaccines also allows governments of the world to run sterilization and depopulation programs disguised as public health. Once the population is bullied into accepting vaccines without question -- blind obedience is now demanded almost everywhere -- governments can add any chemicals they want to those vaccines, including chemicals that cause permanent sterilization or even death.

The fact that all vaccine injuries are systematically denied to exist also means that any person harmed or killed by vaccines is immediately wiped from the national memory. Like a criminal mafia, the vaccine industry works hard to hide the bodies and thereby maintain its monopolistic racket on the utterly false premise that vaccines are 100% safe. To further drive home this extraordinary medical propaganda, the CDC uses intelligence operatives like Nurse Hickox who spread disinfo through the mainstream media, which is always happy to comply with the destructive agendas of the vaccine industry.

As Natural News
uncovered during the Ebola scare of 2014:

Nurse Kaci Hickox, who has made headlines over the last few days by refusing to quarantine herself after returning from the Ebola front lines in Africa, turns out to have been trained as an "intelligence officer" under a two-year CDC program modeled after the U.S. military.

As you can see from the document below, Hickox graduated from a two-year CDC intelligence officer training program in 2012. This is the same nurse
whose LinkedIn page was recently scrubbed to hide her ties to the CDC...

The official intelligence designation granted to Nurse Hickox by the CDC was "Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer," and she is a graduate of the 2012 EIS program according to
this CDC document (PDF)
. (See page 138 - 139 for her name and photo, or view photo below.)

That same year, the CDC graduated 81 such "intelligence officers" whose names and photos are also listed in the public document.

Bottom line? Don't trust the vaccine industry

What's the takeaway realization from all this? Vaccines have been and will continue to be used as a cover for forced depopulation programs involving sterilization or euthanasia chemicals.

Obedience to vaccines allows depopulation teams accompanied by armed police to intimidate people into accepting any liquid they want to put in a syringe. That liquid might be a vaccine, or it might be a sterilization chemical or even a euthanasia chemical.

Any population that is indoctrinated into trusting the vaccine industry -- an industry steeped in repeated criminal activity combined with a total disregard for human life -- is ripe for being targeted for depopulation. (See
Nigeria Issues Arrest Warrants for Top Pfizer Officials After Drug Experiments Conducted on Children.)

After all, why go through the trouble of building gas chambers and rounding people up for mass extermination when you can achieve the same result without any resistance at all if you simply label the chemicals "vaccines"?

(Click here for hi-res version of the graphic below.)


POSTED MAY 11, 2015


Police Have Officially Killed 400 People in 2015

It actually started during the administration of Bill Clinton. Remember the promise of putting 1 million cops on the street? There is nothing worse than giving power and weapons to 1 million people. It is irrelevant that they carry the title of “Police”.

Yes, we all know the cliché' “not all police are bad”. If we think about it, that makes it worse. If there are so many good police, how do the bad police get away with crimes. If the good police cannot prevent the abuses of the bad police, how can they convince us they can prevent crimes committed by bad people.

No, it appears that the extra 100's of thousands of police have only resulted in greater traffic control and more bullets flying in the direction of those convicted of nothing. I have commented before that it is extremely dangerous for our government masters to allow police a blank check when it comes to a “shoot first and ask questions later” policy.

Bruce                         New World Order News



Police Have Officially Killed 400 People in 2015, A New Grieving Family Every Seven and a Half Hours

By Cassandra Fairbanks on May 6, 2015


As of May 5, 2015, the police in the United States of America have killed 401 people that we know of.

Deaths By Law Enforcement 2015:

  • 91 in the 31 days of January

  • 85 in the 28 days of February

  • 115 in the 31 days of March

  • 101 in the 30 days of April

  • 8 people in the 5 days of May

Extrapolating those numbers out to an hourly figure and the police have killed someone on average, every 7.48 hours.  While there is no government-run database, Killed By Police has taken it upon themselves to keep track, and are doing a fantastic job thus far. It’s truly a Cop Crisis.

The three youngest are A’donte Washington, Jason C. Hendrix, and Kendre Omari Alston who were all only 16-years-old.  The oldest was 87-year-old Lewis Becker.  At least four officers have also been shot and killed by other officers.

Meanwhile, the Officer Down Memorial Page is reporting gunfire related deaths of on-duty officers is down 43%.

Law Enforcement Deaths 2015:

  • 9/11 related illness: 2

  • Accidental: 1

  • Assault: 1

  • Automobile accident: 12

  • Gunfire: 8

  • Gunfire (Accidental): 2

  • Heart attack: 10

  • Motorcycle accident: 1

  • Struck by vehicle: 2

  • Vehicle pursuit: 2

The death by assault was Patrolman George Nissen, and they are referring to injuries sustained 10 years earlier when he was attempting to break up a large fight on February 13th, 2005.

A look at the two which were struck by vehicles, both were accidents, with one occurring while the officer was off duty and had stopped to help someone on an icy road. The other was an accident where a semi truck crashed into the officer’s vehicle.

That leaves the eight by gunfire as deaths due to suspects actively attempting to harm them this year.

Deaths of officers directly at hands of suspects this year:

  • 0 in January

  • 0 in February

  • 6 in March

  • 0 in April

  • 2 in May

This means that in the 125 days of 2015, the police have been killed after being shot by a suspect, on average, every 375 hours.

According to an FBI report, Americans are less violent than ever, yet the police seem to be growing increasingly violent.  These numbers seem to agree.

Being a police officer isn’t even close to being in the top 10 most dangerous jobs in this country.  According to the 2013 report by the Federal Bureau of Labor Statistics on work-related fatal injuries, “Police and sheriff’s patrol deputies” ranked as the 41st most dangerous occupation.

Just some numbers for you to consider next time you or someone you know tries to claim that the “brave” men and women in blue are perpetually “fearing for their life” so that they “can get home to their families.”

Every seven and a half hours our police leave another family planning a funeral.  Enough is enough; visit our #solutions section if you’d like to find out some of the many ways we can change this paradigm.

POSTED MAY 7, 2015




So says the military site, According to this covert site, America is poised to experience a cataclysmic collapse leading to massive deaths and emigration. Most here, acknowledge that something bad is up. Along with that, most here, have no idea as to how to react.

The only thing we can take from predictions like this, is that they are frequently not as severe as predicted and usually take longer. Meanwhile, there is no harm in storing food, medical supplies, water filtration and clothing. It would also be useful to have somewhere to go, where you and your family would be hidden from the general population and police. If a scenario such as the one described in the subject article happens, every goal in life goes out the window and is replaced by the need to survive.

Bruce                                                   New World Order News



Military Site’s Forecast for 2025: Economic Collapse Will Lead to Massive 78% Depopulation in America



depopulationWith economic malaise on the horizon and any number of triggers ready to set things into motion, military site recently posted their global forecast for 2025. The site, rumored to be a front for various alphabet intelligence agencies, says that America will soon see a large reverse migration as those who came here seeking riches and safety will emigrate out of the country following a serious, multi-year crisis.


According to the report the economy of the United States will dwindle from a GDP of $17.4 trillion today to just over $800 billion in the next 10 years – a decline of about 95% with respect to the goods and services produced within our own borders. Such a decline would be staggering, but it’s not the most ominous aspect of the report.


According to Deagel, the real concern is the adverse effects on our population, which is currently just under 319 million. If the forecast, which does not include the possibility of war or widespread pandemic in its analysis, is accurate then America may experience an event so massive that some 78% of our population would be wiped out, leaving just 68 million people living on American soil by 2025. 

The key element to understand the process that the USA will enter in the upcoming decade is migration. In the past, specially in the 20th century, the key factor that allowed the USA to rise to its colossus status was immigration with the benefits of a demographic expansion supporting the credit expansion and the brain drain from the rest of the world benefiting the States.
The collapse of the Western financial system will wipe out the standard of living of its population while ending ponzi schemes such as the stock exchange and the pension funds. The population will be hit so badly by a full array of bubbles and ponzi schemes that the migration engine will start to work in reverse accelerating itself due to ripple effects thus leading to the demise of the States. This unseen situation for the States will develop itself in a cascade pattern with unprecedented and devastating effects for the economy.
Jobs offshoring will surely end with many American Corporations relocating overseas thus becoming foreign Corporations! We see a significant part of the American population migrating to Latin America and Asia while migration to Europe – suffering a similar illness – won’t be relevant. Nevertheless the death toll will be horrible. Take into account that the Soviet Union’s population was poorer than the Americans nowadays or even then. The ex-Soviets suffered during the following struggle in the 1990s with a significant death toll and the loss of national pride. Might we say “Twice the pride, double the fall”? Nope. The American standard of living is one of the highest, far more than double of the Soviets while having added a services economy that will be gone along with the financial system. When pensioners see their retirement disappear in front of their eyes and there are no servicing jobs you can imagine what is going to happen next. At least younger people can migrate. Never in human history were so many elders among the population. In past centuries people were lucky to get to their 30s or 40s.
The American downfall is set to be far worse than the Soviet Union’s one. A confluence of crisis with a devastating result.

POSTED MAY 6, 2015




Specifically, a scientist in the employ of the CDC has been exposed. The subject article covers Dr. Poul Thorsen overseeing millions of dollars in grant money that was used to conduct research to 'prove' that vaccines have no link to autism. Not only has this study been thoroughly exposed as false, but Dr. Thosen has fled to Denmark where he is waiting extradiction to the U.S. Having been indicted for fraud and money laundering.

Let's examine this issue of the autism/vaccine link. The MMR vaccine, as well as many others, contain Thimerosal, which itself is 50% mercury. The CDC and many other scientists in the employ of the government and the pharmaceutical industry insist this ingredient is not harmful. Go ahead and plunge it into the bloodstream of your children.

This brings me to the second article posted today. This is from another government source, the EPA. Just read their warnings about mercury and the dangers of eating food containing this ingredient. On the one hand they insist it is just fine to inject mercury into your bloodstream, but it is very dangerous to eat it. You can't have it both ways. The results of the dramatic increase in Autism and other conditions over the past 40 years is proof enough.

Bruce                                    New World Order News



Key CDC scientist who downplayed vaccine-autism connection is now fleeing from justice

Wednesday, May 06, 2015 by: J. D. Heyes
Tags: Poul Thorsen, vaccine fraud, fugitive from justice



(NaturalNews) A leading scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention whose noted "Denmark Study" ostensibly disproved any link between vaccines and autism as well as additional neurological disorders is now fleeing justice with nearly $2 million he allegedly was to spend on research.

As first reported in April 2011 by Natural News editor Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, Dr. Poul Thorsen was indicted by a federal grand jury in Atlanta on charges of wire fraud, money laundering and defrauding research institutions of grant money.

That report came after a May 2010 report in
The Huffington Post noting that Thorsen fled with the money as Danish police launched an investigation into alleged fraud involving millions of taxpayer dollars over time.

Adams noted that Thorsen "is a scientist who formerly worked for the CDC, and over the last several years, he oversaw millions of dollars in grant money that was used to conduct research to 'prove' that vaccines have no link to autism." One of Dr. Thorsen's research papers is the famous "Thimerosal and the occurrence of autism: negative ecological evidence from Danish population-based data" study.

You can see that study published here.

Theft raises doubts about validity of his research

Adams said the paper concluded that thimerosal, the mercury-based preservative that is used in vaccines globally, has no statistically significant link to autism. Thorsen's piece was a key paper used by vaccine proponents who argued that thimerosal is safe to inject into children.

Adams noted that the fact that Dr. Thorsen's "credibility is now being called into question by a federal indictment of fraud and money laundering will, of course, have ripple effects throughout both the vaccine industries and autism support groups."

Regarding his autism-vaccine "research," HuffPo added:

His study has long been criticized as fraudulent since it failed to disclose that the increase was an artifact of new mandates requiring, for the first time, that autism cases be reported on the national registry. This new law and the opening of a clinic dedicated to autism treatment in Copenhagen accounted for the sudden rise in reported cases rather than, as Thorsen seemed to suggest, the removal of mercury from vaccines. Despite this obvious chicanery, CDC has long touted the study as the principal proof that mercury-laced vaccines are safe for infants and young children.

Natural News also developed a graphic demonstrating the web of deceit woven by Thorsen:


Hiding the vaccine-autism link

According to the indictment, Thorsen was given millions in grant money dating back to the 1990s. In 2002, he moved to Denmark and became the "principal investigator" for the grant money, responsible for administering the research money that the CDC awarded. Between 2000 and 2009, he received some $11 million in awards. Adams cited the Justice Department's indictment that said Thorsen allegedly skimmed money by submitting fraudulent expense statements that were falsely tied to the Denmark study.

As HuffPo further noted, Thorsen wasn't even a research scientist or toxicologist - he was a psychiatrist. Nevertheless, he parlayed his initial autism study into a taxpayer-funded cash cow in the form of a long-term relationship with the CDC.

He managed to build a research empire of sorts called the North Atlantic Epidemiology Alliances, or NANEA, which boasted a close relationship with the CDC's autism team. It was a relationship that "had the agency paying Thorsen and his research staff millions of dollars to churn out research papers, many of them assuring the public on the issue of vaccine safety," HuffPo reported.

Thorsen's shenanigans have forced leading independent scientists to question the CDC's judgment, his research in particular, and why the agency has gone to some effort to conceal the vaccine-autism link in mercury-laced injections beginning in 1989 with the epidemic of autism and other neurological disorders that have affected generations of American children.

Now awaiting extradition to the U.S.

According to the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General's web site, Thorsen remains in custody in Denmark awaiting extradition to the United States.

The indictment says that, from "approximately February 2004 until February 2010, Poul Thorsen executed a scheme to steal grant money awarded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC had awarded grant money to Denmark for research involving infant disabilities, autism, genetic disorders, and fetal alcohol syndrome."

The HHS IG has accused Thorsen of allegedly diverting more than $1 million of the CDC grant money to his own personal bank account.

"Thorsen submitted fraudulent invoices on CDC letterhead to medical facilities assisting in the research for reimbursement of work allegedly covered by the grants," says the IG's Web summary on the indictment. "The invoices were addressed to Aarhaus [
sic] University and Sahlgrenska University Hospital. The fact that the invoices were on CDC letterhead made it appear that CDC was requesting the money from Aarhaus University and Sahlgrenska University Hospital although the bank account listed on the invoices belonged to Thorsen."

In April 2011, Thorsen was brought up on charges on 22 counts of Wire Fraud and Money Laundering. According to bank account records, Thorsen purchased a home in Atlanta, a Harley Davidson motorcycle, an Audi automobile and a Honda SUV with funds that he received from the CDC grants.

Adams reported that Thorsen faces 13 counts of wire fraud and 9 counts of money laundering after speaking with the Justice Department. In total, Thorsen could be sentenced to some 260 years behind bars just on the wire fraud charges alone; he could get an additional 90 years in prison for money laundering and face more than $22 million in fines.

For its part, Aarhus University sought to sever its ties with Thorsen in 2011.

"Unfortunately, a considerable shortfall in funding at Aarhus University associated with the CDC grant was discovered," the university said in a statement. "In investigating the shortfalls associated with the grant, DASTI and Aarhus University became aware of two alleged CDC funding documents as well as a letter regarding funding commitments allegedly written by Randolph B. Williams of CDC's Procurement Grants Office which was used to secure advances from Aarhus University. Upon investigation by CDC, a suspicion arose that the documents are forgeries."

Health Effects

Information for...

Health Care Providers

People in the U.S. are mainly exposed to methylmercury, an organic compound, when they eat fish and shellfish that contain methylmercury. Whether an exposure to the various forms of mercury will harm a person's health depends on a number of factors (below). Almost all people have at least trace amounts of methylmercury in their tissues, reflecting methylmercury’s widespread presence in the environment and people’s exposure through the consumption of fish and shellfish. People may be exposed to mercury in any of its forms under different circumstances. The factors that determine how severe the health effects are from mercury exposure include these:

  • the chemical form of mercury;

  • the dose;

  • the age of the person exposed (the fetus is the most susceptible);

  • the duration of exposure;

  • the route of exposure -- inhalation, ingestion, dermal contact, etc.; and

  • the health of the person exposed.

Mercury exists in three chemical forms. They each have specific effects on human health.

Methylmercury effects

For fetuses, infants, and children, the primary health effect of methylmercury is impaired neurological development. Methylmercury exposure in the womb, which can result from a mother's consumption of fish and shellfish that contain methylmercury, can adversely affect a baby's growing brain and nervous system. Impacts on cognitive thinking, memory, attention, language, and fine motor and visual spatial skills have been seen in children exposed to methylmercury in the womb. Recent human biological monitoring by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 1999 and 2000 (PDF) (3 pp., 42 KB, About PDF) shows that most people have blood mercury levels below a level associated with possible health effects. More recent data from the CDC support this general finding.

Outbreaks of methylmercury poisonings have made it clear that adults, children, and developing fetuses are at risk from ingestion exposure to methylmercury. During these poisoning outbreaks some mothers with no symptoms of nervous system damage gave birth to infants with severe disabilities, it became clear that the developing nervous system of the fetus may be more vulnerable to methylmercury than is the adult nervous system.

For more information on fish consumption advisories across the country, visit EPA's fish consumption web pages.

In addition to the subtle impairments noted above, symptoms of methylmercury poisoning may include; impairment of the peripheral vision; disturbances in sensations ("pins and needles" feelings, usually in the hands, feet, and around the mouth); lack of coordination of movements; impairment of speech, hearing, walking; and muscle weakness. People concerned about their exposure to methylmercury should consult their physician.

Mercury and Cancer. No human data indicate that exposure to any form of mercury causes cancer, but the human data currently available are very limited. Mercuric chloride has caused increases in several types of tumors in rats and mice, and methylmercury has caused kidney tumors in male mice. Scientists only observed these health effects at extremely high doses, above levels that produced other effects. When EPA revised its Cancer Guidelines in 2005, the Agency concluded that neither inorganic mercury nor methylmercury from environmental exposures are likely to cause cancer in humans. More technical information is available in volume V of the 1997 Mercury Study Report to Congress (PDF) (349 pp., 1.2 MB, about PDF) (see especially pages 47, 80, 107, and 161 of the file).

Additional Information:

Additional information on the health effects of methylmercury is available from the IRIS database at and EPA’s Methylmercury Water Quality Criterion Web site at You can also visit the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) toxicological profile for mercury.

Top of page

Elemental mercury effects

Elemental (metallic) mercury primarily causes health effects when it is breathed as a vapor where it can be absorbed through the lungs. These exposures can occur when elemental mercury is spilled or products that contain elemental mercury break and expose mercury to the air, particularly in warm or poorly-ventilated indoor spaces. The first paragraph on this page lists the factors that determine the severity of the health effects from exposure to mercury. Symptoms include these: tremors; emotional changes (e.g., mood swings, irritability, nervousness, excessive shyness); insomnia; neuromuscular changes (such as weakness, muscle atrophy, twitching); headaches; disturbances in sensations; changes in nerve responses; performance deficits on tests of cognitive function. At higher exposures there may be kidney effects, respiratory failure and death. People concerned about their exposure to elemental mercury should consult their physician.

Additional Information:

Additional information on the health effects of elemental mercury is available from the IRIS database at

Top of page

Effects of other mercury compounds (inorganic and organic)

High exposures to inorganic mercury may result in damage to the gastrointestinal tract, the nervous system, and the kidneys. Both inorganic and organic mercury compounds are absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract and affect other systems via this route. However, organic mercury compounds are more readily absorbed via ingestion than inorganic mercury compounds.

Symptoms of high exposures to inorganic mercury include: skin rashes and dermatitis; mood swings; memory loss; mental disturbances; and muscle weakness. People concerned about their exposure to inorganic mercury should consult their physician.



POSTED MAY 5, 2015




I know that's sounds alarmist, except children are dying. No, it's not a majority. In fact, it's only a small percentage. Hopefully, your child is not part of that percentage. In the past I have posted articles about babies who died shortly after receiving a vaccine or a series of vaccines. Just this week, I was told of a 2 month old baby who “just died”. According to the story no one knows why this baby just died. I didn't have the courage to ask if that baby had its' 2 month vaccinations.

Now the insaniacs who control our nation are in attack mode. They are doing all they can to require school age children receive vaccinations without any exemptions. Not only do they require children to have the current vaccines, but they want the power to require additional vaccines if they feel it's necessary.

The subject article and video cover this alarming trend towards a medical tyranny. I have also included the current CDC list of vaccinations for children. After reading this, I am sure you will get a sick feeling in your stomach with the prospect of subjecting your children to potential physical injury possibly leading to death.

Bruce                                                 New World Order News

Nurse Reveals Routine Vaccine-Induced Injuries

Current medical community vaccinating children too early with too many vaccines

Nurse Reveals Routine Vaccine-Induced Injuries

by Jefferey Jaxen | | May 5, 2015

The battle rages on in the United States as citizen’s fight to keep vaccine exemptions on a slippery slope pointed away from medical freedom.

Pharmaceutical funded lobbyists are making no effort to conceal their agenda as they coat senate committees like wet blankets covering truth. The trend is moving fast away from public power as senators misrepresent their voters. In California and Vermont, it has been confirmed that the community, because of its strong opposition, is simply no longer able to testify on record. Any whisper of the possibility of endlessly stacked parents rejecting votes sees immediate postponement of committee meetings to remove such options.

It is clear that certain topics are off limits and conversation is controlled by pharmaceutical interests. The term is called astroturfing and it can be witnessed in full force at any state capital currently voting to take away medical freedom and vaccine exemptions. In a recent interview with Sharyl Attkisson, Dr. Joseph Mercola asked the question, “What other currently health related issues might be happening right now that you believe investigative journalists and the media are not reporting on. Or could do a better job if they weren’t being suppressed by the people who authorize the release of that information? Attkinson, a five-time Emmy Award winning investigative journalist and author of the book, “Stonewalled: My Fight for Truth Against the Forces of Obstruction, Intimidation, and Harassment in Obama’s Washington.”, gave the following reply:

If people were simply covering in terms of news value, facts, and fairness we’d be giving way more coverage to vaccine side effects, autism, ADD, and all the immune disorders that have emerged in the past and been made untouchable by this environment that I’ve discussed with you (referring to astroturfing.)

In a recent interview, Michelle Rowton of Nurses Against Mandatory Vaccines was asked her thoughts on the current medical community vaccinating children too early with too many vaccines, she replied:

I think what a lot of people don’t realize in a closed space like NICU (Neonatal Intensive Care Unit) is that they’ve decided that we need to vaccinate these babies on-time. Two months after they’re born…bam, there it goes. This baby could be four months early and still supposed to be inside their mother, weighting three or four pounds and getting the same amount of vaccines as a 200 pound man.”

Rowton then went further to break bombshell news by saying:

I’ve sat in a room with our on-call staff of physicians and practitioners (when they say) “Oh wow, this is so embarrassing this 25 weeker never actually required a breathing tube and going on the vent after he was born, he was so strong. But we gave him his two month vaccinations and he got intubated last night ha ha, oops how embarrassing. The step-down units are calling the NICU’s and saying “hey we’re going to go ahead and give these four babies their two month shots today, make sure you have beds ready because we all know they’re going to have increased breathing difficulties, feeding and digestion difficulties, apnea, and bradycardia. This is what goes on.

This week sees more committees voting on the removal of exemptions. The fairy tales painted by pro-vaccine doctors and nurses in committee testimony drifts further from reality as people at every level of society refuse to stop warning the public. It appears that the power and influence of PR firms dedicated to astroturfing social media combined with the swarm of vaccine manufacturer lobbyist that have descended upon American medical freedom are the only groups that are truly for forced vaccination.


Recommended Immunization Schedule for Persons Aged 0 Through 18 Years

United States, 2015


NEW ACIP Recommendation for Human Papillomavirus Vaccination


  • 9vHPV, 4vHPV, or 2vHPV for routine vaccination of females 11 or 12 years* of age and females through 26 years of age who have not been vaccinated previously or who have not completed the 3-dose series.

  • 9vHPV or 4vHPV for routine vaccination of males 11 or 12 years* of age and males through 21 years of age who have not been vaccinated previously or who have not completed the 3-dose series.

  • 9vHPV or 4vHPV vaccination for men who have sex with men and immunocompromised men (including those with HIV infection) through age 26 years if not vaccinated previously.


Syndicated and print schedules do not yet reflect this change. This recommendation will be incorporated in the immunization schedules that will be published in February 2016.


*Can be given starting at 9 years of age.

See MMWR for complete vaccine recommendations.


These recommendations must be read with the footnotes that follow. For those who fall behind or start late, provide catch-up vaccination at the earliest opportunity as indicated by the green bars in tables below. To determine minimum intervals between doses, see the catch-up schedule. School entry and adolescent vaccine age groups are 4-6 yrs and 11-12 yrs.

Birth to 15 Months



1 mo

2 mos

4 mos

6 mos

9 mos

12 mos

15 mos

Hepatitis B1 (HepB)

1st dose→

2nd dose→


3rd dose→

RV1 (2-dose series); RV5 (3-dose series)



1st dose→

2nd dose→

See footnote 2




Diphtheria, tetanus, & acellular pertussis3(DTaP: <7 yrs)



1st dose→

2nd dose→

3rd dose→


4th dose→

Tetanus, diphtheria, & acellular pertussis4 (Tdap: ≥7 yrs)









Haemophilus influenzae type b5 (Hib)



1st dose→

2nd dose→

See footnote 5


3rd or 4th dose,
See footnote 5

Pneumococcal conjugate6 (PCV13)



1st dose→

2nd dose→

3rd dose→


4th dose→

Pneumococcal polysaccharide6(PPSV23)









Inactivated poliovirus7 (IPV:<18 yrs)



1st dose→

2nd dose→

3rd dose→

Influenza8(IIV; LAIV) 2 doses for some: See footnote 8






Annual vaccination (IIV only) 1 or 2 doses

Measles, mumps, rubella9 (MMR)





See footnote 9

1st dose→

Varicella10 (VAR)







1st dose→

Hepatitis A11 (HepA)







2 dose series, See footnote 11

Human papillomavirus12 (HPV2: females only; HPV4: males and females)









Meningococcal13 (Hib-Men-CY ≥ 6 weeks; MenACWY-D ≥9 mos; MenACWY-CRM ≥ 2 mos)



See footnote 13



Range of recommended ages for all children


Range of recommended ages for catch-up immunization


Range of recommended ages for certain high-risk groups


Range of recommended ages during which catch-up is encouraged and for certain high-risk groups


Not routinely recommended


18 Months to 18 Years


18 mos

19-23 mos

2-3 yrs

4-6 yrs

7-8 yrs

9-10 yrs

11-12 yrs

13-15 yrs

16-18 yrs


Hepatitis B1 (HepB)

3rd dose→


RV1 (2-dose series); RV5 (3-dose series)











Diphtheria, tetanus, & acellular pertussis3(DTaP: <7 yrs)

4th dose→


5th dose→







Tetanus, diphtheria, & acellular pertussis4 (Tdap: ≥7 yrs)









Haemophilus influenzae type b5 (Hib)









Pneumococcal conjugate6 (PCV13)



Pneumococcal polysaccharide6(PPSV23)





Inactivated poliovirus7 (IPV)(<18 yrs)

3rd dose→


4th dose→




Influenza8(IIV; LAIV) 2 doses for some: See footnote 8

Annual vaccination (IIV only) 1 or 2 doses

Annual vaccination (LAIV or IIV) 1 or 2 doses

Annual vaccination (LAIV or IIV) 1 dose only


Measles, mumps, rubella9 (MMR)


2nd dose→



Varicella10 (VAR)


2nd dose→



Hepatitis A11 (HepA)

2 dose series, See footnote 11





Human papillomavirus12 (HPV2: females only; HPV4: males and females)







(3 dose series)→



Meningococcal13 (Hib-Men-CY ≥ 6 weeks; MenACWY-D ≥9 mos; MenACWY-CRM ≥ 2 mos)

See footnote 13


1st dose→






Note: The above recommendations must be read along with the footnotes of this schedule.


Recommended Immunization Schedule for Persons Age 0 Through 18 Years

United States, 2015


For further guidance on the use of the vaccines mentioned below, see the ACIP Recommendations.

For vaccine recommendations for persons 19 years of age and older, see the adult immunization schedule.

  1. Hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine. (Minimum age: birth)

    Routine vaccination:
    At birth:

    • Administer monovalent HepB vaccine to all newborns before hospital discharge.

    • For infants born to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive mothers, administer HepB vaccine and 0.5 mL of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) within 12 hours of birth. These infants should be tested for HBsAg and antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) 1 to 2 months after completion of the HepB series at age 9 through 18 months (preferably at the next well-child visit).

    • If mother's HBsAg status is unknown, within 12 hours of birth administer HepB vaccine regardless of birth weight. For infants weighing less than 2,000 grams, administer HBIG in addition to HepB vaccine within 12 hours of birth. Determine mother’s HBsAg status as soon as possible and, if mother is HBsAg-positive, also administer HBIG for infants weighing 2,000 grams or more as soon as possible, but no later than age 7 days.

    Doses following the birth dose:

    • The second dose should be administered at age 1 or 2 months. Monovalent HepB vaccine should be used for doses administered before age 6 weeks.

    • Infants who did not receive a birth dose should receive 3 doses of a HepB-containing vaccine on a schedule of 0, 1 to 2 months, and 6 months starting as soon as feasible. See Catch-up Schedule.

    • Administer the second dose 1 to 2 months after the first dose (minimum interval of 4 weeks), administer the third dose at least 8 weeks after the second dose AND at least 16 weeks after the first dose. The final (third or fourth) dose in the HepB vaccine series should be administered no earlier than age 24 weeks.

    • Administration of a total of 4 doses of HepB vaccine is permitted when a combination vaccine containing HepB is administered after the birth dose.

    Catch-up vaccination:

    • Unvaccinated persons should complete a 3-dose series.

    • A 2-dose series (doses separated by at least 4 months) of adult formulation Recombivax HB is licensed for use in children aged 11 through 15 years.

    • For other catch-up guidance, see Catch-up Schedule.

  2. Rotavirus (RV) vaccines. (Minimum age: 6 weeks for both RV1 [Rotarix] and RV5 [RotaTeq])

    Routine vaccination:

    • Administer a series of RV vaccine to all infants as follows:

      1. If Rotarix is used, administer a 2-dose series at 2 and 4 months of age.

      2. If RotaTeq is used, administer a 3-dose series at ages 2, 4, and 6 months.

      3. If any dose in the series was RotaTeq or vaccine product is unknown for any dose in the series, a total of 3 doses of RV vaccine should be administered.

    Catch-up vaccination:

    • The maximum age for the first dose in the series is 14 weeks, 6 days; vaccination should not be initiated for infants aged 15 weeks, 0 days or older.

    • The maximum age for the final dose in the series is 8 months, 0 days.

    • For other catch-up guidance, see Catch-up Schedule.

    Top of Page

  3. Diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine. (Minimum age: 6 weeks. Exception: DTaP-IPV [Kinrix]: 4 years)

    Routine vaccination:

    • Administer a 5-dose series of DTaP vaccine at ages 2, 4, 6, 15 through 18 months, and 4 through 6 years. The fourth dose may be administered as early as age 12 months, provided at least 6 months have elapsed since the third dose. However, the fourth dose of DTaP need not be repeated if it was administered at least 4 months after the third dose of DTaP.

    Catch-up vaccination:

    • The fifth dose of DTaP vaccine is not necessary if the fourth dose was administered at age 4 years or older.

    • For other catch-up guidance, see Catch-up Schedule.

    Top of Page

  4. Tetanus and diphtheria toxoids and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine. (Minimum age: 10 years for both Boostrix and Adacel)

    Routine vaccination:

    • Administer 1 dose of Tdap vaccine to all adolescents aged 11 through 12 years.

    • Tdap may be administered regardless of the interval since the last tetanus and diphtheria toxoid-containing vaccine.

    • Administer 1 dose of Tdap vaccine to pregnant adolescents during each pregnancy (preferred during 27 through 36 weeks' gestation) regardless of time since prior Td or Tdap vaccination.

    Catch-up vaccination:

    • Persons aged 7 years and older who are not fully immunized with DTaP vaccine should receive Tdap vaccine as 1 dose (preferably the first) in the catch-up series; if additional doses are needed, use Td vaccine. For children 7 through 10 years who receive a dose of Tdap as part of the catch-up series, an adolescent Tdap vaccine dose at age 11 through 12 years should NOT be administered. Td should be administered instead 10 years after the Tdap dose.

    • Persons aged 11 through 18 years who have not received Tdap vaccine should receive a dose followed by tetanus and diphtheria toxoid (Td) booster doses every 10 years thereafter.

    • Inadvertent doses of DTaP vaccine:

      1. If administered inadvertently to a child aged 7 through 10 years may count as part of the catch-up series. This dose may count as the adolescent Tdap dose, or the child can later receive a Tdap booster dose at age 11 through 12 years.

      2. If administered inadvertently to an adolescent aged 11 through 18 years, the dose should be counted as the adolescent Tdap booster.

    • For other catch-up guidance, see Catch-up Schedule.

    Top of Page

  5. Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccine. (Minimum age: 6 weeks for PRP-T [ACTHIB, DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel) and Hib-MenCY (MenHibrix)], PRP-OMP [PedvaxHIB or COMVAX], 12 months for PRP-T [Hiberix])

    Routine vaccination:

    • Administer a 2- or 3-dose Hib vaccine primary series and a booster dose (dose 3 or 4 depending on vaccine used in primary series) at age 12 through 15 months to complete a full Hib vaccine series.

    • The primary series with ActHIB, MenHibrix, or Pentacel consists of 3 doses and should be administered at 2, 4, and 6 months of age. The primary series with PedvaxHib or COMVAX consists of 2 doses and should be administered at 2 and 4 months of age; a dose at age 6 months is not indicated.

    • One booster dose (dose 3 or 4 depending on vaccine used in primary series) of any Hib vaccine should be administered at age 12 through 15 months. An exception is Hiberix vaccine. Hiberix should only be used for the booster (final) dose in children aged 12 months through 4 years who have received at least 1 prior dose of Hib-containing vaccine.

    • For recommendations on the use of MenHibrix in patients at increased risk for meningococcal disease, please refer to the meningococcal vaccine footnotes and also to MMWR February 28, 2014;63(RR01):1-13 Adobe PDF file [20 pages].

    Catch-up vaccination:

    • If dose 1 was administered at ages 12 through 14 months, administer a second (final) dose at least 8 weeks after dose 1, regardless of Hib vaccine used in the primary series.

    • If both doses were PRP-OMP (PedvaxHIB or COMVAX), and were administered before the first birthday, the third (and final) dose should be administered at age 12 through 59 months and at least 8 weeks after the second dose.

    • If the first dose was administered at age 7 through 11 months, administer the second dose at least 4 weeks later and a third (and final) dose at age 12 through 15 months or 8 weeks after second dose, whichever is later.

    • If first dose is administered before the first birthday and second dose administered at younger than 15 months, a third (and final) dose should be given 8 weeks later.

    • For unvaccinated children aged 15 months or older, administer only 1 dose.

    • For other catch-up guidance, see Catch-up Schedule. For catch-up guidance related to MenHibrix, please see the meningococcal vaccine footnotes and also MMWR February 28, 2014;63(RR01):1-13 Adobe PDF file [20 pages].

    Vaccination of persons with high-risk conditions:

    • Children aged 12 through 59 months who are at increased risk for Hib disease, including chemotherapy recipients and those with anatomic or functional asplenia (including sickle cell disease), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, immunoglobulin deficiency, or early component complement deficiency, who have received either no doses or only 1 dose of Hib vaccine before 12 months of age, should receive 2 additional doses of Hib vaccine 8 weeks apart; children who received 2 or more doses of Hib vaccine before 12 months of age should receive 1 additional dose.

    • For patients younger than 5 years of age undergoing chemotherapy or radiation treatment who received a Hib vaccine dose(s) within 14 days of starting therapy or during therapy, repeat the dose(s) at least 3 months following therapy completion.

    • Recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) should be revaccinated with a 3-dose regimen of Hib vaccine starting 6 to 12 months after successful transplant, regardless of vaccination history; doses should be administered at least 4 weeks apart.

    • A single dose of any Hib-containing vaccine should be administered to unimmunized* children and adolescents 15 months of age and older undergoing an elective splenectomy; if possible, vaccine should be administered at least 14 days before procedure.

    • Hib vaccine is not routinely recommended for patients 5 years or older. However, 1 dose of Hib vaccine should be administered to unimmunized* persons aged 5 years or older who have anatomic or functional asplenia (including sickle cell disease) and unvaccinated persons 5 through 18 years of age with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.

    * Patients who have not received a primary series and booster dose or at least 1 dose of Hib vaccine after 14 months of age are considered unimmunized.

    Top of Page

  6. Pneumococcal vaccines. (Minimum age: 6 weeks for PCV13, 2 years for PPSV23)

    Routine vaccination with PCV13:

    • Administer a 4-dose series of PCV13 vaccine at ages 2, 4, and 6 months and at age 12 through 15 months.

    • For children ages 14 through 59 months who have received an age-appropriate series of 7-valent PCV (PCV7), administer a single supplemental dose of 13-valent PCV (PCV13).

    Catch-up vaccination with PCV13:

    • Administer 1 dose of PCV13 to all healthy children aged 24 through 59 months who are not completely vaccinated for their age.

    • For other catch-up guidance, see Catch-up Schedule.

    Vaccination of persons with high-risk conditions with PCV13 and PPSV23:

    • All recommended PCV13 doses should be administered prior to PPSV23 vaccination if possible.

    • For children 2 through 5 years of age with any of the following conditions: chronic heart disease (particularly cyanotic congenital heart disease and cardiac failure); chronic lung disease (including asthma if treated with high-dose oral corticosteroid therapy); diabetes mellitus; cerebrospinal fluid leak; cochlear implant; sickle cell disease and other hemoglobinopathies; anatomic or functional asplenia; HIV infection; chronic renal failure; nephrotic syndrome; diseases associated with treatment with immunosuppressive drugs or radiation therapy, including malignant neoplasms, leukemias, lymphomas, and Hodgkin's disease; solid organ transplantation; or congenital immunodeficiency:

      1. Administer 1 dose of PCV13 if any incomplete schedule of 3 doses of PCV (PCV7 and/or PCV13) were received previously.

      2. Administer 2 doses of PCV13 at least 8 weeks apart if unvaccinated or any incomplete schedule of fewer than 3 doses of PCV (PCV7 and/or PCV13) were received previously.

      3. Administer 1 supplemental dose of PCV13 if 4 doses of PCV7 or other age-appropriate complete PCV7 series was received previously.

      4. The minimum interval between doses of PCV (PCV7 or PCV13) is 8 weeks.

      5. For children with no history of PPSV23 vaccination, administer PPSV23 at least 8 weeks after the most recent dose of PCV13.

    • For children aged 6 through 18 years who have cerebrospinal fluid leak; cochlear implant; sickle cell disease and other hemoglobinopathies; anatomic or functional asplenia; congenital or acquired immunodeficiencies; HIV infection; chronic renal failure; nephrotic syndrome; diseases associated with treatment with immunosuppressive drugs or radiation therapy, including malignant neoplasms, leukemias, lymphomas, and Hodgkin's disease; generalized malignancy; solid organ transplantation; or multiple myeloma:

      1. If neither PCV13 nor PPSV23 has been received previously, administer 1 dose of PCV13 now and 1 dose of PPSV23 at least 8 weeks later.

      2. If PCV13 has been received previously but PPSV23 has not, administer 1 dose of PPSV23 at least 8 weeks after the most recent dose of PCV13.

      3. If PPSV23 has been received but PCV13 has not, administer 1 dose of PCV13 at least 8 weeks after the most recent dose of PPSV23.

    • For children aged 6 through 18 years with chronic heart disease (particularly cyanotic congenital heart disease and cardiac failure), chronic lung disease (including asthma if treated with high-dose oral corticosteroid therapy), diabetes mellitus, alcoholism, or chronic liver disease, who have not received PPSV23, administer 1 dose of PPSV23. If PCV13 has been received previously, then PPSV23 should be administered at least 8 weeks after any prior PCV13 dose.

    • A single revaccination with PPSV23 should be administered 5 years after the first dose to children with sickle cell disease or other hemoglobinopathies; anatomic or functional asplenia; congenital or acquired immunodeficiencies; HIV infection; chronic renal failure; nephrotic syndrome; diseases associated with treatment with immunosuppressive drugs or radiation therapy, including malignant neoplasms, leukemias, lymphomas, and Hodgkin's disease; generalized malignancy; solid organ transplantation; or multiple myeloma.

  7. Inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV). (Minimum age: 6 weeks)

    Routine vaccination:

    • Administer a 4-dose series of IPV at ages 2, 4, 6 through 18 months, and 4 through 6 years. The final dose in the series should be administered on or after the fourth birthday and at least 6 months after the previous dose.

    Catch-up vaccination:

    • In the first 6 months of life, minimum age and minimum intervals are only recommended if the person is at risk for imminent exposure to circulating poliovirus (i.e., travel to a polio-endemic region or during an outbreak).

    • If 4 or more doses are administered before age 4 years, an additional dose should be administered at age 4 through 6 years and at least 6 months after the previous dose.

    • A fourth dose is not necessary if the third dose was administered at age 4 years or older and at least 6 months after the previous dose.

    • If both OPV and IPV were administered as part of a series, a total of 4 doses should be administered, regardless of the child’s current age. IPV is not routinely recommended for U.S. residents aged 18 years or older.

    • For other catch-up guidance, see Catch-up Schedule.

    Top of Page

  8. Influenza vaccines. (Minimum age: 6 months for inactivated influenza vaccine [IIV], 2 years for live, attenuated influenza vaccine [LAIV])

    Routine vaccination:

    • Administer influenza vaccine annually to all children beginning at age 6 months. For most healthy, nonpregnant persons aged 2 through 49 years, either LAIV or IIV may be used. However, LAIV should NOT be administered to some persons, including 1) persons who have experienced severe allergic reactions to LAIV, any of its components, or to a previous dose of any other influenza vaccine; 2) children 2 through 17 years receiving aspirin or aspirin-containing products; 3) persons who are allergic to eggs; 4) pregnant women; 5) immunosuppressed persons; 6) children 2 through 4 years of age with asthma or who had wheezing in the past 12 months; or 7) persons who have taken influenza antiviral medications in the previous 48 hours. For all other contraindications and precautions to use of LAIV, see MMWR August 15, 2014;63(32);691-7 Adobe PDF file [40 pages].

    For children aged 6 months through 8 years:

    • For the 2014-15 season, administer 2 doses (separated by at least 4 weeks) to children who are receiving influenza vaccine for the first time. Some children in this age group who have been vaccinated previously will also need 2 doses. For additional guidance, follow dosing guidelines in the 2014-15 ACIP influenza vaccine recommendations, MMWR August 15, 2014;63(32);691-7 Adobe PDF file [40 pages].

    • For the 2015–16 season, follow dosing guidelines in the 2015 ACIP influenza vaccine recommendations.

    For persons aged 9 years and older:

    • Administer 1 dose.

  9. Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. (Minimum age: 12 months for routine vaccination)

    Routine vaccination:

    • Administer a 2-dose series of MMR vaccine at ages 12 through 15 months and 4 through 6 years. The second dose may be administered before age 4 years, provided at least 4 weeks have elapsed since the first dose.

    • Administer 1 dose of MMR vaccine to infants aged 6 through 11 months before departure from the United States for international travel. These children should be revaccinated with 2 doses of MMR vaccine, the first at age 12 through 15 months (12 months if the child remains in an area where disease risk is high), and the second dose at least 4 weeks later.

    • Administer 2 doses of MMR vaccine to children aged 12 months and older before departure from the United States for international travel. The first dose should be administered on or after age 12 months and the second dose at least 4 weeks later.

    Catch-up vaccination:

    • Ensure that all school-aged children and adolescents have had 2 doses of MMR vaccine; the minimum interval between the 2 doses is 4 weeks.

  10. Varicella (VAR) vaccine. (Minimum age: 12 months)

    Routine vaccination:

    • Administer a 2-dose series of VAR vaccine at ages 12 through 15 months and 4 through 6 years. The second dose may be administered before age 4 years, provided at least 3 months have elapsed since the first dose. If the second dose was administered at least 4 weeks after the first dose, it can be accepted as valid.

    Catch-up vaccination:

    • Ensure that all persons aged 7 through 18 years without evidence of immunity (see MMWR 2007;56[No. RR-4] Adobe PDF file [48 pages]), have 2 doses of varicella vaccine. For children aged 7 through 12 years, the recommended minimum interval between doses is 3 months (if the second dose was administered at least 4 weeks after the first dose, it can be accepted as valid); for persons aged 13 years and older, the minimum interval between doses is 4 weeks.

    Top of Page

  11. Hepatitis A (HepA) vaccine. (Minimum age: 12 months)

    Routine vaccination:

    • Initiate the 2-dose HepA vaccine series at 12 through 23 months; separate the 2 doses by 6 to 18 months.

    • Children who have received 1 dose of HepA vaccine before age 24 months should receive a second dose 6 to 18 months after the first dose.

    • For any person aged 2 years and older who has not already received the HepA vaccine series, 2 doses of HepA vaccine separated by 6 to 18 months may be administered if immunity against hepatitis A virus infection is desired.

    Catch-up vaccination:

    • The minimum interval between the two doses is 6 months.

    Special populations:

    • Administer 2 doses of HepA vaccine at least 6 months apart to previously unvaccinated persons who live in areas where vaccination programs target older children, or who are at increased risk for infection. This includes persons traveling to or working in countries that have high or intermediate endemicity of infection; men having sex with men; users of injection and non-injection illicit drugs; persons who work with HAV-infected primates or with HAV in a research laboratory; persons with clotting-factor disorders; persons with chronic liver disease; and persons who anticipate close personal contact (e.g., household or regular babysitting) with an international adoptee during the first 60 days after arrival in the United States from a country with high or intermediate endemicity. The first dose should be administered as soon as the adoption is planned, ideally 2 or more weeks before the arrival of the adoptee.

    Top of Page

  12. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. (Minimum age: 9 years for HPV2 [Cervarix] and HPV4 [Gardasil])

    Routine vaccination:

    • Administer a 3-dose series of HPV vaccine on a schedule of 0, 1-2, and 6 months to all adolescents aged 11 through 12 years. Either HPV4 or HPV2 may be used for females, and only HPV4 may be used for males.

    • The vaccine series may be started at age 9 years.

    • Administer the second dose 1 to 2 months after the first dose (minimum interval of 4 weeks); administer the third dose 24 weeks after the first dose and 16 weeks after the second dose (minimum interval of 12 weeks).

    Catch-up vaccination:

    • Administer the vaccine series to females (either HPV2 or HPV4) and males (HPV4) at age 13 through 18 years if not previously vaccinated.

    • Use recommended routine dosing intervals (see above) for vaccine series catch-up.

    Top of Page

  13. Meningococcal conjugate vaccines. (Minimum age: 6 weeks for Hib-MenCY [MenHibrix], 9 months for MenACWY-D [Menactra], 2 months for MenACWY-CRM [Menveo])

    Routine vaccination:

    • Administer a single dose of Menactra or Menveo vaccine at age 11 through 12 years, with a booster dose at age 16 years.

    • Adolescents aged 11 through 18 years with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection should receive a 2-dose primary series of Menactra or Menveo with at least 8 weeks between doses.

    • For children aged 2 months through 18 years with high-risk conditions, see below.

    Catch-up vaccination:

    • Administer Menactra or Menveo vaccine at age 13 through 18 years if not previously vaccinated.

    • If the first dose is administered at age 13 through 15 years, a booster dose should be administered at age 16 through 18 years with a minimum interval of at least 8 weeks between doses.

    • If the first dose is administered at age 16 years or older, a booster dose is not needed.

    • For other catch-up guidance, see Catch-up Schedule.

    Vaccination of persons with high-risk conditions and other persons at increased risk of disease:

    • Children with anatomic or functional asplenia (including sickle cell disease):

      1. Menveo

        • Children who initiate vaccination at 8 weeks through 6 months: Administer doses at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months of age.

        • Unvaccinated children 7 through 23 months: Administer 2 doses, with the second dose at least 12 weeks after the first dose AND after the first birthday.

        • Children 24 months and older who have not received a complete series: Administer 2 primary doses at least 8 weeks apart.

      2. MenHibrix

        • Children 6 weeks through 18 months: Administer doses at 2, 4, 6, and 12 through 15 months of age.

        • If the first dose of MenHibrix is given at or after 12 months of age, a total of 2 doses should be given at least 8 weeks apart to ensure protection against serogroups C and Y meningococcal disease.

      3. Menactra

        • Children 24 months and older who have not received a complete series: Administer 2 primary doses at least 8 weeks apart. If Menactra is administered to a child with asplenia (including sickle cell disease), do not administer Menactra until 2 years of age and at least 4 weeks after the completion of all PCV13 doses.

    • Children with persistent complement component deficiency:

      1. Menveo

        • Children who initiate vaccination at 8 weeks through 6 months: Administer doses at 2, 4, 6 and 12 months of age.

        • Unvaccinated children 7 through 23 months: Administer two doses, with the second dose at least 12 weeks after the first dose AND after the first birthday.

        • Children 24 months and older who have not received a complete series: Administer 2 primary doses at least 8 weeks apart.

      2. MenHibrix

        • Children 6 weeks through 18 months: Administer doses at 2, 4, 6, and 12 through 15 months of age.

        • If the first dose of MenHibrix is given at or after 12 months of age, a total of 2 doses should be given at least 8 weeks apart to ensure protection against serogroups C and Y meningococcal disease.

      3. Menactra

        • Children 9 through 23 months; Administer 2 primary doses at least 12 weeks apart.

        • Children 24 months and older who have not received a complete series: Administer 2 primary doses at least 8 weeks apart.

    • For children who travel to or reside in countries in which meningococcal disease is hyperendemic or epidemic, including countries in the African meningitis belt or the Hajj, administer an age- appropriate formulation and series of Menactra or Menveo for protection against serogroups A and W meningococcal disease. Prior receipt of MenHibrix is not sufficient for children traveling to the meningitis belt or the Hajj because it does not contain serogroups A or W.

    • For children at risk during a community outbreak attributable to a vaccine serogroup, administer or complete an age- and formulation-appropriate series of MenHibrix, Menactra, or Menveo.

    • For booster doses among persons with high-risk conditions, refer to MMWR 2013;62(RR02):1-22.

For other catch-up recommendations for these persons, and complete information on use of meningococcal vaccines, including guidance related to vaccination of persons at increased risk of infection, see MMWR March 22, 2013;62(RR02):1-22 Adobe PDF file [10 pages].

See additional notes for Recommended Immunization Schedule for Persons Age 0 Through 18 Years and Catch-up Immunization Schedule.


This schedule includes recommendations in effect as of January 1, 2015. Any dose not administered at the recommended age should be administered at a subsequent visit, when indicated and feasible. The use of a combination vaccine generally is preferred over separate injections of its equivalent component vaccines. Vaccination providers should consult the relevant Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) statement for detailed recommendations. Clinically significant adverse events that follow vaccination should be reported to Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)External Web Site Icon online or by telephone (800-822-7967). Suspected cases of vaccine-preventable diseases should be reported to the state or local health department. Additional information, including precautions and contraindications for vaccination, is available from CDC's Vaccines and Immunization online site or by telephone (800-CDC-INFO [800-232-4636]).

This schedule is approved by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAPExternal Web Site Icon), the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFPExternal Web Site Icon), and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOGExternal Web Site Icon).



POSTED MAY 4, 2015




Yesterday, while working in my yard, I made the mistake of turning the radio on. It was tuned to a station that was replaying the “Sean Hannity Show”. This long time Fox host, is well known for being a parrot for official government stories. He is also well known for inviting opponents of his position on his show and then interrupting and talking over them so as to prevent any civilized debate on any issue. If you want to know the position of Fox News, all you have to do is research official press releases from any government agency. They will be the same.

This brings me to the subject article. On April 27, Fox News posted pictures purported to be of Baltimore during the recent riots. They were not. They were, in fact, pictures of riots in Venezuela. Of course, once they were caught, they fell back on saying the story wasn't “fact checked”. Really? Are we to believe someone accidentally confused pictures of Baltimore with pictures of Venezuela?

Actually, this happens all the time. How about the second in command of Al-Qaeda who was captured, killed, killed again and captured again. How about the picture of the victims at Sandy Hook where one of the victims was also pictured as a victim of a school shooting in Pakistan? How about witnesses to terrorist events turning up as witnesses in other incidents around the country? How about CNN claiming to be in the middle of an attack in Iraq, when in reality they were in a studio in front of a green screen? It's no wonder very few trust the mainstream media whores anymore.

Bruce                                                New World Order News

Fox News Posts Fake Baltimore Riot Photo That’s Actually From Venezuela


May 2, 2015 3:10 pm·


If you are like thousands of others, you have no doubt seen an iconic photo of Baltimore burning. The image began circulating throughout social media after a local Fox affiliate in Memphis, Tennessee apparently first ran it. Some other mainstream media outlets even shared the image, using it with headlines that said “Baltimore is Burning” and referenced a “purge”.


The only problem is it wasn’t from Baltimore.

That’s right, the image was taken from Venezuela, not Baltimore. But for those who accepted Fox’s rendition of the story uncritically, the image became burned into their minds as being a scene of devastation in Baltimore.

On April 27th, local FOX13 claimed the photo of the fires burning everything except the golden arches at McDonalds was “Baltimore In Flames.”

Reverb Nation notes that one viewer noticed the image and placed it right away. They thought the image looked familiar, and pointed out that the story on the CVS burning was not Baltimore at all.

The Imgur user said: “Now I understand why people mock Fox news so much…”

After racking up tens of thousands of views, Fox acknowledged the “error,” saying: “Our team didn’t fact check the picture the way we should have.”


Just imagine if Fox hadn’t been called out on this? How many more stations would continue to run it as an actual image of Baltimore in flames? Just imagine how much else they are lying to us about!

(Article by Jackson Marciana, Shante Wooten and M. David; image via Fox News; h/t Reverb Press)




POSTED MAY 1, 2015




Well, we're not going to hear it from the mainstream media whores or our government masters. The subject article covers both the press releases and the verified facts on the arrest and confinement of Freddie Gray in Baltimore.

It's not just about Freddie Gray. And it's not just about the killing of black people by police. It's about a militarized police force out of control. Police would argue that they have procedures to investigate abuses, but that's the problem. “They” have procedures. If we want to get our streets back from the rogue police and out of control gangs, we need to be in control of all law enforcement. Citizens need to oversee all police procedures. Citizens need to control investigations of all reports of abuse. Unless and until police are subject to the exact same processes for arrest and prosecution for crimes as are the citizens, this problem will continue to get worse and the reactions more extreme.

Bruce                            New World Order News



Two Tales of a City: Something is Rotten in Baltimore

Lily Dane
The Daily Sheeple
May 1st, 2015




Oh, what a tangled web we weave…when first we practice to deceive.”
― Walter Scott

The death of Freddie Gray, a Baltimore resident who died after sustaining a spinal cord injury while in police custody, has been ruled a homicide. State’s Attorney Marilyn J. Mosby has charged all six officers involved in the incident and said Gray’s arrest was illegal.

Lies, disinformation, outrageous claims, and propaganda about this case have been spreading around like wildfire, and sometimes it is hard to figure out who to believe.

Here’s a roundup of claims, rebuttals, and truths.


1) Claim: The police van carrying Freddie Gray stopped three times.

Last week, Deputy Commissioner Kevin Davis said the van made three stops: one to put leg irons on Gray, the second “to deal with Mr. Gray” for an unexplained reason, and the third to pick up another prisoner.

Truth: the van carrying Gray stopped not three times, but four times: evidence of the previously undisclosed stop “was discovered from a privately owned camera,” Davis said during a news conference yesterday, and came between the first and second stops. Grocery store owner Jung Hyun Hwang told the Associated Press that police came in to make a copy of the footage his security camera recorded.

What happened during that mystery stop has not been revealed to the public yet.


2) Claim: Police said another passenger in the van said Gray was thrashing around and seemed to be trying to hurt himself.

Donta Allen, interviewed by two TV channels on Thursday, said he was the second prisoner authorities said was inside the vehicle with Gray. According to a police timeline, the second prisoner was placed in the vehicle around 20 minutes after Gray was arrested.

On Thursday, a leaked police document, reported by the Washington Post, stated that the second prisoner believed Gray “was intentionally trying to injure himself” by “banging against the walls.”

Rebuttal: Allen denied saying this


And they’re trying to make it seem like I told them that, I made it like Freddie Gray did that to himself,” Allen said. “Why the f*** would he do that to himself ?”

Allen also said:

When I was in the back of that van it did not stop or nothing. All it did was go straight to the station, but I heard a little banging, like he was banging his head,” Allen said. ” I didn’t even know he was in the van until we got to the station.”
Saying his words have been distorted by recent reports and that he doesn’t think Gray hurt himself intentionally, Allen also told a WJZ reporter, “The only reason I’m doing this is because they put my name in a bad state.”


3) Claim: Freddie Gray severed his own spine while intentionally trying to hurt himself during his ride in the police van.

This claim is related to Claim #2. A document written by a Baltimore police investigator, supposedly based on Allen’s alleged statements about Gray trying to hurt himself in the police van (which Allen says is a lie), suggests that Gray may have severed his own spine.

Rebuttal: Jason Downs, the Gray family attorney, said, “We disagree with any implication that Freddie Gray severed his own spinal cord. We question the accuracy of the police reports we’ve seen thus far, including the police report that says Mr. Gray was arrested without force or incident.”

Can a person actually break their own spine and crush their own voice box? Experts say it is highly unlikely.

In an article for the Daily News, Dr. David Samadi said the following:

From a medical standpoint, it is unlikely that the 25-year-old Baltimore man injured himself in the back of that van. The severity of his injuries seem too grave for him to have done that to himself simply by thrashing around or banging his head on something.
It is more likely that there was some type of direct blow to either the front or back of his neck, or somewhere along the spinal cord along his back.
As seen in a video taken by a witness who saw Gray being put into the back of the van, Gray was being dragged by the cops into the van, and it seems as though he was unable to walk.
The ability to control your limbs after a spinal cord injury depends on where along the spinal cord the injury took place, and how severe the injury is. If Gray was showing signs of loss of function in his legs before being put in the van, how could the injury have taken place in the van?
Now, let’s talk about the crushed larynx. Also known as a laryngotracheal injury, a crushed larynx is pretty rare in adults, except when there is blunt force trauma to the front of the neck, such as strangulation, or blows to the trachea from fists or feet.
This is usually caused by a car accident when the passenger does not have a seatbelt on, in the front seat, or driving, and there are no protective airbags.
In this case, the person in the front seat or driver is thrown forward and the front of the neck either hits the dashboard or steering wheel.
Is it possible that Gray’s larynx was crushed first, causing the spinal cord injury? Maybe that caused the spinal cord injury. In order for this to happen, there would have to have been a direct blow to the front of his neck, which is unlikely to have been a self-imposed injury in the back of the van.
It is unclear which injury happened first, or whether one caused the other, but it seems clear that there was nearly no way he caused the fatal injuries himself.

Dr. Anand Veeravagu, Chief Neurosurgery Resident at Stanford University Medical Center who specializes in traumatic brain and spinal cord injuries, told The Daily Beast:

I have never seen it before. I’ve never seen somebody self-inflict a spinal cord injury in that way. It’s hard for me to understand that, unless those terms [like ‘intentional’ and ‘injure himself’] are being used incorrectly. It’s hard for me to envision how a person could try to do that. It would require them to basically hang themselves in a car where there isn’t anything to hang yourself with.”

Dr. Veeravagu went on to explain that there are only a few ways a person’s spine can become injured like Gray’s was: a direct, penetrating injury (via knife or gunshot), fractured bones, which tear ligments (via serious force or impact), or by hanging.

He also said most people do not die of spinal cord injuries – if they are given prompt medical care.

Veeravagu also said it is possible Gray’s spinal fracture could have occurred before he was put in the van, and that symptoms of his broken vertebrae could have been delayed until he was placed in the van:

That is possible: It’s possible to have an injury to your spinal cord that gets worse over time and eventually progresses to complete paralysis,” he says. “Did he have an expanding blood clot in his spine? Did he have an exact fracture to his spine? Both are important to understand.”

Another trauma surgeon, who wished to remain anonymous due to the political nature of the case and because he is “surprised time and again by what I previously believed to be impossible,” thinks that it’s “highly unusual [if not impossible] to deliberately make yourself a quadriplegic while shackled in the back of a police van.”

Sources told ABC7 News that “…the medical examiner found Gray’s catastrophic injury was caused when he slammed into the back of the police transport van, apparently breaking his neck; a head injury he sustained matches a bolt in the back of the van. Details surrounding exactly what caused Gray to slam into the back of the van were unclear. The officer driving the van has yet to give a statement to authorities.”


4) Claim: Rival street gangs known as the Crips and the Bloods made a truce and plan to harm police officers.

A few days ago, the Baltimore police issued the following 7 Comments:

The Baltimore Police Department/Criminal Intelligence Unit has received credible information that members of various gangs including the Black Guerilla Family, Bloods, and Crips, have entered into a partnership to “take out” law enforcement officers.
This is a credible threat. Law enforcement agencies should take appropriate precautions to ensure the safety of their officers. Notifications will be sent via NLETS. Further information will be sent through appropriate channels.


Rebuttal: Members of the Black Guerrilla Family, the Bloods and the Crips talked to 11 News and said they did not make a truce to harm police officers:

And, this:

Now, this is obviously a case of “they said” vs. “they said,” but at this point, nothing has proven that gang members have actually gone after police. To date, there haven’t been any shootings or attacks.

Yesterday, the Baltimore Sun reported the following:

Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake’s spokesman said Thursday that city officials should engage gang members if they are offering “a genuine effort to make peace.”
The mayor would examine information they claim to possess that discredits what police described as a “credible threat” that gangs were unifying to target officers, spokesman Kevin Harris added.
Local ministers and City Council members have praised gang members for helping to quell unrest in neighborhoods hit with protests.

That report also states that some gang experts doubted the police department’s claim that the gangs were uniting to harm officers. It also states that the mayor’s office would look into the police department’s claim, if the police would actually share that information with them.

Sources say gang members worked to direct traffic, talked rioters out of damaging property, and saved journalists who were caught in the middle of violent crowds:

When I am inclined to believe gang members over cops, there are huge problems with the world.


5) Claim: Freddie Gray had spinal surgery shortly before he died in police custody, and he received a car accident settlement:

The Fourth Estate has contacted sources who allege that Freddie Gray received spinal and neck surgery a week before we was arrested, and was allegedly receiving a large structured settlement from Allstate Insurance.  The surgery is allegedly related to a car accident in which Gray was involved.


Truth: court records examined Wednesday by The Baltimore Sun show the case had nothing to do with a car accident or a spine injury:

Instead, they are connected to a lawsuit alleging that Gray and his sister were injured by exposure to lead paint.
Paperwork was filed in December allowing Gray and his sister, Fredericka to each collect an $18,000 payment from Peachtree Settlement Funding, records show. In exchange, Peachtree would have received a $108,439 annuity that was scheduled to be paid in $602 monthly installments between 2024 and 2039.

Jason Downs, the Gray family’s attorney, said, “We have no information or evidence at this point to indicate that there is a prior pre-existing spinal injury. It’s a rumor.”

It seems more likely that Gray’s injuries began before he was even loaded into the police van, and were further exacerbated during a “rough ride” to the police station.


6) Claim: School-aged kids in Baltimore planned a “purge” via social media accounts and were itching for a fight.

After Baltimore police and a crowd of teens clashed near the Mondawmin Mall in northwest Baltimore on Monday afternoon, news reports described the violence as a riot triggered by kids who couldn’t wait to get out of school and begin fighting.


Rebuttal: Parents and teachers say the police are the ones who caused tense but stable conditions to erupt into violence.

When school let out that afternoon, police were in the area equipped with full riot gear. According to eyewitnesses in the Mondawmin neighborhood, the police were stopping buses and forcing riders, including many students who were trying to get home, to disembark. Cops shut down the local subway stop. They also blockaded roads near the Mondawmin Mall and Frederick Douglass High School, which is across the street from the mall, and essentially corralled young people in the area. That is, they did not allow the after-school crowd to disperse.
Meghann Harris, a teacher at a nearby school, described on Facebook what happened:
Police were forcing buses to stop and unload all their passengers. Then, [Frederick Douglass High School] students, in huge herds, were trying to leave on various buses but couldn’t catch any because they were all shut down. No kids were yet around except about 20, who looked like they were waiting for police to do something. The cops, on the other hand, were in full riot gear, marching toward any small social clique of students…It looked as if there were hundreds of cops.
The kids were “standing around in groups of 3-4,” Harris said in a Facebook message to Mother Jones. “They weren’t doing anything. No rock throwing, nothing…The cops started marching toward groups of kids who were just milling about.” (source)

For additional witness accounts, please see Eyewitnesses: The Baltimore Riots Didn’t Start the Way You Think.

Who was actually behind that social media “purge” campaign, anyway? One source says many of the accounts (20 to 50 of them) are linked to those used to spark violence in Ferguson.


Today, prosecutor Mosby announced that the six officers involved in Gray’s death have been charged criminally:

Something is rotten in Baltimore, and hopefully the air will be cleared soon.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple







Admiral Rickover, the “father of nuclear navy,” had to answer the question before the U.S. Senate: “How long would our aircraft carriers survive in a battle against the Russian Navy?” His response caused disillusionment: “Two or three days before they sink, maybe a week if they stay in the harbor.” Of course this was back in the 1970's. Many would argue that in 2015 these carriers are much more able to defend themselves. The subject article covers just a few of the modern weapons developed to destroy carriers. Some of these missiles travel at 2000 mph and skim the surface of the water. They travel in erratic patterns and cannot be tracked. Some have multiple warheads. Some are stealth and none of these were present in the 1970's.

It would be nice if those in charge of our military would pick up a history book. History is full of “naval experts” losing the next war by fighting with the weapons of the past. Off the coast of Gravelines, France, Spain’s so-called “Invincible Armada” is defeated by an English naval force under the command of Lord Charles Howard and Sir Francis Drake. After eight hours of furious fighting, a change in wind direction prompted the Spanish to break off from the battle and retreat toward the North Sea. Its hopes of invasion crushed, the remnants of the Spanish Armada began a long and difficult journey back to Spain. The Spanish ships were bigger, stronger, with a much greater cannon range and were decimated by a more modern and efficient opponent.

In 1921, General William Mitchell pleaded with his superiors to acknowledge the vulnerability of naval ships to air attacks. In an effort to prove his contention, Mitchell sunk the retired battleship USS Alabama in September. The tests incensed President Warren Harding who wished to avoid any show of naval weakness immediately prior to the Washington Naval Conference, but did lead to increased funding for military aviation.

So here we are today. While our nation scours the world for 3rd world enemies to fight, our capabilities to defend this nation against 1st world opponents continues to degrade. In World War 2, we had months, even years, to catch up. Today, we'll have hours, maybe only minutes.

Bruce                          New World Order News


How Long Would the US Navy Survive in a Shooting War?

US Navy is a huge force but largely based around aircraft carrier groups that modern weaponry may have made obsolete

Marc Hopf 

Military Wed, Apr 1 | 18,843 

Carriers today may be sunk from air, land or sea

America sees itself as a ruler of the world’s oceans. After all, the country — which spends 10 times more on its military forces than the following nine countries — has by far the biggest naval force. And as since the Vietnam War they have dealt only with militarily inferior opponents, they are extremely self-confident in their belief that they can defeat everything and everyone. It is not surprising that some young Americans even wear T-shirts with the logo: “United States Navy: The Sea is Ours.”

Perhaps we need to meet this pride and arrogance with some understanding in view of the numerical superiority of the U.S. Navy. In total, it currently has 10 operational aircraft carriers (two in reserve), while Russia and China have only one each.

Aircraft carriers are the great pride of the U.S. Navy and are also perfect to underline visually the claim of the ruler of the seas. They are therefore well liked by U.S. presidents as stages for delivering speeches when the time comes to tell the people that this unique nation has once again won a heroic victory.

What thrilling moments these were (at least for Americans) when George W. Bush landed in a fighter jet on the USS Abraham Lincoln (no, not as a pilot) and then, with the words “mission accomplished” and “a job well done,” proclaimed the end of the Iraq war to the people. As we know, the destruction of Iraq was carried out by the Americans under the label of Operation Iraqi Freedom. We may still ask ourselves what it had to do with freedom, but that’s a different story.

In addition to their suitability as impressive orator stages, the aircraft carriers also fulfill, of course, a military purpose. They can be considered as small floating airports, which ship up to 100 fighter jets to the scene of the action. Since they are equipped with the best weapons, radar, and defense systems, until now they have experienced almost no threat, especially since in the past the U.S. Navy parked them preferably off the coasts of defenseless desert states.

But what would it look like if the power of the U.S. Navy met its peer? The title of this article already implies the answer: not so good, and it could be that the patriotic U.S. Navy fans would hide their T-shirts quickly in the closet.

Back in the 70s, Admiral Rickover, the “father of nuclear navy,” had to answer the question before the U.S. Senate: “How long would our aircraft carriers survive in a battle against the Russian Navy?” His response caused disillusionment: “Two or three days before they sink, maybe a week if they stay in the harbor.”

The reason for the greatly reduced lifetime of the aircraft carrier in a battle against the Russians is a deadly danger below the water: modern submarines — especially Russian ones — are so powerful and difficult to locate that they can send large battleships and aircraft carriers to the bottom of the sea in the blink of an eye. The weakness of the U.S. Navy, therefore, is their vulnerability when they compete with an enemy that — using the language of the Americans — dominates the seas below the water surface. Of course, the U.S. military analysts are aware of this weakness, so one wonders why the U.S. Navy still adheres to the doctrine “the bigger the better” and continues to rely on an armada of aircraft carriers and large battleships.

Colonel Douglas McGregor, a decorated combat veteran, author of four books, a PhD and military analyst, gives the answer: “Strategically, it makes no sense, but the construction of large ships, of course, creates a lot of jobs.”

So the threat of Russian submarines, torpedoes and anti-ship missiles is well known by the Americans — a fact which Roger Thompson’s book, Lessons Not Learned: The U.S. Navy’s Status Quo Culture, also points out. A brief excerpt:

As Howard Bloom and Dianne Star Petryk-Bloom advised in 2003, both the Russians and Chinese now have the deadly SS-N-22 Sunburn missile at their disposal. This massive long-range missile, equipped with nuclear or conventional warheads, is extremely difficult to detect or destroy. According to Jane’s Information Group, it is more than capable of destroying any U.S. aircraft carrier. More to the point, Timperlake (a Naval Academy graduate) and Triplett warned that the Sunburn missile is designed to do one thing: kill American aircraft carriers and Aegis-class cruisers.
The SS-N-22 missile skims the surface of the water at two-and-a-half times the speed of sound until just before impact, when it lifts up and then heads straight down into the target’s deck. Its two-hundred-kiloton nuclear warhead has almost twenty times the explosive power of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima. The U.S. Navy has no defence against this missile system. As retired Admiral Eric McVadon put it: “It’s enough to make the U.S. 7th (Pacific) Fleet sink twice.”

In addition to this concept-related, almost inevitable weakness of large warships, there is another reason for the vulnerability of the U.S. Navy and the U.S. armed forces in general: their arrogance and the associated underestimation of their opponents. Anyone who underestimates his enemy grows imprudent and holds bad cards in the event of a surprise attack. This happened in 2000, when the American aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk was caught by the Russians on the wrong foot.

Here are some excerpts from Jon Dougherty’s article, “Russian Navy takes Flyover by Surprise” (World Net Daily):

A pair of Russian warplanes that made at least three high-speed passes over a U.S. aircraft carrier stationed in the Sea of Japan in October constituted a much more serious threat than the Pentagon has admitted and were easily in a position to destroy the ship if the planes had had hostile intentions, say Navy personnel.
According to reports, a Russian air force Su-24 “Fencer” accompanied by a Su-27 “Flanker” made unopposed passes over the USS Kitty Hawk on Oct. 9, as the carrier was being refueled.

Russian fighters and reconnaissance planes made a second attempt to get close to the carrier on Nov. 9 — a repeat performance for which the Pentagon, as well as eyewitnesses aboard ship, said the carrier was prepared. But it was the first incident in October that caused alarm.
Pentagon spokesman Kenneth Bacon said during a regularly scheduled press briefing Nov. 30 that the Russian fighters were detected on radar well in advance of their high-speed passes. Naval officers aboard ship who spoke of the incident on the condition of anonymity agreed.
However, at the time the carrier’s combat information center alerted the ship’s commander, Capt. Allen G. Myers, that the Russian fighters were inbound, none of the carrier’s fighters were airborne. The ship carries 85 aircraft, according to Navy figures, and has a crew of over 5,500. 
Witnesses said Myers immediately ordered the launch of alert fighters, but the ship’s scheduled fighter squadron was on “Alert-30” status — a minimum launch time of 30 minutes where pilots are “in the ready room” but are not sitting in cockpits waiting to be launched.
Bacon told reporters only that there “may have been a slight delay” in getting the interceptors in the air, explaining that because the Kitty Hawk was taking on fuel, it was not sailing fast enough to launch its aircraft.
One naval officer onboard the ship said, “40 minutes after the CO [commanding officer] called away the alerts,” the Russian planes “made a 500-knot, 200-foot pass directly over the tower” of the carrier.
Before the Kitty Hawk could get a single plane airborne, the Russian fighters made two more passes. Worse, witnesses said, the first plane off the deck was an EA-6B Prowler — a plane used primarily for electronic jamming of an enemy’s radar and air defenses, not a fighter capable of intercepting another warplane.
The EA-6B “ended up in a one-versus-one with a Flanker just in front of the ship,” one witness said. “The Flanker was all over his a…. He was screaming for help when finally an F/A-18 Hornet from our sister squadron got off the deck and made the intercept. It was too late.”
Naval personnel noted that “the entire crew watched overhead as the Russians made a mockery of our feeble attempt of intercepting them.”
The Clinton administration downplayed the incident …. The BBC, however, said that it was evident by the photographs taken by the Russian jets that there was “panic aboard” when the planes made their over-flights.

Our American readers will now perhaps argue that this humiliating incident happened 15 years ago and such a thing is no longer possible nowadays. But most readers of Russia Insider remember the events of April 2014 when the ultra-modern destroyer USS Donald Cook was paralyzed by a single SU-24.

For those readers who unfortunately missed the story, here it is: At the beginning of April last year the Americans sent the USS Donald Cook into the Black Sea, with the permission of Turkey, to protest against the Russian annexation of Crimea and to demonstrate their military strength. The destroyer was equipped with the most advanced Aegis Combat System, a naval weapons systems which ensures the detection, tracking and destruction of multiple targets at the same time. In addition, the USS Donald Cook is equipped with four large radars, whose power is comparable to that of several stations. For protection, it carries more than 50 anti-aircraft missiles of various types.

According to the “Montreux Convention,” non-Black Sea state warships are permitted to stay in the Black Sea for no longer than 21 days. The Americans, of course, ignored this rule, and Russia responded by sending an SU-24. The Sukhoi was unarmed but equipped with the latest electronic warfare device, called Khibiny.

When the SU-24 approached the destroyer, all radar and control systems, information transfers, etc., of the USS Donald Cook were suddenly paralyzed by Khibiny. In other words, the seemingly superior Aegis system was completely off — like when you turn off your TV with the remote control.

Subsequently, the Sukhoi simulated 12 missile attacks at low altitude on the virtually blind and deaf USS Donald Cook, and we can imagine that the two SU-24 aircraft pilots had a lot of fun. Unfortunately, at this time there was neither John McCain nor NATO Commander Phillip Breedlove on board the ship — they would certainly have received some long-lasting impressions from this demonstration.

After this incident, the USS Donald Cook chose to immediately and at full speed move towards a port in Romania, where 27 shocked crew members asked for dismissal from the service.

This story shows us that Americans still overestimate the capabilities of their armed forces and do not realize (or do not want to admit) that Russia’s military technology is in many areas superior and has an advantage that cannot be offset quickly.

So, as long as a single Russian fighter jet can turn off a complete U.S. warship with the latest warning and fire control systems by just pushing a button, the answer to the question “How long would the U.S. Navy survive?” today is the same as in the old Cold War days.






John Kennedy said “Those who make peaceful resistance impossible, make violent revolution inevitable”. The mainstream media whores are working overtime in telling us thugs are running wild in Baltimore and need to be stopped with force. It was the same in Ferguson. There are other examples in the recent past.

The subject video brings us back to reality. There have literally been thousands of unarmed citizens killed by police over the past decade. There are many more who have been beaten, wounded and permanently injured by police. Very few of the offenders have received any punishment whatsoever. Even if some of those victims were suspects in crimes and even if they have a criminal record, there can be no justification to kill them. People, both black and white have had enough. It is a mistake to bring in military force. That will become evident as time goes on.

Here is some of what we have been fed by our government masters. Hijackers were responsible for 911, therefore you have to have security people put their hands down your pants at the airport. Some one wanted to put a bomb in his shoe on a plane, therefore you have to take your shoes off every time you fly. Someone exploded a bomb in Boston, therefore police can break down your door in searching for him. People are protesting in Baltimore, therefore you are being put under marshal law under further notice. There is a flood in New Orleans, therefore police can break down your door and seize any legal weapons you have. Some people may be driving drunk, therefore you can be pulled over by police at any time to see if you're drunk. Someone went into a school and killed children, therefore your child will be expelled if he or she draws a picture of a gun. I could go on, but you get it.

The more they do, the more people get fed up. This type of police state never works. It never has and never will. Those who enforce it are being sacrificed by those who have no respect for the legal process established in the founding of this nation.

Bruce                               New World Order News






Over the past month or so I have been covering the pending legislation in California requiring all children be vaccinated with all vaccines ordered by the State. Mike Adams of Natural News, has a very interesting take on this proposed law. Should this law be signed by the Governor, parents and legal guardians should be prepared to call 911 on any healthcare professional administering vaccines to children without parents permission. He also recommends filing civil actions against those people.

As the article states, vaccines have been proven to be harmful to varying degrees. Our government masters have passed legislation to exempt pharmaceutical companies from any prosecution due to the damage caused by their products. (If vaccines are so safe, why do they need to be protected from prosecution?) No such exemption exists for others involved in the process.

So the bottom line is, do not sign anything giving permission to administer vaccines. Tell the healthcare professional you intend to call the police alleging assault of your child. Also inform them, you will be filing a civil suit against them. It's time for this nonsense to stop. I have said in the past that sooner or later they will go too far. I believe this is it. If defending our children isn't reason enough to fight back, what is?

Bruce                                               New World Order News


SB 277 will unleash “medical civil war” in California as parents demand doctors be arrested for felony assault

  April 28, 2015 12:12 pm EDT 0 Comments

By Mike Adams | Natural News

It is a fundamental and non-debatable scientific truth that all vaccines have inherent health risks. The spectrum of harm varies widely, from small skin rashes to full-blown neurological damage and lifelong debilitation. Some children have even been killed by vaccines, and the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid out nearly $3 billion to families of children who were provably injured by vaccines in America.

The UK government, similarly, has just agreed to $90 million in financial compensation to victims who suffered permanent brain damage from another vaccine. (You will not find any truthful reporting on vaccine injuries in quackpot mainstream media publishers like the Washington Post, of course. They are largely funded by Big Pharma and therefore propagate the junk science delusion that vaccines never cause any injuries at all.)

Because vaccines have the potential to cause harm — and do indeed cause severe harm, injury and even death for some children — when they are forced upon people against their wishes and consent, they represent a form of medical violence against women and children.

Vaccine Violence” is very real, in other words, and it is a form of violence against women and children that the state of California wants to commit via government coercion. That’s the whole point of SB 277, the so-called “vaccine mandate” law. It seeks to eliminate all religious or philosophical exemptions from vaccines, thereby forcing a potentially harmful medical intervention onto the bodies of children (and soon, adults) who did NOT give consent to the procedure.

As the SB 277 website explains, “If there is a RISK, there must be a CHOICE.”

Federal sentencing guidelines characterize a vaccine assault as a serious felony crime

As background on this point, it is important to note that individuals carrying the HIV virus have been charged with felony assault crimes for spitting on people or engaging in sexual intercourse with them.

The state of Ohio, for example, considers it a “felonious assault” to be an HIV-positive person and have sex with someone without informing them of your HIV status. (SOURCE) Those found guilty of this assault are sentenced to up to 11 years in prison.

This is because HIV-positive people are generally believed to carry live viruses which can enter another person’s body and cause them harm. This is precisely the same situation encountered with many vaccines, where faulty quality control procedures have resulted in “live” viruses being administered to people through polio vaccines (see the history of 98 million Americans exposed to cancer viruses via polio vaccines), MMR vaccines (which shed live viruses, causing the recently vaccinated to readily infect others), flu vaccines and many more.

According to federal law enforcement, a needle is categorized as a “weapon” in the context of a physical assault. For example, if you were to acquire the blood of an HIV-positive person, fill a syringe with it, then assault someone with that needle, you would not only be charged with a felony assault, but an assault with a deadly weapon (the needle).

Under Ohio law, for example, it is explained as: “…causing or attempting to cause serious harm with a deadly weapon or a firearm — referred to in the Ohio statutes as a ‘dangerous ordnance.’”

When administered without consent, a vaccine injection is a physical violation of a human body. The substance contained in the vaccine is provably harmful and, in some cases, even deadly. Under Ohio sentencing guidelines, an individual forcing a vaccination upon someone without their consent would be committing a “felonious assault with dangerous ordnance.”

Federal sentencing guidelines and vaccine violence

Under federal sentencing guidelines, a vaccine assault upon an individual without their consent would be considered an “aggravated assault,” part of the category of sentencing covering “offenses against the persons.”

As explained in this sentencing guidelines document, the “base offense level” of a vaccine assault (i.e. aggravated assault) is 14.

This document goes on to explain, “If the assault involved more than minimal planning, increase by 2 levels.” Because all vaccine violence against children is premeditated, it qualifies as “more than minimal planning.”

This sentencing guideline also explains “[if] a dangerous weapon (including a firearm) was otherwise used, increase by 4 levels.” Because a needle containing a potentially dangerous substance is considered a “dangerous weapon” by all law enforcement organizations — including local police, the FBI, etc. — this elevates the vaccine violence to an even higher level.

If that needle weapon “…was brandished or its use was threatened, increase by 3 levels,” says the sentencing guidelines document.

Where injury occurs, the aggravated assault becomes even more serious

If the victim sustained bodily injury, increase the offense level according to the seriousness of the injury,” says the federal sentencing guidelines document.

Bodily Injury = + 3 levels
Serious Bodily Injury = +5 levels
Permanent or Life-Threatening Bodily Injury = +7 levels

Permanent bodily injury would include brain damage or autism, by the way, both of which are caused by vaccines. Even the CDC has evidence that vaccines increase the risk of autism, as publicly admitted by CDC scientist and whistleblower William Thompson. We also know as an established fact that vaccines cause permanent brain damage. The UK government, in fact, just agreed to pay out $90 million in financial awards to families whose children were brain damaged by the swine flu vaccine.

Finally, this sentencing guideline document explains, “If the assault was motivated by a payment or offer of money or other thing of value, increase by 2 levels.”

Because virtually all doctors are financially influenced by vaccine manufacturers through extensive bribery networks, they are also guilty of being “financially motivated” to participate in the vaccine assault of an innocent child. This would add +2 levels to their sentencing. (Flashback: GlaxoSmithKline admits to running massive illegal bribery network involving 40,000 doctors across the United States. The U.S. Justice Dept. prosecuted this case after a company whistleblower stepped forward.)

In total, an act of vaccine violence against a non-consenting person would qualify, under U.S. federal sentencing guidelines, as a Base Offense Level of 22 even if no injury was sustained by the child. If an injury is sustained, that Base Offense Level could rise to 25, 27 or 29 in the case of permanent brain damage.

Why doctors committing vaccine violence against children would earn 41 months (or more) in federal prison

What do these numbers mean in terms of sentencing?

According to this federal sentencing guidelines table located on this federal sentencing website, an offense level of 22 would earn someone with no criminal history a minimum of 41 months in prison.

A base offense level of 29 would result in 87 months in federal prison.

An act of vaccine violence committed against a non-consenting person, if prosecuted by law enforcement authorities, could earn a doctor serious prison time regardless of whether the child was actually injured by the vaccine.

Will California parents start calling 911 and pressing assault charges against doctors?

All this brings up a very important question for Californians, SB 277, medical freedom and the rule of law.

If California claims to be a state operating under the rule of law, then laws regarding aggravated assault must apply equally to all people, including doctors. If an adult or child is forcibly violated against their consent with a needle weapon known to pose a real threat to that child’s safety, that act clearly qualifies as aggravated assault.

Under both federal and state law, parents who believe their children face the risk of imminent harm from a violent attack upon their bodies have every right to call 911 and request armed police officers come to their defense to stop the assault and arrest those attempting to commit those acts of violence.

I am now publicly predicting that, should SB 277 be signed into law, we will see a wave of California parents calling 911 to report their doctors while demanding the government press felony assault charges against medical personnel engaged in vaccine violence.

It is doubtful, of course, that District Attorneys would carry out any government-sponsored prosecution of those doctors, but parents will retain the right of CIVIL prosecution of those doctors for violating their civil rights.

Doctors have no immunity against civil lawsuits stemming from vaccine violence

The civil prosecution of those administering forced vaccines upon children is not in any way protected by the legal immunity from liability which has been granted to pharmaceutical companies by Congress. That protection only exempts the drug companies from lawsuits of injury and harm caused by vaccines. It does not confer any legal immunity to doctors and medical personnel who personally engage in the acts of violence — i.e. administer the vaccines — against the consent of the parent(s).

In a court of law, there can be little doubt that a coercive violation of a child’s body with a potentially deadly substance is a violation of that child’s civil rights (and human rights). An assault with a vaccine needle is no less of a crime than an assault with a surgeon’s scalpel. Both are “medical instruments” which may cause permanent damage and even death.

The “intent” of the doctor administering the vaccine in no way immunizes that doctor from the letter of the law. Even if the doctor testifies that he “intends” to protect the child, that does not negate the fact that he willfully carried out a felony assault upon the body of that child with a dangerous weapon. There is exhaustive legal precedent to support my contention here. While intent is a factor in sentencing, it alone does not negate the act of assault with a dangerous weapon.

All that is necessary to see this happen is for parents to start calling the police

Fascinatingly, California parents already have the power to unleash this law enforcement campaign against anyone administering vaccines without consent. State and federal laws are written to protect innocent victims against their bodies being physically violated / assaulted, and citizens merely need to invoke those laws which already exist.

Parents who believe their children are being placed in harm’s way by vaccine violence might call 911, demand police arrive on the scene, and express their genuine belief that their children are about to be assaulted with a dangerous weapon. Of course, parents engaging in this action might risk a visitation by Child Protective Services, another enforcement arm of an oppressive government that demands obedience to the pharmaceutical industry’s profit agendas. So parents must carefully weigh the risks associated with their actions in this context. (Personally, I would never recommend a parent call 911 on a “vaccine violence” doctor unless they first consult with an attorney and have a solid legal strategy in mind.)

If hundreds (or thousands) of parents do this across the state, it would bring the issue of vaccine violence to the surface, demanding a legal review of the practice of physically violating a person’s body with a potentially harmful medical intervention in violation of medical ethics and medical consent. It might even result in the successful prosecution of a doctor for aggravated assault, sending an important message across the entire medical profession that you are not immune to the laws of the land. You may not commit acts of medical violence against children without simultaneously subjecting yourself to legal or civil consequences in a court of law.

Why SB 277 brings all this to the surface

When vaccines are optional, doctors injecting them are only engaged in a controversial “treatment.” But when vaccines are coerced by the state, doctors are now colluding with a state-sponsored system of coercion that combines medical violence with the threat of denying a child their right to an education. Thus, the doctor is now playing a key role in the coercion / collusion which demands a child be physically violated with a harmful substance administered via what law enforcement already recognizes as a “dangerous weapon.”

The doctor, in other words, is now a “co-conspirator” in the aggravated assault of the child. Under federal law, in fact, that doctor could technically be charged with conspiracy on top of the aggravated assault charge.

Suddenly, the doctor is in the position of carrying out an act of violence which is resisted by the parent. The context is now different: it’s no longer “medical treatment” but rather “medical violence.” Acts of violence against children are illegal under California law and federal law, opening up doctors to being charged, prosecuted and sentenced to prison for their role in the scheme.

Doctors may soon start requiring consent signatures from parents

For this reason, I now expect that many medical professionals in California who administer vaccines will begin requiring signatures on consent forms. This is their primary protection from being sued — or potentially arrested — if caught engaging in vaccine violence committed against a child.

Such “consent forms,” interestingly, would have to include detailed descriptions of the potential side effects of vaccines in order to be recognized as valid. If the forms fail to provide the parent with full details of the vaccine side effects, the parent can rightfully claim they were not given “informed consent” and would therefore have a very strong civil liability case against the doctor.

SB 277 is what changes the context of all this. If it is signed into law, it will force parents who are adamantly opposed to vaccines to have their children vaccinated without their consent. These parents are rightly motivated to protect the health and lives of their children, which is why I predict we will see all the following taking place if SB 277 is signed into law:

1) Parents calling 911 on their doctors and demanding they be arrested for felony assault via vaccine violence.

2) Parents hiring lawyers to file civil lawsuits against pharmacies like CVS and Walgreens where vaccines are administered.

3) Parents of vaccine-injured children who were coerced into vaccination by SB 277 mounting new challenges under civil rights law. A case most likely to receive media attention and social media traction would involve an African-American child damaged by vaccines who was forced to be vaccinated due to SB 277. Under a properly-configured legal challenge, this family could sue the state of California, the clinic administering and vaccine and possibly even take a vaccine injury challenge back to the U.S. Supreme Court which might overturn its previous decision on Big Pharma’s legal immunity. (The logic demands a review when the vaccines are now coerced rather than voluntary.)

In other words, if Gov. Jerry Brown signs SB 277 into law, he will unleash a “medical civil war” in California, involving protests from outraged parents and possibly even billions of dollars in medical liability on the state of California itself.

Sadly, the vaccine industry is so desperate to force compliance with its for-profit agenda that it will pull out all the stops to see this bill signed into law. Expect a medical civil war to erupt in California if Gov. Brown signs this, pitting doctors against patients… with law enforcement and civil rights attorneys thrown into the mix for good measure.






Shakespeare was quoted as saying “All the world is a stage”. Apparently, our government masters have taken this to heart given all the theatrics present in our nation today. Specifically, the demonstrations in Baltimore have now been exposed as largely contrived. We don't know to what extent or who exactly is behind it.

The subject video shows a woman getting her purse snatched, then in another scene in the exact pose watching a “rioter” throw a chair through a window.

Now, the authorities in Baltimore say gangs are targeting police. As I write this, military vehicles are being dispatched. Can marshal law and the military be far behind?

Bruce                            New World Order News








Chalk another one up. This is the second time this week I am praising the action of my State Legislators. They better be careful as they might ruin the reputation of politicians.

Tennessee State representatives have overwhelmingly passed a bill requiring law enforcement agencies in the State to refuse to cooperate with Federal authorities in their attempt to interfere with citizens right to keep and bare arms. Earlier this week, I fantasized about our State leaving the Federal union altogether. Well, one step at a time. Imagine what it would be like to not have the IRS, BATF, TSA, FBI, CIA, Homeland Security and so on?

Bruce                          New World Order News


Tennessee Set to Stop Cooperating With Federal Disarmament Efforts

 Iron Sheik    04/24/2015    US NEWS

(Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.)  On April 20, a bill nullifying all federal gun control efforts landed on the desk of Governor Bill Haslam of Tennessee (shown on right) for his signature or veto. On April 13, the Tennessee House and Senate passed a bill blocking state agencies and employees from enforcing federal acts aimed at unconstitutionally infringing on the right to keep and bear arms as protected by the U.S. and Tennessee constitutions.

The bill passed the state senate unanimously (30-0), while the vote in the state house of representatives was a less impressive, though overwhelming 74 lawmakers in favor and 20 opposed.

State senator Richard Briggs was the prime sponsor of the measure — SB 1110 — which if enacted would prohibit state or local public funds, personnel, or resources from being used for the “implementation, regulation, or enforcement of any federal law, executive order, rule or regulation regulating the ownership, use, or possession of firearms, ammunition, or firearm accessories” if such participation would “result in the violation of Tennessee statutory or common law or the Constitution of Tennessee.”

A grassroots activist organization known as Shall Not ( is keeping tabs on the efforts in Tennessee and sister states to nullify every federal attempt to exceed its constitutionally defined prerogatives, particularly when they affect the right to keep and bear arms.

The group’s take on the climate of disarmament in Washington, D.C. is spot on:

It seems hardly a day passes that we don’t hear about a new proposal coming out of Washington D.C. that will violate your right to keep and bear arms. From assault weapon bans to limits on magazine size, federal politicians and bureaucrats seem able to come up with an infinite number of ways to limit your ability to defend yourself and your family. But there is hope, and a path to victory.

To assist committed constitutionalists in thwarting these plans, Shall Not has published a handbook filled with useful information and blueprints for activists interested in carrying on the fight in their home states.

In the Volunteer State, the fight began with a bill sponsored by state representative Terri Lynn Weaver. Weaver’s take on the philosophy behind the bill is quoted in a story authored by Tenth Amendment Center founder, Michael Boldin. Boldin writes:

I’m from the cut that there is no need for Washington D.C. to be the end all and be all with regards to the regulatory world,” said Weaver. “We should respect our 10th Amendment and shift the power back to the states and that’s what House Bill 1341 does.”

Weaver is right. If only there were more men and women in state governments across the country willing to push back forcefully against the federal assault.

State lawmakers are not left defenseless in the battle to fight the cancer of consolidation. There is a remedy — a “rightful remedy” — that can immediately retrench the federal government’s constant overreaching. This antidote can stop the poison of all unconstitutional federal acts and executive orders at the state borders and prevent them from working on the people.

The remedy for federal tyranny is nullification, and applying it liberally will leave our states and our nation healthier and happier.

In fact, if nullification is to be successfully deployed and defended, states must remember that the Constitution is a creature of the states and that the federal government was given very few and very limited powers over objects of national importance. Any act of Congress, the courts, or the president that exceeds that small scope is null, void, and of no legal effect. No exceptions. James Madison said it best in Federalist No. 45, “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.”

That our Founders understood this principle is demonstrated by Alexander Hamilton in The Federalist, No. 78:

There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.


James Madison, also writing in The Federalist, recommended that state legislators, in order to prevent federal abridgment of fundamental liberties, should refuse “to co-operate with the officers of the Union.”

Founding era jurist Joseph Story described the Second Amendment’s critical check on tyranny: “The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.”

Tennessee’s measure not only nullifies unconstitutional acts (past, present, and future) of the federal government in the arena of gun control, but it prohibits state agents from cooperating with the federal forces of disarmament. This constitutionally sound strategy is known as anti-commandeering.

Put simply, anti-commandeering prohibits the federal government from forcing states to participate in any federal program that does not concern “international and interstate matters.”

While this expression of federalism (“dual sovereignty,” as it was named by Justice Antonin Scalia) was first set forth in the case ofNew York v. United States (1992); most recently it was reaffirmed by the high court in the case of Mack and Printz v. United States(1997).

Former Arizona Sheriff Richard Mack was one of the named plaintiffs in the latter landmark case, and on the website of his organization, the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, he recounts the basic facts of the case:

The Mack/Printz case was the case that set Sheriff Mack on a path of nationwide renown as he and Sheriff Printz sued the Clinton administration over unconstitutional gun control measures, were eventually joined by other sheriffs for a total of seven, went all the way to the Supreme Court and won.

There is much more “ammo” in this historic and liberty-saving Supreme Court ruling. We have been trying to get state and local officials from all over the country to read and study this most amazing ruling for almost two decades. Please get a copy of it today and pass it around to your legislators, county commissioners, city councils, state reps, even governors!

The Mack/Printz ruling makes it clear that the states do not have to accept orders from the feds.

Writing for the majority in the Printz decision, Justice Antonin Scalia explained:

As Madison expressed it: “The local or municipal authorities form distinct and independent portions of the supremacy, no more subject, within their respective spheres, to the general authority than the general authority is subject to them, within its own sphere.” The Federalist No. 39, at 245. [n.11]

This separation of the two spheres is one of the Constitution’s structural protections of liberty. “Just as the separation and independence of the coordinate branches of the Federal Government serve to prevent the accumulation of excessive power in any one branch, a healthy balance of power between the States and the Federal Government will reduce the risk of tyranny and abuse from either front.”

According to the state constitution, if Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam doesn’t sign or veto the bill within 10 days of receiving it (excluding Sunday), it becomes law without his approval.








This is a followup on my story from last week. At a hearing last week, hundreds of outraged California citizens packed the hearing room in opposition to a proposed mandatory vaccine bill. Those in the committee were preparing to vote down the bill when the sponsor withdrew it. It was assumed at that time the bill would be reintroduced after a period of bribes and blackmail could be directed at those reluctant representatives.

So here we are---American democracy in action. Translated that means the citizens can go to hell, while the “representatives” go to the bank. Sooner or later we are just going to have to refuse to obey. This is not East Germany. If a similar law ever comes here, I can assure you I will not submit.

Bruce                       New World Order News


If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. Mandatory Vaccinations are now one step closer to reality in California.

Submitted by IWB, on April 22nd, 2015


If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. Mandatory Vaccinations are now one step closer to reality in California.

Bill requiring full vaccination of most students approved by California state Senate committee







No, not for real, but in a war game scenario. We in the U.S. have been assured that our technology and our military is so superior to any other, that any nation or group of nations that dares to oppose us would be wiped out.


How often the empires of the past said the same thing and they're all gone. The subject article covers war games off the coast of Florida. The French submarine, Saphir, was given the task of trying to get by the space age defenses of a U.S. Naval group protecting the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt. The Saphir quietly slipped into the heart of the multi-billion-dollar aircraft carrier’s defensive screen, while avoiding detection by ASW assets.



On the morning of the last day, the order to attack was finally given, allowing the Saphir to pretend-sinking the USS Theodore Roosevelt and most of its escort.



I'm getting a real uneasy feeling as the insaniacs who run our country are charging headlong into World War 3. It was only a few months ago that a U.S. Cruiser in the Black Sea, had all of it's electronics disabled by a Russian plane. Then we have the 300 billion dollar F35 losing simulated dog fights to 30 year old planes. If we continue in this direction we could very well lose the next war – that is, if there is still a world left.



Bruce                                New World Order News



U.S. Aircraft Carrier and Part of its Escort “Sunk” by French Submarine During Drills Off Florida

By wmw_admin on March 6, 2015

David Cenciotti — The Aviationist March 5, 2015

USS Theodore Roosevelt. Click to enlarge

USS Theodore Roosevelt. Click to enlarge


On Mar. 4, the French Ministry of Defense released some interesting details, about the activity conducted by one of its nuclear-powered attack submarine (SNA) in the waters of the North Atlantic Ocean.


According to French MoD website (that is no longer online, even if you can still find a cached version of the article titled “Le SNA Saphir en entraînement avec l’US Navy au large de la Floride”), the Saphir submarine has recently taken part in a major exercise with the U.S. Navy off Florida.

The aim of the exercise was joint training with U.S. Carrier Strike Group 12 made by the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt

, several Ticonderoga cruisers or Arleigh Burke-class destroyers and a Los Angeles-class submarine, ahead of their operational deployment.


The scenario of the drills saw some imaginary states assaulting American economic and territorial interests; threats faced by a naval force led by USS Theodore Roosevelt.

During the first phase of the exercise, the Saphir was integrated into the friendly force to support anti-submarine warfare (ASW) by cooperating with U.S. P-3C Orion

P-8A Poseidon MPA (Maritime Patrol Aircraft): its role was to share all the underwater contacts with the other ASW assets.


In the second phase of the exercise, the Saphir was integrated with the enemy forces and its mission was to locate the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt and its accompanying warships and prepare to attack the strike group.


While the fictious political situation deteriorated, the Saphir quietly slipped in the heart of the multi-billion-dollar aircraft carrier’s defensive screen, while avoiding detection by ASW assets.


On the morning of the last day, the order to attack was finally given, allowing the Saphir to pretend-sinking the USS Theodore Roosevelt and most of its escort.


Although we don’t really know many more details about the attack and its outcome, the scripted exercise its RoE (Rules of Engagement), the simulated sinking of a U.S. supercarrier proves the flattop’s underwater defenses are not impenetrable.

This is the reason why modern

subs often train with aircraft carriers: they pose a significant threat to powerful Carrier Strike Groups.


Obviously, this was not the first time a submarine scored a simulated carrier kill with torpedo attacks.

For instance, in 2007 HMCS Corner Brook, a Canadian diesel-electric submarine

“sunk” UK’s Illustrious during an exercise in the Atlantic.


Footnote — March 6, 2015

The disclosure that U.S. aircraft carriers may be vulnerable to attack by submarine is significant when seen in light of suggestions that Iran may have more capable submarines than previously thought.
Apart from more than 20 mini-submarines and three Russian built kilo-class vessels, Iran also has the medium sized Besat submarine. Although Tehran has been notably reticent about these vessels, we do know that it is a medium sized submarine weighing about 1200 to 1400 tonnes, which puts it into the same class as Israel’s Dolphin subs.

Video still of Fateh submarine. Click to enlarge

Video still of Fateh submarine. Click to enlarge

First launched in 2013 and with another due to be launched this year, the Besat is approximately twice the size of the locally built Fateh, which was first launched in 2011.
However, what’s significant about the Beast submarine is that apart from being armed with torpedoes it can also launch cruise missiles. This was illustrated recently when submarine launched cruise-missiles were filmed being launched during recent IRGC naval drills in the Persian gulf region.






As a resident of Tennessee, I was gratified to see my State legislators do something good for a change. Common Core is a horrible idea, on top of many previous horrible ideas.

This downward slide began in earnest when, in 1978, the then President, Jimmy Carter, pushed for the creation of the Department of Education. Testing has shown that the overall performance of our nation's students has been in a steady decline ever since. During the Bush Jr., administration, education took a further decline with the advent of “No Child Left Behind”.

Even a casual observer could conclude that the U.S. Federal government does nothing right. In other words, if the Federal Government is involved, you can be sure it will be screwed up. So, congratulations to Tennessee. If only they would follow up by leaving the Federal government completely.

Bruce                                                  New World Order News


BREAKING: Tennessee Legislature Repeals Common Core

By: Truth In Media Team Apr 21, 2015



NASHVILLE, April 21, 2015– Yesterday, in a bipartisan vote, the Tennessee House of Representatives voted unanimously (97:0) to repeal Common Core. Today, the Tennessee State Senate followed with a (27:1) vote in favor of repeal.

This legislation is a template for all states to begin a much needed journey of separation from federally generated standards and an invitation to embrace each states’ own constitutionally delegated authority to serve its citizens at its own will,” said HB1035 chief sponsor Rep. Billy Spivey (R-Lewisburg). “As our founders and God surely intended.”

HB1035 reads, in part, “WHEREAS, these new Tennessee academic standards shall be adopted and fully implemented in Tennessee public schools in the 2017–2018 school year, at which time the previously adopted set of standards shall be rescinded.”

I set out on a mission to do everything in my power to repeal Common Core in State of Tennessee this year,” said HB1035 chief co-sponsor Rep. Andy Holt (R-Dresden). “In addition to repealing Common Core, this bill puts even more control back in the hands of families, local schools and the State of Tennessee, which is exactly where it belongs.”

HB1035 also increases accountability by mandating that all standards committee appointees be confirmed by the House of Representatives and Senate.

Both Democrats and Republicans in my district are strongly against Common Core,” said co-sponsor Rep. Bryan Terry (R-Murfreesboro).” I am proud to have had the opportunity to amend this legislation in order to ensure that the intent was indeed to completely rescind Common Core from the State of Tennessee. Tennessee families, teachers and legislators will now be able to create their own standards, and for that I am thankful.”

The bill now awaits Republican governor Bill Haslam’s signature.






Monday, April 20, 2015

Parent Offers Epic Response to Vaccine Homework

Heather Callaghan
Activist Post

By now readers to this site have seen some outrageous indoctrination assignments springing forth from public schools. Yet wonders never cease when dissecting the exact mechanism of influencing young, impressionable and trusting minds. It cannot be by accident.

Over the weekend, a reader sent us an actual homework assignment from an unspecified elementary grade (below). It's titled "Medicine" and coerces the young mind to believe that vaccines (and prescription drugs) are the main route to overall health, if not the only route. That without them, there would be a gaping lack of health - a vaccine deficiency?

Sadly, this is not for Health Class! Like so many other assignments we've seen, this is for a staple class (the three Rs) but produces propaganda about an unrelated topic. We've seen this happen for math classes in story problems. In the upper right corner is the word "comprehension" indicating that this is from Reading class. The sheet is copyrighted 1995.

The parent, however, would have none of it. Not only did she cross out the entire assignment with a large X, epic on its own, but left a response that didn't pull punches.


Here is the assignment and the parent's response typed below:

The explanatory paragraph mixes the idea of vaccines as part of a healthy lifestyle, falsely claiming that by taking them, you'll never contract measles, mumps and other illnesses. Unfortunately, it is the vaccinated that are getting hit the hardest with disease spikes like measles and whooping cough and like the fox with its tail cut off are encouraged by the media to blame others for not having their tails removed too.

In question #4, "A word that means 'medicine that keeps you healthy is'" - the child is forced to select a. for  "vaccine."

At the end is an open-ended question to determine if the child will explain the guided response that vaccines are the equivalent to taking care of yourself and will prevent disease. It's only a comprehension assignment in that the child is meant only to comprehend vaccine propaganda and medical dogma and be able to repeat the program back to an authority.

The parent's epic response stands up for medical autonomy and reminds the teacher of age appropriate topics and privacy:

Please send home work! I have decided to not have ---- do this homework and will ask to not have her do school or home work on drugs and shots!!

This is a serious and complicated issue that should be between [her] parents and her healthcare provider. At her age, she cannot make informed decisions about the risks.

This appears to be propaganda!

Thank you

That's just it - this inappropriate assignment is making the decision for the child outside of the family life and even the course provided by their healthcare providers. But with no talk of risks. A unilateral decision about medicine in what appears to be a Reading class. Drug corporations do not have a place in children's classrooms.

If children are brainwashed to believe that vaccines are a necessary part of health - they'll never flinch at the idea of forced injections. They'll never question the increase of new vaccines in the pipeline ready to have forced subjects. Or ponder that global corporations like Merck and cowardly, money-grubbing politicians do not have public health in mind...

See also:

Heather Callaghan is a natural health blogger and food freedom activist. You can see her work at and Like at Facebook.





Yesterday, it looked like the people of California were going to get justice. As I had mentioned in a previous posting, the government masters controlling the State had decided that all children in the State will be required to get vaccines. They have even been so kind to list the required vaccines as of now. They have also reserved the option to require more vaccines down the road as they deem fit.

Understandably, residents of the State have shown up in mass demanding the government stop this. As it became apparent the bill would fail, those in charge have removed the bill for a week, so they can find a way to get it through anyway.

Here's the bottom line. Most of those who are in charge of our government are amoral swine. They spend all of their time trying to find ways to subjugate us, while stealing more of our money. We shouldn't have to constantly call, write and make personal appearances to pressure them into doing what we want instead of doing what they want. They have to go --- all of them. It should be obvious they will not stop until they are stopped. They have to go.

Bruce                         New World Order News


SB277 Controversial Committee Chair Steals Victory From CA Parents

Published: April 16, 2015

Following hours of hearing several hundred parents voice their opposition to the controversial SB277, the bill that would remove the personal and religious exemptions and would require mandatory vaccines for children attending public or private schools, was going to fail the Senate Committee Hearing. The State Capitol was flooded with a line of parents that filled the halls and extended out the building doors and into the grounds surrounding the building. One by one people filed in and gave their name, city of residence, and stated their opposition to the proposed bill. The Senate Education Committee held it’s hearing concerning the portion of the bill that would exclude children whose parents have chosen not to vaccinate them from schooling.

The bill by Senator Richard Pan (916) 651-4006 and Senator Ben Allen (916) 651-4026 was facing certain defeat due to lack of votes from committee members. The committee members raised questions about the bill stripping the right to an education to California children because of parents’ decisions concerning inoculations. Despite Pan’s repeated use of a catchy, propagandist phrase “community immunity” and references to the measles incident at Disneyland, the Senators were unconvinced and the bill was going to die in the hearing. I would suggest the extensive line of opposition they had witnessed influenced their decision. Then came the devious twist. Committee Chair, Senator Carol Liu, who supports the bill, threw Pan and Allen a lifesaver and rescued the flailing legislation. What she did was despicable. At the close of the meeting, Liu advised Pan to postpone the vote one week. She, then, asked for a show of hands from the other members. When it was apparent that the bill would not pass the hearing, Pan conceded and stated that he would “take the advice” and rescheduled the vote for April 22. The vote next Wednesday will not have debate or input from citizens. It was clear that Pan and Liu agreed to a “vote only”.

The entire hearing and the multitude of opposition can be viewed here. The atrocity by Senator Liu is in the last three minutes. (Start at 3:38:00)

The frightening part of this bill, besides, the authoritarianism of its nature, is the text at the end of the list of disease covered by this bill.

… it is the intent of the Legislature to provide a means for the eventual achievement of total immunization of appropriate age groups against the following childhood diseases:


(2)Hepatitis B.

(3)Haemophilus influenzae type b.



(6)Pertussis (whooping cough).




(10)Varicella (chickenpox).

(11)Any other disease deemed appropriate by the department

This would appear to allow the ‘department’ the ability to add any disease it seems necessary and require vaccines that could possibly be dangerous. How many more vaccines do they plan on adding to this list?

To get to the bottom of this legislation, let us follow the money. I prefer to start with campaign financing.

Pan’s campaign contributions come from a who’s who in pharmaceautical corruption. Let’s take a look into the history of Pan’s nafarious donors.

London based GlaxoSmithKline was involved in a European bribery scandal and a vaccine trial scandal involving babies in Argentina.

Merck, that attempted to conceal it’s links to many deaths from heart attacks and stroke from Vioxx were running ads and promotions for Nexium that ”caused millions of people to take a drug at inflated high prices”

Amgen, the world’s largest biotechnology firm with 72 lobbyists paid $762 million dollars after pleading guilty to misbranding its anemia drug Aranesp.

Eli Lily, known for its notorious corruption during the George W. Bush presidency, paid a $500 million settlement to 18,000 people that developed diabetes or other diseases after taking Zyprexa

These scandals are well documented and widely known. But it doesn’t stop there. Genentech was caught offering secret rebates to eye doctors to persuede them to use Lucentis rather than a less costly alternative.

After Biomarin received exclusive licensing for Firdapse for ten years, it increased the price from under $2000 to almost $70,000! Much worse is the controversy surrounding the death of Chloe Drury. Chloe was refused medication because she was under the age of 18. This did not stop Biomarin from refusing cancer drugs to Andrea  Sloan.

Committee Chair Senator Carol Liu is not without her controversies. She received campaign money from the law firm Girardi & Keese. Girardi was implicated in a racketeering scandal that involved bribery and laundering money for judges and attorneys! But, it gets worse. Southern Edison was investigated for prolonged power outages by the California Public Utilities Commission. Not only did Edison contribute more than $35,000 to Liu, her husband is a former Edison executive and chaired the CPUC! Liu did not respond to requests. But, it gets worse. Her husband, Michael Peevey resigned in disgrace after the mayor of San Bruno and others accused PUC officials, including Peevey, of not properly notifying the public of confidential communications with the utility in the case of the San Bruno gas explosion. The disaster killed eight people, injured 66, and destroyed 38 homes. It cannot get worse than that. Or can it? Liu and Peevey’s house was raided and computers were taken in a massive judge-shopping investigation involving Pacific Gas & Electric. Truth is certainly stranger than fiction.

Are we supposed to believe that these morally bankrupt politicans have the right to deny our children an education because we may refuse to inject them with drugs from companies that have paid billions in fines for causing deaths and suffering. If not, you have one week to call the members of the California Education Committee and let your will be known!

Here is a list of committee members and their probable vote on this bill:

EARLY Poll of Senate EDUCATION Committee Members on Sb-277

Carol Liu, D-La Cañada Flintridge: YES

Bob Huff, R-Diamond Bar: UNDECIDED
Marty Block, D-San Diego: YES
Loni Hancock, D-Oakland: DECLINED TO SAY
Connie Leyva, D-Chino: UNDECIDED
Tony Mendoza, D-Artesia: LEANING YES
Dr. Richard Pan, D-Sacramento: YES
Andy Vidak, R-Hanford: UNDECIDED






By now, most have either heard of, or viewed the subject video. Apparently, an Arizona State Policeman ran down a fleeing subject with his police car. Now comes the “explanation”. According to the authorities, the suspect was wanted for several violent and non violent crimes. When police observed the suspect, they began to pursue. So far, so good.

That is when one of the other officers deliberately ran down the suspect. Today, many, including Alex Jones, offered support and praise for the officer who ran down the suspect. It is theorized that this type of force was necessary because of the crimes for which the suspect was wanted.

Here's the problem. The problem is the law – and it really isn't complicated. The law says “innocent until proven guilty”. No such proof exists in this case. The law only allows lethal force in the case of “imminent life threatening circumstances”. No such circumstance existed as the suspect was running away with his back turned. If we, in the U.S., are now going to allow lethal force to be used at an officers discretion, it will soon become open season. In fact, police killings now outnumber terrorist killings in the U.S., 10 to 1. It's simple. You cannot allow anyone, police or not, to kill someone who they think is a bad person, especially if they are no danger at the time.

This officer is no better than the accused criminal he ran down. They should share a cell.

Bruce                            New World Order News




Non-lethal arrest? Arizona cop takes suspect down with cruiser (CHILLING VIDEO)

Published time: April 15, 2015 05:20
Edited time: April 15, 2015 16:36

Screenshot from YouTube user Tobuzz

Screenshot from YouTube user Tobuzz

Arizona police have released a chilling video showing a police cruiser being used as a simple but effective “non-lethal weapon” to take down a suspect, who police claims has been armed with a rifle he had stolen from Walmart.

The video released by authorities shows the eye level view from a police cruiser as Mario Valencia, the alleged suspect, was walking down a street in Marana, Arizona.

One round just went out — into the sky,” an officer in the first cruiser is heard saying over the radio. “It's definitely unlocked now. He’s definitely loaded.”

Stand off, the gun is loaded,” the officer is heard saying just before the police vehicle speeds up, ramming Valencia.

Jesus Christ! Man down,” the first officer says.

Following the incident on February 19, the 36-year-old suspect was taken to University of Arizona Medical Center in serious condition. He was then transferred to jail where he faces 15 charges.

Marana police chief Terry Rozema claims the violent takedown by officer Michael Rapiejko behind the wheel likely saved Valencia’s life, according to KOLD-TV.

The suspect’s lawyer, however, disagrees.

Everything in the video seems to point towards an obvious excessive use of force. It is miraculous that my client isn’t dead,” attorney Michelle Cohen-Metzger told CNN.








At first, it would appear impossible for a well financed and well armed military to lose a war against a rag tag army with no money or resources. The subject article has another take. There are some overriding realities to the continuous and ever expanding wars in the middle east. Wars cannot be fought forever. Even the victors run out of money and soldiers and the will to fight. This latest war in Yemen, even though it is technically being led by Saudi Arabia, really has the U.S. fingerprints all over it. The once, most prosperous nation in the world, is now plunging into debt by the trillions of dollars, as it overreaches in it's lust for world domination.

Most of the nations allied with Saudi Arabia are populated with people who hate their government. They are held in check, not by love, but by brute force. All of these peoples, would love a chance to overthrow their government masters. Should the war spread into Saudi Arabia, it would not take much to get their own citizens to join the other side. Just study the Russian revolution.

I don't know if this will happen this time, but I know it will happen. History shows the path taken by despotic governments always leads to their own destruction. I said ALWAYS. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

Bruce                                New World Order News



April 14, 2015



Let Yemenis Determine Their Future

Saudis Face Defeat in Yemen and Instability at Home


The interventions of US imperialism, with the direct collaboration of the Saudi monarchy, have plunged the entire Middle East into chaos and bloodshed—from the destruction of Iraq, to the transformation of Libya into a militia-ravaged “failed state,” to the ongoing carnage inflicted upon Syria … This predatory imperialist offensive threatens to ignite a region-wide conflagration, even as Washington deliberately ratchets up military tensions with both Russia and China. The threat of these separate conflicts coalescing into a third world war grows by the day.”
Bill Van Auken, Obama’s criminal war against Yemen, World Socialist web Site
Will the reactionary rulers of Saudi Arabia manage to break the legitimate hopes and enthusiastic dreams burning in the hearts of thousands of young people of the Arabian Peninsula? Never!”
Gamal Abd al-Nasser, President of Egypt 1956 to 1970

In its ongoing effort to prevent the rise of “any popularly supported government in the region”, the US has joined Saudi Arabia’s savage war of annihilation against Yemen’s northern tribal rebels, the Houthis. The Pentagon has expedited the delivery of bombs, ammunition and guidance systems to assist the Saudi-led campaign and is providing logistical support to maximize the impact of its bombing raids. The US has also set up a “joint fusion center”, provided “aerial re-fueling platforms” and “advanced US-made weaponry” with the explicit intention of suppressing a militant group that overthrew the US-backed puppet government in the capital of Sanaa in the fall of 2014. The level of coordination between the makeshift Arab coalition (The Gulf Cooperation Council or GCC) and the US suggests that Washington is not only fully aware that food depots, water facilities, refugee camps and critical civilian infrastructure are being deliberately targeted and destroyed, but that the White House has given the green light to actions that will inevitably lead to widespread famine and social collapse. Here’s a little background from an article in The National:

Yemen Economic Corporation, one of Yemen’s largest food storage centres, was destroyed by three coalition missile strikes in Hodeidah last Tuesday, according to the Houthi-controlled defence ministry. The corporation had enough food for the entire country. The government’s military food storage centre in Hodeidah was also targeted and destroyed on Tuesday, according to the defence ministry.
Also in Hodeidah, country’s second largest dairy plant was hit by five Saudi missiles on Wednesday, killing at least 29 people, mostly employees, and injuring dozens of others.” (Yemeni civilians struggle to get by amid conflict, The National)

This is from Channel News Asia:

DUBAI: Warships from the Saudi-led coalition have blocked a vessel carrying more than 47,000 tonnes of wheat from entering a Yemeni port, demanding United Nations guarantees that the cargo would not go to military personnel, shipping sources said on Thursday.” (Saudi-led coalition bars wheat ship from entering Yemen port – sources, Channel News Asia)

This is from WSWS:

Airstrikes as well as fighting on the ground has knocked out electrical infrastructure, cutting off power in many urban areas and stopping the operation of crucial pumps that supply Yemen’s cities with drinking water. “We’re worried that this system will break down shortly; Aden is a dry, hot place, and without water people will really suffer,” UNICEF representative Harneis told reporters…
The no-fly zone and blockade enforced by Saudi Arabia and its coalition partners has effectively blocked the delivery of medical aid and supplies for the last two weeks, exacerbating the developing crisis.” World Socialist Web Site

Live reports on the ground confirm that food depots have been bombed across the country; ” in Asr (west) hit as well as Urdhi complex (center) & Noqum (east).

This is how America fights its wars, by precipitating massive humanitarian crises that help it to achieve its political objectives. If that isn’t terrorism, then what is?

Here’s more from the Washington Post:

As tons of desperately needed medical supplies await clearance to be flown into Yemen, aid workers warned Tuesday of an unfolding humanitarian crisis, saying at least 560 people, including dozens of children, have been killed, mostly in a Saudi-led air campaign and battles between Shiite rebels and forces loyal to the embattled president. More than 1,700 people have been wounded and another 100,000 have fled their homes as fighting intensified over the past three weeks, the World Health Organization said.” (560 dead amid fears of humanitarian collapse in Yemen, Washington Post)

The Saudis launched this latest aggression invoking the thinnest of pretexts, that it wanted to “restore the legitimate government” and protect the “Yemeni constitution and elections.” As CNN’s Ali Alahmed sardonically quipped:

The need to protect constitutions and elections is a rather strange message from the representative of an absolute monarchy … The kingdom’s real motives seem clear if one looks at Saudi monarchy’s history of not allowing regional competition of any kind, while consistently combating efforts to build democratic governments that empower the people…
The Saudi goal is simple: Prevent the rise of any popularly supported government in the region that seeks self-determination. And the excuse of “resisting Iran’s influence,” meanwhile, appears to be nothing but sectarian bluster.” (What Saudi Arabia wants in Yemen, CNN)

While we agree with Alahmed’s basic thesis, we think the rule applies more to the United States than Saudi Arabia. After all, it’s the US that has gone from one country to the next, toppling governments, installing puppets, and spreading anarchy wherever it goes. Whatever role the Saudis might have played in Washington’s grand plan to redraw the map of the Middle East and project US tentacles into Eurasia, it is quite small by comparison. It’s the US that refuses to allow an independent government to emerge in a region that it’s committed to control. And it’s the US that is facilitating the attacks on innocent Yemenis by providing the bombs, weaponry and logistical support to the reactionary Saudi leadership. Check this out from Gregory Johnson at Buzzfeed:

A consensus appears to be building in Riyadh, Cairo, and Islamabad toward inserting ground troops into the conflict in Yemen. One Egyptian military official told BuzzFeed News the decision had already been made. “Ground forces will enter the war,” the official said on condition of anonymity in order to discuss classified military operations.
The timing of such a move, which would be a significant escalation in the Saudi-led air campaign in Yemen, is still being discussed. But the Egyptian military source said it could happen as soon as “two or three days.” (Ground Forces Seen Joining Bloody War In Yemen, Buzzfeed)

So after two weeks of nonstop bombing, the coalition is now planning to intensify the conflict by putting boots on the ground. But that will only prolong the hostilities and plunge the country deeper into crisis. It will also increase the risk of Houthi retaliation, which appears to already be taking place. According to Al Arabiya English, fighting broke out in the Southern Saudi city of Narjan on April 11. (#BREAKING Asiri: Houthi militias are amassing close to the Saudi-Yemeni border… #BREAKING: Asiri: clashes reported near the Saudi city of Najran)

While no one expects the Houthis to invade their northern neighbor, there are some analysts who think the monarchy has taken on more than it can chew and will eventually suffer blowback from its incursion. One such critic is Sayed Hassan Nasrallah, Secretary General of the Lebanese paramilitary organization Hezbollah. In a recent interview, Nasrallah suggested that the Houthis have the means to curtail vital energy supplies, strike a blow against Saudi Arabia, and send financial markets tumbling at the same time. Here’s an excerpt from the interview:

There is now a demand on the Yemeni leaders… who have not taken the decision to close (the strategic Strait) of Bab al-Mandeb, which they could do at any time. (It is only 20 kilometres-large, they are quite capable of it.) And they could also hit targets inside Saudi Arabia with missiles, or even enter the interior of Saudi Arabia, although they have not yet made this decision, so far … There is currently a Yemeni popular demand: “Let us go to Saudi Arabia.” Leadership thus far has not taken such a decision. I wanted to indicate this.”…
Nasrallah again: “I am absolutely certain that Saudi Arabia will undergo a major defeat. And its defeat will impact its internal situation, the royal family … and the entire region.” (“Hassan Nasrallah: The war in Yemen announces the end of the House of Saud”, The Vineyard of the Saker)
So the Houthis could close the Bab Al Mandeb straits and prevent millions of barrels of oil from getting to market? That changes the calculus entirely. How would that effect Washington’s plan to crash Russia’s economy with plunging oil prices? How would it impact global stock markets which are already jittery over the Fed’s projected rate hikes? What effect would it have on al Nusra, ISIS and other Al Qaeda-linked groups that would then seek to launch similar attacks against critical energy infrastructure as the best way to achieve their aims?
There are things the Houthis can do to discourage Saudi aggression. They can take matters into their own hands and strike where it hurts most. Washington is so convinced of its own invincibility, that no one has even thought of this. Without the slightest hesitation, the Obama troupe has embroiled a key ally in bloody conflagration that could backfire and seriously undermine US interests in the region. Saudi Arabia is the cornerstone of US power in the Middle East, but it is also its Achilles heel. By supporting the attack on the Houthis instead of seeking a political solution, Washington has strengthened Al Qaeda on the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) which poses the greatest single threat to the monarchy. As Nasrallah notes: “they (the US and SA) protect Al Qaeda and Daesh in Yemen, and more, they drop them weapons by air. This is an achievement? This goes against the interests of Saudi Arabia.”

Indeed, it does. Al Qaeda has much greater ability to infiltrate Saudi Arabia and either launch terrorist attacks or foment popular revolution. The Houthis present no such security threat, they’re only interest is to maintain their own sovereignty, borders, and independent foreign policy. A 2003 article in the Atlantic by CIA Bureau Chief Robert Baer titled “The Fall of the House of Saud” provides a window into Riyadh’s vulnerabilities and draws the ominous conclusion that the kingdom’s days are numbered. Here’s a clip from the article:

Saudi oil is controlled by an increasingly bankrupt, criminal, dysfunctional, and out-of-touch royal family that is hated by the people it rules and by the nations that surround its kingdom…
Signs of impending disaster are everywhere, but the House of Saud has chosen to pray that the moment of reckoning will not come soon—and the United States has chosen to look away. So nothing changes: the royal family continues to exhaust the Saudi treasury, buying more and more arms and funneling more and more “charity” money to the jihadists, all in a desperate and self-destructive effort to protect itself.
The most vulnerable point and the most spectacular target in the Saudi oil system is the Abqaiq complex—the world’s largest oil-processing facility, which sits about twenty-four miles inland from the northern end of the Gulf of Bahrain. All petroleum originating in the south is pumped to Abqaiq for processing. For the first two months after a moderate to severe attack on Abqaiq, production there would slow from an average of 6.8 million barrels a day to one million barrels, a loss equivalent to one third of America’s daily consumption of crude oil. For seven months following the attack, daily production would remain as much as four million barrels below normal—a reduction roughly equal to what all of the opec partners were able to effect during their 1973 embargo…
I served for twenty-one years with the CIA’s Directorate of Operations in the Middle East, and during all my years there I accepted on faith my government’s easy assumption that the money the House of Saud was dumping into weaponry and national security meant that the family’s armed forces and bodyguards could keep its members—and their oil—safe … I no longer believe this …  sometime soon, one way or another, the House of Saud is coming down.” (The Fall of the House of Saud, Robert Baer, The Atlantic)

Neither the United States nor Saudi Arabia have any right to interfere in Yemen’s internal affairs or to install their own political puppets to head the government. That is the right of the Yemeni people. And while the current process of regime change might be messy and violent, the Houthi rebels better represent the interests of the indigenous population than anyone in Riyadh or Washington. The Saudi-US war is merely aimed at controlling the outcome so Yemen remains within the imperial grip. As Nasrallah says, “The real goal of the war is to retain control and domination of Yemen (but) the Yemeni people will not put up with this aggression and humiliation. They will fight to defend their dignity, their existence, their families, and their territory. And they will be victorious.”

MIKE WHITNEY lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle edition. He can be reached at






The subject article covers plans by the Australian government to force everyone in that country to get any and all vaccines the government requires. If anyone should refuse, their family benefits will be revoked. There is also a similar law being debated in California.


So there you have it. Our government masters have decided that you WILL get vaccinated and like it. Yes, we know that there are very dangerous chemicals in most vaccines. And yes, we know there is no evidence that any vaccine works. And yes, there is a fund to compensate families for vaccine damage, but no matter. You will take it or else.


I hope I live long enough to see the American people wake up from their slumber. Maybe this will do it. Surely the sight of seeing autism rates rise from 1 in 25,000 prior to the MMR vaccine to one in 68 today would motivate millions, but nothing so far. History shows us that when a central government becomes authoritarian, the killing of their citizens is not far behind.



Bruce                              New World Order News




No jab, no pay’: Australia to cut welfare for anti-vaccination parents 


Parents in Australia who fail to vaccinate their children will have welfare payments stopped, under government plans.

Rules which until now have allowed a “conscientious objector” loophole are being tightened.

The vast majority of children in Australia are vaccinated but a growing number of refusals has been reported.

The prime minister fears risks to the population at large.

“People can, if they like, object to having their kids vaccinated but if you don’t have your children vaccinated, other than on strictly religious or medical grounds, you won’t qualify for the supplement and you won’t qualify for the child care payments. This is essentially a ‘no jab, no pay’ policy from this government,” Tony Abbott said.

“It’s a very important public health announcement. It’s a very important measure to keep our children and our families as safe as possible.”

The plan has opposition support, important if it’s to become law.

It’s estimated that some 39,000 children under seven haven’t been vaccinated in Australia – two and a half times the number a decade ago.

Some campaigns have claimed that vaccinations are dangerous; at the same time cases of preventable childhood diseases have been rising.






Well, I guess this puts this site into a special place. I took this picture of a screen display on a public computer used by guests at the Hampton Inn in Pigeon Forge, Tennessee. Hampton Inns are owned by the Hilton Corporation. Although I did not confirm this, I am relatively sure the computers used at the Hampton Inns must conform to guidelines established by Hilton.

It is sad that the United States has, at long last, slid right into the pit occupied by so many other despotic governments both present and past. No more freedom of speech. No more expressing ideas of which our government masters disapprove. Isn't it amazing how much filth we must endure in our media and even our educational institutions, while political disagreements are forbidden.

Anyway, I wear this censorship as a badge of honor. Those of us who try to expose truth must be doing it right, to receive such a such an “over the top” response.

Bruce New World Order News